BRIC and MINT countries’ environmental impacts rising ...€¦ · per capita, and (c)...

APPENDIX

BRIC and MINT countries’ environmental impacts rising despite alleviative

consumption patterns

Laura Scherera,*, Arjan de Koning

a, Arnold Tukker

a,b

a Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

b Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), The Hague, Netherlands

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: l.a.scherer@cml.leidenuniv.nl

Additional figures

Fig. A1. Environmental impacts of Russia. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts per

capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue

indicates water footprints.

Fig. A2. Environmental impacts of India. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts per

capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue

indicates water footprints.

Fig. A3. Environmental impacts of China. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts per

capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue

indicates water footprints.

Fig. A4. Environmental impacts of Mexico. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts

per capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue

indicates water footprints.

Fig. A5. Environmental impacts of Indonesia. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts

per capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue

indicates water footprints.

Fig. A6. Environmental impacts of Nigeria. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts

per capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue

indicates water footprints.

Fig. A7. Environmental impacts of Turkey. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts

per capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue

indicates water footprints.

Fig. A8. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in Brazil.

Fig. A9. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in Russia.

Fig. A10. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in India.

Fig. A11. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in China.

Fig. A12. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in Mexico.

Fig. A13. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in Nigeria.

Fig. A14. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in Turkey.

Fig. A15. Projection of environmental impacts by Brazil.

Fig. A16. Projection of environmental impacts by Indonesia.