View
239
Download
5
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 1/89
1
AN APPRAISAL OF THE DOCTRINE OF DOMICILE
UNDER THE PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
BY
OMOTAYO COMFORT OLUWATOBI
MATRIC NO: 06/40IA151
BEING A LONG ESSAY SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF LAW,
UNIVERSITY OF ILORIN, ILORIN, NIGERIA, IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF
BACHELOR OF LAW (LL.B HONS.) IN COMMON LAW .
APRIL 2011
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 2/89
2
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that this long essay: AN APPRAISAL OF THE DOCTRINE OFDOMICILE UNDER THE PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW was written byOMOTAYO COMFORT OLUWATOBI. It has been read and approved asmeeting part of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of Law (LL.B Hons.)Degree in Common Law in the Faculty of Law, University of Ilorin, Ilorin,Nigeria.
DR. (MRS) NIMAT M. ABDULRAHEEM DATE SIGNATURE
Supervisor . ……....……. …..….………
DR. ADEDOYIN RAJI DATE SIGNATURE
HOD of Host Dept.
Dept. of Jurisprudence & International law ….……. ……..……… .
PROF. A ZUBAIR DATE SIGNATURE
HOD of Graduating Dept.
Dept. of Islamic Law ………… .. …………….
DR. WAHAB O. EGBEWOLE DATE SIGNATURE
Dean, Faculty of Law ……………… ..………… ..
EXTERNAL EXAMINER DATE SIGNATURE
.................. ...................
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 3/89
3
ABSTRACT
This write up is to assess the quality of the value of the doctrine of domicile under thePrivate International Law i. e Conflict of laws.
Private International Law is that part of law of a country which deals with caseshaving a foreign element. It is therefore the that part of law that comes into into playwhenever the issue before the affect some events/ facts/ transactions that are soclosely connected with a foreign system of laws as to necessitate recourse to thatsystem.
The law pertaining to where a person intends to make his permanent home is subjectto a lot of argument. No wonder domicile has been said to be easier describe than todefine. There are indication from both local and foreign journals which indicate thatthere are conflicting understanding in the area of domicile.
Under the Private International Law, the concept of domicile has several as well asarea of applications, some of which include the acquisition and loss of domicile ofchoice, origin and dependence.
In Nigeria, the doctrine of domicile is alien, a product of our colonial link with theBritish common law. Due to the diversi ethnicity and culture in Nigeria. The doctrineof domicile is based on its character subject to conflict based in the Nigerian context.
This long essay identifies the various definition of domicile, the distinctive features ofeach type of domicile, their workings, variations and also their shortenings.
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 4/89
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER PAGE ……………………………………..………….………………. i
CERTIFICATION PAGE……………………………..………...…………… ii
ABSTRACT………………………………………………….……………….. iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................iv
DEDICATION…………………………………………………………...…… viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT…………………………………………………… ix
TABLE OF C ASES…………………………………………………………… x
TABLE OF STATUTES………………………..…………………………….. xii
LIST OF AB BREVATIONS…………………………………………………. xiii
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 5/89
5
CHAPTER 1
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.0.0: INTR ODUCTION…………………………………………………………. 1
1.1.0: BACKGR OUND TO THE STUDY………………………………... .........3
1.2.0: OBJECTIVES OF STUDY……………………………………………….. 3
1.3.0: FO CUS OF STUDY………………………………………………………... 4
1.4.0: SCOPE OF STUDY………………………………………………………… 4
1.5.0: METHODOLOGY……………………………………………..…... ............5
1.6.0: LITE RATURE REVIEW………………………………………………….. 5
1.7.0: CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………… 7
CHAPTER 2
DOCTRINE OF DOMICILE
2.0.0: INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………… 8
2.1.0: DEFINITION OF DOMICILE .......................................................................9
2.2.0:ASCERTAINMENT OF DOMICILE……………………………………… 16
2.3.0: DOMICILE AND NATIONALITY……………………………. ..................17
2.4.0: RULES AND T YPES OF DOMICILE…………………….……………… 20
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 6/89
6
2.5.0: C ONCLUSION………………………………………………......... ...............25
CHAPTER 3
ACQUISITION OF DOMICILE
3.0.0: INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………… 27
3.1.0: ACQUISITION OF DOMICILE OF ORIGIN…………….………………. 28
3.2.0: ACQUIS ITION OF DOMICILE OF CHOICE…………………………… .31
3.2.1.0: RESIDENCE (FACTUM)…………………… …………………….…… .33
3.2.1.1: THE REQUISITE INTENTION (ANIMUS) …………………………… 36
3.2.1.2: SPECIAL CASES IN ACQUISITION OF DOMICILE OF CHOICE...49
3.2.1.3: LOSS OF DOMICILE OF CHOICE..........................................................55
3.3.0: DOMICILE OF ORIGIN AND CHOICE CONTRASTED………… .......55
3.4.0: CHANGE OF DOMIC ILE AND NATIONALITY ………...…………… 61
3.5.0: CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………... .62
CHAPTER 4
DOMICILE OF DEPENDENT PERSONS
4.0.0: INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………..64
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 7/89
7
4.1.0: DOMICILE OF CHILDREN …………………………………………64
4.2.0: D OMICILE OF MARRIED WOMEN………………………………....66
4.3.0: DOMICILE OF PERSON OF UNSOUND MIND ……………………69
4.4.0: MERITS AND DEMERITS OF DOMICILE …………….………… ...70
4.5.0: CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………72
CHAPTER 5
GENERAL CONCLUSION
5.0. 0: CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………73
5.1. 0: RECOMMENDATION…………………………………………………….7 4
BIBILOGRAPHY…………………………………………...................... ...............76
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 8/89
8
DEDICATION
To God be the glory for what He has done. I dedicate this work to God almighty for being everything I ever need throughout my course of study. To my parents I amdedicating this work to you too, most especially to my mother Mrs. Abosede ElizabethI love you so much mummy and thank you for being there for me
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 9/89
9
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Above all, I will forever be grateful to the Almighty God for everything, I will neverfail to say thank you Jesus for being there for me and for being my pillar throughoutmy stay on this campus. To my darling parent, thanks for making life worth living,thanks for everything spent on me and for every support given you are the best and Ilove you so much. I won‟t fail to acknowledge all my lecturers right from 100L to thisstage thanks for every knowledge you‟ve imparted into me thank you so much for
building me to be useful in this generation.
And to my wonderful and eloquent supervisor Dr Mrs. N.M. Abdulraheem thank youfor your support, guidance, correction and approval. I admire you amongst all thefemale lecturers in this faculty, you are the best. You are a gem.
I will not fail to appreciate my friends though countless but some can‟t be excluded.Folaranmi Eniola Richard thanks for your love, you are the best. To my loving friendAdewole Adefunminiyi, thanks for your support .And to all my friends , kareemTemitope, Adeshina Aminat, Soremekun Oluwaseun, Runsewe Bimpe, OluwoleOlusegun, Egunjimi Emannuel. And to my neighbours in Kemtas. I cannot forget mysiblings, thank you all for being there. I love you all. To my wonderful classmates Iappreciate you all both friends and foes may we meet at the top.
I will never forget my spiritual home the Redeemed Christian Fellowship(RCF)Shadow of the Almighty indeed it is the gathering of the liveliest and happiest
people on campus, thank you all for your prayers and support. And to our patronDaddy Bamidele, I admire your courage and zeal, may the Lord continue to strengthenyou. Thank you sir for your words of encouragement.
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 10/89
10
TABLE OF CASES
NIGERIA
Adeyemi v Adeyemi (1962) LLR 90 @ 72
Enwonwu v Spira (1965) 2 All NLR 233
Fonseca v Passmen (1958) WRNLR 41 @ 42 Odiase v Odiase (1965) NMLR 196
Udom v Udom (1962) LLR 112 @ 117
GHANA
Crammer v Crammer (1987) 1 FLR 116
Lloyd v Lloyd (1961) 2 FLR 349
Att. For Alberta v Cook ( 1926) AC 444
UNITED KINGDOM
A. G v Pottinger (1861) 30 L J Ex 284 at 292
Bell v Kennedy(1808)LR .Sc & Div 307
Blender v Johnstone( 1769) LR IP & M 611
Bowie (Ramsay) v Liverpool Royal Infirmary(1930) AC 588 at 598
Collier v Rivas (1841) 2 Curt 855
Doucat v Geoghegeon (1878)L.R.9 Ch .D at 256
Fentiman (1991) CL. J 445
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 11/89
11
Gulbenkian v Gulbenkian (1937) 4 All ER 618 at 612
Harrison v Harrison(1953) 1 WLR 865
Henderson v Henderson (1969)p. 77 at 80
Hodgson v De Beauchesne ( 1858) 12 Moo PCC 285 at 329, 330
IRC v Bullock (1976) WLR 1178
IRC v Duchess of Portland (1982) Ch 314 at 318- 319
Moorhouse v Lord (1863)10 HL Cas 27 at 285
Plentika v Plentika (1965) 109 Sol Jo 72
Plummer vIRC (1988)1 All ER 79
Putman v Johnson 10 Mass 488, 501(1813)
Re Craignish (1892) 3 Ch 180, 192
Re Flynn (No 1 ) (1968) 1 WLR 103
Re Fuld’s Estate (No 3) (1968) p 615 at 684
Re Furse ( 1980) 3 All ER 838
Whicker v Hume(1858)7 H L Cas 124 at 160
White v Tenant (1880) WLR 790
Winans v A. G(1904) AC 287
Jopp v Wood (1865) 4 D.J & S.
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 12/89
12
TABLE OF STATUES
AUSTRALIA
Australian Family Law Act 1975
Australian Matrimonial Causes Act 1959
Australian Domicile Act 1982
CANADIAN
Canadian Divorce Act 1968
Code of Domicile
Code of Napoleon (French civil code) 1803
ENGLAND
Domicile and Matrimonial Proceeding Act 1973
NEW ZEALAND
New Zealand Domicile Act 1976
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 13/89
13
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
A.C: Appeal Cases
A.G: Attorney General
ALL ER : All England Report
All NLR: All Nigerian Law Report
Beav: Beavan Charles, Reports…… Rolls court.
