View
213
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
1/20
J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413
A primer on the exposure of non-financialcorporations to foreign exchange rate risk
Sohnke M. Bartram a,, Gunter Dufey b, Michael R. Frenkel c
aLancaster University, Management School, Department of Accounting and Finance, Lancaster LA1 4YX, UK
b Nanyang Business School, NTU Singapore and Ross School of Business, The University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234, USAc WHU Koblenz, Department of Economics, Burgplatz 2, D-65179 Vallendar, Germany
Received 15 August 2004; accepted 3 April 2005
Available online 7 July 2005
Abstract
In the presence of deviations from parity conditions such as purchasing power parity and the
international Fisher effect, non-financial corporations are confronted with risks stemming from the
impact of unexpected exchange rate changes on the value of the firm, especially in the short- and the
medium-term. The motivation for this paper stems from the authors dissonance with both the existing
academic literature and observed corporate practice, where too much emphasis is placed on either
financial assets or hedging instruments, or forecasting rates in the latter case. This paper analyzes
the economic exposure of non-financial firms, focusing on cash flows. In this context, issues such as
the dimension of pass-through time and other complexities of exposures are explicitly addressed and
such considerations in turn are linked to hedging decisions. The role of the competitive environment
is stressed and related to analytical concepts such as currency of denomination and currency of
determination. Finally, the complexity of the trade-off between financial and operative hedges is
emphasized. The overall objective is to pull together diverse strands of the existing academic literature
into a clear conceptual framework with the ultimate aim of improving managerial decision-making. 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
JEL classification: G3; F4; F3
Keywords: Foreign exchange rates; Exposure; Corporate finance; Risk management; Hedging; Derivatives
Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 1524 592 083; fax: +44 1425 952 10 70.
E-mail addresses: s.m.bartram@lancaster.ac.uk (S.M. Bartram), gdufey@umich.edu (G. Dufey),
mfrenkel@whu.edu (M.R. Frenkel).
URL: http://www.lancs.ac.uk/staff/bartras1.
1042-444X/$ see front matter 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.mulfin.2005.04.001
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
2/20
S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413 395
1. Introduction
Foreign exchange rate changes represent an important source of risk for non-financial
corporations. Spectacular losses or even bankruptcies over the last decade and longerhave drastically demonstrated the consequences of unprofessional management of these
risks.1 With the emergence of large currency blocs with their own, internally focused
macro-economic policies, together with the parallel rise in the international involvement
of firms (usually referred to as globalization), and the opening of markets through more
liberal trade policies and the technology-driven reduction in transportation costs, the num-
ber of firms impacted directly or indirectly by exchange rate changes has dramatically
grown.
Corporate foreign exchange risks began to attract widespread attention during the 1970s
when the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates unraveled. The subsequent rise in
volatility of exchange rates and interest rates fostered a burst of financial innovation, exem-
plified by the proliferation of derivative instruments and their increasing use by corporations
in all industry sectors (see e.g., Bartram et al., 2004; Bodnar et al., 1998). Derivatives can
be quite efficient hedging instruments for corporate risk management. Nevertheless, they
can be quite complex as well, with strong leverage effects. Consequently, the use of these
instruments carries with it high risks both for the unsophisticated user, as well as for
executives tempted by gambling with their shareholders money. In contrast, when properly
used for hedging, derivatives or various other financial transactions can reduce those risks of
non-financial firms for which they are not rewarded in the market. Since the term hedging
is widely misused in practice, a clear conceptual foundation is key to management actionconsistent with the objective of firm value maximization.
Hedging requires first and foremost an understanding of the underlying risk position: it
means creating a position to offset an exposure. A hedge can be implemented either in the
cash market or with derivatives. In contrast, speculation means taking actions in view of an
explicit or implicit forecast that deviates from that of the market (as revealed, for example,
by forward rates or interest differentials in functioning markets). In other words, a good test
of whether an action involves hedging or speculation is the presence or absence of a causal
relationship to the underlying exposure of the firm. This consideration focuses the agenda
firmly on the definition and estimation of the exposure of firm value due to unexpected
exchange rate changes. Here is where problems begin: the literature offers three definitionsof exposure, namely accounting, transaction and economic (or cashflow), but only the
latter is consistent with financial theory.
The use of alternative measures such as accounting or transaction exposure is largely
prompted by management incentive issues (e.g., bonuses are paid on the basis of reported
1 To illustrate, exchange rate losses on its European sales were identified as the largest factor in a 16 billion
Yen operating loss of the Japanese carmaker Mazda in 2001. In the same year, Toyota reported a 2.5 billion
Yen operating loss in Europe, indicating that the current Euro exchange rate against both the Yen and Sterling
meant Toyotas European operations would not return to profitability in the near term. Similarly, the profits of theEuropean aerospace and defense group EADS were wiped out in the year 2000 by a Euro 1.4 billion currency hit.
And Uniwear, a Belgian group that specializes in hosiery, announced that its 39.5% plunge in profits in 1998 (to
20 billion Belgian Franc) was mainly due to losses on Sterling and Dollar exchange rates.
