Chapter 12 INTRODUCTION TO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, THIRD CANADIAN EDITION by John Hunsley and Catherine...

Preview:

Citation preview

Chapter 12

INTRODUCTION TO CLINICAL

PSYCHOLOGY, THIRD CANADIAN EDITION

by John Hunsley and Catherine M. Lee

• Questions

• Does psychotherapy work?

• Meta-analysis and psychotherapy research

• Evidence-based treatment

• Clinical practice guidelines

• Examples of evidence-based treatments

• Effectiveness trials

• Adoption of evidence-based treatments

• For next class

Overview

Clinical experience;

case accounts; narrative reviews of

uncontrolled studies

Meta-analyses of overall effects of

psychotherapy

Meta-analyses of treatments

for specific disorders and subgroups of

clients

Does psychotherapy work?

• Proponents of psychodynamic and eclectic therapy make claims based on clinical experience and case examples

• Eysenck (1952) reviews uncontrolled studies and concludes effects are poorer than no-treatment

• Validity of the conclusion?– What about equivalence of groups pre-treatment?

Initial Evaluation

• Inclusion of studies based on explicit criteria

• Effect size: d and r– d = .4 indicates a difference between groups of two-fifths of a standard

deviation

– d = .4 indicates that 66% of patients in treated group score below the mean of untreated participants

• Takes sample size into account, so small studies influence findings less than do large studies

Meta-Analysis & Psychotherapy Research

• Smith & Glass (1977)

• d = .68

• Average person receiving treatment was better off at the end of treatment than 74% of those who did not get treatment

Overall Effects of Psychotherapy

Garbage out

Unreliable conclusion

Meta-analysis

Garbage in Methodologically weak studies

Criticisms of Early Meta-Analyses

• It is not reasonable to include different constructs, measures and informants in the meta-analysis

Criticisms of Early Meta-Analyses (2)

• Like any statistical procedure, it has become more refined as developers respond to criticisms and problems

• d comparing a treatment to no treatment will almost always be larger than d comparing two active treatments

• Hoffman et al. (2012): 269 meta-analyses published since 2000 on the efficacy of CBT

• Quality of the meta-analysis depends on the methodological decisions made by meta-analyst

Meta-Analysis

• Initiatives

• Controversies

Evidence-Based Treatments

• Early 1990s, APA, Society for Clinical Psychology task force lead by Dianne Chambless

• Established criteria for designating a treatment as efficacious or probably efficacious, including demonstration of improvement in RCT, controlled single case experiment or time series design

• 1995 report

• 1998 special issue of Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology

• More stringent criteria than for ‘evidence-based’

Empirically Supported Treatments

• Scientific soundness

• Impact on clinicians

Criticisms of EST Initiatives

• Australia & New Zealand: Quality Assurance Project

• Germany: Access to services with an evidence base

• United Kingdom: Roth & Fonagy

• United States: Nathan & Gorman

International Efforts on Evidence-Based Psychological Services

• Available for most common mental disorders; fewer for personality disorders

• CBT

• Process-experiential

• Interpersonal

• Psychodynamic

Evidence-Based Psychological Treatments

• American Psychological Association, 2006

Integration of best available research evidence and clinical expertise within the context of patient values and preferences

• Canadian Psychological Association, 2012

Emphasis on (a) published, peer reviewed research to inform treatment options and (b) use of ongoing monitoring of treatment effects

Task Forces on Evidence-Based Practice

• PsycINFO

• Cochrane Collaboration: www.cochranelibrary.com

• National Guideline Clearinghouse: www.guideline.gov

• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: http://www.ahrq.gov/

• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: www.nice.org.uk

• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration: www.samhsa.gov

Searching for Evidence

• Interdisciplinary

• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (USA)

• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK)

• Institut national d’excellence en santé et services sociaux (Quebec)

• Disciplinary

• Canadian Psychiatric Association

Clinical Practice Guidelines

• CBT for depression

• Prolonged exposure for PTSD

• EFT for couple distress

Examples of Evidence-Based Treatments

• Assessment– Diagnosis and comorbidity

– Life circumstances: relationships & social functioning

– Resources and strengths

– Recent precipitating events and stressors

• Information on depression

• Case formulation

• Treatment options

CBT for Depression: Phase 1

•Behavioural activation

•Altering negative automatic thoughts

•Altering dysfunctional beliefs

CBT for Depression: Phase 2

• Self monitoring to identify patterns

• Scheduling pleasant activities

Behavioural Activation

Examining Cognitions: Thought log

Situation What I did How I felt What I thought

• Gathering data

• Carrying out experiments

Challenging Cognitions

• I am not good at anything

• I do not deserve to be in a relationship

• If bad things happen to me, I must deserve them

Longstanding Beliefs

• Review gains & new skills

• Anticipate challenges

• Prepare for future stressors

Phase 3: Relapse Prevention

• Effectiveness studies key to evaluating whether evidence-based treatments work well in routine clinical settings

• Evidence to date, both for the treatment of depression (Hans & Hiller, 2013) and anxiety disorders (Stewart & Chambless, 2009), indicates effectiveness of CBT interventions

• Increasing use of a benchmarking strategy of drawing data from empirical studies to provide a comparison against which the effectiveness of clinical services can be gauged

Effectiveness Trials

• Relatively slow uptake of training in EBTs in many clinical psychology training programs (e.g., Weissman et al., 2006)

• For both clinicians and clinical psychology trainees, research support for a treatment appears to be important in determining whether to provide a treatment, but may not be the most important determinant

• Eating disorder treatment example– Previously many clinicians had no training in EBTs (Mussell et al., 2000)

– More recently, use of EBTs appears to have increased, but a significant minority refuse to provide these treatments (von Ransom et al., 2013)

Adoption of Evidence-Based Treatments

• US Department of Veterans’ Affairs– Roll out of treatments for

• PTSD• Insomnia• Depression

– Training & supervision

– Monitoring

• Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (UK)– train new therapists in evidence-based treatments (2 for depression & at least 1 for

an anxiety disorder)

– Stepped care with low intensity & regular services

– In 2013 two-thirds of those treated through IAPT services showed reliable improvement

– www.iapt.nhs.uk

Efforts to Disseminate Evidence-Based Treatments

For next class…

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Access Copyright (The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency) is unlawful. Requests for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his or her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The author and the publisher assume no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.

All clipart courtesy of Microsoft.com

Copyright Notice

Recommended