Ch: Chancery
Ch. D: Chancery Division
Curt: Curties, W.C Reports…… Ecclestical
Ed: Edition
FLR: Federal Law Report
H L Cas: House of Lords Cases
LR: Law Report
LR. Eq: Law Report Equity Cases
LLR: Lagos Law Report
NMLR: Nigerian Monthly Law Report
NLR: Nigeria Law Report
NNLR: Northern Nigeria Law Report
NWLR: Nigerian Weekly Law Report
WNLR: Western Nigeria Law Report
WRNLR: Western Regional Nigeria Law Report
WLR: Western Law Report
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 14/89
14
CHAPTER 1
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.0.0: INTRODUCTION
It has been universally recognized that questions affecting the personal status of a
human being should be governed constantly by one and the same law irrespective of
where he may happen to be or of where the facts giving rise to the question may have
occurred. But unanimity goes no further, there is disagreement on two matters. What
is t he scope of this „personal law‟, as it is called and should its criterion be domicile or
nationality? 1 In England, however it has long been settled that question affecting status
are determined by the law of the domicile of a person and that broadly speaking such
questions are those affecting family relations and family property. To be more precise,
the following matters are to a greater or lesser extent governed by the personal law:
the essential validity of marriage; the effect of marriage on the propriately rights of
husband and wife; jurisdiction in divorce and nullity of marriage, though only to a
limited degree; legitimacy, legitimating and adoption, wills of movables and intestate
succession to movables. The concept of domicile however, is not uniform throughout
1 Cheshire and North‟s :on the merits of nationality and domicile in pp 165 - 167 of Private
International Law
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 15/89
15
the world Domicile known as habitual residence to some and permanent residence to
some people.2
The English concept of domicile is bedeviled by rules, these are complex often
impossible to justify in policy terms and lead to uncertainty of outcome. Before
looking at these rules in details, one preliminary matter should be considered. This is
question of whether the same test for domicile applies regardless of the context I
which the matter is raised. English law take the view that the test which determines the
place of a man‟s domicile must remain constant no matter wha t the nature of the issue
may be before the court. „Domicile ‟ is regarded as a relative term which varies in
meaning according to the different situation (e.g. divorce, taxation intestate
succession) to which it is applicable. There are however types of domicile, domicile of
origin: gotten from birth, domicile of choice: acquired in substitution for the present
one and also domicile of dependent persons: acquire through the person they are
depending on.
These and many more are what is going to be discussed later. Domicile, in its
appraisal, its type, workings and also shortenings.
2 Whicker v Hume (1858) 7 H L Cas 124 at 160
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 16/89
16
1.1.0: BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
Until the beginning of the nineteenth century, domicile was universally recognized as
the basis for the application of personal law. 3 However, as a result of the influence of
Maincini 4 in the mid-nineteenth century some of the continental European countries
adopted nationality in preference to domicile as the connecting factor for the
ascertainment of personal laws. Since then, some countries have somehow combined
the two criteria. For common law countries, however, domicile appears to have been
generally accepted. In Nigeria, the adoption of can be justified on ground of practical
necessity as “Nigeria nationality” covers a number of independent le gal systems. 5
1.2.0: OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
The aim of this write up is to
1. Assess the definitions of domicile under the Private International Law.
2. Access the quality of the value of domicile.
3. To discuss the rules of domicile as contained in the received English law and to
show how these rules have been, or ought to be modified in order suit Nigerian local
conditions.
3 Logical and Legal basis of the conflict of laws .pp 104.4 Cheshire G.C ; Private International Law (7 th ed) p. 1805 The French Civil Code ( code Napoleon ) 1803
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 17/89
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 18/89
18
1.5.0. METHODOLOGY
Both primary and secondary sources of law and the basis for this research work. Thus
the Domicile Act, Law Textbooks, Law report, Articles on law, various statute and
cases on the subject matter are sources of information. This project shall also be both
comparative and analytical in nature.
1.6.0: LITERATURE REVIEW
In this study relevant literature, judicial authorities and statutes shall be examined.
Thus, credence shall be given to several authors in the field of the Conflict of laws
whose works have in no small measure contributed immensely to Private International
Law on the whole. Works of different authors both foreign and Nigerian such as
Morris and Dicey, Cheshire an North ‟s, Graveson, Agbede I.O, to mention a few will
serve as an aid to arrive at a logical conclusion on this study.
Morris in his book The Conflict of laws 6 provides a comprehensive and authoritative
coverage of the subject but failed to Graveson ,Conflict of laws 7 who only commented
on the definition of domicile to no longer fits the complexity, movement and
sophistication of modern life in which many of our best intentions become temporary
through frustrating circumstances. But he failed to point out the ways to go about
6 Morris: the Conflict of laws , 4 th ed by J D McClean, London, sweet and Maxwell, 1993, p 127 Graveson, conflict of laws (1969) p.20
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 19/89
19
giving a definition that will fit our modern life. On the other hand, Agbede .I .O,
Themes on Conflict of Laws8
talk on the need to establish residence and intention toremain in a place permanently (or indefinitely),he also went further to provide a
comprehensive coverage of the spectrum of the law of domicile as it applies in
Nigeria but he did little in expanciating on this requisites of acquiring a domicile of
choice.
Accordingly, Cheshire and North‟s in their book Private Internationa l Law 9 gave a
good insight to domicile being a difficult term to define but rather better in
description, but their way of describing was faulty in that there was no clear
distinction between a permanent home and habitual home.
Many books and Statutes shall be used mostly in the course of this study. This is
because textbooks are what has been compiled by various authors while using the
Statutes to back up their argument. Thus, it is only logical for this approach to be
adopted since the word domicile itself still happen in how day to day living, as people
migrate from one country to another, so there was need for domicile. In this vein,
Omoruyi. I. O in his Article 10 Domicile as a determinant of personal law; a case for
the abandonment of the revival doctrine in Nigeria, examined that the common law
8 Agbede I.O., Themes on Conflict of Laws.( 2001) Shaneson C. I Ltd9 Cheshire and North‟s , Private International Law, (1974) (7 th ed)10http://www.nigerianlawguru.com.articles>accessed 2000
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 20/89
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 21/89
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 22/89
22
In this chapter, the various definitions of domicile shall be examined, the English
conception of domicile, domicile and nationality, how domicile can ascertained andthe forms and types of domicile.
2.1.0. DEFINITION OF DOMICILE
It is not an easy task to define the concept of domicile because, the concept is not
uniform throughout the world therefore it is subject to diverse meanings.
According to Sir GEORGE JESSEL;
“The term domicile is incapable of definition 12 ”
MORRIS also has asserted that
“Domicile is easier to illustrate than it is to define” 13
This is probably due to the fact that traditional definition has become rather obsolete
as a result of judicial modification, which has attended the concept overtime.
The Oxford Advance and Learners Dictionary define domicile as
“The place where somebody lives, especially when it is stated for official or legal
purpose” 14
12 Doucat v Geoghegeon (1878) L. R. 9 Ch. D at 25613 Morris, Conflict of laws , 4 th ed by J. C McLean, Sweet and Maxwell, 1993, p.126 th edition14 6 th edition by Sally Wehmeier (2000)
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 23/89
23
The Black Law Dictionary defines the concept of the domicile as
“A person ‟s legal home. That place where a man has his true, fixed and permanent
home and principal establishment, and to which whenever he is absent he has the
intention of returning 15”
LORD CRANWORTH attempted a definition sometimes ago in Whicker v Hume 16
to the effect that;
“By domicile we mean home, the permanent home, and if you do not understand
your permanent home I am afraid that no illustration drawn from foreign writers or
foreign language will very much help you to it”
This definition by Lord Cranworth is obviously simplistic from the subsequent judicial
developments on these issues. In fact there is an opinion that the definition by LORD
CRANWORTH is „ far too simplicitic a nd indeed somewhat misleading‟ 17
LORD CRANWORTH‟s definition errs on the side of simplicity because there are
circumstances in which a person may not be residence in his place of domicile. The
fact that one has lived in a particular place for several years is irrelevant where there is
intention to remain there 18.
MORRIS also objects to this definition on the ground that a perso n‟s domicile may not
always be the permanent home. In fact according to him;
15Bryan A. Garner: 8 th edition Thompson West 200416 (1958) H L C 124 at 16017Collier J. G : Conflict of laws , 2 nd edition, Cambridge, C. U. P 1994. P 40.18 White v Tenant (1880) W L R 790 and IRC v Bullock (1976) W L R 1178
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 24/89
24
“A person may be domiciled in a country which is not and never has been his home;
a person may have two homes but he can only have one domicile. 19”
He concluded that there is often a wide difference between the English concept of
domicile and population of a home.
Judicial authorities have equally shown that to acquire domicile according to the
received English law, it is necessary to establish residence in a place and an intention
to reside there permanently. The English courts have with complete justification
established the principle of definition of domicile for the purpose of English rule
conflict of laws according to thee concept in English law Nevertheless it is clear from
decided cases that to acquire domicile in territory, according to the received English
law, it is necessary to establish residence and an intention to remain there permanently
(or indefinitely). A domicile can only be acquired by the concurrence of these two
factors. However, an intention of indefinite residence is not equivalent to permanent
residence if it is contingent upon uncertain event.20
Thus in Moorhouse v Lord 21 it was held that:
“The present intention of making a place a person‟s permanent home exists only
where he has no other idea than to continue there without looking forward to any
event, certain or uncertain which might induce him to change his residence. If he
19 Ibid at 1320Ibid21 (1863) 10 H L Cas 272 at 285-286
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 25/89
25
has in his contemplation some event upon the happening of which his residence will
cease it is not rather a present intention of making it a temporary home, though for a
period indefinite and contingent.”