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
3/20
396 S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413
earnings) associated with the reliance on accrual accounting based on historical cost. For the
last 30 years, these issues have been addressed in many diverse publications, but the various
facets of economic exposure are distributed throughout a vast literature. The purpose of this
paper is to pull together all relevant strands of the literature and to present a comprehensiveanalysis of economic foreign exchange rate exposure, including an explicit consideration
of the time dimension that is relevant in this context. Last but not the least, we provide some
cogent and consistent implications for corporate hedging policies, including fundamental
considerations regarding the choice of hedging instruments.
To this end, the remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 briefly reviews
the definition of exchange rate exposure. Section 3 examines exchange rate effects on non-
financial firms competing in export or import markets. Section 4 focuses on additional
aspects of foreign exchange rate exposure resulting from basically indirect effects of unan-
ticipated foreign exchange rate changes on the profitability of firms. From the analysis of
the various dimensions of exposure, Section 4 derives implications for managerial action
such as debt denomination and duration structuring, the use of derivatives and other hedging
activities. Finally, Section 5 presents the conclusion of the analysis.
2. Concepts of foreign exchange rate exposure
Foreign exchange rate riskin general is related to unexpected changes in foreign exchange
rates. It can be quantified with the statistical measure of variance or standard deviation. More
specifically, foreign exchange rate risk exists because international parity conditions suchas Purchasing Power Parity and the International Fisher Effect hold at best in the long run.
Consequently, there is no immediate adjustment among exchange rates, interest rates and
prices for goods and services. The concept of foreign exchange rate exposure describes the
impact of foreign exchange rate changes on corporations. More precisely, economic foreign
exchange rate exposure represents the sensitivity of firm value in national currency with
regard to unexpected foreign exchange rate changes (Adler and Dumas, 1984). Transaction
exposure defines the effect of exchange rate risk on individually contracted transactions and
can thus be perceived as a part, or component, of the economic exposure. This is in contrast
to the concept of accounting exposure, which refers to the impact of exchange rate risk on
accounting measures.Conventional wisdom of exposure and hedging typically relates to the management of
investment portfolios, especially with regard to fixed-income securities and, by extension,
to commercial receivables. For financial assets, the foreign exchange rate exposure can be
determined and quantified without great difficulties, since the amount, currency and term of
payments of securities, accounts receivables, or payables are typically contractually fixed
(equities represent an exception here). Consequently, financial assets with a few exceptions
are subject to foreign exchange risk only if some of its cash flows are denominated in
foreign currency. Due to the deterministic character of the cash flows, hedging the asset
against unexpected foreign exchange rate changes can be accomplished with relative ease
in the forward market. A typical example is the hedging of a foreign currency receivable byselling an equivalent amount of foreign currency for forward delivery, i.e., establishing a
short position in that currency to offset changes in the value of future cash flows. Essentially,
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
4/20
S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413 397
the forward hedge converts a foreign currency asset, or liability, into an asset denominated
in domestic currency.
The analysis of foreign exchange rate exposures for a corporation on the basis of indi-
vidual assets and liabilities is, however, incomplete, since portfolio effects can be realizedif different assets and/or liabilities are denominated in currencies that are not perfectly cor-
related. This is particularly true for financial institutions, which have almost exclusively
financial assets on their balance sheet, but also for the large group of non-financial firms
for whom it is not untypical to have some of their receivables, payables, debt and other
financial positions in different currencies. When assets and liabilities are denominated in
the same (foreign) currency and have the same duration of cash flows, matching or netting
of cash flows is possible (Pringle, 1991). Moreover, there is also a statistical relationship
between assets and liabilities in different currencies due to the correlations between differ-
ent exchange rates. As a consequence, diversification effects result as changes of cash flows
in one currency are partially offset by changes of cash flows in other currencies, and one
has the possibility of reducing (but not eliminating) risk through cross hedging for the
combined position by utilizing a matrix of expected correlations among currencies based
largely on past experience.
Even when focusing on these net effects, the analysis of foreign exchange rate exposure
presented so far remains at the level of transaction exposure. A transaction exposure is
relatively easy to identify and to hedge, but it represents only a part of the relevant eco-
nomic foreign exchange rate exposure of the firm. While exchange rate movements affect
contractually fixed transactions directly, there are additional effects on future cash flows
related to the competitive position of the firm, which can manifest themselves in price aswell as quantity effects. Consequently, only an integrated analysis of the foreign exchange
rate exposure of financial assets and real assets provides the basis for a complete profile of
the economic foreign exchange rate exposure of the entire firm (Adler and Dumas, 1980).
3. Analysis of economic foreign exchange rate exposures
3.1. Exposure analysis for exporters and import-competing firms
For non-financial institutions, financial assets with contractually fixed cash flows and(more) readily available market prices only play a minor role. By contrast, current values
of real assets such as machinery and production facilities are important for them, but at the
same time more difficult to determine, since the future cash flows from these assets are not
contractually fixed and may be affected by currency movements. Thus, they can be often
estimated only with a great deal of uncertainty.
