View
47
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
COMPLIANCE & SOX. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT At Issue. If the governance of the modern corporation isn’t completely broken, it is going through a severe crisis of confidence. At risk is the very integrity of capitalism. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Sarbanes-Oxley - 1
COMPLIANCE& SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley - 2
SARBANES-OXLEY ACTAt Issue
If the governance of the modern corporation isn’t completely broken, it is going through a severe crisis of confidence. At risk is the very integrity of capitalism.
Directors who fail to direct and CEOs who fail at moral leadership are arguably the most important challenge facing corporate America today.
Business Week (May 6, 2002)
Sarbanes-Oxley - 3
SARBANES-OXLEY ACTThe Solution Starts At Home
The recent corporate collapses have involved many breakdowns: in ethics, in trust, in common sense, to name a few. But perhaps the most troubling breakdown is in corporate oversight.
Directors, senior executives, and Wall Street analysts all failed miserably by missing – or concealing – danger signals until it was too late.
Regulators will no doubt have plenty to say on the issue, but the most zealous reformers should be the companies themselves.
Fortune (May 27, 2002)
Sarbanes-Oxley - 4
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STANDARDS
1900: NYSE requires distribution of annual reports to stockholders 1909: NYSE requires annual stockholders’ meeting 1926: NYSE adopts “one share, one vote” standard 1929: Stock market crash 1932: Increased financial disclosure and independent audits become mandatory 1934: SEC is formed 1955: Shareholder approval required for certain corporate acquisitions
Sarbanes-Oxley - 5
1968: AMEX publishes first guide establishing listing standards 1977: NYSE requires establishment of an audit committee comprised of independent directors 1985: NASDAQ initiates its first corporate governance listing standards 1987: Treadway Commission (COSO) established to define responsibilities of the auditor in detecting and preventing fraud
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STANDARDS
Sarbanes-Oxley - 6
1999: NYSE/AMEX/NASD adopt new rules based
on Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the
Effectiveness of Audit Committees
2002: Sarbanes-Oxley Act (July 30, 2002)
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STANDARDS
Sarbanes-Oxley - 7
SARBANES-OXLEYMajor Objectives
Improve corporate governance Reform public accounting (auditing) Reform Wall Street practices Attack insider trading and obstruction
of justice (document retention)
“Restore confidence in capital markets”
Sarbanes-Oxley - 8
Title I: Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Title II: Auditor Independence
Title III: Corporate Responsibility, Disclosure, and Governance
Title IV: Enhanced Financial Disclosures
SARBANES-OXLEY ACTMajor Provisions
Sarbanes-Oxley - 9
Title V – Analyst Conflicts of Interest Title VI – Commission (SEC) Resources
and Authority Title VII – Studies and Reports Title VIII – Corporate and Criminal
Fraud Accountability Title IX – White-Collar Crime Penalty
Enhancements Title X – Corporate Tax Returns Title XI - Corporate Fraud and
Accountability
SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOther Provisions
Sarbanes-Oxley - 10
PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD
Established by Sarbanes-Oxley
Broad powers to regulate audits and auditors of public companies
Appointed by the SEC
Sarbanes-Oxley - 11
PCAOB Register public accounting firms
Establish auditing standards
Inspect registered public accounting firms
Conduct investigations and disciplinary proceedings – with ability to sanction auditors and audit firms
Sarbanes-Oxley - 12
AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE
Prohibits certain “nonaudit services”– Bookkeeping, financial systems design, appraisal or
valuation, actuarial, internal auditing outsourcing, management or human resources, broker-dealer or investment banking, others per PCAOB
Audit committee must pre-approve all auditing and non-auditing services
Audit partner rotation– Audit firm rotation was discussed
Sarbanes-Oxley - 13
AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE
Audit Committee is directly responsible for oversight of external auditors
Auditor required to discuss– All critical accounting policies and practices– All alternative accounting and disclosure
treatments– Other material written communications
“Cooling – off” period– CEO, CFO, Controller, etc.
Sarbanes-Oxley - 14
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY & GOVERNANCE
Audit Committee = independent directors
Audit Committee has responsibility to appoint, compensate, and oversee public accounting firm performing the audit
Audit Committee has responsibility to resolve disagreements over financial reporting between management and external auditors
Audit Committee must establish “whistle-blower” procedures– New penalties for retaliation against them
Sarbanes-Oxley - 15
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY & GOVERNANCE
Requires executives and financial officers (CEO & CFO) to certify financial reports are accurate, complete and fairly presented
Also must certify the state of internal controls
Outlaws improperly influencing the auditor
Sarbanes-Oxley - 16
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY & GOVERNANCE
Reimbursement of bonuses and profits if public was misled
Removal of “substantial unfitness” standard Prohibits trading during a pension
“blackout” period Minimum standards for attorneys
– Both in-house and outside counsel Any reimbursed funds from guilty parties be
added to a fund for the benefit of victims
Sarbanes-Oxley - 17
ENHANCED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
Off-balance sheet arrangements and obligations
Prohibits loans to executives and directors
Insider trades within two business days
Adoption of code of ethics for senior financial officers and requirements
Whether at least one member of the audit committee is an “Audit Committee Financial Expert”
Sarbanes-Oxley - 18
Reconciliation of non GAAP revenue to most directly comparable GAAP measure
Requires management to establish and maintain adequate internal controls and report annually on:– Management’s responsibility for such– Effectiveness of such internal controls
Assessment of internal controls by management is to be subject of an attestation report by the external auditor
ENHANCED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
Sarbanes-Oxley - 19
PRIVATE COMPANIESWho Should Adopt SOX
May soon go public Contemplating a combination with
a public company Large Not-for-profit entities
– Audit committees becoming common Significant absentee owners Creditors may require SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley - 20
PRIVATE COMPANIESWhat parts of SOX?
More than internal controls Independent audit committees
– “Financial expert”– Compensation & funding of committee– Approval of nonaudit services
Certification of financial statements Codes of ethics Whistle-blower procedures and
protections
Sarbanes-Oxley - 21
CORPORATE AMERICAAfter SOX
Must have autonomous & vigorous audit committees– “Take charge”
Financial information is inherently judgmental– Financial statements are NOT precise– Users must appreciate this fact– FMV reporting will increase volatility– Non-financial disclosures will become more important– Auditors’ opinions on overall “fairness” of statements– Financial reporting should be as clear and concise as
possible
Committee for Economic DevelopmentMarch 28, 2006
Sarbanes-Oxley - 22
CORPORATE AMERICAAfter SOX
Give SOX (esp. 404) a chance to work– PCAOB has issued new guidelines– Learning curve effects
Excessive executive compensation can be tamed by Compensation Committees
Directors must be selected and appraised by independent nominating committees– Issue of Non-Executive Chair– Direct nomination by shareholders
Committee for Economic DevelopmentMarch 28, 2006
Recommended