Adaptive Learning and Training in an Austere Fiscal Climate€¦ · Adaptive Learning and Training...

Adaptive Learning and Training in an Austere Fiscal Climate

Skip A. Payne, MSPH, REHS/RS, LCDR, USPHS Program Officer, Training and Support Services, Division of the

Civilian Volunteer Medical Reserve Corps, Office of the Surgeon General

Disclosures

  This continuing education activity is managed and accredited by Professional Education Service Group. The information presented in this activity represents the opinion of the author(s) or faculty. Neither PESG, nor any accrediting organization endorses any commercial products displayed or mentioned in conjunction with this activity.

  Commercial Support was not received for this activity.

Disclosures

•  LCDR Skip A. Payne   Has no financial interest or relationships to disclose

•  CME Staff Disclosures   Professional Education Services Group staff have no

financial interest or relationships to disclose

Non-Standard Disclaimer

  The contributions of others in this presentation are easy to spot.   If it is a well thought out and highly cogent point, which

withstands the ramblings of the presenter, then it probably originated from someone else.

  Attempts to provide due credit have been made when possible.

  All other points/comments are mine and not the opinion of the aforementioned contributors or my agency/division.

Attendees will be able to:

  Summarize the DCVMRC/MRC case study   Recognize the effects of the programmatic lifecycle

stage on DCVMRC and MRC training needs   Explain the effects of network topology in determining

modes/methods of training for the MRC   Restate the fiscal implications related to the training

modes discussed in the presentation

A Brief MRC Network Overview

  Following 9/11 and the Anthrax attacks,   thousands of unaffiliated volunteers   showed up at sites to help

  Problems: •  No way to ID or credential •  Not covered under liability laws •  No Incident Command System (ICS) training •  No management structure

MRC Model - No “typical” MRC   All MRC units:

•  Provide an organization structure for utilizing members •  Pre-identify members •  Verify professional licensure/certification •  Train/prepare

  Units vary by: •  Housing organizations – LHD, hospital, CHC, faith-based

org. •  Partner organizations •  Types/number of volunteers •  Local mission/activities - emergency response, public

health, veterinary

Why One Model Would not Work

  Communities differ by: •  Population •  Geography •  Community government structure •  Health needs •  Laws and local government structure

One “size” does not fit all.

9

MRC Volunteers

•  Medical and public health professionals –  in training –  active practice –  inactive/retired

•  Students –  secondary and post

secondary

•  Other interested individuals –  can help with leadership,

communications, administration, logistics, etc…

Medical Reserve Corps

  Overview: •  National Network •  Mission to engage volunteers to strengthen public

health, emergency response and COMMUNITY resiliency

•  Operates/utilized LOCALLY •  Affiliates and integrates with existing programs and

resources

Key Messages

  Mapping ideas, thoughts and processes   easier for leadership

– early review work output   improves efficiency and effectiveness of our staff.

  Focusing some of our resources on a shared distributed learning network   increases the provider’s ability to deliver content to the

larger Public Health/Medical audience   more efficient than increased funding to any single training

program.

Natural Question #1

  Has the idea of investing in an elemental infrastructure, over directly funding a given core program, been tried before?

Answer: Question #1

  Distributed Computing   Folding@home: Simulates the folding of proteins by using processing

time on otherwise idle computers across the Internet. (http://folding.stanford.edu/English/HomePage)

  Distributed "Gaming"/Peer Networks   Companies allow you to sell your products through their respective

platforms direct to others.   Even economies have been affected by peer to peer technology with no

central authority   Distributed Learning Management

  TrainingFinder Real-time Affiliate Integrated Network (TRAIN):Utilized by 28 affiliates (3 National & 25 States) as a Learning Management System for Public Health, Safety and Emergency Preparedness Organizations.(www.train.org/) - Poster #19 outside

Natural Question #2

  So what do these examples have to do with distributed work and the delivery of work product and distributed learning networks and the delivery of training content?