By definition, the economic foreign exchange rate exposure of real assets consists of
the effect of foreign exchange rate movements on the associated future cash inflows and
outflows. However, in contrast to financial assets, cash flows of real assets are uncertain
even without currency risk, since the quantities as well as future prices of inputs and outputs
are not known with certainty. As a result, the analysis of the economic foreign exchangerate exposure has to consider the short- and long-term impact of exchange rate movements
with regard to prices and quantities (Adler, 1994; Dufey and Giddy, 1978). Since suppliers,
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
5/20
398 S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413
Fig. 1. Devaluation effect on exporter with perfect competition.
customers and competitors are affected by foreign exchange risk as well and possibly
attempt to pass the consequences on to other market participants (pass-through), competitive
conditions play a crucial role in determining economic foreign exchange rate exposure.
The general principles of economic foreign exchange rate exposure of non-financial firms
can be illustrated in a simplified analysis of an exporter (with cash sales to avoid the foreign
currency receivables digression) based on comparative statics. At the outset of the analysis,
it is assumed that the exporter only uses domestic inputs to produce one good, which is
sold exclusively in a foreign market with perfect competition (Levi, 1994). As markets arecompetitive and individual market participants are price takers in the short run, their only
decision variable consists of the quantity of production and sales. Profits are maximized
where marginal costs, MC, which define the supply curve S, equal marginal revenues MR
(Fig. 1). Applying the small country argument to the relevant market, the demand curve
(and, thus, the marginal revenue curve) is horizontal. For simplicity, it is further assumed
that the quantities of production and sales are identical, i.e., there are no inventories. Further,
the common assumption of increasing marginal cost is made.
The profit of the exporter that originates from the sales of a quantity X1 at price PDC1 (in
domestic currency DC) is:2
G1 = (MR1 MC1)X1 = (PDC1 MC1)X1. (1)
The sales price in domestic currency can be expressed as the product of the price in foreign
currency PFC and the exchange rate S (in domestic currency per unit of foreign currency):
PDC1 = S1PFC1 . (2)
Assuming that the small country assumption applies to all domestic exports, exchange
rate changes do not change the sales price in foreign currency. Therefore, a depreciation of
2 The sales price is equal to marginal revenue with perfect competition, i.e. the demand curve D is horizontal.
It is assumed that there are no fixed costs.
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
6/20
S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413 399
the domestic currency (anincrease in the exchange rate) from S1 to S2 leads to a proportionate
increase in PDC, as the sales price in the foreign currency does not change:
PDC2 = S2PFC1 > PDC1 = S1PFC1 . (3)
At the same time, foreign sales prices at different points in time are assumed to be determined
by the foreign inflation ratePF:
PFC2 = PFC1 (1 + P
F). (4)
This implies that all suppliers increase their prices in foreign currency according to
the foreign inflation rate. Inflationary effects abroad have the same effects on PDC as a
depreciation of the domestic currency:
PDC2 = S2PFC1 (1 + PF). (5)
Combining (2) and (5) yields:
PDC2
PDC1
=S2
S1(1+ PF). (6)
Consequently, price increases in the world market as well as a depreciation of the domes-
tic currency will result in increasing marginal revenues. However, this may translate only
partially into higher profits due to possible simultaneous domestic inflation. Thus, in the
end, the change in the real exchange rate determines the overall effect on profits and, thus,exposure to foreign exchange rate risk of exporters. Assuming that there is no domestic
inflation so that input prices of exporters remain unchanged, marginal costs do not change
and the exporter increases production to the profit-maximizing quantityX2 (Fig. 1). A depre-
ciation of the domestic currency thus leads to an increase in sales revenue and profits as
well as to higher production, confirming the results ofShapiro (1975).
As there are no barriers to market entry in the case of perfect competition, higher profits
not only induce higher output by producers but could also attract new competitors in the
long run, who wish to benefit from more advantageous market conditions. This would shift
the supply curve outward, so that the output effect is larger.
In addition to the effects described so far, Fig. 2 illustrates the implications of higherinput prices induced directly or indirectly by a depreciation of the domestic currency. After
a depreciation, prices in domestic currency increase for imported (consumer) goods and
the opportunity costs (of sales abroad) increase for tradable domestic inputs. As a result,
domestic cost of living, wages and prices for domestic inputs may also rise; so that the
depreciation indirectly induces higher production costs even if the exporter has no direct
foreign inputs. Higher costs correspond to an upward shift of the marginal cost curve, from
MC1 to MC2 (Fig. 2). As a result, exports and profits are lower, a result that is independent
of the possibilities of an adjustment of prices as mentioned above. If domestic inflation,
which is reflected in the increase in cost
MC2
MC1= (1 + PD), (7)
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
7/20
400 S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413
Fig. 2. Long-term effect of depreciation on exporter.
is lower than the combined effect of the exchange rate increase and foreign inflation (6),
the domestic firm still benefits, since a real depreciation occurs and profits in real terms
increase:
PDC2
PDC1
MC2
MC1=
S2
S1(1 + PF) (1 + PD)
= S(1+ PF) (PD PF)
S (PD PF).
(8)
As (8) shows, a positive net effect on the profits of exporters results from a real depreci-
ation. If purchasing power parity holds initially, net effects occur should the exchange rate
deviate from purchasing power parity in the new equilibrium. This illustrates again that the
economic currency risk depends entirely on changes in the real exchange rate.
