View
213
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Competition Issues in Agricultural Marketing and Procurement in IndiaJyoti Gujral- IDFCPiyush Joshi & Anuradha R.V.- CLARUS LAW ASSOCIATES
February 16, 2011
• Inefficiencies in Agricultural Markets in India, primarily due to: ▫Undue State intervention in pricing, marketing
etc.▫Barriers to entry by private operators▫Bureaucracy at various levels of obtaining
licenses/ permits for different stages of activity
• Regulatory and Institutional Reforms to ensure robust functioning of markets and ensuring competition- a necessity
Some basic facts
2
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
X Our paper is not about how Competition Commission of India can intervene and resolve all that ails agricultural marketing and procurement systems in India
√ Our paper is about identifying a few critical issues in agricultural marketing and procurement, which may potentially
qualify as issues necessitating and justifying intervention by the Competition Commission of India
Threshold issue: Not everything an issue for the Competition Commission for India
3
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
Agricultural Marketing governed by Agricultural Produce Marketing Acts in different States in India Constitution of Agricultural Produce
Marketing Committees
Agricultural Procurement governed by the FCI Act in India
Focus of Discussions
4
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
Farmer
Pre-Harvest Contractor
Commission Agent/ Broker (Regulated by APMC)
Wholesaler (Regulated by APMC)
Retailer
Consumer
Chain in Agricultural Marketing
5
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
Theory•Regulation of Agricultural Produce markets•Access to Farmers to orderly regulated
markets
Practice•Exclusion of new entrants•Restriction of growth of agricultural
markets•Difficult terms for existing players•Monopolistic and Oligopolistic conduct
Role of APMCs
6
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
•Regulation of :▫Licensor/ Creator of market, and▫Regulation of participating entities
•Regulation of:▫Who can Farmer sell to▫Who can participate in the market▫Where are the markets to be established
•Price inefficiencies in procurement, storage, release and marketing of agricultural produce▫Any increase in price of agri commodities: 53%
for farmers, 31% for middlemen, 16% market costs.
Impact of APMCs
7
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
•Marketing only in ‘notified areas’; which is typically the whole state
•No marketing without APMC license possible in whole state
•Licenses to limited no. of wholesalers/ traders
•Imperfect competition in agricultural mandis
•No transparency in Licensing system
Anti-competitive effects
8
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
• Process of granting licenses- not transparent• Very few new entrants• Location specific licenses; limited scope for
expansion• Instances of arbitrary revocation of license• Variations in Duration of Licenses: In some
states, duration is only 1 year, which dis-incentivises investment in infrastructure
• Impact of Licensing terms: Inability to raise adequate commercial loans
• Only persons controlling and regulating system typically retain licenses
APMC Licenses
9
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
•Closed system; no transparency on price discovery etc.
•Open auction accounts only for 20-30% of market transactions; 40% through secret bidding
Role of Traders/ Commission Agents
10
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
•Limiting the market for farmers
•Preventing purchasers from accessing markets
•Preventing development of adequate infrastructure
•Preventing development of private markets
Anti-competitive impacts & APMCs
11
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
•FCI, estb. Under Food Corporation Act, 1964, is the nodal agency of GOI to undertake procurement under Minimum Support Price (MSP).
•Although MSP procurement is not the only procurement FCI undertakes, it is one of its more critical operations and is the focus of our paper
Food Corporation of India
12
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
•FCI MSP procurement is undertaken through state level agencies and cooperatives identified by the state government at identified purchase centers
•Generally majority of the identified purchase centers for MSP procurement are APMC markets leading to control of APMC licensed traders.
Food Corporation of India
13
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
• CCI’s Mandate:▫Anti-competitive Agreements
When these have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India
▫Abuse of Dominant Position
• Broad Jurisdiction:▫Includes jurisdiction over statutory entities and
Govt. authorities. (Only exception: when Govt. exercises ‘sovereign functions’)
Role of the Competition Commission of India
14
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
•Resolving Disputes (Adversarial situations)
•Competition Advocacy: a unique role to advocate principles of competition in various contexts; potential ability to initiate legislative reforms.
Role of the Competition Commission of India (cont’d)
15
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
•There is preliminary grounds for CCI to either:▫Commence full scale investigation by the DG
under the Competition Act▫If not a full investigation, commence studies
and surveys as a first step towards investigation
▫ take action based on complaints received▫Issue competition advocacy advisories to GOI,
State Governments and other government agencies on measures that can be initiated to remedy
Role of the Competition Commission of India (cont’d)
16
CLARUS LAWASSOCIATES
Recommended