A Static and Dynamic Density Functional Theory Study of Methanol Carbonylation Minserk Cheong, a...

A Static and Dynamic Density Functional Theory Study of

Methanol Carbonylation

A Static and Dynamic Density Functional Theory Study of

Methanol Carbonylation

Minserk Cheong,a Rochus Schmid,b and Tom Zieglerc

a Department of Chemistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 130-701, Koreab Technische Universitat Munchen, Anorganisch-Chemisches Institut, D-85747

Garching, Germanyc Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4

2

Abstract

Quantum mechanical calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) were carried out in order to investigate the reaction mechanism for the carbonylation of methanol to acetic acid by [M(CO)2I2]

- (M =

Rh, Ir). The study included the initial oxidative addition of CH3I to

[M(CO)2I2]- : (1) [M(CO)2I2]

- + CH3I [M(CO)2I3(CH3)]-, as well as the

migratory insertion of CO into the M-CH3 bond : (2) [M(CO)2I3(CH3)]-

[M(CO)I3(COCH3)]-. Considerations were also given to migratory

insertion processes where the I--ligand trans to methyl was replaced by another ligand L (where L = MeOH, MeC(O)OH, CO, P(OMe)3 or

SnI3-) or an empty coordination site. The calculated free energies of

activation and heat of reactions are in good agreement with the experimental data. A full analysis is provided of how ligands trans to the migrating methyl group influence the barrier of migratory insertion.

3

M

OC I

OC I

M

I I

OC IC

CH3O

M

OC I

OC I

I

CH3

M

OC I

OC I

HI

H2OC

MeI

CH3O

MeCOI

MeOHI MeCO 2H

CO

1

2

3

4

Catalytic Cycle for Acetic Acid Synthesis

M= Rh +, Ir +

4

Thermodynamics of oxidative addition reactions

Meta l H298(g) S298(g) G298(g) Esolv G298(solv)

Rh 29.5 -13.6 33.6 -22.0 13.6Ir 22.4 -15.1 26.9 -22.5 4.4

kcal/mol

Meta l H298(g) S298(g) G298(g) Esolv G298(solv)

Rh -38.9 -28.4 -30.4 18.6 -11.8Ir -41.4 -27.7 -33.1 14.0 -19.1

CH3I + M(CO)2I2−→ CH3 ( )M CO 2I 2 + I

-

CH3M(CO)2I2 + I- → CH3 ( )M CO 2 I3−

5

I

R hO

CI

C

O

I

C

r(R

h -H)

r(C

- I)

r (Rh-C)RC=3

G

O R C = r(M-C)-r(I-C)

Transition S tate Region

O

C

OCRh

C

I

I

I

r(C

-I)

r(R

h-C

)

