Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09 equilibrium: Real-time dynamics Avraham Schiller Quantum impurity...

Preview:

Citation preview

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

equilibrium: Real-time dynamics

Avraham Schiller

Quantum impurity systems out of

Racah Institute of Physics,

The Hebrew University

Collaboration: Frithjof B. Anders, Dortmund University

F.B. Anders and AS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, (2005)

F.B. Anders and AS, Phys. Rev. B 74, (2006)

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Outline

Confined nano-structures and dissipative systems:

Time-dependent Numerical Renormalization

Benchmarks for fermionic and bosonic baths

Spin and charge relaxation in ultra-small dots

Non-perturbative physics out of equilibrium

Group (TD-NRG)

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Quantum dot

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Leads

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Lead Lead

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Lead Lead

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

ULead Lead

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

ULead Lead

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

ULead Lead

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

i+U

U

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

ULead Lead

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

ULead Lead

Conductance vs gate voltage

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

ULead Lead

Conductance vs gate voltage

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

ULead Lead

Conductance vs gate voltage

dI/d

V (

e2 /h)

Coulomb blockade in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

Tunneling to leads

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

Inter-configurational energies d and U+d

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

Inter-configurational energies d and U+d

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

Inter-configurational energies d and U+d

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

Inter-configurational energies d and U+d

Hybridization width )( 22RL tt

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

Inter-configurational energies d and U+d

Hybridization width )( 22RL tt

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

Inter-configurational energies d and U+d

dd U ,Condition for formation of local moment:

Hybridization width )( 22RL tt

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

Inter-configurational energies d and U+d

dd U ,Condition for formation of local moment:

Hybridization width )( 22RL tt

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

EFd d+U

TK

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

EFd d+U

TK

A sharp resonance of width TK

develops at EF when T<TK

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

EFd d+U

Abrikosov-Suhl resonance

TK

A sharp resonance of width TK

develops at EF when T<TK

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

EFd d+U

TK

A sharp resonance of width TK

develops at EF when T<TK

Unitary scattering for T=0 and <n>=1

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

EFd d+U

TK

A sharp resonance of width TK

develops at EF when T<TK

Unitary scattering for T=0 and <n>=1

U

UT dd

K 2

)(||exp

Nonperturbative scale:

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

The Kondo effect in ultra-small quantum dots

EFd d+U

TK

A sharp resonance of width TK

develops at EF when T<TK

Unitary scattering for T=0 and <n>=1

U

UT dd

K 2

)(||exp

Nonperturbative scale:

Perfect transmission for

symmetric structure

RLdimp dtnUnnH

,

H.c.)0(

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Electronic correlations out of equilibrium

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Electronic correlations out of equilibrium dI

/dV

(e2 /

h)

Differential conductance intwo-terminal devices

Steady state

van der Wiel et al.,Science 2000

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Electronic correlations out of equilibrium dI

/dV

(e2 /

h)

Differential conductance intwo-terminal devices

Steady state ac drive

Photon-assisted side peaks

Kogan et al.,Science 2004van der Wiel et al.,Science 2000

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Electronic correlations out of equilibrium dI

/dV

(e2 /

h)

Differential conductance intwo-terminal devices

Steady state ac drive

Photon-assisted side peaks

Kogan et al.,Science 2004van der Wiel et al.,Science 2000

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Nonequilibrium: A theoretical challenge

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Nonequilibrium: A theoretical challenge

The Goal: The description of nano-structures at nonzero bias

and/or nonzero driving fields

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Nonequilibrium: A theoretical challenge

The Goal: The description of nano-structures at nonzero bias

Required: Inherently nonperturbative treatment of nonequilibrium

and/or nonzero driving fields

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Nonequilibrium: A theoretical challenge

The Goal: The description of nano-structures at nonzero bias

Required: Inherently nonperturbative treatment of nonequilibrium

and/or nonzero driving fields

Problem: Unlike equilibrium conditions, density operator is not

known in the presence of interactions

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Nonequilibrium: A theoretical challenge

The Goal: The description of nano-structures at nonzero bias

Required: Inherently nonperturbative treatment of nonequilibrium

and/or nonzero driving fields

Problem: Unlike equilibrium conditions, density operator is not

Most nonperturbative approaches available in equilibrium

known in the presence of interactions

are simply inadequate

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Nonequilibrium: A theoretical challenge

