‘The 1000 cow study’ · 3 11.1.2016 © Natural Resources Institute Finland Holstein Friesian UK...

© Natural Resources Institute Finland© Natural Resources Institute Finland1 11.1.2016

Ilma Tapio and

RuminOmics consortium

Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)

ilma.tapio@luke.fi

RuminOmics final conference

Paris, France

7th of December, 2015

Field-scale study of rumen function,

efficiency and emissions in dairy cows

‘The 1000 cow study’

Rumen microbiome

© Natural Resources Institute Finland© Natural Resources Institute Finland2 11.1.2016

• Introduction

• Overview of the results

• Concluding remarks

Content of the presentation

© Natural Resources Institute Finland© Natural Resources Institute Finland3 11.1.2016

Holstein Friesian

UK

NUDC 243

Park 164

Nordic Red

SwedenFinland

Minkio 100 Robacksdalen 100

Italy

Bianchini 185

Gandolfi 48

Franciosi 176

Maize silage Grass silage

South-North gradient

Sampling design

© Natural Resources Institute Finland

Rumen sampling by stomach tubing

Samples immediately frozen in liquid N2 or dry ice

Samples freeze-dried and DNA extracted using protocol (Yu and Morisson 2004)

Amplicon library preparation: bacteria-archaea(16S), ciliates (18S), fungi (ITS1)

Metabarcoding sequencing (Illumina)

Sequencing data analysis (OBITools, R)

Rumen sampling design

© Natural Resources Institute Finland5 11.1.2016

3-Low 2-Medium 1-High

Country Farm6.6-15.6

methane g/kg DMI

15.6-22.4 methane g/kg DMI

22.4-39.4 methane g/kg DMI

UK NUDC 48 147 49

Park 47 77 39

Italy Franciosi 16 98 62

Bianchini 132 50 2

Gandolfi 5 39 4

Finland Minkio 0 40 60

Sweden Robacksdalen 5 54 37

Sampling design

© Natural Resources Institute Finland6 11.1.2016

3-Low 2-Medium 1-High

Country Farm6.6-15.6

methane g/kg DMI

15.6-22.4 methane g/kg DMI

22.4-39.4 methane g/kg DMI

UK NUDC 48 147 49

Park 47 77 39

Italy Franciosi 16 98 62

Bianchini 132 50 2

Gandolfi 5 39 4

Finland Minkio 0 40 60

Sweden Robacksdalen 5 54 37

Sampling design

© Natural Resources Institute Finland7 11.1.2016

Bacteria by farmBacteria methane g/kg DMI

high (1), medium (2), low (3)

Rumen bacteria

© Natural Resources Institute Finland8 11.1.2016

Rumen bacteria

© Natural Resources Institute Finland9 11.1.2016

Archaea by farmArchaea methane g/kg DMI

high (1), medium (2), low (3)

Rumen archaea

© Natural Resources Institute Finland10 11.1.2016

Rumen archaea

© Natural Resources Institute Finland11 11.1.2016

Fungi by farmFungi methane g/kg DMI

high (1), medium (2), low (3)

Rumen anaerobic fungi

© Natural Resources Institute Finland12 11.1.2016

Rumen anaerobic fungi

© Natural Resources Institute Finland13 11.1.2016

Ciliate by farmCiliate methane g/kg DMI

high (1), medium (2), low (3)

Rumen ciliate protozoa

© Natural Resources Institute Finland14 11.1.2016

Rumen ciliate protozoa

© Natural Resources Institute Finland© Natural Resources Institute Finland15 11.1.2016

• Strong farm subdivision

• No clear microbial community composition correlation with methane output in the total set

• Within farm analysis needed

Concluding remarks

© Natural Resources Institute Finland

Thank you!

RuminOmis consortium

Miika Tapio for help with R