View
218
Download
1
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Characterization of a Geiger-mode Avalanche Photodiode
aRochester Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical and Microelectronic Engineering; bRochester Imaging Detector Laboratory
May 10, 2011
ObjectiveThe objective of this project was to extract key parameters that will allow for effective and efficient operation of a Geiger-mode avalanche photodiode (APD) array in a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) imaging system.
ObjectiveThe objective of this project was to extract key parameters that will allow for effective and efficient operation of a Geiger-mode avalanche photodiode (APD) array in a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) imaging system.
MotivationLIDAR imaging systems can be used for a variety of applications. The most common is altimetry. Measuring the altitude of an object can be useful for observing celestial bodies, polar ice caps or ocean levels. In addition, this imaging system can be implemented in autonomous landing systems.
MotivationLIDAR imaging systems can be used for a variety of applications. The most common is altimetry. Measuring the altitude of an object can be useful for observing celestial bodies, polar ice caps or ocean levels. In addition, this imaging system can be implemented in autonomous landing systems.
Geiger-mode OperationAPDs can be operated in linear-mode or Geiger-mode. Geiger-mode operation means the diode is biased at or just above the breakdown voltage of the device. This ensures single-photon sensitivity of the device.
Geiger-mode OperationAPDs can be operated in linear-mode or Geiger-mode. Geiger-mode operation means the diode is biased at or just above the breakdown voltage of the device. This ensures single-photon sensitivity of the device.
Array TestedA 32x32 array of 100 µmsilicon Geiger-mode APDs was designed and fabricated at MIT’sLincoln Laboratories. The Rochester Imaging Detector Lab(RIDL) was given the responsibilityto test and characterize the array.
Array TestedA 32x32 array of 100 µmsilicon Geiger-mode APDs was designed and fabricated at MIT’sLincoln Laboratories. The Rochester Imaging Detector Lab(RIDL) was given the responsibilityto test and characterize the array.
Camera Design
Requirements• Light tight• Allow for thermoelectric cooler• Mountable lens for imaging• Connector interface for existing hardware• Probeable hardware without disassembly
Camera Design
Requirements• Light tight• Allow for thermoelectric cooler• Mountable lens for imaging• Connector interface for existing hardware• Probeable hardware without disassembly
AfterpulsingAfterpulsing occurs when an event is seen during a timing gate, and the dead time before the next timing gate is not long enough to account for the discharge of trapped charge. A false event will be seen.
AfterpulsingAfterpulsing occurs when an event is seen during a timing gate, and the dead time before the next timing gate is not long enough to account for the discharge of trapped charge. A false event will be seen.
ResultsResults
ConclusionsIt was expected to see the results that were measured in the afterpulsing experiment. From the forward diode characteristic, no recombination/generation region was seen, implying that there are a minimal amount of traps in the device. Either there are no traps in the device or the lifetime makes the peak too shallow to see or so steep that it occurs before the shortest dead time. RIDL now has the means to test for afterpulsing in devices that MIT will be sending them in the coming months.
ConclusionsIt was expected to see the results that were measured in the afterpulsing experiment. From the forward diode characteristic, no recombination/generation region was seen, implying that there are a minimal amount of traps in the device. Either there are no traps in the device or the lifetime makes the peak too shallow to see or so steep that it occurs before the shortest dead time. RIDL now has the means to test for afterpulsing in devices that MIT will be sending them in the coming months.
AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Dr. Figer, John Frye, Dr. Rommel, Dr. Pearson and Dr. Hirschman for their help during this project. This work has been supported by NASA grant NNX08AO03G.
AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Dr. Figer, John Frye, Dr. Rommel, Dr. Pearson and Dr. Hirschman for their help during this project. This work has been supported by NASA grant NNX08AO03G.
Fig. 1. Enhanced LIDAR image of Mars (Image Credit: MOLA Science Team and G. Shirah, NASA GSFC Scientific Visualization Studio).
1
10
100
M
Breakdown0
Ordinary photodiode
Linear-mode APD
Geiger-mode APD
Response to a photon
M1 ∞ I(t)
Fig. 2. Comparison of photodiode operation (Image Credit: Dr. Don Figer).
Fig. 3. Actual array of Geiger-mode APDs.
Fig. 4. CAD camera design (left); actual fabricated camera (right).
AfterpulseAPD current
APD bias
Timing gate
Laser-induced firing
Varm
tdead
trap
dead
trap
ftadarkdead
tNPRt
exp)(
Fig. 5. Waveform demonstrating afterpulse test.
λ(tdead) – Dark count rate with respect to dead timeRdark – Dark count rate measured without afterpulsingPa – Avalanche probabilityNft – Number of filled trapsτtrap – Trap lifetimetdead – Dead time
Eq. 1. Dark count rate with respect to dead time.
•Ideality factor of n = 1.0•No recombination/generation region•Series resistance ~2 kΩ
Fig. 6. Measured forward diode characteristic.
•Breakdown voltage ~32 V•Geiger-mode operation ≥ 32 V
Fig. 7. Dark count rate vs. bias.
Fig. 8. Theoretical afterpulsing. Fig. 9. Measured afterpulsing.•Short trap lifetimes show a steep peak•Long life times exhibit a shallow peak•Deep level traps have long lifetimes and have a minimal effect on afterpulsing
•No afterpulsing is seen
Fig. 10. Complete LIDAR system ready for imaging.
Chris Maloneya Advisors: Dr. Don Figerb, Dr. Rob Pearsona, Dr. Sean Rommela
Recommended