Canadian Fire Safety Academic Capabilities and Education ... · Fire Safety Education in Canada...

Preview:

Citation preview

Canadian Fire Safety Academic Capabilities and Education Programs

Professor Beth Weckman

University of Waterloo Fire Research Group

In this presentation

▪ Where are we today?

Fire science and engineering as fields

Canadian outlook

▪ expertise, infrastructure, education

Global snapshot

▪ education

▪ Opportunities and frameworks

▪ Conclusions

Components of Fire Science

▪ Chemistry

▪ Fluid Dynamics

▪ Heat Transfer

▪ Materials

▪ Structures

Real Fires Interactions

…multi-disciplinary…

Fire Safety Engineering

▪ relatively young discipline

▪ rapidly emerging and changing field

▪ scientific advances often ‘piecemeal’

▪ occur in response to tragedy

The Challenges

▪ must address complex problems

▪ broad, interdisciplinary, many stakeholders

▪ demographics – many experts retiring 3 -10 yrs

Stakeholders

▪ many backgrounds, levels of knowledge

▪ many philosophies and cultures

… particularly with push to go global…

… have to remember we …

▪ share many common goals

▪ all play key roles - design, operations, safety

▪ have to do our best to maintain dialogue

To advance we must blend…

6

Science, Technology, Experience

are we doing this?

…Fire Safety Education in Canada…

Fire Safety Education in Canada

Linked with research

▪ broad base of expertise, isolated groups

▪ greatly expanded infrastructure over past 20 years

▪ federal/provincial/industry funding - limited

….the challenges

▪ funding often industry specific not ‘base’ funding

▪ some areas of research/education not addressed

▪ fire fighter safety, aging, new energy sources, climate change, etc

▪ hard to capitalize on funding

Fire Safety Infrastructure

▪ large installations: >$15M federal/province

▪ Dalhousie University

▪ University of Waterloo

▪ University of Alberta

…NRC, industry, government labs

Dalhousie: Dusts/Explosion

Waterloo Fire Research Facility

▪ 3,975 ft2, 4+ storey test enclosure, 2 storey burn house

▪ Six 72” fans with plenum

▪ Crosswind:

• up to ~ 12 m/s

• 20 ft x 26 ft outlet

▪ Small-scale test rigs

▪ Integrated with fire training complex

11

Alberta: Clothing/Field/Wildfire

Fire Safety Infrastructure

▪ many smaller research specific labs

▪ Memorial, ETS, Laval, Concordia, Lakehead,

Queens, UOIT, York, Toronto, Saskatchewan,

Lethbridge, UBC and others…

▪ collaborative efforts in lab and field

Saskatchewan: Cross Canada Collaboration

Canadian University Expertise

▪ covers wide range of fire safety issues

▪ explosions, industrial fires, risk

▪ tunnels, buildings, infrastructure, structures

▪ forest, wildland fires

▪ products, protective clothing

▪ experiments, testing and modeling

BUT….

experts often not identified as ‘fire safety’

need hybrid concepts-cases approach

Canadian Undergrad Education

▪ Individual ELECTIVE courses

▪ Co-op work internships, design projects

MemorialDalhousieCarletonLakeheadQueensTorontoYorkWaterlooWesternSaskatchewanAlbertaUNBCUBCBCIT….

Canadian Graduate Programs

▪ Fire safety or fire protection engineering

▪ MASc, PhD and MEng programs

▪ individual courses and certificates

▪ first program: UBC MEng – closed down

▪ Waterloo: multi-institution (late 2000’s)

▪ Carleton: single institution (late 2000’s)

▪ engineering faculty: ‘fire safety’ research

College and PD Programs

▪ Colleges

▪ Pre-service Fire for fire fighter training

▪ Fire and Life Safety Systems

▪ Fire Science, Management, Leadership

▪ Professional Development

▪ many backgrounds/levels of education

▪ many organizations provide ‘training’

▪ many organizations certify ‘training’

…How do we compare in education?

