View
222
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
1/22
THECHARTEREDINSTITUTEOFBANKERSOFNIGERIALAGOSBRANCH)CONFERENCEONRISKMANAGEMENT
Topic:
The Role of Corporate Governance in Basel II
Presented by
BAYO OLUGBEMI FCIBManaging Director/Chief Executive Officer
irst Registrars Nigeria Limited
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
2/22
TABLEOFCONTENT
Introduction
Corporate Governance Defined
Who is responsible for corporate governance in Banks?
Basel II & Corporate Governance 3 Cs : Control
3 Cs : Culture
3 Cs : Clarity
8 Principles for Bank Boards & Senior Management
Common Factors in Corporate Governance Breakdown in Banks
Conclusion 2
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
3/22
INTRODUCTION
Since late 2008 the financial crisis has rapidly weakened the globaleconomy and has demonstrated that Nigeria is not isolated from
disturbances in the global financial markets.
Although at first the problem was considered to be one of solidity, affectingonly a few companies, it has turned out to be a more widespread problemrequiring state involvement.
According to a recent analysis published by the Financial SupervisoryAuthority in April 2009, the profitability of the banking sector has materiallyweakened, but loss-bearing capacity remains fairly solid.
Banking supervisors have long recognized the importance of goodgovernance; supervision can not function properly if sound corporategovernance is not in place
Good corporate governance and supervisory actions complement oneanother. The guidance, inspections and oversight activities of supervisorscannot guarantee, on their own, the prudent operation and financialsoundness of a supervised bank.
3
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
4/22
CORPORATEGOVERNANCEDEFINED
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)principles define corporate governance as involving:
a set of relationships between a companys management, its board, itsshareholders, and other stakeholders. Corporate governance also provides thestructure through which the objectives of the company are set, and the means ofattaining those objectives and monitoring performance are determined. Goodcorporate governance should provide proper incentives for the board and
management to pursue objectives that are in the interests of the company and itsshareholders and should facilitate effective monitoring.
The Basel Committee document states:
From a banking industry perspective, Corporate Governance involves themanner in which the business and affairs of banks are governed by their boards ofdirectors and senior management, which affects how they: Set corporate objectives;
Operate the banks business on a day-to-day basis;
Meet the obligation of accountability to their shareholders and take into account theinterests of other recognised stakeholders;
Align corporate activities and behaviour with the expectation that banks will operate in asafe and sound manner, and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
4
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
5/22
WHOISRESPONSIBLEFORCORPORATEGOVERNANCEIN
BANKS?
Primary responsibility rests with bank boards and seniormanagement (Guidance Paper, s. III)
Bank supervisors have an important role to play by providing
guidance & assessing bank practices (Guidance Paper, s. IV)
Others can promote good governance (Guidance Paper, s. V), e.g.:
Shareholders
Depositors & customers
Employees
Auditors
Banking industry associations
Credit rating agencies
Governments, securities regulators and stock exchanges5
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
6/22
BASELII & CORPORATEGOVERNANCE
Fundamentally, banks must act in a way that promotes confidenceto the public and themarkets in general and, more specifically, to their primary stakeholders.
Banks play a crucial role in the flow of capital within an economy and are charged with aspecial public trust to safeguard customerswealth.
A stable and healthy banking system is critical to the long-term growth of an economy.
The primary responsibility for the conduct of the banksbusiness lies with its board andmanagement. Indeed, it is difficult to conceive that a bank could carry out activities in theabsence of strategic objectives or guiding corporate values.
Therefore the responsibilities of the board and management would include, among otherthings, approving ethical standards, establishing and maintaining strategic objectives,policies and procedures as well as ensuring that the bank complies with the statutory andsupervisory obligations.
Basel II is fundamentally about better risk management anchored in sound corporategovernance.
With that in mind, I would like to focus now on three areas that will bring to light the role ofeffective Corporate Governance in Basel II. I will refer to these as the three Cs: Controls,Culture and Clarity. 6
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
7/22
CONTROLS
The first Cis Controls.
A bank can use the most sophisticated measurement tools inthe world, but if it is poorly governed, it will be vulnerable tofinancial and operational weaknesses.
The first pillar aligns minimum capital requirements more
closely with banksactual underlying risks.
