View
220
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
1/39
1 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
IMT NagpurPGDM 2009-2011
Feasibility of a Tea Experience Retail in Nagpur
Final Report
Date of Submission: 26th March, 2010
Group: 5
Section: D
Submitted By:
Satyam Joshi 2009223
Rahul Thakur 2009206
Sarita Bhutani 2009222
Rani Treasa Joseph 2009209
Revati Naik 2009211
Sampath R 2009253
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
2/39
2 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
CONTENTS:
1. Introduction.32. Research Methodology83. Questionnaire Design .124. Data Analysis.. .16Annexure 1 .32
Annexure 2... .35
Bibliography .38
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
3/39
3 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Introduction
Contents:
1. Introduction2.
Problem to be studied3. Background of the problem
4. Research gap identified from past research5. Relevance of the studyoutcome of the research project6. Limitations of the study
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
4/39
4 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
1. IntroductionThe world's largest producer of tea, India is a country where tea is popular all over as a breakfast
and evening drink. It is often served with milk and sugar, and is sometimes even scented with
spices.
A research on the tea consumption behavior is highly significant since in a culture of mainstream
commercialism where a retail tea outlet has the scope of turning into the next happening
teenage hangout. A specific research on the attitudinal and perceptive study of a tea experience
provider in Nagpur provides a replicable model for many Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities. Further, the
concept of a tea experience stall or a tea hangout is not well conceived as of now, as compared
to that of Caf Coffee day, Barista or any other caf chains around the country - despite the fact
that India is the world's largest tea-drinking nation.
2. Problem to be studiedTo check the feasibility of the idea of a tea junction that provides an exclusive tea experience in
Nagpur.
3. Background of the problem3.1. Scope
The scope of the research will include identifying the feasibility of an exclusive tea
experience at a tea junction.
The problem statement as mentioned above cites an opportunity that can be exploredsuccessfully especially in an as yet untapped market like Nagpur. However for the
success of this Agro processing venture, extensive and systematic research regarding the
possible existence of a demand and the viability of the idea is a must. The process must
begin with the question: is it feasible to make this product, will it possibly attractrepeated visits from a Customer, can we make money from such a venture and, if so,
how much?
Without market research there is a risk that consumers might not need or want theproduct, or might not like it or the way it is packaged and presented.
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
5/39
5 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
3.2. Market ResearchIt will focus on the following aspects:
Secondary research for retrieving the existing product details and consumer attitudes tothose products
Primary research involving questions to identify the opinions and expectations which would involve a perceptional and attitudinal study of the respondents regarding the
attractiveness of the idea among these prospective customers.
3.3. Market Trend The world's largest producer of tea, India is a country where tea is popular all over as a
breakfast and evening drink where per capita consumption of tea is almost 701 grams(2008 Tea Board of India) and is very popular amongst all sections of the Indian
society.
Furthermore in a recent study commissioned by the Tea Board of India, Maharashtra hasemerged as the Indian state that consumes the most tea.
In such a scenario of a definitive demand, research on the viability of setting up a teajunction is worth an extensive study.
4. Research gap identified from past researchExisting Research data related to Tea retail were identified as following, quoting its major sources:
Source 1:
1. Yearly Production and area wise consumption of Tea
2. Tea and Health
3. National Tea Research Foundation (NTRF) on biotechnical aspects of tea
4. Tea Research Association on distribution channels
5. DTR & DC on Net work program on automation and integration in manufacture of tea.
6. Development of technology for product diversification and value added items in tea.
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
6/39
6 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Source 2
1. Database of tea types, qualities and content
2. Research on Development of technology for product diversification and value added
items of tea: namely, like: Tea tablets of different taste and flavor, canned tea (soft drinks)
from different sources developed for commercialization, flavored instant tea, Herbal tea,
decaffeinated tea, Confectionary items like tea toffee and candy, tea biscuits, tea cakes.
3. Categorization of tea on the basis of its flavor % by weight of Vanillin, Cardamom,
Ginger, Bergamot, Lemon, Cinnamon, Mixture of flavors.