In the case of monopolistic competition, the demand curve is downward-sloping, as is
marginal revenue (Fig. 3). For simplicity, we assume that marginal costs are constant. If
the domestic currency depreciates, each point on the demand curve shifts upward by the
rate of foreign currency appreciation and the new sales price for the export quantity X is
determined as
PDC2 = S2P
FC2 = S2(1 + P
F)PFC1 . (9)
Since this is a proportional price change, the absolute price increase is larger for high
prices than for low ones. As in the case of perfect competition, the depreciation ceteris
paribus leads to higher export quantities. Put differently, the same number of exported
products generates larger revenues in domestic currency. Consequently, the depreciation
leads to an increase in the profit-maximizing export quantity from X1 to X2, which is
determined by the intersection of the marginal cost curve and the marginal revenue curve
(this effect is smaller for increasing marginal cost than for constant marginal cost). Due tothe finite elasticity of the demand curve, the sales price increases less than it does under
perfect competition.
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
8/20
S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413 401
Fig. 3. Impact of depreciation on exporter with imperfect competition.
If the exporting firm is a subsidiary of a foreign company, the impact of exchange rate
changes has to be analyzed in the local currency of the parent and not in the currency of the
subsidiary. The effects on the profits of the subsidiary measured in foreign currency, i.e., the
local currency of the parent, are illustrated in Fig. 4. As in the analysis shown in Fig. 3, we
again assume monopolistic competition, constant marginal costs and independence of input
prices from foreign prices. A change in the exchange rate now has no effect on the demand
curve and the marginal revenue curve. The subsidiarys cost of production, however, accrues
in its domestic currency. Consequently, a depreciation of the currency or the subsidiary
reduces these costs from the perspective of the parent. Therefore, the marginal cost curve
shifts downward by the rate of the depreciation of the currency of the subsidiary. As in
the earlier analysis, the optimal export quantity of the exporter increases from X1 to X2.
However, the price expressed in the currency of the parent company declines. Nevertheless,
sales revenue will increase because demand is price-elastic around the optimum. The costs
Fig. 4. Foreign currency analysis of depreciation effect on exporter.
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
9/20
402 S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413
Fig. 5. Depreciation effect on domestic producer with perfect competition.
of production increase as well, but to a lesser degree than sales rise. As a consequence, the
resulting net effect is an increase in profits in the currency of the parent company.
The analysis so far has demonstrated that foreign exchange rate risk will, in the short run,
affect the revenue side of the business of an exporting firm and will also directly or indirectly
affect its cost structure over time. Some domestic firms may, however, engage only to a small
extent if at all in international trade. Nevertheless, even companies with purely domestic
operations, with no exports or imports, nor foreign currency debt, etc., which consequentlyface neither accounting nor transaction exposure, may have economic foreign exchange rate
exposure. This can happen in case international market leaders located abroad are able to
contest the local market with imports (import competition) (Hodder, 1982; Marston, 2001;
OBrien, 1994; Aggarwal, 1981).
If domestic prices are influenced by the value of foreign currencies because of import
competition, exchange rate changes will affect revenue and profits of domestic producers
despite their focus on the domestic market. Depending on the direction of the exchange rate
change, prices may rise or firms may be forced to lower their prices. Fig. 5 shows the effect
of a depreciation of the domestic currency on the business of an import-competing domestic
firm with perfect competition.D denotes domestic demand for the good under consideration.S1W depicts the world market price that is given for the individual import-competing firm.
For simplicity, we assume that there is only one domestic import-competing firm. The
marginal costs of the firm (MC1) determine the supply curve of the domestic producer (S1D)
and, thereby, the level of domestic demand satisfied by domestic production. A depreciation
of the domestic currency increases the world market price expressed in domestic currency
units from P1 to P2 so that the world market supply curve shifts upward to S2W. With
increasing marginal costs, this leads to an increase in the number of units sold in the domestic
market fromX1 toX2. Here we assume that the depreciation reduces but does not completely
eliminate imports in the market under consideration. As the marginal cost function does
not change in response to the depreciation in the short run, the increase in marginal costs isonly caused by higher output. As a consequence, profits are unambiguously higher for the
domestic firm after the currency depreciation. Similarly, an appreciation forces domestic
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
10/20
S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413 403
Fig. 6. Depreciation effect on domestic producer with imperfect competition.
firms to lower their price. As a result, domestic producers suffer a profit loss following the
appreciation.
Over time, exchange rate changes may affect the costs of the firm. For example, a
depreciation of the domestic currency leads to more expensive imports, which can induce
higher domestic production costs through higher prices for imported inputs or through
higher wages induced by higher costs of living. As a consequence, the supply curve of
the domestic producer (S2D = MC2) shifts upward, once again causing his competitiveness
vis-a-vis imported products to deteriorate and, thus, reducing his market share (Fig. 5).