Effective risk controls are essential to the successfulimplementation of the new capital framework. Under Basel II,the board of directors is expected to establish the institutionsrisk tolerances, policies, and code of conduct, and to ensure
that a sufficiently strong risk control framework is in place.
Senior management, in turn, is responsible for implementingthe risk control framework set forth by the board.
7
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
8/22
CULTURE The second Cis Culture.
I believe that the increased responsibilities of the board of directors andsenior management under Basel II will foster a culture of improved riskmanagement.
This notion underlies the second pillar of the new framework, whichtakes as its starting point that the board and senior management have anobligation to understand the banksrisk profile and ensure that the bank
holds sufficient capital against its risks.
Supervisors, in turn, are responsible for reviewing the banksassessmentto evaluate and determine whether that assessment seems reasonable.
The key, in my view, is that risk awareness starts at the top of theorganisation. The board and senior management cannot abdicate theirresponsibility to understand and manage the risks arising from the banksactivities.
I believe that this focus on sound risk management at the very top willhelp to set the tone throughout the bank that effective risk managementis everyonesjob. 8
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
9/22
CLARITY
The third Cis clarity.
I believe that Basel II will provide greater clarity regarding banksmeasurement and management of risk. This will be achieved first of allthrough the third pillarmarket disciplinewhich aims at ensuring thatthe market provides an additional layer of oversight.
The third pillar is intended to focus the board and senior management onheightening disclosure, which should strengthen incentives for prudentrisk management.
Greater transparency in banks financial reporting should allow majorityand minority shareholders, depositors, debt-holders, and other marketparticipants to evaluate banks and reward or penalise them according tohow prudently they are managed.
Basel II will enhance clarity in other ways as well. Not only will banks beexpected to improve their external transparency, but they will also beexpected to operate more transparently internally. In particular, banks willbe expected to ensure that the board of directors and seniormanagement are sufficiently well-informed to be able to meaningfullyassess the banksrisk profile. 9
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
10/22
10
8 PRINCIPLESFORBANKBOARDS
& SENIORMANAGEMENT
Principle 1: Board qualifications, capabilities and responsibilities.
Principle 2: Boards role regarding the banks strategic objectives andcorporate values.
Principle 3: Lines of responsibility & accountability.
Principle 4: Ensuring oversight by senior management.
Principle 5: Auditors and internal control functions.
Principle 6: Board & key executive compensation.
Principle 7: Transparent governance.
Principle 8: Know your operational structure
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
11/22
11
PRINCIPLE1
Board members should be qualified for their positions, have a clear
understanding of their role in corporate governance and be able to exercisesound judgment about the affairs of the bank.
Some responsibilities apply to any kind of organisation (bank or non-bank), forexample: The board should understand its oversight role
Some responsibilities are unique to the banking sector: Promote bank safety and soundness
Understand the regulatory environment
Ensure that the bank maintains an effective relationship with supervisors
Board should have an adequate number of independent members.
Independence = ability to exercise objective judgment, independent of the views of management,
political interests, and
inappropriate outside interests
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
12/22
12
PRINCIPLE2
The board of directors should approve and oversee the banks strategicobjectives and corporate values that are communicated through the bankingorganisation.
Standards should address, among other things: Corruption
Self-dealing
Other illegal, unethical or questionable behaviour
Employees should be encouraged to raise concerns about illegal or unethicalpractices to the board or an independent committee without fear of reprisal orretaliation.
Watch out for practices that could diminish the quality of corporate governance,for example: Internal lending (to officers, employees, board members or controlling shareholders)
Preferential treatment for related parties and other favoured entities Conflicts of interest
The board should ensure senior management implements effective policies toprevent (or limit) such activities.
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
13/22
13
PRINCIPLE3
The board of directors should set and enforce clear lines ofresponsibility and accountability throughout the organisation.
Role of the board: Define authorities & key responsibilities
Oversee management actions
Senior managements role: Delegate to staff & promote accountability
Be responsible to the board for banks performance
Guidance also addresses: Accountability where bank is part of a larger group structure
Outsourcing of bank functions
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
14/22
14
PRINCIPLE4
The board should ensure that there is appropriate oversight bysenior management consistent with board policy.