Source 3:
1. Current Retail, Total, Food service Sales of Tea: by % Volume, Growth, by Sector,Distribution Format and by Rural-Urban %.
2. Forecasted Retail, Total, Food service Sales of Tea: by % Volume, Growth, by Sector,Distribution Format and by Rural-Urban %
3. Penetration of Private Label by Sector 2004-2008Source 4:
1.
Consumption growth, Tea drinking population growth, price, global demand, Domesticdemand-supply Per capita consumption growth.
2. Industry structure, Size of the industry, Industry segmentation, Industry characteristics,Products and process, Product classification and Market classification.
3. Domestic branded tea market - Growth in the packaged tea market, Key brands, Playermarket shares, Player strategies in the branded tea market.
The historical research has the followinggaps which this project proposes to address:
1. Taste preferences of the Indian consumer of Tea in a Tiered 2 city like Nagpur2. Attitudinal and perceptive study of the Nagpur Respondent on the different flavors/
product varieties proposed to be offered
3. Attitudinal and perceptive study of the Nagpur Respondent on the tea experienceproposed to be offered
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
7/39
7 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
5. Relevance of the studyoutcome of the research projectThe main objective of the study is to gauge the feasibility of a tea boutique in Nagpur. The research
would concentrate on various aspects as listed below
To identify the expectations of the Respondent s with regard to the product which wouldgive us a lead on the kind of products to develop
To evaluate the different options available in developing the product. Data regarding the various segments of the market based on the demographic characteristics Establish the attitude of the Respondent s towards different varieties of tea across different
sectors of the Respondent s.
This research data can be used by the retailers to develop their products and position their products
across segments based on the demographics and various psychographic characteristics.
6. Limitations of the studyThe following are the Limitations of the Study:
1. Lack of disciplinary knowledge:The attitudinal and perception study which is proposed to be conducted would require high
level of disciplinary knowledge of the psychological aspects of human attitude andperception
2. Time:Considering the magnitude of the research which can be carried out in the project, a time
period of 3 months is considerably short for deriving an extensive study outcome.
3. Budgetary constraints:Gathering and processing data can be very expensive.
4. Reliability of the data:The value of any research findings depend critically on the accuracy of the data collected.
Data quality can be compromised via a number of potential routes, e.g., leading questions,
unrepresentative samples, biased interviewers etc.
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
8/39
8 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Research Methodology
Contents:
1. Research methods2. Sampling plan3. Measurement scales4. Hypothesis
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
9/39
9 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
1. Research methods:
1.1. Exploratory Research TechniqueExploratory research is basically used when there is relatively limited amount of knowledgeabout the given research topic. In this case, the introduction of a tea junction is a new
concept, hitherto unexplored in Nagpur. The data got will mostly be from secondary sources
regarding similar outlets in different parts of the country. Therefore the exploratory research will
aid in diagnosing the situation, screening product alternatives and go a long way in discovering
new ideas about peoples perceptions regarding the tea junction.
The following are the exploratory research methods identified:
1.1.1. Primary Data Collection Technique:i. Pilot Survey
This technique involves data collection in the form of a questionnaire from a pilot/small
group of respondents. The questionnaire includes both open-ended as well as close-
ended questions in order to glean/extract information regarding the respondents
perception of a tea experience, their preferences, likes and dislikes with regard to the
topic under research.
Advantages of using Surveys:
i. They are relatively inexpensive (especially self-administered surveys)- Can becarried out at different tea shops or in front of CCDs or coffee house.
ii. Consequently, very large samples are feasible, making the results statisticallysignificant even when analyzing multiple variables. Like the attitude towards
the theme of opening such a tea junction, how they will like it to be etc.
iii. Standardized questions make accurate measurements possibleiv. Usually, high reliability is easy to obtain and relatively lower response error
1.1.2. Secondary Data Collection technique
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
10/39
10 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
The secondary data like the annual tea consumption, varieties of tea and their quality,
health benefits and the state wise production can be obtained from the website of Tea
Board of India. This is especially useful in clarifying issues in the early stages and
providing a platform for further research.
