View
213
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Class Actions and Mass Tort Litigation:Aggregative Justice in a Global Context
Professor Linda S. Mullenix
University of Trento, Italy
Introduction to Mass Tort Litigation
Questions
What is a mass tort litigation? What are the characteristics of mass tort
litigation? When did mass tort litigation first develop as
a litigation problem? Why do mass torts present a problem for the
judicial system? What are the problems of mass tort litigation? What possible solutions?
The Paradigmatic Original Mass Torts
Dalkon Shield Litigation Morton Mintz, At Any Cost: Corporate Greed,
Women, and the Dalkon Shield (1985) Asbestos Litigation
Paul Brodeur, Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial (1985)
Agent Orange Litigation Peter Schuck, Agent Orange on Trial: Mass
Toxic Disasters in the Courts (1986)
Other Mass Torts since 1980s Pharmaceuticals (drugs):
DES (pregancy drugs) Bendectin (thalidomide)(pregnancy drug Phen-fen (diet drugs) Baycol (statins for cholesterol) Vioxx (joint pain)
Medical Devices: Breast implants Pacemaker leads Hip replacements
Environmental pollution: Three Mile Island nuclear disaster Love Canal pollution
Structural building collapses
Characteristics of Mass Tort Litigation
Product involved? Defendant? Time period? Type of injury? Nature of Claimants (users)? Number of Potential Claimants? Location of Claimants? Problems with litigation? Defenses? Method of resolution?
Dalkon Shield: Characteristics as a Mass Tort
Product involved? IUD (contraceptive medical device)
Defendant? A.H. Robins (manufacturer; only defendant)
Time period? 1971 (on market) to mid-1970s (off market) U.S. sales halted in 1974 Finite pool of claimants
Type of injury? PID (pelvic inflammatory disease/death/sterility) No latent or longterm injury
Dalkon Shield: Characteristics as a Mass Tort
Nature of Claimants (users)? all women
Number of Potential Claimants? 4.5 million in 80 countries 2.86 million in U.S.
15,000 lawsuits filed by 1985 Estimates of 90,000 injured women
1.7 million abroad
Dalkon Shield: Characteristics as a Mass Tort
Location of Claimants? All over the world Dispersed throughout United States
Problems with litigation? Defenses? Defense strategy: aggressive investigation of women
claimants’ personal lives Strategy to have women drop lawsuits
Method of resolution? A.H. Robins bankruptcy
Asbestos: Characteristics as a Mass Tort
Product involved? Asbestos insulation products
Defendant? Multiple defendants Asbestos miners Asbestos manufacturers (40-50 companies)
Time period? Early 20th century forward (decades)/focus on 1940s
through 1990s
Asbestos: Characteristics as a Mass Tort
Type of injury? Asbestos exposure diseases (at least six types):
Lung cancers Asbestosis mesothelioma
Both current illness and latent long-term injury Nature of Claimants (users)?
Refinery workers Shipyard workers Any industrial worker exposed to asbestos School buildings
Asbestos: Characteristics as a Mass Tort
Number of Potential Claimants? 1970s-1980: 50,000 claimants 1990s: 0ver 100,000 claimants 2007: hundreds of thousands of claimants
Location of Claimants? Throughout U.S. (every state)
Problems with litigation? Defenses? All defenses eventually fail
Method of resolution? Bankrupcty; class litigation; group settlements
Agent Orange: Characteristics as a Mass Tort
Product involved? “Agent Orange” herbicide defoliant Used during Vietnam War
Defendant? Dow Chemical Company; seven corporate defendants United States government
Time period? Vietnam War (1960s through 1974) First lawsuit, 1978
Agent Orange: Characteristics as a Mass Tort
Type of injury? Various diseases; “Agent Orange” syndrome Cancers, birth defects, genetic defects
Nature of Claimants (users)? Vietnam War veterans (2.4 million veterans) Wives (spouses) of Vietnam veterans Children of Vietnam veterans 15,000 claimants in 600 actions filed 1970s-1980s
Number of Potential Claimants? Finite? Expanded?