This rule of domicile might have worked well during its formative (mid-Victorian
England) era of comparative certainty, simplicity and legalism but in the
contemporary world of tension and increased mobility, few things for human affairs
can be certain least of a ll is one‟s intention. As stated by CHESHIRE 22,
“Singular indeed would be the man who could unreservedly warrant that whatever
good or evil might befall him he would never return whence he came”
In GRAVESON‟s 23 view, this definition no longer fits the complexity movement and
sophistication of modern life in which many of our best intentions become temporary
though frustrating circumstances. Rather curiously, this unsatisfactory definition of the
English concept of domicile has been in Fonseca V Passman 24, THOMAS.J. held
that:
“To establish a domicile in Nigeria the mere factum of residence here is not
sufficient…. There must be unequivocal evidence of animus manendi or intention to
remain permanently”
22 Cheshire: Private International Law (7 th ed ) at 14523 Graveson: Conflict of laws (1969) p. 20724 (1958) WRNLR 41 at 42
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 26/89
26
More curiously, however is the failure of the Nigerian judged to distinguish between
inter-state and international situation. For instance, in Udom v Udom 25, COKER.J.
who was concerned with an inter-state conflict problem said:
“The subject must not only change his residence to that o f a new domicile, but also
must have settled or resided in the new territory cum animo manendi The residence
in the new territory must be with the intention of remaining there permanently to
reside, the factum is the actual residence.”
This dictum appears to ignore the warning of BEALE 26that the circumstances of life in
a country must have weight with the judge in determining the meaning of domicile.
“In USA there is a habit of moving from place to place; in England the habit is to
remain indefinitely in one place. The rule of English law will have many Americans
without a domicile of choice. 27”
American judges are equally conscious of the inconvenience that will result from
adopting the English rigid definition of domicile. Thus, PARKER .J. held in Putman
v Johnson 28
In this new and enterprising country it is doubtful whether one half of
the young men, at the time of their emancipation, fix themselves in any town with an
intention of always staying there. They settle in a place by way of experiment to see
whether it would suit their view of business and advancement in life, and with an
25 (1962)LLR.112 at 11726 Beale, J.HA. : Treatise on the conflict of law (1935),P.10627 Ibid28 10 Mass 488,501(1813)
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 27/89
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 28/89
28
movements are unrestricted, it will be difficult, if not impossible to find people who
will wish to reside in a particular state for better for worse.
Moreover, it is in best interest of Nigerian people to discourage ethnic cohesion and
minimizing its attendant evils. Such a social policy ought to influence judicial
decisions, but the decision in Udom v Udom 31 domicile does not appear to take
account of this policy.
As for the necessary requirements for establishing a domicile in Nigeria at the
international level, it would be better, one imagines, to impute an intention to be
domiciled in Ni geria to person‟s who are habitually resident in Nigeria. This
suggestion is designed to aid the courts in ascertaining a person‟s v. therefore, if there
is evidence convincingly showing that a propositus has no such intention, he should he
should be denied a local domicile.
The object of determining a person‟s domicile is to connect him with some legal
system for certain legal purposes. To establish this connection it is sufficient to fix his
domicile in some “country” in the sense of the conflict of laws .e.g. England or
Scotland, California or New York. It is not necessary to show in what part of such a
country he is domiciled 32, but it is usually insufficient to show that he is domiciled in
some composite state like the United Kingdom, the United states, Australia or Canada
30 Ibid31 Ibid32 Re craignish( 1892)3 Ch 180,192
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 29/89
29
with, each of which comprised several “countries” in the conflict of laws sense. A
person who emigrates, Scotland or to Canada with the intention of settling either in
England or British Columbia, does not change his domicile until he has decided in
which country he intends to settle and has actually settled there 33.
2.2.0: ASCERTAINMENT OF DOMICILE
The question as to whether a person has established factual residence in a particular
country raises little or no problem in practice. However, the thorough manner in which
the English courts attempt to discover the necessary intention has produced absurd
results.
These courts have found it necessary to consider such difficult as a person‟s taste,
habits, conducts, action, ambitions, health, hopes, projects and so on. „there is no act,
no circumstances in a man‟s life however trivial it may be in itself, which ought to be
left out of consideration…‟But these factors are, one imagines, hardly suitable for
judicial enquiry. What is rather absurd in the whole exercise is that circumstances
which are treated as decisive in one case may be disregarded in another or even relied
upon in support of a different conclusion. No circumstances of group of circumstances
appear to furnish a definite criterion of the existence of the necessary intention.
33 Att.Gen For Alberta v Cook (1926) AC 444
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 30/89
30
The latitude of discretion which the courts reserve to themselves makes their decisions
appear arbitrary and very often inconsistent. The result is that a person‟s domicile may
remain uncertain throughout his life. Must our domicile asks Gravenson continue to be
kept a legal secret from us until we either invoke divorce jurisdiction or die?
A desirable approach for the Nigerian courts in this regards is to tackle this problems
with the presumption that a person intends to reside indefinitely in a country where heis habitually resident.
This presumption which should be rebuttable will, it is hoped, obviate the very
complicated problems involved in discovering a person‟s exact intention when he is
absent from jurisdiction or when (as is usually the case) he is already dead.
2.3.0: DOMICILE AND NATIONALITY.
The change from domicile to nationality on the continent of Europe started in France
with the promulgation of the code Napoleon in 1804. One of the principal objects of
the codifiers was to substitute a uniform law throughout the whole of France for the
different coutumes of the French provinces. In matters of personal status these
coutumes applied to person‟s domiciled within the province, whenever they happene d
to be. It was natural that the new uniform law should apply to Frenchmen everywhere,
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 31/89
31
Article 3 (1) 34 of the civil code provided that the laws governing the status and
capacity of person‟s govern Frenchmen even though they are residing in foreign
countrie s.”No provision was expressly made for the converse case of foreigners
residing in France, but the ”French courts held that in matters of status and capacity
they too were governed by their national law. The provisions of the French code were
adopted in Belgium and Luxembourg and similar provisions were contained in theAustrian code of 1811 and the Dutch code of 1829.
The change from domicile to nationality on the continent of Europe was accelerated
by Mancini‟s famous lecture he advocated the principle of nationality on the ground
that laws are made more for an ascertained people than for an ascertained territory. A
sovereign (he said) in framing laws for his people should consider their habits and
temperament, their physical and moral qualities and even the climate, the temperature
and fertility of the soil. This was heady wine for a people preparing to throw off a
foreign yoke and unify all the small state of Italy into a new nation. Under Mancini‟s
influence article 6 of the Italian civil code (1865) pro vided that “the status and
capacity of person‟s and family relations are governed by the laws of the nation to
which they belong”. Mancini‟s ideas proved extremely influential outside Italy too,
and in the second half of the nineteenth century the principle of nationality replaced
that of domicile in code after code in continental Europe, until today only Norway and
34 Code Napoleon 1804
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 32/89
32
Denmark retain the principle of domicile. The result is that the nations of their world
have become divided in their definition of the personal law; and it is the fact more
than any other which impedes international agreement on uniform rules of the conflict
of laws. What then are the arguments in favour of nationality and domicile as the
personal law?
The advocates of nationality claim that it is more stable than domicile becausenationality cannot be charged without the formal consent of the state of new
nationality. However, as has been well said, “the principle of nationality achieves
stability, but by the sacrifice of a man‟s personal freedom to adopt the legal system of
his own choice. The fundamental objection to the concept of nationality is that it may
require the application to a man, against his own wishes and desires has perhaps risked
his life”.
It is also claimed that nationality is easier to ascertain than domicile because it
involves a formal act of naturalization and does not depend o the subjective intentions
of the propositus. This is undoubtedly time, though there may be difficult cases of
double nationality or of statelessness 35. But it does not follows that the most easily
ascertained laws is the most appropriate law. Many immigrants who have no intention
of returning to their country of origin do not trouble to apply for naturalization. It
would have been ludicrous to say that only the English courts, and not the courts of
35 Beckett( then second legal adviser to the foreign office ) 1939
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 33/89
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 34/89
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 35/89
35
Domicile signifies connection with what has conveniently been called a “law
district”. 40 i.e. a territory subject to a single system of law. In the case of a federation,
where the legislation authority is distributed between the state and federal legislatures,
this law district is generally represented by the particular state in which the propositus
has established his home 41. A resident in the USA, for instance is not normally
domiciled in the USA as such, but in one of its states. Nevertheless, the doctrine of
unity of domicile one man, one domicile- may be modified by federal legislation. Thus
the family law 1975, which has force throughout the commonwealth of Australia,
provides inter alia that proceedings for a decree of dissolution of marriage is
“domiciled in Australia”42
. Thus, the effect within a limit field is to create an
Australian, as distinct from a state, domicile and, indeed, one that, because of statutory
amendments in this limited content, is different from domicile in a state for other
purpose, e.g. succession 43.
3. The fact that domicile signifies connection with a single system of territory law does
not necessarily connote a system that prescribes identical rule for all classes of
persons. It may well be that in a unit such as India different classes of the population
according to their religion, race or caste, but none the less it is the territorial law of
40 Dicey and Morris, pg 118- 11941 Odiase v Odiase (1965) NMLR 19642Family Law Act 1975, s 39(3) (b)43 Lloyd v Lloyd (1961) 2 FLR 349
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 36/89
36
India that governs each person domiciled there, not withstanding that Hindu law may
apply to one case, Muslim to another.
4. An existing domicile is presumed to continue until it is proved that a new domicile has
been acquire. Hence, the burden of proving a change of domicile lies on those who
assert it. Conflicting views have been expressed as to the standard proof require to
rebut the presumption. According to SCARMAN. J., the standard is that adopted in
civil proceeding, proof on a balance probability not that adopted proof beyond
reasonable doubt in the criminal proceedings. 44 On the other hand, according to SIR.
JOCELYN SI MON P., “the standard of proof goes beyond a mere balance of
probabilities45
”. This observation no doubt stems from such case s as Winans v A.G46
which appear to regard the intention in favouring of retaining the domicile of origin as
an almost irrebuttable presumption SCARMAN.J., however, added that „two things
are clear-first, change, the domicile of origin persists; and secondly, that the
acquisition of a domicile of choice is serious matter not to be lightly inferred from
slight indications or casual words‟.