Finally, we examine the situation in which a domestic producer is a monopolist for his
products although there are similar products available in the world market. The producer
is then operating in monopolistic competition and domestic buyers consider world market
products as imperfect substitutes. For simplicity, we assume that the producers marginal
costs are constant. This situation is illustrated in Fig. 6. A depreciation of the domestic
currency increases the price of substitutes from abroad so that the demand curve and the
marginal revenue curve shift upwards to D2 and MR2, respectively. Revenue increases by
more than in the case of perfect competition, because not only the sales quantity rises
(X2 >X1), but also the sales price (P2 > P1). At constant marginal cost of production, thedomestic producer ends up with higher profits. However, as discussed before, over time the
domestic marginal cost of production may increase (MC1 shifts to MC2), leading to a higher
price (PL), lower sales, market share and profits. As the analysis demonstrates, there is an
economic foreign exchange rate exposure even for domestic producers who do not engage
in international trade originating from import competition. Note, that this effect may occur
not only in the presence of foreign import competition, but also in the case of a threat of
foreign penetration of the domestic market.
3.2. Exposure analysis for importers
The effect of foreign exchange rate changes on exporters and on importers is essentially
the opposite for each. While a depreciation of the domestic currency improves the business
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
11/20
404 S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413
Fig. 7. Impact of depreciation on importer with imperfect competition.
of exporters, it has a negative impact on the profits of importing firms. Here, we focus on
traders who can import any quantities of goods in the world market at a given price and
can sell these goods in domestic markets under conditions of monopolistic competition.
This implies that domestic markets can be separated from the world market. Of course, we
could alternatively assume that these firms are foreign producers with constant marginal
production costs who sell their products in what we refer to as the domestic market. Thus,
they are exporters of the foreign country.
Assuming that the domestic currency depreciates, importing firms are negatively affected
because imported goods become more expensive. In Fig. 7, we show this as an upward shift
of the marginal cost curve from MC1 to MC2. Note, that the same effect would result from
foreign inflation. As a result, the depreciation leads to a price increase in domestic currency
units and to a decline in import volumes. The import value will decline due to price-elastic
demand around the optimum.
With imperfect competition (i.e., a not completely elastic demand curve), the increase
in cost resulting from the depreciation reduces the quantity of imported goods (M2 P1), total
revenues of the importer decrease due to price-elastic demand around the optimum. Total
costs of the importer will decline as well, but to a smaller extent than the decrease in sales,
so that the depreciation of the domestic currency leads to a net decline in monopolistic
profits.
The analysis from the perspective of a foreign exporter or the parent company of the
importer both focusing on the effects in foreign currency units is very similar. As shown
in Fig. 8, marginal costs are unchanged, as the change in the exchange rate has no impact
on foreign currency costs. However, the sales price in foreign currency is lower after a
depreciation, and so is the profit-maximizing import quantity. Since a smaller number ofgoods are sold at a lower price, total revenues decrease. As they decrease more than total
costs, profits of the foreign parent company decline.
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
12/20
S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413 405
Fig. 8. Foreign currency analysis of depreciation effect on importer.
3.3. Dimensions of complex economic foreign exchange rate exposure
An important aspect relevant for the analysis of the economic foreign exchange rate
exposure is the distinction between the currency of denomination and the currency of
determination (OBrien, 1994; Flood and Lessard, 1986; Dufey, 1972). The currency of
denomination of a transaction is the currency in which the payments of contractually fixed
agreements are specified (e.g., the currency specified in a purchase contract). By contrast,the currency of determination indicates which currency is most important in determining
the price in the world market. For example, lead is traded and paid in pound sterling at the
LME, but the price is determined by the U.S. Dollar, as the United States is a substantial
source of supply in addition to representing a large part of total demand. The currency of
determination is thus specified by the international competitiveness of corporations, which
results from comparative advantages in terms of technology, efficiency and effectiveness of
production, cost structures, etc.
To illustrate the previous point, consider the automotive industry. In this market, the
U.S. Dollar and the Japanese Yen can be regarded as currencies of determination. Because
of the significant size of the national car markets and the associated cash flows in theirnational markets, the value of these currencies also plays an important role for car prices
in international trade. Specifically, international competition forces car manufacturers in
other countries to follow price changes of producers from countries of the currencies of
determination in order to keep their market shares (Williamson, 2001).
The size of the exposure is closely related to its time horizon. In the short run, the
opportunity for firms to change their exposure is very limited. Changing cost structures
by altering sources of supply or the location of production is not possible within this time
frame. As a consequence, the asset exposures can be expected to be larger in the short-term
than in the long-term, where operative flexibility may be used to change the asset exposure
through the purchase, sale or relocation of assets. To illustrate, considerations concerningthe foreign exchange rate exposure of a firm may be a motivation to engage in foreign direct
investment, to create excess capacities or to invest in machinery with multi-functionality.
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
13/20
406 S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413
Fig. 9. Transaction exposure of exporter with fixed sales.
However, to build in such flexibility will be costly. Conclusions with regards to the exposure
after hedging may be different, though, as financial hedging is readily available to provide
short-term protection. Another facet of the time dimension is the speed of the adjustment
processes of prices and quantities following a change in the exchange rate. The exposure is
determined by the ability to pass the (negative) consequences of exchange rate movements
on to other market participants and by the pace with which equilibria between exchange
rates, interest rates, and prices for goods and services are re-established (Bodnar et al., 2002;
Flood and Lessard, 1986).In reality, existing long-term purchase agreements between companies as well as techno-
logical facts often cause a time lag for exchange rate changes to induce the described effects
on prices and quantities. Moreover, the points in time for delivery, billing, and payment typi-
cally differ, giving rise to accounting and transaction exposures for accounts receivables and
accounts payables. As a result, firms often try to reduce their foreign exchange rate exposure
through the choice of the invoicing currency and the hedging of transaction exposures with
forwards or futures.