Answer: Question #2

  All deal with limited resources.   Computer processing power, product viability/market

position, ability to track all users’ training in one location, respectively.

  All have a cost, but the costs are born collectively by voluntary participants.   NOTE: The costs are not voluntary…used to support the

system but participation in the "network" is voluntary. In the case of the DCVMRC, early leadership intervention, as needed, reduces cost and wasted time.

  The systems all operate under a "network of trust" to build a better product/service.

THE DIVISION OF THE CIVILIAN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL RESERVE CORPS

The way this ideology affects

General Division of the Civilian Volunteer Medical Reserve Corps

Overview   The Division of the Civilian Volunteer Medical Reserve

Corps (DCVMRC) is:   led by CAPT Robert Tosatto   the program office within the Office of the Surgeon General

that works on behalf of the Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Network. We are not the MRC, per se.

  Split between “home” office staff, contractors, a Cooperative Agreement Partner, and regional representatives.

DCVMRC Internal Training Tool Utilization

MindMapping as a Knowledge and Task Capture Tool

  Presentation building/Ideation sharing   Workload management/SOP generation - Snapshot of

work assignments   SharePoint examples   Document Writing - FDC devolution example

Example of Presentation Building

Workload Management (Group)

Workload Management (Self)

Ideation Sharing (Training Dynamics)

SharePoint Collaboration (SLaTS)

SharePoint Collaboration (Staff Retreat)

Document Writing FDC devolution example

THE MEDICAL RESERVE CORPS

The way this ideology affects

NETWORK TRAINING TOOLS

Topology Driven Training Decisions

  Preferential attachment of organic network v. matrix topology of top down organizations.

  Command and Control v. Advise and Link Resources

What type of network are we dealing with?

HUBS Defined as units who display innovation and organic network leadership.

No preferential attachment Preferential attachment

Command and Control v Advise and Link Resources

Direct connection required to all units Direct connection required to a select few

Distributed Learning Platform (MRC-TRAIN Concept) Explanation

Leveraging potential   DCVMRC offered training

  Only offered on the most generic of topics, such as MRC 101

  Psychological First Aid (with partner)   Partner offered Training

  CDC-TRAIN example   Training Plan example

  Generally offered Training   FEMA Training System is free for course providers and to be a MRC user.

TRAIN Affiliate Coverage

Psychological First Aid

  The system uses a rating system that helps us “see” the perceived value of the course. For instance one of the PFA courses was rated 4.25/5 stars by 16 users.   “Great resources and easy to follow along. I liked that I

could take breaks since it was a long program.”   “Excellent course”   “Covered subject well, would recommend!”

CDC-TRAIN Example

Training Plan Example

FEMA Training

Many Course Providers, One Transcript

Limitations

  Need to rely on network feedback.   Requires staff to proffer expertise to partners.   Fairly steep learning curve to manage effectively.   Systematic maintenance fees and "glitch" repairs.   Update/Upgrading of System features.   Unknown and unforeseeable limitations due to network

topology.

Danger Ahead!

  The Hazard of Over-tweaking   Beware of the Braess’s Paradox

Adding an intuitive, and thought to be helpful, link negatively impacts network users (Braess, Nagurney, & Wakolbinger, 2005),

Braess, D., Nagurney, A., & Wakolbinger, T., (2005) On a Paradox of Traffic Planning Transportation Science, Vol. 39, pp. 446-450

Summary

  The DCVMRC/MRC case study   The effects of the programmatic lifecycle stage on

DCVMRC and MRC training needs   The effects of network topology in determining modes/

methods of training for the MRC   The fiscal implications related to the training modes

discussed in the presentation

Remember to use #LDH13 when Tweeting about today's

session!

Obtaining CME/CE Credit

If you would like to receive continuing education credit for this activity, please visit:

http://www.pesgce.com/NCDMPH