View
7
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
62nd Tobacco Science Research Conference
Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of Base Fractions Derived
from Cigarette Smoke Condensate (CSC)1 Lijia YANG, 2 Michael F. Borgerding, 2 William M. Coleman
III, 2 Betsy R. Bombick, 2 Jeremy B. Mabe, 2 Kathy P. Putnam, 1 Larry T. Taylor
1 Virginia Tech, 2 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
September 23rd, 2008Nashville, Tennessee
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Outline1. Research objectives2. Previous studies3. Fractionation schemes4. Biological activity (Ames & NRU) of CSC
fractions5. Chemical composition of CSC fractions6. Summary
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Research Objectives - Mutagenicity1. Identify constituents of mainstream
cigarette smoke that are (a) mutagenic (b) anti-mutagenic, or (c) not active in the Ames Salmonella assay
2. Determine the relative contribution of the active constituents to the aggregate mutagenicity observed for the complex mixture (i.e. cigarette smoke)
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Research Objectives - Cytotoxicity3. Identify constituents of mainstream
cigarette smoke that (a) are cytotoxic, (b) mitigate cytotoxicity, or (c) are not active in the neutral red uptake assay
4. Determine the relative contribution of the active constituents to the aggregate cytotoxicity observed for the complex mixture (i.e. cigarette smoke)
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Lee C.K., Munoz J.A., Fulp C., Chang K.M., Rogers J.C., Borgerding M.F., Doolittle D.J.
Mutation Research 322, 21-32, 1994
◼ CSC exerts a significant inhibitory effect on mutagens requiring bio-activation
◼ CSC fractionated into neutral, weakly acidic, acidic, and basic fractions
◼ Fractions were effective as anti-mutagens against Glu-P-1, a representative heterocyclic amine
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Lee C.K., Munoz J.A., Fulp C., Chang K.M., Rogers J.C., Borgerding M.F., Doolittle D.J.
Mutation Research 322, 21-32, 1994
Fraction Mass (%) Ames* (%)
CSC 100.0 100.0
N1 23.8 4.2
N2 3.5 5.6
B1 2.1 2.7
B2 1.3 11.1
A1 1.0 0.0
A2 2.2 0.3
InP 6.8 15.8
Recovery 40.7 39.8
CSC 1R4F
Hexane Soluble Hexane Insoluble
Hexane
Neutrals (N1, N2)
Base (B1)
Base (B2)
Acids (A1, A2)
Insoluble (InP)
* TA98 + S9
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Muto H., Honjo K., Yoshida S., Higashi N. et al., CORESTACongress, Paris, 2006
◼ Methanol, diethyl ether, water and cyclohexanewere used as solvents for extraction and separation
◼ Freeze drying and water extraction resulted in loss of Ames activity
2R4FCSC
MethanolSolubles
MethanolInsolubles
Diethyl EtherInsolubles (DEI)
Diethyl EtherSolubles (DES)
1. Dried
2. Diethyl Ether (DE)
MeOH
62% Ames Activity 21% Ames Activity
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
CSC Collection◼ AMESA Type 1300C smoke generator
◼ 2R4F Kentucky reference cigarettes
◼ Standard Federal Trade Commission (FTC) smoking conditions
◼ Cigarette smoke was delivered to a CSC cold-trapping system with a temperature range from -10C to -70C
◼ Condensate was kept frozen at -20C, and then was extracted from the trap by rinsing with high-purity acetone
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Initial Diethyl Ether (DE) Fractionation Scheme – This Study
CSC
DE PhaseInsoluble Residue
HCl Aqueous Phase
B-DE Aq.Phase
1. NaOH (2N), adjust pH to 112. Diethyl Ether (DE) 3. Dichloromethane (CH2Cl2)4. Ethyl Acetate (EtOAc)
1. Diethyl Ether (DE)2. HCl (0.5N)
1.NaHCO3 (5%)
2.NaOH (0.5N)
NaHCO3 Phase NaOH Phase DE Phase
1.HCl (2N) to pH 2
2.Diethyl Ether (DE)
1.HCl (2N) to pH 2
2.Diethyl Ether (DE)
Strong Acids (SA) Weakly Acids (WA)
Hexane 2% EtOAc/Hexane(E/H) 5% E/H Methanol
Florisil
10%E/H 25%E/H 50%E/HN1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 N7
B-CH2Cl2
200 mL solvent for each fraction
B-EtOAc
Neutral Fraction (NF)
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Precaution1. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) is a preservative
in diethyl ether (6-10 ppm)
