View
292
Download
7
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
IBM Rational Automotive Engineering Symposium 2013
ASPICE Made Easy-Case Studies and Lessons Learned
Duncan SeidlerMethod Park Software AgDuncan.Seidler@methodpark.com
Tom SouthworthMethod Park America Inc.Tom.Southworth@methodpark.com
Portfolio
Training
Wide range of Trainings on systems and software engineering
Accredited by the following organizations:SEI, ISTQB, iSQI, iNTACS, IREB, iSAQB, ECQA
Engineering
• Automotive
• Medical Devices
Consulting/Coaching
Topics:• Software Process Improvement• CMMI®, SPICE, Automotive SPICE®
• AUTOSAR, Functional Safety• Requirements Management• Project and Quality Management• Software Architecture & Design• Software Testing
Product
Solution for integrated
process management
Facts and Figures
Awards
Business unit revenueRevenue & employees
Facts
• Founded in 2001
• Locations:Germany: Erlangen, MunichUSA: Detroit, Miami
• Today 120 Engineers
20092006, 2007, 2009
2004 20082011
2005
25%
30%
45%Products
Training undConsulting
Engineering
-2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
100 Emp. / 5 Mio. EUR
Revenue
Employees200 Emp. / 10 Mio. EUR
Customers
Defense/Aerospace•Airbus•Diehl•EADS•Elbit•JAXA•KID•Orbital•Raytheon
Further•Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte•Deutsche Post•GMC Software Technologies•Raab Karcher •Giesecke & Devrient•Thales Rail Signaling•Bundesagentur für Arbeit•Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Baden-Württemberg
Healthcare•Alere•Braun•Carl Zeiss•Fresenius•Olympus•Siemens •Ziehm Imaging
IT/Telecommunications•GFT•Intersoft•Nash Technologies•NEC •Micronas•PTC•Teleca
Automotive•Audi•Automotive Lighting •Blaupunkt•BMW•Bosch•Brose•Continental•Daimler•Delphi•Denso•General Motors•ETAS•Helbako•IAV•Johnson Controls•Knorr-Bremse•Magna•Marquardt•Panasonic Automotive•Peiker Acustic•Preh•Thales•TRW•Volkswagen•Webasto•ZF•Zollner•…
Engineering/Automation•ABB•Carl Schenk•EBM Papst•Heidelberger Druckmaschinen
•Insta•Kratzer Automation•Mettler Toledo•Mühlbauer Group•Rohde&Schwarz•Siemens Industries•Wago
Banking•Landesbank Kiel•Fiducia•Credit Suisse•UBS
Agenda
• ASPICE Rationale
• Areas of Focus for Management:
• Process Definition
• Compliance Management
• Process Tailoring
• Process Execution in RTC
• Case Studies
• Summary
ASPICE Rationale: Prevent Expensive Mistakes
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 8
Here’s the help your going to get.
ASPICE Rationale: Find SW Defects Early
Error correction costs today
Typical fault correction during:
Concept $ 1,300
A sample $ 4,550
B sample $ 5,200
C sample $ 7,800
PV series $ 84,500
Production $ 104,000
Post Production $ 117,000
Source: HIS (Audi, BMW, Daimler, Porsche and Volkswagen)
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 10
Rationale for Auto SPICE
� Productivity improvement by
� … out sourcing of subsystem development
� … distributed engineering
� … use of building blocks
� Compliance is necessary
� … for integration of subsystems
� … for platform strategies
� … for product line approaches
� … for global distributed engineering
� Examples for Compliance Needs
� … Automotive SPICE®
� … CMMi
� … ISO/IEC 26262
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 11
Rationale for Auto SPICE
� Pain Points of Tier One Suppliers
� … showing traceability of customer requirements
� … define and implement change management with respect to customers and own suppliers
� … integration of PLM/ALM tools to improve efficiency
� … showing compliance to standards on the fly
� … include their own suppliers in a common infrastructure
� … managing a network of dependencies among their own suppliers
� ...