If the revenues of an exporter are fixed in the domestic currency in the short run because
sales quantities and prices are fixed either by setting prices in the domestic currency or by
hedging foreign currency prices through foreign exchange forwards/futures then only the
cost side of the exporter can possibly be influenced by exchange rate changes. As explained
above, a depreciation of the domestic currency can lead to cost increases if tradable factors
of production become more expensive or if an increase of production costs results from
increased domestic inflation as a result of the depreciation (Fig. 9). Consequently, profits
are reduced in the short run unless the cost of the input factors is hedged against currency
risk as well (Levi, 1996).3 The analysis of this situation in foreign currency (perspective
of a foreign parent) results in lower profits as well (in the short run), since the revenues
in foreign currency decrease for the same hedging/invoicing strategy and they decrease
more than the costs fall if the depreciation causes higher costs in the domestic currency.
3 However, hedging inflation risk is difficult in general.
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
14/20
S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413 407
The previous considerations show that foreign exchange rate risk management by hedg-
ing individual transactions in the forward market (possibly on a revolving basis) or by
choosing the invoicing currency guarantees only a short-term reduction or delay of the
exposure. That is, foreign exchange risk for existing contracts can be hedged, but transac-tion hedging provides no protection against future changes of competitiveness induced by
(unexpected) exchange rate changes. For those changes, the implementation of a long-term
strategy or a long-term hedge is necessary. However, the extent and magnitude to which
such future effects on cash flows are relevant in the analysis and hedging of risk, depends on
the relevant discount rate. Since cash flows that are very far in the future are less important
for firm value, defined as the present value of all future cash flows, it appears sensible to
define a time horizon up to which cash flows are planned and considered in the analysis
(Oxelheim and Wihlborg, 1991).
The economic foreign exchange rate exposure of multinational firms typically has many
more dimensions and facets than that analyzed for the exporters and importers above, since
it is determined by many different factors. For example, as pointed out by OBrien (1994),
an exposure often exists for several products (multi-product exposure), several markets
(multi-market exposure) and with regard to several currencies (multi-currency exposure).
Apart from exports and imports of input and output components, the foreign exchange
rate exposure is often related to the financial structure of different (foreign) subsidiaries
with their parent company, which in turn is influenced by the repatriation of profits, e.g.,
via dividends, patents fees or royalties, transfer prices, etc. (Smithson, 2000). Through the
impact on the operating cash flow, the investment decisions of the firm are affected as well
(Campa and Goldberg, 1999).Consequently, it is often assumed that the foreign exchange rate exposure of multina-
tionals is larger than that of firms with primarily domestic activities. In this context, the
percentage of foreign sales or foreign assets is perceived as an indicator of the foreign
exchange rate exposure. However, companies with sizable international business in dif-
ferent countries and different currencies are often diversified across various currencies so
that they possess natural hedges (i.e., not only revenues but also costs depend on the
exchange rate) and that they can react at lower cost to exchange rate movements because
of their foreign subsidiaries (e.g., shifting of production, operative flexibility). In addition,
as discussed earlier, any firm or subsidiary can be exposed to exchange rate risk without
its operation necessarily being reflected in international trade, as long as it is faced withcompetition from abroad (Hodder, 1982).
If companies in the same industry are relatively homogeneous with regard to their busi-
ness activity, the industry sector might give a general indication about the extent of foreign
exchange rate exposure. Thus, export-oriented industries and sectors with import com-
petition can be expected to exhibit a positive exposure. By contrast, for industry classes
with high import content, a negative relationship between corporate performance mea-
sures and exchange rate changes can be expected. The economic foreign exchange rate
exposure is eventually determined by factors such as the international, industry- or even
firm-specific competitive structures, the degree of product diversification, the competitive
position, the extent of geographic diversification, and the relevant product and factor mar-kets (Allayannis and Ihrig, 2001; Marston, 2001; Johnson, 1996; Pringle, 1995; Moffett and
Karlsen, 1994; Lessard, 1991; Pringle, 1991; Luehrman, 1990; Abuaf and Schoess, 1988;
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
15/20
408 S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413
Flood and Lessard, 1986; Dickins, 1988; Lessard and Lightstone, 1986).
To summarize, the following aspects are crucial for identifying, analyzing, and quanti-
fying the economic foreign exchange rate exposure of non-financial corporations:
a long-term, forward-looking perspective;
the clear focus on cash flows;
taking into account price and quantity effects of exchange rate changes;
the consideration of operative flexibility of the firm (adjustment of prices, changes of
market for inputs and outputs);
the focus on the currencies of denomination and determination.
4. Implications for corporate hedging decisions
With regard to the implementation of risk management strategies, financial as well as
operative hedging tools appear reasonable to cope with foreign exchange rate exposures.