2. Observed in all our fractions
3. Interferes with efforts (GC-MS) to identify components in individual fractions
4. Reported to be anti-mutagenic or non–mutagenic
• Y. Yoshida, Mutation Research, 242, 209-217, 1990
5. Are Ames results influenced by presence of BHT in the fractions?
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Final Methyl t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) Fractionation Scheme – This Study
CSC
MTBE PhaseInsoluble Residue
HCl Aqueous Phase
B-MTBE Aq.Phase
1. NaOH (2N), adjust pH to 112. Methyl t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 3. Dichloromethane (CH2Cl2)4. Ethyl Acetate (EtOAc)
1. Methyl t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)2. HCl (0.5N)
1.NaHCO3 (5%)
2.NaOH (0.5N)
NaHCO3 Phase NaOH Phase MTBE Phase
1.HCl (2N) to pH 2
2.Methyl t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)1.HCl (2N) to pH 2
2.Methyl t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
Strong Acids (SA) Weakly Acids (WA)
Hexane 2% EtOAc/Hexane(E/H) 5% E/H Methanol
Florisil
10%E/H 25%E/H 50%E/HN1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 N7
B-CH2Cl2
200 mL solvent for each fraction
B-EtOAc
Neutral Fraction (NF)
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Biological Assays• Ames Mutagenicity Assay
◼ TA98 +S9◼ Preincubation ± S9 activation (5%)◼ Methodology in accordance with OECD Guideline 471
• Neutral Red Cytotoxicity Assay
◼ 24 hr. exposures
◼ Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells
◼ Methodology recommended by ICCVAM (Interagency
Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative
Methods)
◼ Results expressed as EC50: effective concentration of test sample that damages and/or kills 50% of the cells
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Ames Assay Results: MTBE Fractions
0
400
800
1200
1600
Am
es R
eve
rta
nts
/m
g
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Comparison of Ames Activity with DE versus MTBE FractionationDE (with BHT) MTBE (without BHT)
Fraction
Ames TA98
with S9 (Rev/mg)
Weight%
Weighted Revertants
(WR)Fraction
Ames TA98 with
S9 (Rev/mg)
Weight%
Weighted Revertants
(WR)
CSC* 634 100.0 634 CSC* 634 100.0 634Base-
DE 1,772 6.4 113 Base -MTBE 1,681 6.2 104
Base-CH2Cl2
1,831 3.0 55 Base -CH2Cl2
1,213 2.1 25
Base-EtOAc NA 0.6 NA Base -
EtOAc 649 0.3 2
Neutral 517 27.3 141 Neutral 536 31.3 168WA 404 16.2 65 WA 102 3.5 4SA 74 2.3 2 SA 79 1.6 1
* CSC was assayed “as is” without either DE or MTBE extraction.
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Recovery of Ames Activity vs. Recovery of Mass
(MTBE Fractions)
WR: Weighted Revertants
303 634
WA)SANFBBWR(B CSC EtOAcClCHMTBE 22
==
+++++
48%100634
303(Ames)Recovery ==
55%(mass)Recovery =
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Recovery of Ames Activity vs. Recovery of Mass
(DE Fractions)
WR: Weighted Revertants
376 634
WA)SANFBWR(B CSC22ClCHDE
==
++++
59%100634
376(Ames)Recovery ==
66%(mass)Recovery =
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Potential Sources of Lost Ames Activity
• Insoluble precipitate • Discarded aqueous phases• Volatile compounds lost during nitrogen
purge• Compounds irreversibly sorbed on the
Florisil stationary phase
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
NRU Assay Results: MTBE Fractions
0
40
80
120
160
NR
U E
C5
0(µ
g/m
L)
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
EC50 From Neutral Red Uptake Cytotoxicity Assay versus CSC Fraction
FractionsDE (With BHT)
(µg/mL)
MTBE (Without BHT)
(µg/mL)
CSC* 65.0
Base-DE/MTBE 37.1 69.7
NF 57.5 41.6
SA 68.6 84.0
WA 74.4 53.4
* CSC was assayed “as is” without either DE or MTBE extraction.
