Constructive Male Engagement in Family Planning in Madagascar€¦ · –Misconceptions about what...

Preview:

Citation preview

Constructive Male Engagement in

Family Planning in Madagascar

Ashley Jackson, Technical Advisor

Population Services International (PSI)

Laura Hurley, Senior Program Manager

IntraHealth International

Global Health Mini-U

March 2, 2015

Overview

page 2

Madagascar

Context

– FP in Madagascar

– Top Réseau

– ISM Project

Gender assessment

Male engagement approach

Activity demonstration

Lessons learned

29% MCPR among

married women

– 23% among all WRA

19% unmet need among

married women

– 10% for spacing

– 9% for limiting

– 15% among all WRA

– 27% among age 15-19

Context: FP in Madagascar

page 3

23% of births are less than 2

years after a prior birth

33% of women (25-49) gave

birth before age 18

– 29% of 17-year-olds had given

birth or were pregnant

Context: FP in Madagascar

page 4

Nationwide network of 254 private health

clinics

– Started by PSI in 2000

– 67% urban

Services:

– RH, STI, FP

• Including LARC methods

– Child survival, fever

Top Réseau social franchise

page 5

USAID funded project from 2013-2017

– PSI, IntraHealth, and 4 other partners

Focus on social marketing and franchising for

FP/RH, Child survival, malaria, and nutrition

Demand creation by IPC agents, peer

educators, and CHW

Quality assurance is key project objective –

gender integration is one aspect of QA

Integrated Social Marketing (ISM) Project

page 6

Objective: Identify gender-based constraints and

opportunities that affect men’s and women’s health

risks and capacity to seek appropriate quality care

Methodology

– Literature review

– 26 key informant interviews (MOH, NGOs, donors)

– 12 focus group discussions with 93 people:

• Women and men (married & unmarried, younger & older)

• Providers and Community Health Workers

Gender assessment led by IntraHealth (2013)

page 7

Barriers to contraceptive use: Male opposition to

family planning was second only to side effects,

and was raised in every focus group

– Misconceptions about what methods are appropriate for

young people (only condoms and counting days)

– Myths that hormonal methods would lead to infertility,

reduced sex drive, and health problems

– Married men felt that there were no family planning

programs or information for them

Gender assessment findings

page 8

All focus groups brought up that

many women hide

contraceptive use from their

partners

Men’s motivations to support

contraceptive use:

– “Life is hard.” – Married rural

man

– “You can fulfill your dreams.”

– Unmarried urban man

Gender assessment findings

page 9

68% of women think their partner

supports modern FP use

– 50% of women think that their

husbands would accept their

partner using an IUD

The most significant determinants

associated with the use of FP

among youth (age 15-24) were

social support from friends and

from partner

page 10

Quantitative data from PSI/Madagascar

Gender synchronized

approach

– Target men and women

alike with messages and

services

Communication channels

– Radio serial drama

– Peer education

– Couples’ counseling

page 11

Program design to constructively engage men

Healthy Images of Manhood (HIM) approach

page 12

Demo: Act Like a Man/Act Like a Woman

page 13

“When the PSI peer

educators invited me to

attend the session, I

laughed because I told

him that I can’t get

pregnant. But after the

session I realized that

my future is also at stake

and that if I really care

about my partner I

should help her to realize

her dreams too.”

Meet Romelle, age 23

page 14

Increase in number of young male FP clients

page 15

Keys to success:

– Separate peer education sessions for girls/women

and boys/men

– Involvement of providers in communication activities

– Training follow-up and supervision

Lessons learned

PAGE 16

Evaluation planning

underway

Thank you

PAGE 17