Symmetric exposures can be hedged with cash transactions, including debt denomination,
or with derivatives, having straight line-payoff functions such as forwards, futures or swaps.
However, corporate exposures may not be linear or symmetric (Bartram, 2004). Asymmet-
ric foreign exchange rate exposures originate, for instance, when multiple currency price
lists are used, by which effectively a currency option is granted to the customer (Kanas,
1996a,b; Giddy and Dufey, 1995). Furthermore, real or financial options at the firm level
can cause non-linear exposures as well (Ware and Winter, 1988), and firms may adjust their
pricing in different ways as a reaction to currency appreciations and depreciations (Knetter,1994). Having recognized that exposures may frequently be non-linear, simple currency
options will rarely fit: exposures often reflect complex, compound options that may not
be available in the market (Giddy and Dufey, 1995). Apart from using derivatives, hedging
can be implemented by choosing the currency of denomination of short-term and long-term
debt and other cash transactions.4 Vice versa, the extensive use of currency options may
simply reflect that management is trying (or feels compelled) to arbitrage compensation
systems based on (deficient) accounting information the bottom line rather than cash
flow driven value maximization.
Internal methods of risk management such as making payments earlier or later (e.g.
for accounts payables), the matching/netting of cash flows in foreign currency or the use
of transfer pricing are, however, often rather ineffective instruments to manage foreign
exchange rate risk, as they reduce only the gross exposure of subsidiaries, but not the
exposure at the level of the consolidated parent company (Oxelheim and Wihlborg, 1997;
Eiteman et al., 2004). What counts is the change in the denomination of liabilities from
unrelated providers of funds that may result from such internal movements of funds.
In addition to derivatives and cash transactions, operative instruments can be employed
especially for the management of long-term exposures through the natural hedges of
production facilities abroad and the operative flexibility of excess capacities (Aggarwal and
4 The hedging effect of foreign currency debt is analyzed in OBrien (1994); examples are presented in Shapiro
(1999).
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
16/20
S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413 409
Soenen, 1989; Lessard and Lightstone, 1986; Srinivasulu, 1981). Non-financial firms can
benefit from natural hedge positions if cost and revenue cash flows occur in such a way that
largely compensate currency positions, which depend on the same determinants (Shapiro,
1999; Chowdhry and Howe, 1999; Logue, 1995; Moffett and Karlsen, 1994).A general challenge of hedging exposures consists of the fact that the exposure is con-
stantly changing over time, reflecting changes in corporate assets and activities as well as
developments in the competitive environment. As a result, the hedge ratio is time-dependent,
and hedging needs adjustment whenever exposures change (Stulz, 2003). However, this
tends not to be a day-to-day occurrence and, thus, too frequent adjusting of financial posi-
tions tends to beprima facie evidence for financial management trying to beat the market.
Conceptually, it is useful to distinguish between the exposure of the operative assets
(gross exposure) of a corporation, and the exposure of the equity position (residual or
net exposure). The latter reflects not only the impact of foreign exchange rate risk on the
(operative) assets, but also the effects of the financial structure of the firm taking into
account the denomination and duration of its liabilities. Non-financial firms clearly derive
their competitive advantage from the effective and efficient use of operative assets, which
are primarily their real assets both tangible and intangible, but also include some financial
assets such as cash balances, receivables, and payables necessary to operate efficiently. The
core competency of non-financial firms in the market place for non-financial goods and
services allows them to make better predictions about the developments in these markets
and, thus, to generate profits from carrying the operative risks associated with their business
assets. As a consequence, they can increase firm value by taking on business risk that is
associated with these assets, as capital markets reward higher risks with higher returns.In contrast, non-financial firms cannot be expected to persistently make better predictions
on foreign exchange rates than professional traders in banks and other financial institutions
who provide transaction and pricing services for financial assets to their clients as their
core business. As a result, they will typically not be able to increase the value of the firm
by betting on particular exchange rate movements. To the contrary, theoretical arguments
largely supported by empirical evidence indicate that taking financial risk will generally be
a value-destroying strategy for firms outside the financial sector (Bartram, 2000).
Nevertheless, as always there are exceptions: In situations in which the access to seg-
mented financial markets is conditioned on having operative assets, financial transactions
can provide the firm with (additional) sources for value creation. Such is typically thecase in situations where corporate financial management is not competing in its pricing
efforts with professional traders in financial institutions with sophisticated information and
risk management systems, but essentially the objectives of a political system where non-
economic objectives dominate, which is particularly true with respect to countries with
exchange-control regimes.
