Composition of Current and Alternative Jet Fuels Nov 3, 2011 Tim Edwards, AFRL Russ White, API

Preview:

Citation preview

Composition of Current and Alternative Jet Fuels

Nov 3, 2011

Tim Edwards, AFRLRuss White, API

2DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Bottom Line Up Front

• Approved and prospective alternative jet

fuels (either 100% or blends) will be

hydrocarbons very similar to current fuels

• Fuels are to be “drop-in” – no handling

changes

• Most notable differences reduce the health

effects of these fuels– Lower aromatics – Lower sulfur

3DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Current Composition Limits in Jet Fuel Specifications

• Aromatics < 25 vol% by D1319

• Naphthalenes < 3 vol% by D1840 (not naphthalene)

• “Light ends” controlled by flash and T10

• “Heavy ends” controlled by freeze and T90

• Density spec (0.775-0.84) requires cycloparaffins and/or

aromatics

• Impurities indirectly limited by thermal stability

• Sulfur content limited

• Smoke point limits aromatics indirectly (naphthalenes

more directly)

4DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Aromatics in JP-8

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

PQIS data 2008

Num

ber

of s

ampl

es

Aromatics by D1319, vol %

avg 17.4+/- 2.7 vol%

5DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Naphthalene Study

• Individual naphthalenes results reported in µg/mL; total naphthalenes in

volume % (convert to µg/mL by multiplying by 1.06x104)

•Large standard deviations in concentrations within fuel classes

•Consistent results between current study and previous World Survey fuels

•Highest naphthalene in jet fuels and F-76, lowest in motor diesel

•Highest total naphthalenes in F-76 diesel, lowest in motor gasoline

FuelNaphthalene

(µg/mL)

1-Methyl naphthalene

(µg/mL)

2-Methyl naphthalene

(µg/mL)

D1840 Total

naphthalenes (volume%)

D6379 Total

naphthalenes (volume %)

Jet 1530 ± 772 1520 ± 495 2360 ± 869 1.15 ± 0.38 1.33 ± 1.49

F-76 1590 ± 599 1690 ± 701 3010 ± 1505 4.05 ± 0.84 5.74 ± 1.21

Motor diesel 357 ± 241 563 ± 467 1050 ± 875 2.61 ± 1.01 3.19 ± 1.48

Motor gasoline 1480 ± 797 467 ± 319 1080 ± 733 0.42 ± 0.21 0.42 ± 0.23

Jet (World Survey) 1580 ± 1037 NA NA 1.23 ± 0.72 1.80 ± 1.00

NA= Not analyzed

6DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Jet Compositional Space

aromatics

cycloparaffins

n- +

iso-

para

ffins

25% aromatic limit in D1655,D7566

25

50

75

Avg: 53 n/iso, 28 cyclo, 19 aroWorld Survey

• ASTM D2425 currently used

7DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

5 10 15 20 25 30

4597 Jet A

4598 Jet A

4599 Jet A

4600 Jet A

4626 Jet A

4658 Jet AC7

C11

C16

Limited by flash point Limited by freeze point

Jet GC-MS

8DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

GC X GC

naphthalenes

alkyl benzenes

• JP-8 (POSF 4751)• Aromatics separated by class and carbon number

9DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Baseline Fischer-Tropsch Fuels

n-paraffins

• Form basis of Research Report to support specification

B-52, T-38

C-5, B-2, C-130, F-16, HH-60, T-6, A-10, RQ-4

C-17, B-1, F-15F-22, KC-135R

10DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Sasol IPK/A Analysis

• Research Report to support specification based on similarity to petroleum jet

11DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

HRJs feedstock independent

C13 C14 C15

C12

C9

C8

C11

C10

jatropha/algae oil

jatropha oil

camelina oil

animal fat

Salicornia oil

F-T

Inte

nsity

(ar

bitr

ary

units

)

Time

12DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

SPK Compositional Space

cyclo-paraffins

iso-paraffins n-pa

raffi

ns

15% cyclo limit in D7566Sasol IPK

Shell SPKS-8

ARA

PSU

cam HRJ

tallow HRJ

Gevo

13DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Fuels from Woody Biomass

• Focus of DOE Biomass program

• Can yield fuels of atypical composition “Sugars”

Lignin

14DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Lignocellulosic Biomass

April 21, 2023

“Sugars”

“Pyrolysis Oil”

alcohols jet “alcohol-to-jet”

jet“direct fermentation” or“metabologic engineering”

gasification syn gas jet

Fischer-Tropsch

“SPK”

pyrolysisjet

upgrading

fermentation

catalysis

jet “catalytic renewable jet?”