2. Sampling planSampling Technique:
Convenience Sampling:
In Nagpur the nearby colleges or malls will give us a good amount of respondents. The
researcher using such a sample cannot scientifically make generalizations about the total
population from this sample because it would not be representative enough. Howeverthis type of sampling is most useful for pilot testing where we can get good response
rates from individual passers-by and relatively more accurate and complete responses to
the questionnaire.
3. Measurement scalesScaling Technique
- Nominal ScaleNominal scale is used for the demographic and Hang out pattern questions
- Likert ScaleHere a statement is made and the respondents indicate their degree of agreement or
disagreement on a five point scale. Once the attributes have been identified a batch of
samples would be prepared and the group would be asked to rate the samples individually.
This method will help in identifying the attitude of the consumers towards the individual
samples and a balanced scale would be chosen for the group to rate the samples on.Depending on the ratings we can identify those samples which are preferred the most. We
can also gauge the attitude towards the samples across different sectors which could be later
used to position the product across different segments. The likert scale is most effective in
extracting information related the respondent perceptions.
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
11/39
11 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
4. HypothesisThe following is the Hypothesis to be studied:
Hypothesis:There exists a significant positive attitude and perception for the Respondent s of
Nagpur towards the idea of an exclusive tea experience.
Significance: Will Prove/disprove that the consumers of Nagpur favor the idea of a tea
junction provide an exclusive tea experience.
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
12/39
12 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Questionnaire Design
Contents:
1. Preliminary Decisions2. Design3. Response format4. Question Sequence
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
13/39
13 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Questionnaire Design
The questions emphasized on the feasibility, and being an exploratory pilot survey, it had to
accommodate a considerable number of descriptive questions.
1. Preliminary Decisions:a. Objectives:The questionnaire is framed around 4 sub- objectives of the main feasibility
objective, which are:
1. To obtain the demographics to obtain the respondent profiling2. To obtain the current Hangout Place pattern of the respondents3. To obtain the Attitude towards the different features offered at the tea junction4. To obtain the perceptions about the exclusive tea experience
b. Target respondents:College students and Mall goersc. Method of communication:Email survey, Personal: Mall Intercept
2. Design:a. Question ContentPart 1: Demographics
S. No. Question Significance(s)
1 Name Identification of the respondent
2 Gender Demographics of the respondent
3 Income Demographics of the respondent
4 Profession Demographics of the respondent
5 Marital Status Demographics of the respondent
Part 2: Hang-Out pattern
S. No. Question Significance(s)
1
Awareness of the
concept
The Profile of respondent
- Whether aware of the concept
-Whether has a preconception of the idea
-Whether has experienced the concept previously
2Time spend in a tea
hangout venue
Hangout pattern of the respondent
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
14/39
14 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
3Amount spend in a
tea hangout venue
Hangout pattern of the respondent
4With whom the visit
happens
Hangout pattern of the respondent
Part 3:Attitude towards the features offered
S. No. Question Significance(s)
4Importance of 12
listed feature
Provides the attitude of the respondents towards the
importance of the features mentioned
5Importance of 4 add-
on features
Provides the attitude of the respondents towards the
importance of the features mentioned
6Amount spend in a
tea hangout venue
Hangout pattern of the respondent
Part 4: Perceptions about the exclusive tea experience
S. No. Question Significance(s)
7
Chances that the
respondent becomes
a regular visitor
The overall perception of the customers about the new
idea
8
Few words that occur
at the thought of an
exclusive tea
experience
Direct Perception evaluation.
Thoughts and different perceptions created in the mind
of the Respondent
9
Difference of the new
concept from the
previously existing
ones
Direct Perception evaluation.
Thoughts and different perceptions created in the mind
of the Respondent
Expectations of the Respondent
10Least favored aspect
about the concept
Direct Perception evaluation.
Thoughts and negative perceptions created in the mind
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
15/39
15 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
of the Respondent
11
Most favored aspect
about the concept
Direct Perception evaluation.