Senior management should: Have the necessary skills to manage the business
Oversee line managers consistent with board policies (but avoid micro-managing
line managers)
Under boards guidance, establish system of internal controls
Apply the four eyes principle, even in small banks
Watch out for senior managers who are unwilling or unable toexercise effective control over star employees
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
15/22
15
PRINCIPLE5
The board and senior management should effectively utilise the workconducted by the internal audit function, external auditors and internal
control functions.
Internal auditsthe board & senior management should: Recognise & communicate importance of audit & internal control processes throughout the
bank
Use the findings of internal audits and require timely correction of problems by management
Promote the internal auditors independence, e.g. through reporting to the board or boards
audit committee Engage internal auditors to judge effectiveness of key internal controls
External audits - the board and senior management should: Ensure that external auditors comply with applicable codes & standards of professional
practice
Ensure that external auditors understand their duties
Engage external auditors to review internal controls relating to financial statements Encourage the principal auditor to take responsibility for other external audits of financial
statements conducted within a group
For state-owned banks, maintain a dialogue as appropriate with state supreme auditinstitutions, state controllers and external auditors
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
16/22
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
17/22
17
PRINCIPLE7
The bank should be governed in a transparent manner.
Disclosure should be made on the banks website, in its
annual/periodic reports and/or in reports to supervisors about: Board and senior management structure
Basic ownership structure & organisational structure
Incentive structures (e.g.remuneration policies)
Code of business conduct and/or ethics code
Bank policies relating to conflicts of interest & related party transactions
States ownership policy, if the bank is state-owned
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
18/22
18
PRINCIPLE8
The board and senior management should understand the
banks operational structure, including where the bank
operates in jurisdictions, or through structures, that impede
transparency (i.e. know-your-structure).
Banks sometimes operate in jurisdictions, or employ
structures, that lack or impair transparency This sometimes occur for legitimate business purposes
But doing so can: Pose significant financial, legal and reputational risks for bank
Impede board and senior management oversight
Make it more difficult for authorities to effectively supervise the bank
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
19/22
19
PRINCIPLE8 (CONTINUED)
The risks should be appropriately assessed and managed
Information regarding the activities and risks should be easily available at the bankshead office & reported to the board and bankssupervisors.
Clear policies and procedures should exist:
For board approval of the banksuse (or sale) of complex structures, instruments andproducts.
For the identification and management of material risks.
Regularly evaluate the need to operate in jurisdictions or use structures that reducetransparency.
Set clear corporate governance expectations for all relevant entities and business lines.
Assess compliance with applicable laws and internal policies.
Activities should be subject to enhanced audit procedures and internal control reviews.
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
20/22
COMMONFACTORSINCORPORATE GOVERNANCE
BREAKDOWNINBANKS
Many of the recent corporate governance breakdowns appear to have several factors in
common: The board of directors failed to understand the risks that the firm was taking, and did
not exercise appropriate oversight or questioning of senior managers and employeesactions;
Conflicts of interest and a lack of independent board members and senior executivesresulted in decisions that benefited a few at the expense of the many;
Internal controls were either weak or non-existent, or appeared to be adequate onpaper but were not implemented in practice;
Internal and external audit fell asleep at the switch and failed to detect fraudulentbehaviour, and in some cases even aided and abetted such behaviour;
Transactions and organizational structures were designed to reduce transparency andprevent market participants and regulators from gaining a genuine picture of the firmscondition;
And perhaps most importantly, the corporate culture fostered unethical behaviour anddiscouraged questions from being raised.
20
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
21/22
REFERENCE
Caruana J (2005), Basel II and Corporate Governance Issues
Office of the Secretary General (2007), Corporate Governance Framework
Holmes J (2006),Basel Committee Guidance on Corporate Governance for
Banks
Johnson D.J (2004),OECD Principles of Corporate Governance
21
8/12/2019 Conference on Risk Management
22/22
CONCLUSION
I would just like to emphasize that sound corporate
governance should be considered a key element of a
banksability to understand and manage its risks.
Supervisors should direct their resources to helping
banks improve their controls, culture and clarity inrespect to risk management.
In so doing, I believe that we will help achieve our
objective of a stable and healthy banking system thatcontributes to the proper functioning of our economy.
Thank you for your attention. 22
Recommended