Agent Orange: Characteristics as a Mass Tort
Location of Claimants? Throughout U.S., New Zealand, Australia
Problems with litigation? Defenses? Government sovereign immunity Corporate military contractor defense Weak science to show causal link to illness
Method of resolution? Class action settlement Agent Orange Fund
Questions
What similarities exist among these three seminal or original mass tort litigations?
What differences are there among these three examples?
Is bankrupcty an appropriate method for a defendant to resolve mass tort liability?
Is there a “paradigm” mass tort litigation?
Additional Mass Tort Litigation Concepts
Distinction between “mass accident” and “mass tort” litigation
Mass accident cases: Single site Single event Small numbers of claimants (few hundred at
most) Easy to resolve Examples: airplane crashes, train wrecks;
building collapses
Additional Mass Tort Litigation Concepts
Mass Tort Cases: Geographic dispersion (claimants in multiple
places or jurisdictions) Temporal dispersion (multiple claimants over
long time periods) Very large numbers of claimants (thousands,
hundreds of thousands, millions) Complex scientific and causation issues Examples: asbestos, drugs, medical devices
Additional Mass Tort Litigation Concepts
Concept of Life-Cycle of Mass Tort Litigation: Nascent or immature mass tort litigation
Litigation may or may not turn into a mass tort Evolving mass tort litigation
Increasing cases filed Plaintiffs win more victories; defendants lose Courts aggregate cases
Mature mass tort litigation Defendants lose most cases Scientific evidence is mature Settlement values established through verdicts or toher
settlements
Problems with Complex Mass Torts
Large numbers of individual cases clog courts Repeat litigation of common issues (duplicative
litigation) Great expense factor in litigating dispersed claims in
many different forums Inefficient use of resources
Attorneys, corporate officers, judicial officers Inconsistent judgments from multiple courts Delay of justice for persons in need of compensation Brings judicial system into disrepute
Working Definitions of Mass Torts
American Law Institute (1991): Salient defining characteristics of a mass
tort:(1) Numerous victims who have filed or might
file damage claims against the same defendant(s);
(2) Claims arising from a single event or transaction, or from a series of similar events or transactions spread over time;
Working Definitions of Mass Torts
(3) Questions of law and fact that are complex and expensive to litigate and adjudicate – frequently questions that are scientific and technological in nature;
(4) Important issues of law and fact which are identical or common to all or substantial subgroups of the claims;
(5) Injuries that are widely dispersed over time, territory, and jurisdiction;
Working Definitions of Mass Torts
(6) Causal indeterminacy – especially in cases involving toxic substance exposure– that precludes use of conventional procedures to determine and standards to measure any causal connection between the plaintiff’s injury and the defendant’s tortious conduct;
(7) Disease and other injuries from long delayed latent risks, especially in cases involving toxic substance exposure
Questions
How is this paradigm of mass tort litigation different than “ordinary” litigation?
What is the traditional model of Anglo-American litigation?
What is a bi-polar lawsuit? What is the “public interest law” model? Is mass tort litigation a new kind of “public
interest law”?
Litigation Models
Abram Chayes, The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation, Harv. L. Rev. (1976)
Description of traditional civil case:(1) Lawsuit is bipolar;
(2) Litigation is retrospective
(3) Right and remedy are interdependent
(4) Lawsuit is self-contained episode
(5) Process is party-initiated and party- controlled
Litigation Models
Prof. Chayes description of new public law model:(1) Process is sprawling and amorphous
(2) Litigation subject to change over course of litigation
(3) Process is suffused and intermixed with negotiating and mediating
(4) Judge is dominant figure ir organizing and guiding the case
(5) Ongoing judicial involvement in remedies
Final Question
Is mass tort litigation the “public interest” law of the late twentieth and twenty-first centuries?
Recommended