Thoughts and Positive perceptions created in the mind
of the Respondent
12Adjectives on
Different Tea Types
Perception about specific products
3. Response formatPart 1: DemographicsFill in the blanks/ Multiple Choice
Part 2: Hang-Out pattern- Multiple Choice
Part 4: Perceptions about the exclusive tea experienceLikert Rating Scale
Part 3:Attitude towards the features offeredDescriptive
4. Question SequenceThe sequence of the questions is in the order of increasing complication.
Demographics (direct answers) > Hang out pattern (current information) > Perceptions (Thought
creating, but rating scale) > Attitude (Full thought mapping through Descriptive questions)
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
16/39
16 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Data Analysis
Content:
1. Current Hang out Pattern Analysis2. Perception Analysis: Feasibility of the New Idea3. Perception Analysis: Significant Features(factors) of the New idea4. Attitude Analysis : General5. Attitude Towards The Kind Of Items Planned To Offer
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
17/39
17 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
1. Current Hang out Pattern AnalysisCross Tab Analysis
Correspondence analysis is a descriptive/exploratory technique designed to analyze simple two-
way and multi-way tables containing some measure of correspondence between the rows and
columns.
The cross tab is evaluated on the basis of:: Pearson Chi-square. This tests the statistical
significance. A chi-square probability of .05 or less is interpreted as a justification for rejecting
the null hypothesis that the row variable is unrelated to the column variable.
In all the following tables, we see that the value of Pearsons coefficient is high, the value of df
(degree of freedom) low and the 2-sided significance level below 0.05.
This implies that there is a high association between the following survey items.(The below given test results are the ones where the significance has been tested and has come p > 0.05)
1.1. Analysisof Cross Tabulationa. GenderTimeCount
Time
Total1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00
Gender Male 6 30 27 6 69
Female 6 9 21 9 45
Total 12 39 48 15 114
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.958a 3 .047
Likelihood Ratio 8.195 3 .042
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.448 1 .118
N of Valid Cases 114
Here, we observe that majority of males(30) would like to spend 15-30
minutes while majority of females(21) would like to spend 30-60 minutes
at a tea junction.
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
18/39
18 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
b. Rs SpentTimeCount
Time
Total1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00
RsSpent 1.00 12 18 6 3 39
2.00 0 18 24 12 54
3.00 0 3 18 0 21
Total 12 39 48 15 114
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)Pearson Chi-Square 50.341a 6 .000
Likelihood Ratio 55.810 6 .000
Linear-by-Linear
Association
19.525 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 114
People willing to spend up to Rs 50 per visit, would stay for 15-30
minutes. People willing to spend send above Rs 50 would stay for 30-60
minutes. This probably implies that the duration of time spent is
positively related to the amount of money people will spend.
c. RsSpentPrevAwarenessCount
PrevAwareness
Total1.00 2.00
RsSpent 1.00 15 24 39
2.00 33 21 54
3.00 18 3 21
Total 66 48 1
Chi-Square Tests
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
19/39
19 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 12.938a 2 .002
Likelihood Ratio 13.818 2 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 12.814 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 114
Here we see that people who are previously aware of a similar concept are willing to
spend more.
2. Perception Analysis: Feasibility of the New IdeaOne-Way ANOVA
Descriptive Statistics of the Total Data:
Age N MeanStd.
DeviationStd.
Error
95% ConfidenceInterval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLowerBound
UpperBound
50 16 3.1250 1.02470 0.25617 2.5790 3.6710 1.00 5.00 Total 114 3.5263 1.04932 0.09828 3.3316 3.7210 1.00 5.00
This table shows the age of the respondents and their perceptions about importance of menu
pricing, the number of respondents corresponding to the age, the mean and standard deviation of
the responses. The responses range from a value of 1-5, where 1-least important; 2-not so
important; 3-neutral; 4- important; 5-most important. This table shows that the age-group 36-50
considers the menu pricing as least important and the age group greater than 50 years
a. ANOVASum ofSquares df
MeanSquare F Sig.