The presumption of continuance of domicile varies in strength according to the kind of
domicile which is alleged to. It is weakest when that domicile is one of dependency 47
44 Re Fynn (No 1 ) (1968) 1 WLR 10345 Henderson v Henderson ( 1969) p. 77 at 8046 (1904) AC 28747 Harrison v Harrison (1953) 1 WLR 865
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 37/89
37
and strongest when domicile is one of origin, for “its character is more enduring, its
hold stronger, and easily shaken off 48.
The law commission‟s proposals for the reform of the law of domicile would leav e
unchanged the rule the burden of proving the acquisition of a new domicile falls on the
person alleging it. However, the normal civil standard of proof on a balance of
probabilities would apply in all disputes about domicile and no higher on different
quality of intention would be required when the alleged change of domicile was from
one acquired at birth than when it was from any other domicile.
5. For the purpose of a rule of conflict of laws, domicile means domicile in the English
sense. The question where a person in domiciled is determined soled in accordance
with English law. Thus, persons domiciled in England often acquired a domicile of
choice in France without complying with the formalities formerly required by French
law for the acquisition of a French domicile 49. Conversely, a person domiciled in e.g.
France may acquire an English domicile of choice regardless of whether French law
would regard him as domiciled in England 50. There is one statutory exception to this
rule. Section46(5) of the family law Act 1986 refers to domicile in a country in the
sense of that country‟s law
48 Ibid49 Collier v Rivas (1841)2 Curt 85550 Ibid
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 38/89
38
It is too wide a formulation to say that an English court, domicile means domicile in
the English sense. Under the renvoi doctrine, English courts sometimes refers to the
whole law of a foreign country, including its rules of the conflict of laws, and accept a
reference back to English law either because the foreign conflict rule referrers to the
law of the nationality, and the propositus is a British citizen; or because the foreign
conflict rule refers to the law of the domicile, and the foreign court regards the
propositus as domiciled in England. In the latter case, it is not true that domicile in
English court always means domicile in the English sense; but it is still true that it
means domicile in the English sense for the purpose of an English rule of the conflict
of laws
There are different kind of domicile and they are;.
1. Domicile of origin
2. Domicile of choice
3. Domicile of dependent person e.g. domicile of children, married women, persons of
unsound mind and so on. All these will be discussed extensively in the next chapter
2.5.0: CONCLUSION
In conclusion of this chapter, domicile is regarded as a relative term which varies in
meaning according to different situation (for example taxation divorce interstate
succession) to which it is applicable. A judge must however inevitably focus his
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 39/89
39
attention on the concrete problem before him, otherwise he will neglect the social and
economic requirements of the situation. Also it is hard to believe that judges in this
country have not been influenced by an awareness of the consequences of the finding
as to domicile in the particular case before them. There is evidence that the courts
wish to achieve a number of policy objectives in particular, to validate wills and to tale
jurisdiction to grant a divorce whenever possible. It is easy for courts to achieve the
right result by manipulating the process of ascertaining the domicile, and is a likely
explanation of many cases which are otherwise hard to reconcile on their fact.
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 40/89
40
CHAPTER 3
ACQUISITION OF DOMICILE3.0.0: INTRODUCTION
Every person in accordance with the English law is required to have or acquire a
domicile and s ince domicile is the means of ascertaining a person‟s per sonal law under
the English. In this regard, acquisition of domicile is a way by which domicile can be
obtained by a person. The various types of domicile has a way they can be acquired
e.g. domicile of origin is acquired at birth, this is rather automatic in that it is ascribe
to every person at birth unless such person acquire another by his own choice when
eligible 51. Domicile of choice on the other hand is acquired when a person takes up
residence in another country which is backed up by an intention to remain
permanently. There are however special cases where domicile is being dictated by
some external necessity, such as offices, the demands of creditors or relief from
illness 52. The loss of domicile of choice, domicile of origin and choice contrasted and
how domicile and nationality can be changed. All these are what shall be discussed
extensively as we proceed in this chapter.
51 Ibid at 45852 Ibid at 458
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 41/89
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 42/89
42
It is suggested therefore that an illegitimate child should be presumed to take the
domicile of the head of its family. It should be stressed, however, that this rule is by
no means absolute. It is merely a presumption so that in those cases where a child is
virtually reared and maintained by the mother or her „family‟ this presumption may be
rebutted. This suggestion has no other basis than the welfare of the child. It is
therefore the child‟s welfare that must be given overriding consideration in this regard.
It is however, the exaggerated importance attached to the domicile of origin under the
English law and stands in need of radical modifications in Nigeria. According to this
law, almost overwhelming evidence is required to shake off the domicile of origin. 56Its
character is more enduring, its hold is stronger and less easily shaken off.57
As put byLord WESTBURY
“The domicile of origin is the creature of law and is dependent of the will of the
party, it would be inconsistent with the principle on which i t is by law created and
ascribed, to suppose that it is capable of being by the act of the party entirely
obliterated and extinguished. It revives and exist wherever there is no other
domicile and does not require to be reacquire or reconstituted animo et facto a
manner which is necessary for the acquisition of a domicile of choice.” 58
56 Udom v Udom (1962) L. L .R 11257 Winans v Att. Gen (1904) A.C.287 at 290,Per Lord MACNAGHTEN58 Cheshire: Private International Law (7 th Ed) at 164
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 43/89
43
Cheshire has suggested that these rules evolve in the nineteenth century when England
was a nation of enterprising pioneer‟s, most of whom regarded their ultimate return
home as a forgone conclusion. 59
The “revival” doctrine (this is done when one abandons his domicile of choice, such
revives back the domicile of origin) as well as the enduring character of domicile of
origin appear to rest on the assumption that a man belongs to his country of origin
much more that to the country of his choice. But this assumption has been dismissed
as archaic and meaningless in an age of migratory population . Perhaps, a better
explanation for the development of rules of domicile of origin in its rigid sense from
the view of Rabel who wrote that;.
“The doctrine of domicile of origin was maintained and developed to satisfy t he
natural desire of a home country from which innumerable colonizer have gone out
into the world” 60
While a person may easily sever his connection with the country of his nationality
(where that is the connecting factor) he remains, for all times, a miserable prey to his
domicile of origin. 61 Undoubtedly, the „revival‟ doctrine of domicile of origin runs
59Wolff: m, Private International Law (2 nd Ed 1950)p.10960Rabel: E, The Conflict of Laws : A Comparative study ( 2 nd Ed.1958) vol 1, p.16561 Cheshire: Private International Law (7 th Ed)at 165, the domicile of origin transcends even nationality
instability and permanence.
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 44/89
44
counter to the fundamental principle of domicile as it may located a person‟s domicile
in a country which cannot be regarded as his home by any stretch of the imagination.
The rule of domicile of origin might have been good law in an era where families were
born and when they lived and died in the same community and „when the ties, both
material and sentimental, which bind one to his birth place‟ were str ong. 62 But under
the present political arrangement in Nigeria where state boundaries bear little relation
to ethnic loyalty, to adopt such rules will be socially undesirable if not legally
embarrassing. Moreover the mobility of society generally has provoked, even in
England, an almost unanimous critism of this rule and the recommendation for its
change. Indeed the English rules of domicile of origin have found a place in American
law. 63
3.2.0: DOMICILE OF CHOICE
Any person who is not dependent on another (i.e. one who is not a child or a mentally
disordered person) can acquire a domicile of choice or may change his domicile by
taking up residence in another country with the intention of remaining there
permanently 64.
62 Goodrich and Scoles: Conflict of Laws (1964) 3963 Beale, Treatise on the conflict of Laws (1935) at pp. 184-18564 Ibid at 17
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 45/89
45
The two requisite here is residence and intention and they are normally referred to as
“factum and animus” respectively. It is not essential that the “factum and animus”
should come in any particular order so long as it comes at a point in time. These two
factors must coincide before the law will recognize a change of domicile. Residence
however long in a country will not result in the acquisition of domicile of choice, if the
necessary intention is lacking. 65 Conversely intention however strong to change a
domicile will not have the result if the necessary residence in the new country is
lacking. A new domicile is not acquired until there is not only a fixed intention
establishing a permanent residence in the new country, but until also this intention has
been carried out by actual residence there. 66 Hence, a domicile cannot be acquired in
itinere, 67 it is necessary not only to travel, but to arrive.
It is very difficult to keep the two requirements of residence and intention watertight
compartments, but in the nearest of clarity of exposition they must be considered
separately. However, residence and intention are separate but interrelated concepts.
65 Jopp v Wood (1865) 4 D.J & S.616: Winans v Att. Gen. (1904)A.C.28766 Bell v Kennedy (1868) L .R 1 Sc & div, 307,319 Per Lord Chelmsford67 Ibid at 454 .
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 46/89
46
3.2.1.0: RESIDENCE (FACTUM)
„Residence in a country for the purposes of the law of domicile is physical presence in
that country as an habitant of it. ‟68
In one case a taxpayer who spent ten to twelve weeks each year in Quebec for the
purpose of maintaining her links with that province with a view ultimately to returning
to live was held not to be a resident of Quebec during her presence there since she was
not there as an inhabitant.
Normally, though, the requirement of residence is easy to establish. Residence is a
fact, though a necessary one, from which intention may be inferred. Older cases
adopted a presumption in favour of domicile which grew in strength with the length of
residence and was so hard to rebut. However, more recent cases, including House of
the Lords authorities have attached less weight to the length of residence, and have
taken the view that, although a material consideration, it is rarely decisive.
