Carbon Storage & Low Energy Intensity in Harvested Wood Products

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Presentation by Jim Bowyer, Dovetail Partners, at the Blandin Foundation sponsored Forest Values and Carbon Markets: Opportunities for Minnesota conference. February 25-26, 2009 at the Cloquet Forestry Center, Cloquet MN

Citation preview

Carbon Storage and Low Energy Intensity in Harvested Wood

Products: Critically Important in Developing a Rational Carbon Trading

Policy

Current carbon protocols under the Kyoto accord award credit only for establishment of new

forests on previously non-forested land.

Current carbon protocols under the Kyoto accord award credit only for establishment of new

forests on previously non-forested land.

However, proposed rules would provide credit (and payments) for “avoided deforestation.”

However, proposed rules would provide credit (and payments) for “avoided deforestation.”

The potential for reduced carbon emissions through use of wood rather than more energy intensive non-renewable alternatives is also gaining recognition.

The potential for reduced carbon emissions through use of wood rather than more energy intensive non-renewable alternatives is also gaining recognition.And carbon storage is likely to become an important issue in the green bldg movement.

Material

Net Carbon

Emissions (kg C/metric ton)

Framing lumber 33

Medium density fiberboard (virgin fiber)

60

Brick 88

Glass 154

Recycled steel (100% from scrap)

220

Concrete 265

Concrete block 291

Recycled aluminum (100% recycled content)

309

Steel (virgin) 694

Plastic 2,502

Aluminum (virgin) 4,5321/ Values are based on life cycle assessment and include gathering and processing of raw materials, primary and secondary processing, and transportation. 2/ Source: USEPA (2006).

Net Carbon Emissions in Producing a Ton of: 1/ 2/

Dimension lumber wood

joist floor

Concrete slab floor

Steel joist floor

Total 9.93 24.75 48.32

Consumption of Fossil Fuels (MJ/ft2) Associated with Three Floor

Designs

Source: Edmonds and Lippke (2004)

Results of a Life-Cycle Inventory of a Large Office

Building Construction

Total Energy Use*

Above Grade Energy Use*

CO2 Emissions**

Wood 3.80 2.15 73

Steel 7.35 5.20 105

Concrete 5.50 3.70 132

Source: Athena Sustainable Materials Institute (1997)

* GJ x 103

** kg x 103

Building Element

Type of Exterior Wall

Lumber-Framed

Wall

Concrete Wall

Structural components 6.27 75.89

Insulation 8.51 8.51

Cladding 22.31 8.09

Total 37.09 92.49

Total Consumption of Fossil Fuels (MJ/ft2) Associated with Two

Exterior Wall Designs in a Warm Climate Home

Source: Edmonds and Lippke (2004)

CaCO3 CaO + CO2

limestone Δ lime carbon dioxide 2700°F

Production of Cement – Energy Intensive and a Major Source of

Carbon Emissions

Material

Net Carbon

Emissions (kg C/metric ton)

Framing lumber 33

Medium density fiberboard (virgin fiber)

60

Brick 88

Glass 154

Recycled steel (100% from scrap)

220

Concrete 265

Concrete block 291

Recycled aluminum (100% recycled content)

309

Steel (virgin) 694

Plastic 2,502

Aluminum (virgin) 4,5321/ Values are based on life cycle assessment and include gathering and processing of raw materials, primary and secondary processing, and transportation. 2/ Source: USEPA (2006).

Net Carbon Emissions in Producing a Ton of: 1/ 2/

Material

Net Carbon Emissions (kg

C/metric ton)

Net Carbon Emissions Including Carbon Storage

Within Material (kg C/metric ton) 3/

Framing lumber 33 -457

Medium density fiberboard (virgin fiber)

60 -382

Brick 88 88

Glass 154 154

Recycled steel (100% from scrap)

220 220

Concrete 265 265

Concrete block 291 291

Recycled aluminum (100% recycled content)

309 309

Steel (virgin) 694 694

Plastic 2,502 2,502

Aluminum (virgin) 4,532 4,5321/ Values are based on life cycle assessment and include gathering and processing of raw materials, primary and secondary processing, and transportation. 2/ Source: USEPA (2006).3/ A carbon content of 49% is assumed for wood.

Net Carbon Emissions in Producing a Ton of: 1/ 2/

Carbon Dioxide Implications of

Forest Growth and Wood Use

Carbon Dioxide Implications of

Forest Growth and Wood Use

Tree growth sequesters considerable quantities of carbon

Dry wood is 49% by weight carbon. For each pound of carbon stored:

3.7 pounds of carbon dioxide are removed from the atmosphere

2.7 pounds of oxygen are produced Carbon is stored in the soil, the litter,

and in the trunks, branches, twigs, leaves, and roots of trees.

Carbon Dioxide Implications of Forest Growth and Wood

Use

Cumulative Changes in Carbon Stocks in Soil, Forest Litter, and

Standing Trees After Afforestation

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Time (Years)

Cum

lula

tive

Car

bon

(tC/h

a)

Source: Marland and Schlamadinger (1999)

SoilLitter

Trees

Cumulative Changes in Carbon Stocks with Afforestation and

Subsequent Harvest After 40 Year Rotation

020406080

100120140160180

0 7

14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91 98

Time (Years)

Cum

ulat

ive

Car

bon

(tC/h

a)

SoilLitter

Trees

Source: Marland and Schlamadinger (1999)

The production of wood products can add significantly to stocks of stored carbon . . . especially when products have a long service life.

Homebuilding Activity in the United States in the 20th

Century

0

5

10

15

20

25

'10s '20s '30s '40s '50s '60s '70s '80s '90s

Million

s o

f U

nit

s

U.S. housing inventory 2000: 116 million units.

Cumulative Changes in Carbon Stocks with Afforestation and

Subsequent Harvest After 40 Year Rotation

020406080

100120140160180200

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Time (Years)

Cum

ula

tive C

arb

on (

tC/ha)

Long-lived productsTreesLitterSoil

Source: Marland and Schlamadinger (1999)

Projected Change in Carbon Stocks in Ontario’s Forests,

2000-2100

050

100150200

250300350

400450

FMU PFL MeasFMZ

Parks WdProd

TotForest

2000-2020

2000-2050

2000-2100

Mill

ion

metr

ic t

on

s of

carb

on

Source: Colombo, S., Chen, J., and Ter-Milkaelian, M. 2007.

While some wood may be land-filled following processing, wood residues are more commonly burned to produce process steam or electricity.

Also, when wood products, rather than products made from alternative materials, are manufactured and used, emissions of carbon dioxide are minimized.

The use of wood, therefore, results in “carbon storage” in that emissions of carbon are less that what would otherwise have been produced.

Cumulative Changes in Carbon Stocks with Afforestation and Subsequent Harvest After 40 Year Rotation

0

50

100

150

200

2500

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Time (Years)

Cu

mu

lati

ve C

arb

on

(tC

/ha)

Avoided Fossil FuelsLandfillShort-lived productsLong-lived productsTreesLitterSoil

Source: Marland and Schlamadinger (1999)

t Carbon

Summary

Neither carbon storage in wood nor avoided greenhouse gas emissions resulting from use of wood rather than alternative materials are considered in global carbon protocols.

The omission is serious, as both factors have a substantial impact on carbon storage and flux.

Whatever carbon protocol we adopt in Minnesota must, at a minimum, account for carbon storage in wood products.

Recommended