Between Groups 10.852 4 2.713 2.604 0.040
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
20/39
20 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Within Groups 113.569 109 1.042
Total 124.421 113
The Sig value or P-value less than 0.05 signify that the Null hypothesis is rejected in this case againand hence the factor or independent variable Age has significant impact on the dependent variable
Importance of Menu pricing.
b. MANOVAIndependent Variable: Question 7, Probability of becoming a regular customer
Dependent variables: Question 8, Ratings of the features
Table: Feasibility (factor)
Other variables (dependent variable)
Sum ofSquares df
MeanSquare F Sig. Interpretation
Importanceof Service
BetweenGroups
19.934 4 4.984 8.726 0.000Sig
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
21/39
21 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
GoodAmbience
BetweenGroups
14.481 4 3.620 3.925 0.005Sig
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
22/39
22 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
3. Perception Analysis: Significant Features(factors) of the New ideaFactor Analysis
Factor Analysis: Round 1
(Note:NOT using Communalities to select Factors, using component Matrix)
Variable Key
Variable Name Variable Description
ImpQofServ Importance of Quality of Service
ImpHygiene Importance of Hygiene
ImpPromptServ Importance of Promptness of Service
ImpStaff Importance of Professionalism and friendliness of Staff
ImpQofFood Importance of the Quality of Food
ImpAmbience Importance of the Ambience
ImpSeating Importance of the Interiors and seating
ImpMenupricing Importance of Menu Pricing
ImpVarietyTea Importance of Variety of Tea
ImpVarietySnacks Importance of Variety of Snacks
ImpLocation Importance of Location
ImpAddOns Importance of Add-ons
Analysis Table 1: Descriptive Statistics
Variable Name Mean Std. Dev N Interpretation
ImpQofServ 4.4474 .85282 114 Mean is Close to Important
ImpHygiene 4.6316 .93376 114 Mean is Close toVery Important
ImpPromptServ 3.8684 1.03491 114 Mean is Close to Important
ImpStaff 3.7895 .92625 114 Mean is Close to Important
ImpQofFood 4.7105 .76104 114 Mean is Close toVery Important
ImpAmbience 3.8684 1.00893 114 Mean is Close to Important
ImpSeating 3.6842 1.00719 114 Mean is Close to Important
ImpMenupricing 3.5263 1.04932 114 Mean is Close to No difference
ImpVarietyTea 3.7105 1.10288 114 Mean is Close to Important
ImpVarietySnacks 3.4737 .99743 114 Mean is Close to No difference
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
23/39
23 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
ImpLocation 3.4474 .99638 114 Mean is Close to No difference
ImpAddOns 2.9737 1.22987 114 Mean is Close to No difference
Analysis Table 2: KMO and Bartlett's Test
Interpretation
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .782 >than 0.5, sample adequate
Bartlett's Test of
Sphericity
Approx. Chi-Square 825.914
Df 66
Sig. .000
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
24/39
24 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
2 1.447 12.061 59.605 1.447 12.061 59.605
3 1.070 8.920 68.525 1.070 8.920 68.525
4 .896 7.469 75.995
5 .756 6.297 82.292 Interpretation:
6 .548 4.570 86.861 3
7 .476 3.968 90.829 Components
8 .327 2.725 93.554 For Factors
9 .285 2.375 95.929 Generated
10 .226 1.887 97.817
11 .181 1.510 99.327
12 .081 .673 100.000
Analysis Table 4: Component MatrixComponent
Selection of Factors1 2 3
ImpQofServ .728 -.174 .387 Component> .7, Selected
ImpHygiene .771 -.405 .139 Component> .7, Selected
ImpPromptServ .573 -.412 -.140 Component .7, Selected
ImpQofFood .808 -.268 .305 Component> .7, Selected
ImpAmbience .775 .103 -.354 Component> .7, Selected
ImpSeating .771 .112 -.266 Component> .7, Selected
ImpMenupricing .468 -.409 -.359 Component
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
25/39
25 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Analysis Table 1: KMO and Bartlett's TestInterpretation
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .850 >than 0.5, sample adequate
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 513.137
Df 21Sig. .000
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
26/39
26 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
1 single component
ImpQofServ .772 Component value> .7, Selected
ImpHygiene .835 Component value> .7, Selected
ImpStaff .809 Component value> .7, Selected
ImpQofFood .833 Component value> .7, Selected
ImpAmbience .794 Component value> .7, Selected
ImpSeating .773 Component value> .7, Selected
ImpLocation .741 Component value> .7, Selected
All the factors selected for Significance.