Whatever weight is given to the length of residence it is undeniable that time is not the
sole criterion of domicile. 69 Both long residence and short residence does not
constitute negative domicile everything depends on the attendant circumstances, for
they alone disclose the nature of the person‟s presence in a country. In short, the
68 IRC v Duchess of Portland (1982)Ch 314 at 318-31969 Hodgson v De Beauchesne (1858) 12 Mco PCC 285 at 329, 330
id t “ lit ti ll tit ti t t” 70 Th i J
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 47/89
47
residence must answer “a qualitative as well as a quantitative test”. Thus in Jopp v
Wood 71 it was held that a residence of twenty- five years in India did not suffice to
give a certain John Smith an Indian domicile because of his alleged intention
ultimately to return to Scotland, the land of his birth. Again in IRC v Bullock 72 a
Canadian who had a domicile of origin in Nova Scotia was held not to have become
domicile in England, despite the fact that he had either serve in RAF or lived in
England for over forty years. He retained his domicile in Nova Scotia because he
intended to return there, should his wife predecease him.
Conversely, brevity of residence is no obstacle to the acquisition of a domicile if the
necessary intention exists. If a man clearly intends to live in another country
permanently, as for example, where an emigrant, having wound up his affairs in the
country of his origin, flies off with his wife and family to Australia, his mere arrival
there will satisfy the element of residence. 73
A striking example of this truth occurred in America: where a man abandoned his
home in State X and took his family to a house in state Y, about half a mile from X,
intending to live there permanently. Having deposited belongings there, he and his
70 Bowie (or Ramsay) v Liverpool Royal Infirmary (1930) AC 588 at 59871 (1865) 4 De GJ & Sm 61672 (1976) 3 All ER 353, (1976) 1 WLR 117873 Hodgson v De Beauchesne (1858) 12 Moo PCC 285 at 329, 330
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 48/89
disappear if the law commissions proposal that residence‟ be replace by simpler
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 49/89
49
disappear if the law commissions proposal, that „residence be replace by simpler
concept of „presence‟, is adopted. 77
3.2.1.1: THE REQUISITE INTENTION (ANIMUS)
An intention to reside permanently or for an unlimited time in a particular country is
required for the acquisition of domicile of choice. This may however not pose any
difficulty as the word „permanently‟ is used in its ordinary meaning as signifying the
opposite of „temporary‟. The word ;permanent‟ a according to the Shorter Oxford
English Dictionary means “lasting or designed to last indefinitely without change”,
and this indeed is the definition that most of the judges have recognized when require
to consider the nature of intention necessary for a change of domicile. In Udny v
Udny ,78 for instance, Lord WESTBURY described the intention as being one to reside
“for an unlimited time”. A more modern statement to the same effect is that of
SCARMAN J,79
who referred to an intention to reside “indefinitely”.
The essence, therefore of these and many other similar statements is that the intended
residence must not be for a limited period, whether the limitation is expressed in term
of time or made dependent on the occurrence of a contingency (i.e. a possible but
77 Law Com No 168 (1987) Scot, Law Com No 107 (1981), Para 5,778(1869) L.R 1 Sc & Div 441 at 45879 Re Fuld’s Estate (No 3) (1968) p 615 at 684
unpredictable future event), such as the accomplishment of a definite task, that will
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 50/89
50
unpredictable future event), such as the accomplishment of a definite task, that will
occur if at all during the life of the propositus.
It is also clear that a conditional intention will not suffice. Thus in Crammer v
Crammer ,80 a woman with a French domicile of origin who came to England
intending to remain there and marry an Englishman, who was already married, did not
acquire an English domicile of choice. Her intention to remain was conditional on
both herself and her proposed husband obtaining divorces or their relationship
continuing. It would, no doubt, have been different if she had intended to remain there
without a condition, but this was not her intention.
In cases where the termination of residence is dependent on the occurrence of a
contingency(i. e, a possible but unpredicted future event) this will not prevent the
acquisition of a domicile unless the contingency is itself unambiguous and realistic, in
the world of SCARMAN J : „ If a man intends to return to the land of his birth upon a
clearly foreseen and reasonable anticipated contingency, e.g. the end of his job the
intention require by law is lacking; but, if he has in mind only a vague possibility,
such as making a fortune (a modern example might be winning a football
pool)……such a state of mind is consistent with the intention require by law.‟
Subsequently, a distinction has been drawn between the question of whether a
80 (1987) 1 FLR 116
contingency itself is clear and the question of whether a contingency which is clear
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 51/89
51
g y q g y
will happen. 81
If a contingency is not sufficiently clear to be identified then it cannot operate to
prevent the acquisition of a domicile of choice. Thus in Re Furse 82 evidence that the
propositus, who had a Rhode Island domicile of origin would leave England, where he
had lived for nearly forty years, if he was no longer able to live an active physical life
on his farm was not fatal to a change of domicile, and it was held that the propositus
had acquired an English domicile of choice.
On the other hand, if the contingency can be identified, it has to be asked whether
there is a substantial possibility of the contingency happening; if there is , this will
prevent the acquisition of domicile of choice. Thus in IRC v Bullock, 83 where a
husband intended to return to Canada to live permanently if his wife predeceased him,
it was held that the husband did not acquire the English domicile of choice, since there
was a real possibility, in view of their ages, of this happening. Of course, if there is nosubstantial possibility of a contingency happening the evidence showing a desire to
leave the residence will not prevent the acquisition of the domicile of choice. 84
81 IRC v Bullock (1967) 1 WLR 1178 at 118682 (1980) 3 All ER 83883 (1976) 1 WLR 117884 Pletinka v Pletinka (1965) 109 Sol Jo 72
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 52/89
possibility as if were t o cite the word of SCARMAN J. again, “a clearly foreseen and
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 53/89
53
reasonable anticipated contingency”. The facts of the former case were these:
Winans was born in 1823 in the United State, where he was continuously engage in
his father‟s business until 1850. F rom 1850 to 1859 he resided in Russia. He married a
British subject and appears never to have set foot again in the USA. In 1859 he
showed signs of consumption and being advised by the doctors to winter in Brighton
in England, he reluctantly took rooms at a hotel there, and in 1860 leased two
adjourning houses. He still held these houses at the time of his death. From 1860 to
1893 he spent time each year in England but also in Scotland, Germany or Russia.
From 1893 until he died in 1897 he lived entirely in England. Estate duty was paid on
English fortune of over two million pounds, but the crown now claimed legacy duty
on a comparatively small amount of property abroad. Such duty was payable only if he
had acquired an English domiciles at the time of his death. 91
The fact that he had resided principally in England for the last thirty-seven years of hislife raised a very strong presumption in favour of an English domiciles, but there was
no direct evidence as to what his intention was analysed by LORD MACNAGHTEN
with some particularly the hope, projects and daily habits of Mr. Winans. He found
that, in addition to the care of his health. Mr. Winans had two objects in life. The first
was the construction in Baltimore of a large fleet of spindle-shape vessels, which
91Ibid at 290
would give America superiority at sea over Britain. The second object was to develop
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 54/89
54
a large property of about 200 acres in Baltimore. On this, wharves and docks were to
be constructed for the spindle-shaped vessels, and a large house built in which Mr.
Winans intended to live in order that he might take personal command of the whole
undertaking. He succeeded in getting control of the property only at the very end of
his, and at the time of his death he was working day and night on the scheme.
LORD MACNAGHTEN reached the conclusion that the domicile of origin in New
Jersey had not been lost. He said that “up to the very last he had an expectation or
hope of returning to America and seeing his grand scheme inaugurated”. 92 LORD
HALSBURY found it impossible to infer from the evidence what Mr. Winans
intention was, and he held therefore that the crown had not discharged its duty of
proving a change in domiciles. LORD LINDLEY vigorously dissented. In his view
Winans had given up all serious idea of returning to America. 93
In Bowie (or Ramsay) v Liverpool Royal Infirmary ,94
one George Bowie, who hadleft a will that was formally valid if his domiciles at death was Scottish but invalid if it
was English. The story of his life was uneventful. He was born in Glasgow in 1845
with a Scottish domicile of origin. He gave up his employment as a commercial
traveller at the age of thirty-seven and refused to do any more work during the92 Ibid at 29893 Ibid at 30094 Ibid at 588
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 55/89
stressed that the difficulty in reconciling the numerous statements arises not from
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 56/89
56
clarity of judicial thought, but from the nature of the subject. The cases involved a
detailed examination of the facts and it is not surprising that different factual situations
have chosen different language to describe the law. 95 SCARMAN J. would regard the
difference between the statements of judges in earlier cases as showing a difference of
emphasis and therefore as being of no great moment.
It may well be, then, that to construct a formula which describes the precise intention
required by English law for the acquisition of a domicile of choice is an impossibility,
but perhaps the most satisfactory definition was that offered a hundred years ago by
KINDERSLEY V-C:That place is properly the domicile of a person in which he has
voluntary fixed the habitation of himself and his family, not for mere temporary
purpose, but with a present intention of making it his permanent home, unless and
until something (which is unexpected of the happening of which is uncertain) shall
occur to induce him to adopt some other permanent home. 96
There is a time at which intention is relevant. The traditional statement that there must
be at present intention of permanent residence merely means that so far as the mind of
the person at the relevant time was concerned he possessed the requisite intention. The
relevant time varies with the nature of inquiry. It may be past or present. If, for
95 Re Fuld’s Estate (No 3 ) (1968 ) P 675 at 682 - 68396 Lord v Calvin (1859) 4 Drew 366 at 376
example, the inquiry relate to a domicile of inquiry of a deceased person. It must be
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 57/89
57
ascertained whether at some period in his life he had formed and retained a fixed and
settled intention of residence in a given country. Once this is established, evidence of
his subsequent fluctuations of opinion whether he would or would not will be
ignored. 97
There is evidence of intention i.e. intention needs to be proved. Most disputes as to
domicile turn on the question whether the necessary intention is accompanied with
residence, and this question often involves very complex and intricate issues of fact.