Two possible strategies

Work directly atsteady state

e.g., construct the many-particle Scattering states

Evolve the system in time to reach steady

state

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Time-dependent numerical RG

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Time-dependent numerical RG

Consider a quantum impurity (e.g., quantum dot) in equilibrium, to which asudden perturbation is applied at time t = 0

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Time-dependent numerical RG

Consider a quantum impurity (e.g., quantum dot) in equilibrium, to which asudden perturbation is applied at time t = 0

LeadLead

Vg

t < 0

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Time-dependent numerical RG

Consider a quantum impurity (e.g., quantum dot) in equilibrium, to which asudden perturbation is applied at time t = 0

LeadLead

Vg

t > 0

LeadLead

Vg

t < 0

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Time-dependent numerical RG

Consider a quantum impurity (e.g., quantum dot) in equilibrium, to which asudden perturbation is applied at time t = 0

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Time-dependent numerical RG

Consider a quantum impurity (e.g., quantum dot) in equilibrium, to which asudden perturbation is applied at time t = 0

OeeOtO iHtiHt

t

ˆˆTraceˆ)(ˆTraceˆ0

0

Perturbed Hamiltonian

Initial density operator

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Wilson’s numerical RG

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Wilson’s numerical RG

-1 1--1 --2 --3 -1-2-3

/D

Logarithmic discretization of band: 1

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Wilson’s numerical RG

-1 1--1 --2 --3 -1-2-3

/D

Logarithmic discretization of band: 1

imp

After a unitary transformation the bath is represented by a semi-infinitechain

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Why logarithmic discretization?

Wilson’s numerical RG

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Why logarithmic discretization?

Wilson’s numerical RG

To properly account for the logarithmic infra-red divergences

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Why logarithmic discretization?

Wilson’s numerical RG

To properly account for the logarithmic infra-red divergences

imp

Hopping decays exponentially along the chain: 1,2/ nn

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Why logarithmic discretization?

Wilson’s numerical RG

imp

Hopping decays exponentially along the chain: 1,2/ nn

Separation of energy scales along the chain

To properly account for the logarithmic infra-red divergences

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Why logarithmic discretization?

Wilson’s numerical RG

imp

Hopping decays exponentially along the chain: 1,2/ nn

Exponentially small energy scales can be accessed, limited by T only

To properly account for the logarithmic infra-red divergences

Separation of energy scales along the chain

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Why logarithmic discretization?

Wilson’s numerical RG

imp

Hopping decays exponentially along the chain: 1,2/ nn

Iterative solution, starting from a core cluster and enlarging the chainby one site at a time. High-energy states are discarded at each step,refining the resolution as energy is decreased.

To properly account for the logarithmic infra-red divergences

Exponentially small energy scales can be accessed, limited by T only

Separation of energy scales along the chain

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Equilibrium NRG:

Geared towards fine energy resolution at low energies

Discards high-energy states

Wilson’s numerical RG

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Equilibrium NRG:

Problem: Real-time dynamics involves all energy scales

Geared towards fine energy resolution at low energies

Discards high-energy states

Wilson’s numerical RG

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Equilibrium NRG:

Problem: Real-time dynamics involves all energy scales

Resolution: Combine information from all NRG iterations

Geared towards fine energy resolution at low energies

Discards high-energy states

Wilson’s numerical RG

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Time-dependent NRG

imp

r e

Basis set for the “environment” statesNRG eigenstate of relevant iteration

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Time-dependent NRG

imp

r e

Basis set for the “environment” statesNRG eigenstate of relevant iteration

For each NRG iteration, we trace over its “environment”

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Time-dependent NRG

N

m

trun

rs

tEEisr

mrs

mr

msemOtO

1 ,

)(red,, )()(

Sum over discarded NRG statesof chain of length m

Matrix element of Oon the m-site chain

Reduced density matrix for them-site chain

e

sr mesmerm ;,;,)( 0red,

(Hostetter, PRL 2000)

Sum over all chain lengths(all energy scales)

Trace over the environment, i.e., sitesnot included in chain of length m

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Fermionic benchmark: Resonant-level model

k

kkdk

kkk cddcVddtEccH )()(

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Fermionic benchmark: Resonant-level model

k

kkdk

kkk cddcVddtEccH )()(

0)0( tEd 0)0( 1 dd EtE

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Fermionic benchmark: Resonant-level model

k

kkdk

kkk cddcVddtEccH )()(

0)0( tEd

We focus on )()( tddtnd and compare the TD-NRG to exact

analytic solution in the wide-band limit (for an infinite system)

Basic energy scale: 2V

0)0( 1 dd EtE

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Fermionic benchmark: Resonant-level model

T = 0

Relaxed values(no runaway!)

