Biodata of speakers and presenters

Biodata of speakers and presenters

The President of APQN

Ms. Concepcion Pijano Ms. Concepcion Pijano

Concepcion V. Pijano is the Executive Director of the Federation of Accrediting Agencies of the Philippines (FAAP) and the Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges and Universities. She has worked in the field of academic accreditation since 1978 and has shared her experiences and expertise in accreditation with various institutions, both local and international. She has served as a consultant for accreditation and quality assurance to a number of countries/territories in the Asia-Pacific region. At present, she is the adviser and consultant for quality assurance to the newly established Accreditation Committee of Cambodia. She also serves as an accreditation specialist and resource person for the Apex Bodies Training on Performance Benchmarking in Southeast Asia. She has authored several manuals and tools for accreditation, and presents papers in both regional and international conferences. She earned her Master's degree in Public Administration at Pace University in New York, U.S.A.

Bhutan

Brunei

Maldives

Russia

..

Membership: 61 members from 26 countries and 7 observers from 5 countries

CONCEPCION V. PIJANOPresident, Asia-Pacific Quality Network

Executive Director, PAASCU

CAPACITY BUILDING FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE:

LESSONS LEARNED

Founded in Hong Kong in January 2003.

Current host: Shanghai Educational Evaluation Institute (SEEI)

Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA): 2003 – March 2009

Fairy Godmothers: The World Bank and UNESCO

The Asia Pacific Quality Network(APQN)

Development Grant Facility

In 2004, APQN became the first network to receive a 3-year World Bank Development Grant Facility (DGF) to strengthen its institutional capacity and the technical capacity of its member organizations.

Global Initiative for Quality Assurance Capacity (GIQAC)

a partnership between World Bank and UNESCO launched in March 2008 to support capacity building in quality assurance of higher education in developing countries and countries in transition.

To enhance the quality of higher education in Asia and the Pacific region through strengthening the work of quality assurance agencies and extending the cooperation between them.

Mission

To be a self-sustaining Network, a first point of reference for advice or support, efficient in operation and open in information sharing.

Vision

Expansion of the website and databases of consultants to achieve better electronic communication and information-sharing

Workshops and conferences to build quality assurance capacity in developing countries/territories.

Activities supported by the grants:

• Internship and Cross-regional Staff Exchange Programme

• Training Materials and Resource Package

Impact

Most impact has occurred:

in improving QA mechanisms across national systems in various countries,

in the exchange of ideas and of expertise, in promoting communication, cooperation

and mutual understanding among agencies and institutions.

Countries where workshops, conferences and training programs were

conducted

AustraliaBangladesh ChinaFiji IndiaJapanLao PDR

MalaysiaMongoliaNew ZealandPakistanPhilippinesVietnam Indonesia

INTERNSHIP AND CROSS-REGIONAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM (2008-2009)

Countries servedCambodia Vietnam Bangladesh Mongolia Indonesia

Lessons learned:

A regional approach is an efficient and cost effective mechanism to deliver capacity building across a wide and diverse region.

The regional approach has led to greater capacity to learn and share.

The regional model tends to develop higher education QA systems more quickly and efficiently.

The subject of educational quality is global, but the work of QA, for the most part, is local.

International cooperation and commitment towards building capacity in QA as demonstrated by the World Bank and UNESCO are yielding positive results.

Framework for Higher Education Quality Assurance Principles in the Asia Pacific Region

A: Internal Quality

Assurance

B:Quality

Assessment

C:Quality

AssuranceAgencies

(Chiba Principles)

Challenges

Continued expansion of the website to provide a platform for discussion and exchange of information among members

Developing other internet-based knowledge sharing and capacity building tools for QA

Challenges

Developing a vocabulary of key QA terms describing how these terms are used in different contexts.

Continuous training of staff and external reviewers

Sustainability of the network