“pyrolytic renewable

jet?”

15DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Gevo Public Data

16DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Summary

• Alternative aviation fuels will remain hydrocarbons,

but…– Specifications will add more composition constraints– Molecular weight range may narrow (but still be ~8-14)– Blend stocks with a small number of HCs may exist– Relative proportion of hydrocarbon classes may shift– Sulfur will decrease, relative to current average of ~700 ppm– Blend stocks with and without aromatics will be seen

• Health benefits of alternative fuels currently not being

given credit in evaluations of “drop-in” fuels

17DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Turbine Engine Emissions

• AF, NASA, FAA supporting emissions

testing for alternative jet fuels– The “usual” – NOx, CO, UHC, SOx– Particulates to support SAE E31 ARP– VOC, HAPS to develop database

• Significant data on ground (AAFEX etc.)

• Bottom line – alternative jet fuels are

hydrocarbons, most emissions unchanged– Exception – particulates (soot), typically reduced

18DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

18

AFRL Turbine Engine Research Transportable Emissions Lab (TERTEL)

Instrument MeasurementCondensation Particle Counter(TSI 3022A)

Particle Number

Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (TSI 3936)

Particle Size Distribution(D=4.0 - 570 nm)

Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (R&P 1105)

Particle Mass Concentration

FTIR Analyzer (MKS 2030) CO2, CO, NOx, SOx, HC speciesNDIR Analyzer (CA 602P) Diluted Sample CO2

Smoke Sampler & Reflectometer(Photovolt Instruments Inc. 577)

Smoke Number

LECO Carbon Analyzer (RC-412) Elemental/Organic CarbonFID Analyzer (CA 600) Total HydrocarbonsMulti-Angle Absorption Photometer Particle Mass Concentration

19DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Emissions Collaboration

DC-8

AFRL EmissionsTrailer EPA

Missouri S&T

AEDC, NASA/GRCAerodyne

NASA/LaRC

• Emissions study conducted with multiple partners on modified NASA DC-8 (CFM56) – Jan ’09– Multiple FT fuel blends (Sasol, Shell, 50/50, & 100%)• Data reduction underway but clear PM reductions with FT fuel and blends

20DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

21DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

AAFEX I

22DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

• Higher impact at lower power

– Consistent with previous studies (e.g. T63, CFM56, T701C, TF33)

– Reduce HC aerosols– Reduce soot nuclei

• Increased role of paraffinic species on soot formation at higher power

AAFEX CFM56 Particle Number EI

1.00E+11

1.00E+12

1.00E+13

1.00E+14

1.00E+15

1.00E+16

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Parti

cle

Num

ber

EI (

#/kg-f

uel)

Engine Setting

JP-8 R (27 Jan - 48 F) FT1 (28 Jan - 56 F) FT2 (30 Jan - 60 F)

Significantly lower particle number EI with FT fuels

23DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

AAFEX I (cont)

24DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Ultralow Sulfur Jet Fuel

2009

25DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Unclassified, Unlimited Distribution

Diesel Engine Evaluation with Alternative Fuels

•Similar engine performance (fuel conversion eff.) with JP-8, FT blend & diesel

•Higher engine exhaust temperatures (5-10%) with diesel at higher RPMs

•Slight reductions (5-10%) in engine BHP with JP-8 and FT blend

– Lower fuel density and limits in fuel delivery system

• Impact of JP-8 and FT blend on emissions dependent on engine and condition

•Highly variable particle number data

– Inherent non-continuous combustion in reciprocating engines

•Similar or lower smoke numbers with alt fuels

•Moderate reduction in PM mass

•Mostly lower CO (20-40%) and NOx (10-17%) emissions

– Trends agree with previous measurements in 6.5L diesel

•Technical paper to be included in IASH 2009 proceedings