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 12
Rationale for Auto SPICE
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 13
Rationale for Auto SPICE
Word, Excel, Visio, EPF, RMC, ARIS, etc.
Control Define Compliance
PLM ALM Project Management
Requirements Management
Document Management
Configuration Management
Test Management
Project Status Reports
Measurement Repository
ProcessMetrics Execute
Industry Standards
ComplianceReports
Maturity Models
Company Standards
Organizational Processes
Project ProcessesProject Processes
IMPROVEIMPROVE
MEASUREMEASURE
TA
ILO
R
WhatHow
Doing
Rationale for Auto SPICE
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 15
Rationale for Auto SPICE
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 16
Move the burden away from the engineer.
Agenda
• ASPICE Rationale
• Areas of Focus for Management:
• Process Definition
• Compliance Management
• Process Tailoring
• Process Execution in RTC
• Case Studies
• Summary
Process Definition
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 19
Process Definition
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 20
Agenda
• ASPICE Rationale
• Areas of Focus for Management:
• Process Definition
• Compliance Management
• Process Tailoring
• Process Execution in RTC
• Case Studies
• Summary
Compliance Mapping
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 22
Compliance Gap Analysis
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 23
Agenda
• ASPICE Rationale
• Areas of Focus for Management:
• Process Definition
• Compliance Management
• Process Tailoring
• Process Execution in RTC
• Case Studies
• Summary
Process Tailoring
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 25
Process Tailoring (2)
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 26
Tailored Process (Project / Quality Manager)
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 27
Agenda
• ASPICE Rationale
• Global Engineering Needs
• Areas of Focus for Management:
• Process Definition
• Compliance Management
• Process Tailoring
• Process Execution in RTC
• Case Studies
• Summary
Process Execution: User Environment
User creates Change Request in the usual user environment
Sample Environment: IBM Rational Team Concert
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 29
Process Execution: Active Process
Work tickets are automatically created according to the defined process in this project
Sample Environment: IBM Rational Team Concert
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 30
Process Execution: Process Guidance
Process related data is automatically transferred
Sample Environment: IBM Rational Team Concert
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 31
Process Execution: Direct Access
Direct accessto related data
Sample Environment: IBM Rational Team Concert
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 32
Process Execution: Direct Process Guidance
Direct link toprocess guidance
Sample Environment: IBM Rational Team Concert
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 33
Agenda
• ASPICE Rationale
• Areas of Focus for Management:
• Process Definition
• Compliance Management
• Process Tailoring
• Process Execution in RTC
• Case Studies
• Summary
Is this Process Management?!?
This is how processesare usually defined…
Situation
• Isolated business units with lots of different heritage (resulting from M&A), processes and culture
• Transformation from a hardware-driven to an electronic-focused software company with > 10,000 engineers
• Many different tools and repositories
Challenges
• Development silos made it impossible to collaborate across business units
• No transparency over project status and progress
Customer Scenario 1
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 36
Solution
• Definition and design of a unified, modular and extensible standard development processcompliant with Automotive SPICE
• Ongoing rollout of integrated process-driven PM, ALM and PLM
• Training of the whole engineering workforce on the new processes
Results
• Unified processes across disciplines and business units with unit-specific additions for flexibility
• Ability to collaborate and exchange personnel between business units
• Repeated Automotive SPICE Level 3 ratings
Customer Scenario 1
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 37
Customer Scenario 1
Standardized Process Architecture
input
output
ext input
ext output
Metric
Artifact
support
sequence
Milestone
Phase
Method
execution
required
sequence
Resource
checklist
Process
use
support
inform
responsible
Activity Role
use
Training
use
use
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 38
Customer Scenario 1
10 Orbital Integrated Processes ........................................................................................ 17
10.1 Project Management Processes ............................................................................... 17
10.1.1 Software Project Planning ................................................................................. 17
10.1.2 Software Project Management .......................................................................... 22
10.1.3 Supplier Agreement Management ..................................................................... 26
10.1.4 Software Scope Management ........................................................................... 29
10.2 Life Cycle Processes ................................................................................................ 32
10.2.1 Software Requirements Definition ..................................................................... 32