FSE Education in USA

….facing similar challenges

▪ Undergraduate, graduate: University & College

▪ Two original engineering programs

▪ Maryland and Worcester Polytechnic

▪ Now 7 - 10 FPE programs and growing

▪ California Polytechnic State, Case Western, Lawrence Tech, New Haven, St. Thomas, Eastern Kentucky (FPSET), Oklahoma

▪ Another 25+: one course; other fire programs

….facing similar challenges

• Undergraduate, graduate - University

– 5 well known programs

• Cantebury, Hong Kong Polytechnic, Queensland, State Key Lab of Fire Science, Tokyo University of Science, Western Sydney,

• Undoubtedly more with multiple courses

– Many: one course; other fire programs

• Kyoto, UTokyo, Victoria, China UMT, NTUSingapore, India (NAFS, UPES, CUSAT)

FSE Education in Austral-Asia

….facing similar challenges

• Undergraduate, graduate: University

– Thirteen programs

• Ghent, Karlsruhe, Lulea, Lund, Stord Haugesund, DTU, Ulster, U. Cantabria, UP Comilas, Coimbra, Edinburgh, Greenwich, Leeds, Wuppertal

• Likely several more with multiple courses

– Another 10+: one course; other fire programs

• Glasgow Caledonian, Central Lancashire, London South Bank, Imperial College,

FSE Education in Europe

FSE Education in Europe

….very strong collaborative program

IMFSE Erasmus Mundus Program

▪ 2-year full time Masters programme

▪ EU funding - three universities

▪ Ghent University (Belgium)

▪ Lund University (Sweden)

▪ The University of Edinburgh (UK)

▪ Partners for theses: University of Queensland (Australia), ETH Zürich (Switzerland), The University of Maryland (USA)

…No matter the place must mesh…

Theory and Practice, Research & Education

Science, Design and Engineering ▪ fundamentals: fire science,

engineering, critical analysis, modeling, statistics

▪ field fire behaviour

▪ fire protection & life safety technologies, investigation

▪ codes and standards

▪ materials, fire performance testing

▪ concepts, case studies, design, skills, practical issues

Science, Design and Engineering

▪ human behaviour

▪ health and safety, toxicity, emissions

▪ risk and loss prevention

▪ wildland fires, industrial fires, explosions

▪ operational issues

▪ fire department, inspections, emergency planning,

disaster management, joint events

…wealth of fire safety options…

…A Canadian SWOT in brief

Strengths

• world class research infrastructure distributed across Canadian universities

• active, leading edge researchers in fire safety science and engineering

Weaknesses

▪ lack of funding to support infrastructure – staff, faculty, operations

▪ unable to attract enough HQP

▪ lack of coordinated collaboration and partnerships amongst all stakeholders

Threats

• loss of existing infrastructure, programs and opportunities due to

• low recognition of worth (not buzz-word research - hard to compete/grow)

• lack of time and funding (cannot keep up and capitalize on opportunity to grow)

Opportunities

• establish cross-Canada network to combine strengths and excel globally

• capitalize on available research opportunities (and new ops)

• train next generation of qualified fire safety professionals

…Future of Fire Safety Research and Education…

Professional Certification

Basic TrainingPre-entry Level, Skills Training

University OptionPrograms

Certificate, Diploma Programs

Advanced CertificationContinuing Education

Update and UpgradeExtension Courses

Professional DevelopmentSeminars

Multi-faceted Fire Safety Training

Certificate ProgramsSpecialty Aras

Professional Development

Forge Links through All Stakeholders

▪ AHJ key partner in education/research

▪ wealth of experience

▪ identify challenges

▪ practical design issues

▪ bring field know-how

▪ many opportunities

…experience largely untapped

To advance we must develop…

▪ effective communication at all levels

▪ gather and interpret scientific information

▪ two way transfer technology-experience

▪ a collaborative approach

▪ engineers, scientists, fire service, authorities

▪ internal and international partnerships, global trade

▪ research, education and training for changing professional needs

ALL working TOGETHER!

Conclusions

▪ the many fire safety stakeholders

▪ do blend science, technology, experience

▪ are developing new educational pathways

▪ partnerships across stakeholders will lead to

▪ more educational opportunities

▪ innovative technical advancements

▪ research ideas and shared facilities

Conclusions

▪ we need to develop common goals to

▪ new avenues for technology transfer

▪ enhance cross-stakeholder dialogue

▪ reap mutual benefits by working together

▪ the future holds

many exciting, new opportunities for

fire safety at all levels!

Thank you!

Recommended