This is because “there is no act, no circumstance in a man‟s life, however trivial it may
be in itself, which ought to be left out of consideration in trying the question whether
there was an intention to change the domicile. A trivial act might possibly be weightier
with regard to determining this question than an act which was of more importance to
a man in his lifetime. 98
It is impossible to lay down any positive rule with respect to the evidence necessary to
prove intention. All that can be said is that every conceivable event and incident in a
man‟s life is a relevant and an admissible indication of his state of mind. It may be
necessary to examine the history of his life with the most scrupulous care, and to
resort even to hearsay evidence where the question concerns the domicile of a person,
97 Re Marrett, Chalmers v Wingfield (1887) 36 Ch D 40098 Drevon v Drevon (1864) 34 L.J. Ch.129, 133,Per Kindersley V- C.
now deceased, possessed in his lifetime. 99 Nothing must be overlooked that might
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 58/89
58
possibly show the place which he regarded as his permanent home at the relevant time.
No fact is too trivial to merit consideration. Indeed, one of the defects of English law
is that the evidence adduced in a disputed case of domicile is often both voluminous
and difficult to assess. This is due to the over- scrupulous manner the courts attempt to
discover a man‟s exact intention. The tendency is to investigate his actual state of
mind, rather than to rest content with the natural inference of his long – continued
residence in a given country. This, indeed, is to set sail on an uncharted sea. Nothing
must be neglected that can possibly indicate the bent of his resident‟s mind. His
aspirations whims, amours, prejudice, religion, financial expectations – all are taken
into account. 100
Having regard, therefore, roving commission imposed on the courts, it is not
surprising that their decisions exhibit a multiplicity of different factors that have been
regarded as indicia of intention. Without attempting to give an exhaustive list, it may
be useful to observe that at one time or another the following have been regarded as
relevant criteria of intent: naturalization, retention of citizenship, purchases of a house,
or of a burial ground, the exercise of political rights, the establishment of children in
business, the statutory declaration made by a candidate for naturalization that he
99 Scappaticci v A-G (1955) P 47,(1955) 1 All ER 193n100 Casdagli v Casdgli (1919) AC 145 at 178
intends to reside permanently in the United Kingdom, the where a man‟s wife and his
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 59/89
59
family reside, departure from a country owing to compulsion of war, the refusal of a
foreign fiancé to leave her own country, statements as his domiciliary intentions made
by a deceased person in his lifetime, the effect of the radical intolerance on
domiciliary intention, and the fact that a family is split between England and
abroad. 101
Undue stress must not be laid on any single fact, however impressive it may appear
when viewed out of its context, for its importance as a determining factor may well be
minimized when considered in the light of other qualifying events. Again, no one fact
is of constant value, for every case varies in its circumstances and what is of decisive
importance in one may be of little weight in another. 102
It is for this reason that it is impossible to formulate a rule specifying the weight to be
given to particular evidence. All that can be gathered from the authorities in this
respect is that more reliance is placed on conduct than on declarations of intention,
especially if they are oral. Nevertheless, the common law rule, that expression of
intention by a living person cannot be received in evidence unless against his own
interest, is not applicable in an issue of domicile, and it is common enough for witness
to testify to parol declarations made during his life by the person whose domicile is in
101Begum v Entry Clearance Officer, Dacca (1983) Imm AR 163102 Hodgson v De Beauchesne (supra)
question. This kind of evidence, however, especially when given long after the
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 60/89
60
conversation occurred, is suspect, for witness may lie or forget. Declarations should
contain “a real expression of intention” for it only too frequently happens that they
cannot be taken at their fact value. They may be interested in statements designed to
flatter or to deceive the hearer, they may represent nothing more than vain
expectations unlikely to be fulfilled, and the very facility with which they can be made
require their sincerity to be manifested by some active step taken in furtherance of the
expressed intention. The circumstance in which the statement is made needs to be
considered and any declaration must be backed up by conduct consistent with the
declared intention.
Even lower in the scale of values is evidence given in the course of the trial by the
person himself not of his past declarations, but of his past intention. This must be
accepted with very considerable reserve, for on such personal issue as his own place of
domicile he is under a bias that is likely to influence his mind, perhaps even his
veracity. 103
In at least two respects, motive in the sense of the antecedent desire that determines
the will to act is one of the indicia of the intention requisite for the acquisition of a
domicile of choice. First it may throw light on the question whether the removal to
103 Ibid , but in Brown v Brown (1982) 3 FLR 212 at214 -215 where the declaration was consistence
with conduct.
another country was intended to be permanent. It will serve, for instance, to contrast
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 61/89
61
the case of a man who flees to England to escape political persecution in his own
country with that of retired officer who goes to Jersey to avoid heavy taxation.
Secondly, it may provide a means of testing the sincerity of a declaration of intention.
Thus if a widower testifies t hat at the time of his wife‟s death he and his wife regarded
Scotland as their perman ent home, the fact that Scotland‟s law he is entitled to one -
half of his wife‟s property may make his testimony a little suspect. 104
It is important to realize that the only intention relevant to a change of domicile is an
intention to settle permanently in a country. This will effect a change of domicile even
if the propositus intended to retain his former personal law. 105 One of the legal
consequences of an intention to settle in country „X‟ is that the person in question
becomes subject to the law of „X‟ whether this is his wish or not. It is inevitable effect
to his residence in that country couples with his intention to remain there without any
limit of time 106 . Thus in Re Steer 107 An English man, having taken up his residence in
Hamburg with the intention of settling there for good, remained there until his death
some fifty years later. On the occasion, when he came to England for a temporary
purpose, he made a Will in which he declared that though he intended to return to
104 Cf Re Craignish (1892) 3 Ch 180.105 Douglas v Douglas (1871) LR 12 Eq 617 at 644, 645.106 Re Craignish (1892) 3 Ch 180 at 188, 189.107 ( 1858) 3 H & N 594.
Hamburg it was not his intention to renounce his English domicile of origin. It was
h ld h hi d l i hi h d d i h i l
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 62/89
62
held that this declaration which suggested a desire to have two simultaneous
domiciles, could not nullify the consequences of having in fact acquire a German
domicile.
3.2.1.2: SPECIAL CASES IN ACQUISITION OF DOMICILE OF CHOICE
In order that a person may acquire a domicile of choice, it has been said that „ there
must be a residence free chosen, and prescribed or dictated by any external necessity,
such as the duties of offices the demands of creditors or the relief from illnesses 108 .
This is a somewhat misleading statement. It certainly does not mean that only a person
able to exercise the most perfect freedom of choice can acquire a domicile of choice,
for it did, the acquisition of a domicile of choice would be a rare event. What it does
means can only be elucidated by examining a number of a special cases. These are;
person liable to deportation; fugitives from justice; refuges; invalids; member of the
armed forces; employees; and diplomats.
Persons liable to deportation: A person who resides in a country from which he is
liable to be deported may lack the necessary intention because his residence is
precarious. But if in fact the forms the necessary intention, he acquires a domicile of
108Ibid at 458
choice. 109 Once such a person has acquired a domicile of choice he does not lose it
l b d t ti d h b d g i t hi H l l it h
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 63/89
63
merely because a deportation order has been made against him. He only loses it when
he is actually deported and can no longer be said to have an intention to return as a
lawful resident.
Fugitives from justice: A person, who leaves a country as a fugitive from criminal
justice, or in order to evade his creditors, has a special motive for leaving it, but no
special motive for living in any other country. In the case of a fugitive from justice,
the intention to abandon his previous domicile will readily be inferred, unless perhaps
the punishment which he seeks to avoid is trivial, or by the law of that country a
relatively short period of prescription bars liability to punishment. In Re Martin ,110 a
French professor committed a crime in France in connection with professorship and
fled to England, where he remained for the next twenty years. Two years after the
French period of prescription had expired he returned to France. The court of Appeal
by a majority held that he had an English domicile six years after his arrival in
England.
109 Boldrini v Boldrini (1932) P. 9110 (1900) P. 211
Similarly, a person who leaves a country in order to evade his creditors may lose a
domicile there; but if he plans to return as soon as he has paid or otherwise got rid of
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 64/89
64
domicile there; but if he plans to return as soon as he has paid or otherwise got rid of
his debts, there is no change of domicile. 111
Refugees: If a political refugee intends to return to the country from which he has fled
as soon as the political situation changes, he retains his domicile there; but if his
intention was not to live that country even when the political situation has changed, he
can acquire a domicile of choice in the country to which he has fled. Thus in Re Lloyd
Evans 112 an Englishman with a Belgian domicile of choice returned to England very
reluctantly in June 1940 because of the German invasion, and lived in furnished flat in
England until he died in 1944. He always intended to return to Belgium after the war.
It was held that he retained his Belgian domicile. On the other hand, in May v May 113
a Jew fled from Germany to England in 1938 to escape persecution by the Nazis. He
originally intended to emigrate to the United States, but his hope of doing so was
frustrated by the outbreak of war in 1930. In 1914 the idea of going to the United
States gradually faded from his mind. He declared that he would never return to
Germany even if the Nazis were overthrown. It was held that he had acquired an
English domicile of choice by the beginning of 1942.
111 Re Wright’s Trusts (1856) 2 K & J.112 (1947) Ch. 695113 (1943) 2 All E.R. 146.
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 65/89
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 66/89
limited time. On the other hand an employee can more easily gives up his employment
than a member of the armed forces can. The question whether an employee who is
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 67/89
67
q p y
sent to a country intends to reside there permanently or indefinitely remains in the last
resort a question of fact. There is, for the purpose, no distinction between public
servants and other employees. If such persons go to a country for the temporary
purposes of performing the duties of their office or employment, they do not acquire a
domicile of choice there, but if they go not merely to work but also to settle, they do
acquire domicile of choice. This in Att. Gen v Rowe 117 an English barrister was
appointed chief Justice of Ceylon. His intention was to hold this office until he had
earned his pension and then return to England. It was held that he retained his English
domicile. On the other hand, in Gunn v Gunn 118 a man with a domicile of origin in
Manitoba was employed by a corporation owning a chain in cinema in Saskatchewan.
He moved to Saskatchewan with the intention of residing there for an indefinite
period. It was held that he acquire domicile of choice in Saskatchewan.