10.2.2 Software Design ................................................................................................ 35
10.2.3 Software Code and Unit Test ............................................................................ 38
10.2.4 Software Integration .......................................................................................... 42
10.2.5 Software Verification ........................................................................................ 45
10.2.6 Software Validation ........................................................................................... 47
10.3 Support Processes ................................................................................................... 50
10.3.1 Software Configuration Management ................................................................ 50
10.3.2 Software Assurance .......................................................................................... 53
10.3.3 Project Measurement and Analysis ................................................................... 55
10.3.4 Risk Management ............................................................................................. 58
10.3.5 Decision Analysis .............................................................................................. 60
10.3.6 Peer Review ..................................................................................................... 62
10.4 Organizational Processes ......................................................................................... 64
10.4.1 Process Management ....................................................................................... 64
10.4.2 Organizational Measurement and Analysis ...................................................... 68
10.4.3 Organizational Training ..................................................................................... 71
Was
Is
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 39
Customer Scenario 1
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 40
Customer Scenario 1
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 41
IBM Rational Automotive Engineering
Symposium 201342
Customer Scenario 2
Key Steps
• Design of a common Software Process driven byAutomotive SPICE L3 requirements
• Decentralized rollout in different business units
• Centralized standard process approach and TS 16949 certification
• Central top-down rollout of common engineering andbusiness processes inside of large PLM program
Lessons & Success Factors
• Involve business units early
• Design processes with end user involvement
• Focus on business benefits when standardizing
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 43
Customer Scenario 3
Key Steps
• Design and incremental rollout of a standard software development process driven by Automotive SPICE L3 requirements
• Iterative integration of safety topics (ISO 61508 and ISO 26262)
• Tight integration with Systems Engineering and other interface disciplines
• Full usage and acceptance in all Engineering disciplines
Lessons & Success Factors
• Process design was done per discipline drivenby experienced practitioners (subject matter experts)
• Experiences of pilot projects were taken very seriously and fully integrated into next process versions
• Process rollout was tools based (RE, CM, Testing, etc.)
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 44
Agenda
• ASPICE Rationale
• Areas of Focus for Management:
• Process Definition
• Compliance Management
• Process Tailoring
• Process Execution in RTC
• Case Studies
• Summary
Summary
Create a framework for improvement
Simplify processes for people by making themeasy to understand, user-centric and project specific
Manage risk of non-compliance
Automate process execution and reducing manual overhead
Harmonize and integrate different tools, platforms and repositories
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 46
Summary
W. Edwards Deming
“If you can‘t describe
what you are doing as a process,
you don‘ t know what you are doing“
© 2013 � Method Park Software � IBM Automotive Engineering Symposium � 10.24.2013 � Slide 47
Leads to Happy Engineers!
IBM Rational Automotive Engineering
Symposium 201349
© Copyright IBM Corporation 2013. All rights reserved. The information contained in these materials is provided for informational purposes only, and is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind, express or implied. IBM shall not be responsible for any damages arising out of the use of, or otherwise related to, these materials. Nothing contained in these materials is intended to, nor shall have the effect of, creating any warranties or representations from IBM or its suppliers or licensors, or altering the terms and conditions of the applicable license agreement governing the use of IBM software. References in these materials to IBM products, programs, or services do not imply that they will be available in all countries in which IBM operates. Product release dates and/or capabilities referenced in these materials may change at any time at IBM’s sole discretion based on market opportunities or other factors, and are not intended to be a commitment to future product or feature availability in any way. IBM, the IBM logo, Rational, the Rational logo, Telelogic, the Telelogic logo, and other IBM products and services are trademarks of the International Business Machines Corporation, in the United States, other countries or both. Other company, product, or service names may be trademarks or service marks of others.
Recommended