4. Attitude Analysis:Analyzing the descriptive questions:
Technique used: Language Processing Technique
The most repeated ideas/ perceptions are plotted on a Pareto chart to quantify the
importance of that particular attitude towards the new concept.
Question 8: Write down a few words that occur to you when you think of an exclusive tea experience?
The most import Overall perception of the customers: Different Experience
28
1716
15
119
8 87 7
54 4 4 4 4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Frequencyof the Word/ Idea: Question 8
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
27/39
27 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Question 9:How will an exclusive tea experience be different from the current hangout venues?
Most important differences: Unique and Cheaper Prices
20
1413
109 9
76
5 5 54 4
0
5
10
15
20
25
Frequencyof the Word/ Idea: Question 9
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
28/39
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
29/39
29 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Question 11: What did you like the most about the concept?
Most important Positive perceptions:
1. The expectation of Variety of Tea2. Expectation of Good Ambience
27
20
17
11
9
76
4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Variety oftea
GoodAmbience
One morehangout
place added
Low risk Can't say Exclusiveexperience
Interesting New concept
Frequency of the Word/ Idea: Question 11
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
30/39
30 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
5. Attitude Towards The Kind Of Items Planned To OfferQuestion 12:
Write an adjective that you relate to the tea beverage that is described below:
1. Niche Category Items: Amaretto Tea Tangerine Tea Darjeeling Black Tea White tea
Adjective Frequency using, Language Processing Technique:
Positive adjectives, like Delicious, exotic, refreshing contribute maximum to the total frequency.
An overall Positive Attitude can be perceived in the responses.
2. Natural/ Refreshment items: Moroccan mint tea Green Tea Jasmine Tea
35
27
2119 18
12 11 119
7 7 6 6 6 65 4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Frequency of the Word/ Idea: Question 12
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
31/39
31 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Adjective Frequency using, Language Processing Technique:
Positive adjectives, like Healthy, refreshing, exotic, contribute maximum to the total frequency.
A High degree of Positive Attitude can be perceived in the responses.
40
32
24
14 1311
6 6 5 5 5 4
05
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Frequency of the Word/ Idea: Question 12
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
32/39
32 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Annexure 1: Code Book
SlNo
Name of theVariable
Type Width Variable Description ValuesMissing
ValuesMeasurement
1 Name String 16 Name of the Respondent None -
2 Gender Numeric 8 Gender {1.00, Male}, {2.00, Female} None Nominal
3 Age Numeric 8 Age{1.00, 50 years}
NoneNominal
4 Family Income Numeric 8 Family Income{1.00, 50 lakhs}
NoneNominal
5 Profession String 17 Profession None None
6 MaritalStatus Numeric 8 Marital Status{1.00, Unmarried}, {2.00, Married
without Children}, {3.00, Married withChildren}
NoneNominal
7 PrevAwareness Numeric 8 Previous Awareness of the Idea {1.00, Yes}, {2.00, No} NoneNominal
8 Time Numeric 8Time liked to be spent in a Teaboutique
{1.00, 60 mins}
NoneNominal
9 RsSpent Numeric 8 Rupees spent in a Tea boutique{1.00, 250 Rs.}
NoneNominal
10 ImpQofServ Numeric 8Importance of the Quality ofService
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None Ordinal
11 ImpHygiene Numeric 8 Importance of Hygiene
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
12 ImpPromptServ Numeric 8 Importance of Prompt Service
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
33/39
33 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
13 ImpStaff Numeric 8 Importance of Staff
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
14 ImpQofFood Numeric 8 Importance of the Quality of Food
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
15 ImpAmbience Numeric 8 Importance of the Ambience
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
16 ImpSeating Numeric 8Importance of the Interiors andSeating
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
17 ImpMenupricing Numeric 8 Importance of the Menupricing
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
18 ImpVarietyTea Numeric 8Importance of the Variety of Teaavailable
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
19 ImpVarietySnacks Numeric 8 Importance of the Variety ofSnacks
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, Less
Importance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
20 ImpLocation Numeric 8 Importance of the Location
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
21 ImpAddOns Numeric 8 Importance of Add-ons
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
34/39
34 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
22 AddonImpBGMusic Numeric 8Importance of the Add-on, BackGround Music
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
23 AddonImpLivePerf Numeric 8Importance of the Add-on, LiveMusic Performance
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
24 AddonImpLib Numeric 8 Importance of the Add-on, Library
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
25 AddonImpWLIC Numeric 8Importance of the Add-on,Wireless Internet conectivity
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
26AddonImpPartyRooms
Numeric 8Importance of the Add-on, PartyRooms
{1.00, Least Important.}, {2.00, LessImportance}, {3.00, Unimportant},{4.00, Important}, {5.00, VeryImportant}
None
Ordinal
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
35/39
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
36/39
36 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Question 4
With whom would you prefer to visit such a place?