RC=-1.0

6

Comparison of static(ADF) calculations and dynamic(PAW) calculation

Comparison of static(ADF) calculations and dynamic(PAW) calculation

Metal ‡ S‡ G‡

RhPAW

ADF

19.2

13.8

-21.1

-43.9

25.5

26.9

Expt 12.0 -39.4 23.7

Ir PAW 12.1 -23.4 19.1

ADF 6.0 -44.6 19.3

Expt 12.9 -26.8 20.9kcal/mol

7

I

O

I

C

Rh

C

I

C

O2 .7 7

2.39

1.91

OO

I

CC

Rh

C

I I

O

I

C

Rh

O

C

C

O

I

C

0 kcal/mol

‡ 18 kcal/mol

S‡ 1.1 cal/mol•K

G‡ 17 kcal/mol - 5.6 kcal/mol

S 2.3 cal/mol•K

G = - 6.2 kcal/mol

Migratory Insertion of [MeRh(CO)2I3]-

Transition State

Reactant

Product

‡expt

= 15 kcal/mol S‡

expt = -14 cal/mol•K

G ‡expt

= 19 kcal/mol

expt = -8.8 kcal/mol

S expt = - 13 cal/mol•K

G expt = -5.0 kcal/mol

8

I

O

C

I

C

Ir

C

I

O

2 .77

2.50 1. 88

O

I

C

I

I r

C

C

I

O

O

C

IIr

O

C

C

O

C

I

H‡

= 28 kcal/mol

S‡

= 2.0 cal/mol•K

G‡

= 28 kcal/mol

Transition State

kcal/mol

Reactant

Product

H= 4.0 kcal/mol S = 3.6 cal/mol•K G = 2.9 kcal/mol

Migratory Insertion in [MeIrCO2I3]-

2.90

Hexpt‡ = 37 kcal/mol

Sexpt‡ = 22 cal/mol•K

Gexpt‡ = 31 kcal/mol

9

Comparison of static (ADF) calculations and dynamic (PAW) calculations

H ‡expt = 155 ± 4 kJ/mol

S ‡ expt = 91 ± 8 J/mol•K G ‡ expt = 128± 4 kJ/m ol

I

O

C

I

C

Ir

C

I

O

2.60

2.42

1.80

H ‡ = 118 kJ/molS ‡ = 8 J/mol•K G ‡ A DF = 116 kJ/m ol

A DF

A DF

H ‡ = 126 kJ/molS ‡ = 60 J/mol• KG ‡ PAW = 111 kJ/m ol

PAW

PAW

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3

0.0

00

01

RC = r(C-C)

G k

J/m

ol

Free Energy Reaction Profile

3.53

10

H‡expt = 37 ± 1 kcal/mol

S‡ expt = 22 ± 2 cal/mol•K G‡ expt = 31 ± 1 kcal/mol

Reduction of migration barrier by substituting iodine trans to methyl

O

C

I

O

C

Ir

C

II

+L or Act

-I-

O

CO

C

Ir

C

II

LL = CO; MeOH; AcOH; P(OMe)3 ; None. Act = SnI2.

H‡expt = 21 ± 1 kcal/mol

S‡ expt = -9 ± 2 cal/mol•K G‡ expt = 24 ± 1 kcal/mol

L= I- L=CO

11

Activation parameters for the CO insertionActivation parameters for the CO insertion

kcal/mol

[Ir(CO)2I2(CH3)L]n- [Ir(CO)I2(COCH3)L]n-

L H‡ S‡ G‡

--- 21 -5.2 23

I- 28 2.0 28

CH3OH 33 -5.7 35

CH3C(O)OH 34 -4.7 36

CO 17 -3.9 18

P(OMe)3 14 1.9 13

SnI3- 22 -3.9 23

12

Isomers of [M(CO)2I2(CH3)L]n- and their relative energies

Isomers of [M(CO)2I2(CH3)L]n- and their relative energies

L M fac,cis mer,cis mer,trans

I Rh 0.0a 1.3 0.4

Ir 0.0 4.1 4.1

CO Rh 0.0a -2.2 -2.5

Ir 0.0 -1.8 0.4

a Energies(kcal/mol) relative to fac,cis isomer

13

Activation parameters for the different isomers of [Ir(CO)3I2(CH3)]

Activation parameters for the different isomers of [Ir(CO)3I2(CH3)]

Isomer H‡ S‡ G‡

fac,cis 17.3 -3.90 18.5

mer,cis 28.8 -1.19 29.2

24.1ª -4.34 25.4

mer,trans 16.8 -0.46 16.9

expt. 21.3 -8.6 23.8

kcal/mol

ª Methyl group migrating to the CO which is trans to another CO

14

ConclusionConclusion• Static and dynamic calculation results for the oxidative addition and

the migratory insertion step in the carbonylation of methanol catalyzed by [M(CO)2I2]- (M=Rh, Ir) are in good agreement with the experimental values.

• The rate-determining step for the Rh catalyst is the oxidative addition of CH3I, whereas for Ir it is the migratory insertion step.

• Enthalpic and entropic contributions to G‡ can vary considerably depending on reaction conditions without changing G‡ considerably.

• Detailed study on the methyl migration of [Ir(CO)2I2(CH3)L]n- (L is trans to I-) shows that free energies of activation is in the order of P(OMe)3 < CO < SnI3

-, none < I- < CH3OH, CH3C(O)OH. • In predicting the reaction rate, the relative stabilities of various

isomers should be considered.