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Fermionic benchmark: Resonant-level model

T = 0

T > 0

Relaxed values(no runaway!)

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Fermionic benchmark: Resonant-level model

T = 0

T > 0

Relaxed values(no runaway!)

The deviation of the relaxed T=0 value from the new thermodynamic valueis a measure for the accuracy of the TD-NRG on all time scales

For T > 0, the TD-NRG works well up to Tt /1

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

T = 0 Ed (t < 0) = -10Ed (t > 0) = = 2

Source of inaccuracies

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

T = 0 Ed (t < 0) = -10Ed (t > 0) = = 2

Source of inaccuracies

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

T = 0 Ed (t < 0) = -10Ed (t > 0) = = 2

Source of inaccuracies

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

T = 0 Ed (t < 0) = -10Ed (t > 0) = = 2

TD-NRG is essentially exact on the Wilson chain

Source of inaccuracies

Main source of inaccuracies is due to discretization

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Analysis of discretization effects

Ed (t < 0) = -10Ed (t > 0) =

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Analysis of discretization effects

Ed (t < 0) = -10Ed (t > 0) =

Ed (t < 0) = Ed (t > 0) = -10

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Bosonic benchmark: Spin-boson model

iiii

zx

iiii bbbbH )(

22

ssc

iiicJ 12 2)()(

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Bosonic benchmark: Spin-boson model

iiii

zx

iiii bbbbH )(

22

ssc

iiicJ 12 2)()(

Setting =0, we start from the pure spin state

BathThermalxxt ˆ11)0(ˆ

and compute 1)(ˆ1)(01 zBathz tTrt

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Bosonic benchmark: Spin-boson model

)(01 t

Excellent agreement between TD-NRG (full lines) and theexact analytic solution (dashed lines) up to Tt /1

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Bosonic benchmark: Spin-boson model

For nonzero and s = 1 (Ohmic bath), we prepare the system suchthat the spin is initially fully polarized (Sz = 1/2)

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Bosonic benchmark: Spin-boson model

For nonzero and s = 1 (Ohmic bath), we prepare the system suchthat the spin is initially fully polarized (Sz = 1/2)

Damped oscillations

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Bosonic benchmark: Spin-boson model

For nonzero and s = 1 (Ohmic bath), we prepare the system suchthat the spin is initially fully polarized (Sz = 1/2)

Monotonic decay

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Bosonic benchmark: Spin-boson model

For nonzero and s = 1 (Ohmic bath), we prepare the system suchthat the spin is initially fully polarized (Sz = 1/2)

Localized phase

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Anderson impurity model

ddtHtEccH dk

kkk )(2

)(,

dddUdcddctVk

kk

,

)()(

t < 0

02 V

t > 0

12 V

2/UEd

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Anderson impurity model: Charge relaxation

Charge relaxation is governed by tch=1/1

TD-NRG works better for interacting case!

Exact newEquilibrium

values

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Anderson impurity model: Spin relaxation

1t

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Anderson impurity model: Spin relaxation

KTt 1t

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Anderson impurity model: Spin relaxation

Spin relaxes on a much longer time scale

Spin relaxation is sensitive to initial conditions!

chsp tt

Starting from a decoupled impurity, spin relaxation approaches a

universal function of t/tsp with tsp=1/TK

KTt 1t

Avraham Schiller / Seattle 09

Conclusions

A numerical RG approach was devised to track the real-time

dynamics of quantum impurities following a sudden perturbation

Works well for arbitrarily long times up to 1/T

Applicable to fermionic as well as bosonic baths

For ultra-small dots, spin and charge typically relax on

different time scales

Recommended