Friends Family Colleagues Girlfriend/Boyfriend
Question 5
How much importance do you assign to the following features (Tick beneath the rating, 5Most
important, 1Least important)?
Rating1Leastimportant
2 3 45-Most
Importanta. Quality of serviceb. Hygienec. Promptness of serviced. Professionalism and friendliness
of staffe. Freshness/quality of foodf. Ambience/Dcorg. Seating arrangement and Lightingh. Menu pricingi. Variety of teaj. Variety of Snacksk. Locationl. Quality of servicem.AddonsQuestion 6
Rate the following Add-ons according to the importance assigned to them
Rating1Leastimportant
2 3 45-Most
Important
a. Background musicb. MiniLibraryc. Wireless Internet connectivityd. Party room/ arrangements
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
37/39
37 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
Question 7
If an Exclusive tea outlet opens up at Nagpur, what are the chances that you will become a regular
visitor of the place?
Highly Probable Mostly Probable Probable Mostly Improbable Highly Improbable
Question 8
Write down a few words that occur to you when you think of an exclusive tea experience?
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
Question 9
How will an exclusive tea experience be different from the current hangout venues?
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
Question 10
What did you like the least about the concept?
__________________________________
__________________________________
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
38/39
38 Group 5/BRM/ Final Report/ Section D/IMT-N/2009-11
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
Question 11
What did you like the most about the concept?
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
Question 12
Write an adjective that you relate to the tea beverage that is described below:
1. Amaretto Teacontains Added Almond liqueur to hot tea and topping with whipped cream______________
2. Tangerine Tea Made with black or orange pekoe tea and freshly squeezed juice withoptional addition of peach brandy or peach schnapps
______________
3. Jasmine TeaEnjoy this very floral Green Tea and experience why it is Chinas favorite andmost consumed exotic tea. Jasmine is harvested in the afternoon and stored until evening
when its fragrance is at its fullest.
______________
4. Green tea The freshness of tea with all possible health benefits______________
5. Moroccan mint tea This exotic tea consists of Chinese Gunpowder tea (high quality GreenTea hand rolled into small pellets) and the flavors of Spearmint and Peppermint.
______________
6. White teaThe combination of White Teas Yin Zhen buds and Ginger Root produces adelicate aromatic exotic tea with zest. White tea and Ginger is a wonderful combination and
this tea is often called The Pleasure of the Orient.
______________
7. Darjeeling Black tea Darjeeling Black Tea is considered the champagne of teas. Light incolor and thin-bodied this gourmet tea has a muscatel flavor and a slightly astringent after
taste. There are seasonal differences to note.
______________
8/9/2019 BRM Report PGDM'10
39/39
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Tea Board of India- 54th ANNUAL REPORT 2007-2008,www.tocklai.net- A report by PricewaterhouseCoopers for IBEF- Fast Moving Consumer Goods CRISIL (A-Ii CRISIL RESEARCH TEA ANNUAL
REVIEW)
http://www.tocklai.net/http://www.tocklai.net/http://www.tocklai.net/http://www.tocklai.net/Recommended