Diplomats: Diplomats are simply a special category of public servants and the same
principles apply to them. It is a question of fact whether they intend to reside
permanently or indefinitely in the country to which they are accredited. Generally, of
course, they form no such intention, but occasionally they may do so and thus acquire
117 (1862) 1 H & C 31118 (1956) 2 D .L. D
a domicile of choice in a country, he does not lose it merely by reason of being
appointed to a diplomatic post in that country. 119
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 68/89
68
3.2.1.3: LOSS OF DOMICILE OF CHOICE
A domicile of choice is said to be lost when both the residence and intention, which
must exist for its acquisition are given up. This is not lost by given up residence and
intention only, neither is it necessary to prove a positive intention not to return. It is
sufficient to prove merely the absence of intention to continue to reside. 120
3.3.0: DOMICILE OF ORIGIN AND CHOICE CONTRASTED
As compared with the views held in civil law countries, in the USA, in New Zealand
and Australia 121 , the domicile of origin is regarded by the present English law as
fundamentally different from a domicile of choice. It differs in its character, in the
conditions necessary for its abandonment and in its capacity for revival. These is
categorized into two
TENACITY OF THE DOMICILE OF ORIGIN
There is the strongest possible presumption in favour of the continuance of a domicile
of origin. As contrasted with a domicile of choice, it has been said by LORD119 An instance is afforded by Naville v Naville (1957) (1) S.A. 280120 Re Flynn (No 1) (1968) 1 W. L. R. 103, 113-115121 New Zealand Domicile Act 1976 and the Australian Domicile Acts 1982; Nygh, pp 177- 178
MACNAGHTEN that “its character is more enduring, its hold stronger and less easily
shaken off” 122 . In fact decision such as Winans v A-G 123 and Ramsay v Liverpool
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 69/89
69
Royal Infirmary 124 warrant the conclusion that almost overwhelming evidence is
require to shake it off. In the latter of these cases evidence was completely lacking of
the slightest indication, either by words or actions, that George Bowie intended to live
anywhere else than in England. Yet it was held that the tenacity of his Scottish
domicile of origin had not yielded. Also in Cramer v Cramer Stephen BROWN and
BALCOMBE LJJ held that the burden of proving a change of domicile from one of
origin to one of choice was a heavy one. 125
ABANDONMENT OF AN EXISTING DOMICILE .
Since a domicile of choice is voluntarily acquire if there is the requisite intention and
residence, so it is extinguishable in the same manner, i.e. merely by a removal from
the country with an intention not to return and even without acquiring a fresh
domicile 126 . In case of dual or multiple residence what is necessary is that the country
ceases to be the chief residence with presumably an intention not to reside there as the
chief residence. The only distinction between acquisition and abandonment is that the
122 Ibid at 290
123 Ibid at 290124 Ibid at 558125 (1987) 1 FLR 116 and (1982) 3 FLR 212126 Tee v Tee (1947) 1 WLR 213 at 215
latter requires less evidence than the former. There cannot be abandonment by
intention alone.
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 70/89
70
But it has been objected by MEGGARY J, obiter, that to require proof of an intention
not to return is too rigorous a test, since it denies effect to a departure from a country
without an intention of returning. In his view, it is unnecessary to prove a positive
intention not to return , since the “merely negative absence of any intention” 127 , to
resume the residence will suffice of effect an abandonment of the domicile.
It is submitted that this suggested distinction between an intention not to return and the
absence of an intention to return is fallacious. The difference between the two variants
of intention is not obvious, but presumably the absence of an intention not to return
can only mean that at the time of departure the person in question has not decided
whether to return or not . if this is the state of his mind, the result in law is that his
mind domicile is unchanged. In other words, it would seem clear on the authorities
that there must always be a positive intention not to return before it can be said that a
domicile of choice has been lost. But the identification of a person‟s domic ile is
always inferred from his conduct together with his declarations, if any, and at the time
when the question falls to be determined the inference from the evidence may well be
that what began as indecision has been gradually transformed into a definite resolve
not to return.
127 Ibid at 113
But the domicile of origin on the other hand, which in its inceptionn is not a matter of
free will but is communicated to a person by operation of law; is not extinguished by
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 71/89
71
mere removal with an intention not to return. It cannot be lost by mere abandonment.
It endures until supplanted by a fresh domicile of choice. Bell v Kennedy 128 is the
leading authority for this rule,
The domicile of origin of Bell was in Jamaica, where he had been born of Scottish
parents domiciled in that Island. He was educated in Scotland but returned to Jamaica
after reaching his majority. Some fourteen years later, in 1837, he left the Island
without any intention of returning, resided with his mother-in-law in Scotland, and
occupied himself in looking for an estate in that country on which to settle down. He
had not been successful in this when his wife died in 1838, but after her death he
bought an estate and it was admitted that at the time of the trial he had acquired a
Scottish domicile. The question for decision, however, was what his domicile was at
the time of his wife‟s death? It was held that his domicile at the moment was in
Jamaica. Although he abandoned the Island for good in 1837 and was resident in
Scotland, he had not at that time decided to make his permanent residence there. The
evidence showed that in 1838 his mind was vacillating with regard to his future home.
Therefore, since he had not acquired a Scottish domicile of choice, he retained his
domicile of origin.
128 (1868) LR 1 Sc & Div 307
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 72/89
and takes up his temporary residence in New York, being undecided whether to settle
permanently in Virginia or California. The result is that immediately on his departure
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 73/89
73
from Peru his Peruvian domicile ceases abruptly, but his Scotland‟s domicile of origin
revives and remains attached to him until he has in fact acquired a domicile of choice
in some other country. It is clear that during his period of indecision in New York
there must be some personal law applicable to him. This might be either Peruvian or
Scottish law. In the United States of America, where revival doctrine is not
accepted 132 , it would be the law of Peru. According to Lord chancellor HATHERLEY,
however, to admit this is to be absurdity of asserting a person to be domiciled in a
country which he has resolutely forsaken and cast off, simply because he may perhaps
for years be deliberating before he settles himself elsewhere.
Yet certain doubts suggest themselves. Is it so absurd to prefer the law under which
the man has recently been living, perhaps for a prolonged period? Are the claims of
the law which is imposed on him at birth, independently of his volition, superior to
that which he has voluntarily chosen and long retained? At any rate the advantages of
preferring the domicile of origin in the case of our hypothetical X are not particularly
conspicuous. The country that determines his personal law is one that he has never
visited and for which he feels repugnance. Nevertheless, if he wishes to marry, his
capacity will be determined by reference to the law of Scotland. If he dies intestate
132 Re Jones’ Est ate (1921) 192 Iowa 78, 182 NW 227.
leaving movables in England, they will be disturbed according to Scotland‟s law and
United Kingdom inheritance tax will be payable. These illustrations, which could be
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 74/89
74
multiplied, provoke the thought that the virtues of the doctrine of revival are not so
obvious as appeared to the mid-Victorian judges. The doctrine of revival has in fact
been rejected in New Zealand 133 and in Australia 134 and its rejection in the United
Kingdom has been proposed by the law commission.
3.4.0: CHANGE OF DOMICILE AND NATIONALITY
It is importantt to emphasise that nationality and domicile are two different
conceptions and that a man may change the latter without divesting himself of his
nationality 135 . An Englishman may remain an Englishman in the sense that his
allegiance renders him subject to certain duties to the crown, and yet he may so
change his residence that many of his legal rights and obligations will be determinable
by a foreign system of law, as being the law of his domicile. The mere fact that an
alien living in England under a certificate of registration is liable to deportation for
misbehavior or has even been recommended for deportation does not prevent him
133 Domicile Act 1976, s 11. Webb (1977) 26 ICLQ 194134 Domicile Acts 1982, s 7135 Bradfield v Swanton (1931) IR 446; also a discussion By Westlake in Private International Law (7 th
edn) pp 348-354
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 75/89
abandonment of domicile of choice should be sufficient for the abandonment of
domicile of origin. 139
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 76/89
76
139Agbede. I. O. „ Personal law and personal system of law : Synthesis or Symbolisms
CHAPTER 4
DOMICILE OF DEPENDENT PERSONS
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 77/89
77
4.0.0: INTRODUCTION
No dependent person can acquire a domicile of choice by his own act. As a general
rule, the domicile of such persons is the same as, and changes with the domicile of the
person (if any) on whom he is legally dependent. The class of dependent persons is
children, women, and persons of unsound mind. This was stream lined by the law of
England on Domicile and and Matrimonial Proceedings Act. 140 These classes of people
can only acquire domicile based on the act of the person they are dependent upon. All
these shall be dicussed as we proceed in this chapter.
4.1.0: DOMICILE OF CHILDREN
The Common law rules as to the domicile of dependency emphasized the link
between a child and its father, the child was treated as dependent upon the father even
if the parents had separated and the child was living with the mother. Section 4 of the
Domicile and Matrimonial Proceeding Act 141 sought to introduce greater flexibility
into the rules as to dependency, enabling the child to be dependent upon the mother in
appropriate circumstances. It provides that the domicile of a dependent child whose
140 1974141ibid
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 78/89
When the domicile of a dependent child is change as a result of a change in his
parents‟ domicile or as a result of his legitimation, the new domicile which the chil d
g t i thi i th d i il f d d d t d i il f igi H it
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 79/89
79
gets in this way is the domicile of dependency and not a domicile of origin. Hence, it
is not domicile but the one he acquired at birth which will revive if in later life he
abandons one domicile of choice without acquiring another at the same time.. On the
other hand, it would seem to follow from what has been said above about adopted
children that the domicile of origin of an adopted child is deemed to be the domicile of
his adopted parent or parents at the time of his adoption. If this is so, it is the only
example in English law in which a domicile of origin can be changed.
