Closing the Achievement Gap in Park City School District Nicole Todd, Ph.D. Special Education...

Preview:

Citation preview

Closing the Achievement Gap in Park City School

District

Nicole Todd, Ph.D. Special Education Coordinator

PC out-performs State

Spring 05 Spring 06 Spring 07 Spring 08 Spring 09 Spring 10 Spring 11 Spring 12 Spring 13 Spring 14 Spring 150%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Elementary Language Arts CRT

Park City State

% Proficient

PC out-performs comparable districts

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Elementary Language Arts CRT

District 1 PC District 2

% P

rofic

ient

Changing Demographics…

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

PCSD Annual Increase in Hispanic Students

# of

Hisp

anic

stud

ents

Elementary Schools 12-13

• School 1: 343 Total: 54% Hispanic, 48% FRL

• School 2: 590 Total: 24% Hispanic, 19% FRL

• School 3: 498 Total: 17% Hispanic, 12% FRL

• School 4: 528 Total: 14% Hispanic, 11% FRL

Are we happy with our data?

PC’s LEP students not outperforming state

Spring 05 Spring 06 Spring 070%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Elementary Language Arts CRT LEP students

Park City State

LEP not out-performing comparable districts

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-070%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Elementary Language Arts CRT LEP students

District 1 PC District 2

Disaggregated data revealed issues that needed to be addresses

• Bi-monthly meetings with Curriculum, Student Services, and Elementary Principals– Why the Achievement Gap?• Tier 1 Instruction varied widely• Instruction not aligned with best practice• “Your kids, my kids”• Too many interventions, providers, poor fidelity• Lots of resources were not solving the problem

The steps- Tier 1

• Grade Level Team Meetings• Comprehensive SIOP PD for all staff• Comprehensive SIOP PD for every

administrator and coach• SIOP model teacher cohorts

The steps- Tiers 2 & 3

• Interventions and the Problem Solving Model• Standard Protocol Committee• Track interventions in SIS

The steps- Additionally

• After School Programs• 6-week Summer School• Family Literacy• District-wide Preschool

Our Results…

• As a result of these efforts, we are seeing the data turn in the right direction.

LEP as compared to State Average

Spring 09 Spring 10 Spring 11 Spring 120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Language Arts CRT - Grades 3-5 LEP

State PC

% P

rofic

ient

PC LEP students exceeding comparable districts

Spring 09 Spring 10 Spring 11 Spring 120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Language Arts CRT - Grades 3-5 LEP

District 1 PC District 2

% P

rofic

ient

Currently…

Tier 1 Focus: Journeys, Math Adoption, SIOP PD

Tier 3 Focus: Reading InterventionsDistrict-wide Preschool

Tier 1 Focus:Journeys

Math AdoptionSIOP

Are we keeping kids at benchmark?

% of students at Benchmark BOY that are at Benchmark EOY

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%60%70%80%90%

100%

83%

94% 92% 94% 96% 94%99% 97%

90%

KINDER

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%60%70%80%90%

100%

86% 85% 83%77%

83% 86%91% 91%

85%

1ST GRADE

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

95%90%

94% 92% 93% 92% 92% 90% 92%

2ND GRADE

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

88% 90% 91% 90% 93% 90%99% 96% 97%

3RD GRADE

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

94% 96% 96% 95% 97% 96% 96% 97% 97%

4TH GRADE

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

93%97% 96% 97% 98% 98% 97% 97% 97%

5TH GRADE

Tier 3 Reading Interventions Established

Are we moving kids from intensive?

% of students at Intensive BOY that move out of Intensive at EOY

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-130%

20%40%60%80%

100%

56% 62%81%

69% 77%86% 94% 91% 92%

KINDER

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-130%

20%40%60%80%

100%

47%

26% 34% 28% 33% 30%

57% 50%59%

1ST GRADE

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 AVERAGE0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

29%

11% 11% 10% 6%

23%

53%

35%42%

2ND GRADE

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-130%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

37% 31% 35% 33% 35%21%

40% 44% 40%

3RD GRADE

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-130%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

33%45% 40% 42%

22%

42%52%

39%

63%

4TH GRADE

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-130%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

40%25% 31%

18% 22% 20%

40% 38%24%

5TH GRADE

District-wide Preschool Implementation

Preschool impacting KindergartenFewer kids entering at Intensive

09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13*0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

60%75%

40%28%

BOY Dibel's Kindergarten - Hispanic Students

Benchmark Strategic Intensive

Questions?

Nicole Stewartnstewart@pcschools.us

Recommended