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Chemical Identification of Base Fraction Components
GC-MS Conditions
◼ Columns: DB-Waxetr (polar), DB-1701 (mid-polar), DB-1 (non-polar) , 30m x 0.25mm x 0.25m (J&W Scientific)
◼ Temperature programs: 1. 50C (1 min) 5C /min to 150C, 3C /min to 255C (10 min); 2. 37C (2 min) 2.5C /min to 255C (10 min)
◼ Helium flow: 1 mL/min◼ Injector temperature: 250C .◼ GC/MS interface temperature: 260C◼ Electron Impact mode ◼ MS scan range: 29-450 amu
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Components Identified In Base-MTBE Fraction versus Reported Ames Activity
1 Name in bold font indicates the compound was identified by both mass spectral and retention time match with authentic standard2 CCRIS: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/ , 3 NA: Not available in CCRIS
Name1 Reported Ames 2
Nicotine -2,3'-Bipyridine + Myosmine NA 3
1H-Indole-2-acetonitrile, 1-methyl- NANorharmane -Harmane +?Nornicotine NATriacetin -Piperidine, 1-methyl-2-(3-pyridyl)- NA4-Hydroxy-benzeneethanol NA4,4'-Bipyridyl + Nicotyrine NA1,2-Benzenediol + Pyridine, 3-phenyl- NA4-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone -4-Methyl-pyrrolo(1,2-A)Pyrazine NA
Name1 Reported Ames 2
Pentanamide, 4-methyl- NAAnabasine NA1H-Benzimidazole, 2-methyl- NA2-Ehyl-6-methyl-3-hydroxy pyridine NAQuinoline + Quinoline, 8-methyl- + Pyridine, 3-methyl- -Pyridine -1-Acetyl-beta-carboline NAPyridine, 3-ethenyl- -Pyridine, 2-methyl- -Quinoline, 4-methyl- + Pyridine, 3-butyl- NAFurfural + Corylone NA2-Furanmethanol -
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Components Identified In Base-MTBE Fraction versus Reported Ames Activity (cont.)
1 Name in bold font indicates the compound was identified by both mass spectral and retention time match with authentic standard
2 CCRIS: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/3 NA: Not available in CCRIS
Name1 Reported Ames 2
4-Methylthio-2-butanone NA3
2,3-Dimethylcyclopent-2-en-1-one NAIsoquinoline -2-Propanone, oxime -2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-methyl- -Thiazole, 4,5-dimethyl- NAQuinoline, 2,6-dimethyl- NAPyridine, 3-ethyl- NAPyridine, 2,4-dimethyl- NAOxazole, trimethyl- NAMethional -2-Pentenal, 4,4-dimethyl- NAPyridine, 2-ethyl- NAThiocyanic acid, methyl ester NAAetonitrile, (dimethylamino)- NA
Name1 Reported Ames 2
Cyclopentanone NA3-Penten-2-one NA2-Methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one NAQuinoline, 5-methyl- NAQuinoline, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro- NAQuinoline, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro- NAPyridine, 2,6-dimethyl- NAPyridine, 2,3-dimethyl- NA3-Penten-2-one, 4-methyl- NA2-Acetyl-pyridine -Pyridine, 4-methyl- -Pyrazine, 2,6-dimethyl +3-Acetylpyridine NAPyrazine, 2-methyl- -3-Methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one NA
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Summary – Activity Found by Fraction
◼ MTBE Solvent: Base fractions exhibited the highest Ames mutagenic activity (rev/mg); Neutral fractions exhibited the greatest cytotoxicity
◼ DE Solvent: Base fractions exhibited the highest Ames mutagenic activity (rev/mg); Base fractions exhibited the greatest cytotoxicity
◼ The recovery of Ames activity for CSC fractions was about 50-60% of whole CSC
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Future Research◼ Determine biological activity of identified
compounds in base fractions◼ Spike identified compounds into base
fractions and CSC to assess potential antimutagenic activity and cytotoxicity mitigation potential
◼ Ascertain chemical composition and biological activity of neutral sub-fractions
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Acknowledgement
◼ This research was supported by a gift from R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
◼ Dr. Lijia Yang was selected as an RJRT-Harold McNair Fellow in 2007
2008
_TS
RC
40_Y
angL
ijia.
TS
RC
2008
(62)
- D
ocum
ent n
ot p
eer-
revi
ewed
Recommended