4.2.0: DOMICILE OF MARRIED WOMEN
Until 1974, the rule was that the domicile of a husband was communicated to his wife
immediately on marriage and it was necessarily and inevitably retained by her for the
duration of the marriage. This rule was much criticized as “the last barbarous relic of a
wife‟s servitude” 145 and was abolished by section 1 of the Domicile and Matrimonial
Proceedings Act. 146 The domicile of a married woman as at any time on or after 1st
January 1974 „shall, instead of being the same as her husband‟s by virtue only of
marriage, be ascertained by reference to the same factors as in the case of any other
145 Gray v Formosa (1963) pg 259.267.146 1973
individual capable of having an independent domicile‟ .This means t hat for all
purposes a married woman is to be treated as capable of acquiring a separate domicile;
though in vast majority of cases she and her husband will independently acquire the
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 80/89
80
though in vast majority of cases she and her husband will, independently, acquire the
same domicile. It is however quite possible for happily married spouses to have
separate domiciles. For example, a person domiciled in New York marries a fellow
domiciled in England, both intending at the end to go live in New York. 147
However, before 1974 there was an absolute rule, to which there were exceptions, that
the domicile of a married woman was the same as, and changed with, the domicile of
her husband as discussed above. 148 This rule reflected social conditions and attitudes
of past age; it led to serious injustice to wives especially in the matter of divorce
jurisdiction, but it has been abolished in 1974.
Section 1 (1) of the Act is retrospective in the sense that it applies to women married
before as well as after January 1, 1974. Hence, a transitional provision was needed.
Section 1(2) provides that where immediately before that date a woman was married
and then had her husband‟s domicile by dependence, she is to be treated as retaining
the domicile (as a domicile of choice, if it is not also her domicile of origin) unless and
until it is changed by acquisition of another domicile either on or after that date. Thus,
147 Ibid148 Ibid
in IRC v Duchess of Portland ,149 a woman with a domicile of origin in Quebec
married a domiciled Englishman in 1948. She lived with her husband in England but
retained links with Quebec visiting it for ten to twelve weeks every summer keeping
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 81/89
81
retained links with Quebec, visiting it for ten to twelve weeks every summer, keeping
a house which she owned there ready for immediate occupation and retaining
Canadian citizenship. She intended to return permanently to Quebec with her husband
when he retired from business, but continued to live in England. It was held that the
effect of section 1 (2) was that she retained her English domicile of dependency as a
domicile of choice. In effect, the pattern of her own life before 1974 was given no
weight. The Law Commission has recommended, in the context of its proposal on
reformulation of the domicile that any person at any date after the enactment of the
new rules should be determined as if those rules had always been in force. 150
However, this transitional problems may give rise to a problem similar to one found at
common law when the husband died. Taking an hypothetical case; where H domiciled
in France marries W domiciled in Scotland and they live in England. In 1972, H leaves
W in England and returns to live in France. Where is W domiciled in 1974?
After 1973, W retains H‟s domicile in France as if it were a domicile of choice and
this will continue until she utilizes her new capacity to acquire a domicile of choice in
England, where she wishes to remain living. Does she acquire such an English
149 (1982) Ch 314150 Law of Domicile , para, 8. 7
domicile merely by continuing and intending to live permanently in England. On the
analogy of common law decisions involving acquisition of a domicile of choice after
the death of a husband, W immediately acquires an English domicile and no further
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 82/89
82
the death of a husband, W immediately acquires an English domicile and no further
act on her part is necessary. Authority for this view can be found in the obiter dicta in
IRC v Duchess of Portland .151
4.3.0: DOMICILE OF PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND
A person of unsound mind cannot acquire a domicile of choice and as a general rule,
retains the domicile which he had when he became insane. 152 Since he cannot exercise
any will, he can neither acquire nor lose a domicile. Nor can his domicile be changed
by the person in charge of him.
Most of the cases which support these statements concerned persons who were
“lunatics so found” by inquisition. This procedure and the term “lunatic” are obsolete
in English domestic law, which now make provision for many kind and degrees of
mental disorder. 153 It seems unlikely that all persons who suffered from any form of
mental disorder for which provision is made by English domestic law would be
regarded as dependent persons for the purpose of the law of domicile. Whether or not
151 Ibid152 Bempde v. Johnstone (1796) 3 Ves, 198153 Mental Health Act (1983)
they could form the necessary intention to acquire or lose a domicile is likely to be
treated as a question of fact in each case.
There is one exception to the rule stated above that a mentally disordered person
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 83/89
83
p y p
retains the domicile he had when he became insane. If a dependent child becomes
insane and remains so after attaining the age of sixteen, the appropriate parent has
power to change his domicile even after he attains that age. Whether the power is
exercised or not is a question of fact in each case.
Under the new domicile provisions proposed by the Law Commission, 154 an adult
lacking the capacity to form the intention necessary for acquiring a domicile would be
domiciled in the country with which he was for the time being most closely connected.
When that capacity was restored to him, he would retain the domicile he had
immediately it was restored, but could of course then acquire a new domicile under the
rules applying to adults generally.
4.4.0: MERITS AND DEMERITS OF DOMICILE
The English preference for domicile is based on two main grounds. First, domicile
means the country in which a man has established his permanent home, and what can
be more natural or more appropriate than subject him to his home law? It is difficult to
agree that he should be excommunicated from that law merely because technically he
154 Law Commission
is a citizen of some state that he may have abandoned years ago. 155 Secondly, domicile
furnishes the only practicable test in the case of such political units as the United
Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and USA where the same nationality embraces a number
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 84/89
84
of sometimes diverse legal systems. The ex pression “national law” when applied to a
British subject is meaningless. It is one system in England, another in Scotland;
similarly for a Canadian, there is one system in Ontario and a quiet different one in
Quebec.
In the course of its development in England, however, the law relating to domicile has
acquired certain vices. A short mention of these will suffice. First, it will not
infrequently happen that the legal domicile of a man is out of touch with reality, for
the exaggerated importance attributed to domicile of origin, coupled with the technical
doctrine of its revival may well ascribe to a man a domicile in a country which by no
stretch of the imagination can be called his home. Secondly, an equally irrational
result may ensue from the view, sometimes accepted by the English courts, that long
residence is not equivalent to domicile if accompanied by the contemplation of some
uncertain event the occurrence of which will cause a termination of the residence.
Thirdly, the ascertainment of a man‟s dom icile depends to such an extent on the proof
of his intention, the most elusive of all factors, that only too often it will be impossible
to identify it with certainty without recourse to the courts.
155 Law of Domicile
4.5.0: CONCLUSION
In conclusion, it has been suggested that the capacity to acquire a domicile of
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 85/89
85
dependent person is not always governed by English law, the law forum. Such a
possibility was adumbrated obiter in an English case in 1887. 156 Its acquisition is not
itself a problem for the solution of which a rule for the choice of law is required. For
the connecting factor in any English choice of law rule must logically always be
interpreted according to English notions. 157
156 Urquhart v Butterfield (1887) 37 Ch.D 357 at 384157 Re Martin (1900) P 211 at 227
CHAPTER 5
GENERAL CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5 0 0: CONCLUSION
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 86/89
86
5.0.0: CONCLUSION
In summary of this essay, questions concerning the status of a body of persons
associated together for some enterprise, including the fundamental question whether it
posses the attribute of legal personality, must on principle be governed by the same
law that governs the status of the individual, i.e. by the law of domicile. What this law
admits of no doubt if we reason on the analogy of the individual. Every person
acquirers at birth a domicile of origin by operation of law. In the case of the legitimate
natural person it is the domicile of his father.
It is however clear that the law of domicile needs some radical modifications
especially concerning on the few Nigerian situations. It is so dishearten to know that
our judges have now chosen to adhere strictly to the received English law rules which
have been subjected to reform in England where they originated from, but furthercling conservatively to the outdated rules.
In conclusion, it may be said that a system which is based upon domicile, is free and
more elastic than that which is based upon nationality because nationality is generally
too artificial and has little to recommend it. The Nigerian legislature and court should
remove some of the archaic doctrines that seem to have eaten deep into our modern
dispensation, and should form a new definition of domicile, simple and more workable
and in line with the concept of habitual home rather than permanent home.
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 87/89
87
5.1.0: RECOMMENDATIONS
I would recommend that as touching intention to prove acquisition of domicile;
a) When a person has his home in a country, he should be presumed to intend to live
there permanently.
b) Where a person has more than one home, he should be presumed to intend to live
permanently in the country in which he has his principal home.
c) Where a person is stationed in a country for the principal purpose of carrying on a
business, profession or occupation and his wife and children have their home in
another country, he shall be presumed to intend to live permanently in the latter
country. 158
d) The rule of reviving domicile of origin should be regarded as the principle of
continuity i.e. a person‟s domicile once acquired would continue until he obtained
another one. There will be no question of previous reviving.
e) The fact that a dependent person can only acquire his/her domicile by the act of the
person he is depensdent upon should be rerconsidered. Especially that of a married
woman, she should retain her domicile after acquiring that of her husband.
158Article 2 of Code of Domicile
f) In all, the law commission‟s proposals should be considered as „a further important
step in the process of improving the structure, effectiveness and fairness of the rules of
domicile‟
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 88/89
88
BIBLOGRAPHY
ARTICLE ON INTERNET
8/10/2019 Concept of Domicile in PIL
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/concept-of-domicile-in-pil 89/89
89
Omoruyi . I. O. „ Domicile As A Determinant Of Personal Laws: A Case For
The Abandonment Of The Revival Doct rine In Nigeria‟
http://www.nigerianlawguru.com.article>accessed 2000
BOOKS
Agbede. I. O, Themes on Conflict of Laws (2001) Shaneson C.I Ltd
Beale, Treatise on the conflict of laws (1935)
Bryan A. Garner, Blacks Law Dictionary 8 th ed. Thompson West 2004
Cheshire and North‟s; Private International Law(1974)7 th edition
Colier J.G; Conflict of laws 2 nd ed. Cambridge C. UP 1994
Dicey and Morris; Private International Law (8 th ed.1969)
Goodrich and Scoles; Conflict of laws (1964)39
Graveson; conflict of laws (1969)
Morris, Private International Law 4 th ed by J.C Mclean Sweet & Maxwell 1993
Oxford Learners Advanced Dictionary 6 th ed.by Sally Wehmeier (2000)
Rabel .E.; The Conflict of laws ; A comparative study.(2 nd ed.1958)
Wolff. M., Private International Law (2 nd ed. 1950) p 109
Recommended