Anticipation in Canada since Sanofi

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Anticipation in Canada since Sanofi. February 15, 2012. Don Cameron. Donald M. Cameron. What’s a patentable invention need to be?. New Useful Inventive An invention of the court: 1890: it’s an “invention”, so it must be “inventive” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Anticipation in Canada since Sanofi

February 15, 2012

Don Cameron

Donald M. Cameron

2

What’s a patentable invention need to be?

• New• Useful

• Inventive– An invention of the court:

• 1890: it’s an “invention”, so it must be “inventive”• 1936: SCC required “a degree of ingenuity” to be

present– Now in the New Patent Act, s. 28.3

NEW – NOVELTY/ANTICIPATION

Current Patent Act• 28.2 (1) The subject-matter defined by a claim in an

application for a patent in Canada (the "pending application") must not have been disclosed – (a) more than one year before the filing date by

the applicant, or by a person who obtained knowledge, directly or indirectly, from the applicant, in such a manner that the subject-matter became available to the public in Canada or elsewhere;

– (b) before the claim date by a person not mentioned in paragraph (a) in such a manner that the subject-matter became available to the public in Canada or elsewhere;

4

What Sanofi said

• Enabling disclosure

5

What Sanofi said

6

What Sanofi said

7

Enablement: The “IKEA” threshold

8

Cases since Sanofi

Merck v. Apotex (2010)• Prior art: fermentation

process with yeast – did it produce lovostatin?

• No disclosure:– Not inevitable that claimed

product would be produced– No evidence process was

actually used before key date

9

disclose enable

Cases since Sanofi

Sloan Kettering (P.A.B.)• Claim was for an antibody• No disclosure:• BTW: No enablement:

– starting material: you couldn’t buy it, you’d have to make it

– To make it would take:• “hopeful yet prolonged and

arduous experimentation”

10

disclose enable

Cases since SanofiAstraZeneca v. Apotex• esomeprazole, a

stereoisomer of enalapril• Prior art said it separated

optically pure compounds• Apotex: slight change in

process produced esmeprazole

• AstraZeneca: no it didn’t• Court: result not consistent

11

disclose enable

Cases since Sanofi

Easton v. Bauer• Hockey skate boot: a

one-piece rear quarter• Used in test league, but

in public rink• Disclosed but not

enabled– You’d have to dismantle

the skate to reproduce it

12

disclose enable

Conclusions since Sanofi

Mechanical: – “The Caramilk bar test”– If you can see it, you can

figure it out– Observing isn’t

“experimenting”

13

disclose enable

Conclusions since Sanofi

Chem/Pharma: – “The Coca-cola test”– Can’t figure out how

they made it.

14

disclose enable

Thank You

Don CameronDCameron@bereskinparr.com

Bereskin & Parr LLP

Recommended