As a result, the financial strategy of a firm, and thus the structure of its liabilities, will
generally be driven by its assets with the intent to accommodate or enable the optimal,
i.e. value-maximizing, operative strategy. Moreover, even firms with large asset exposure
should exhibit little stock price exposure (net exposure) if the gross exposure is reduced or
even eliminated through hedging. As a matter of fact, while a large number of empiricalstudies have investigated the impact of exchange rate risk on the stock returns of non-
financial firms, the general result of these studies is that only few firms have significant
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
17/20
410 S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413
foreign exchange rate exposures (e.g., Griffin and Stulz, 2001; Dominguez and Tesar, 2001;
Bartram, 1999; He and Ng, 1998; Bartov et al., 1996; Bartov and Bodnar, 1994; Jorion,
1990). To illustrate, Bartram and Karolyi (2003) find 9.9% of the 701 multinational firms
from 20 countries in their study to be affected by exchange rate risk (at the 5% significancelevel). Allayannis and Ihrig (2001) study different industry sectors in the United States and
find in 22.2% of them significant foreign exchange rate exposures. Similarly, about 14% of
the 1079 Japanese firms in the study by Doukas et al. (2003) are significantly exposed to
exchange rate risk. Overall, the bottom line of this large and growing body of evidence on the
exposure phenomenon appears to be that only about 1025% of all firms show significant
foreign exchange rate exposures regardless of the study characteristics. While this result
has often been perceived as below prior expectations based upon theoretical and anecdotal
predictions, it is very consistent with endogenous financial and operative hedging at the
firm level that reduces exposure to a level likely difficult to detect empirically given the
degree of noise in exchange rates and returns (Bartram and Bodnar, 2004).
One of the important implications of the above analysis is to establish the priority of
financial hedges over operative hedges (Dufey and Giddy, 1997). The ex ante economic
cost of choosing among alternatives of denominating debt (in uncontrolled markets) or
using straight-line derivatives is close to zero. In contrast, building flexibility into opera-
tions or shifting sources and markets after unexpected exchange rate changes, especially
when implemented on short notice, is usually quite costly. Only if financial hedges are not
feasible when financial markets are underdeveloped because of governmental controls
and regulations or if exposures are highly complex and quickly shifting, will opera-
tive hedging constitute the first best solution. This straightforward conclusion may have tobe modified, however, in those situations where adopting operating hedges involves real
options, which enhance the value of the firms investment. Having recognized this point,
the burden of proof of the superiority of an operating hedge over near zero-cost financial
hedging must be established on a case-by-case basis and will usually fail.
5. Conclusion
In the presence of deviations from parity conditions such as purchasing power parity and
the international Fisher effect, non-financial corporations are confronted by risks stemmingfrom the impact of unexpected exchange rate changes on the value of the firm. Nevertheless,
professional firm-wide risk management does not yet seem to be in place at all non-financial
institutions. Consequently, the need for implementing or improving risk management sys-
tems appears especially strong for firms outside the financial sector.
To this end, the lack of focus on economic foreign exchange rate exposure exhibited
by such firms justifiably deserves criticism. This is so particularly at a time when risk
management has become even more important in light of the globalization of business
activities, with increased competition and lower profit margins. This paper therefore ana-
lyzes the economic exposure of non-financial firms, focusing on cash flows. In this context,
the time dimension and other complexities of exposures are explicitly addressed. Theseconsiderations are then linked to corporate hedging decisions broadly defined. The role of
the competitive environment and the relevance of concepts of currency of denomination and
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
18/20
S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413 411
currency of determination are emphasized. The paper provides clear conceptual foundations
with the aim of improving managerial decision-making.
Acknowledgements
Helpful comments and suggestions by an anonymous referee and participants of the
Australasian Conference on Banking and Finance 2004 as well as financial support by
Lancaster University Management School is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Abuaf, N., Schoess, S., 1988. Foreign-Exchange Exposure Management. Executive Enterprises Publications &
Co., New York.
Adler, M., Dumas, B., 1980. Foreign exchange risk management. In: Antl, B. (Ed.), Currency Risk and the
Corporation. Euromoney Publications, London, pp. 145157.
Adler, M., Dumas, B., 1984. Exposure to currency risk: definition and measurement. Financial Management 13
(2), 4150.
Adler, M., 1994. Exchange rate planning for the international trading firm. In: Amihud, Y., Levich, R.M. (Eds.),
Exchange Rates and Corporate Performance. Irwin, New York, pp. 165179.
Aggarwal, R., Soenen, L.A., 1989. Managing persistent real changes in currency values: the role of multinational
operating strategies. Columbia Journal of World Business 24 (3), 6067.
Aggarwal, R., 1981. Exchange rates and stock prices: a study of the U.S. capital markets under floating exchangerates. Akron Business and Economic Review 12 (4), 712.
Allayannis, G., Ihrig, J., 2001. Exposure and markups. Review of Financial Studies 14 (3), 805835.
Bartov, E., Bodnar, G.M., 1994. Firm valuation, earnings expectations, and the exchange rate exposure effect.
Journal of Finance 44 (5), 17551785.
Bartov, E., Bodnar, G.M., Kaul, A., 1996. Exchange rate variability and the riskiness of U.S. multinational firms:
evidence from the breakdown of the Bretton Woods System. Journal of Financial Economics 42 (1), 105
132.
Bartram, S.M., Karolyi, G.A., 2003. The impact of the introduction of the Euro on foreign exchange rate risk
exposures, Working Paper, Ohio State University.
Bartram, S.M., G.M. Bodnar, 2004. The Foreign Exchange Exposure Puzzle, Working Paper, Lancaster University,
Johns Hopkins University.
Bartram, S.M., 1999. Corporate Risk Management. Uhlenbruch, Bad Soden.
Bartram, S.M., 2000. Corporate risk management as a lever for shareholder value creation. Financial Markets,
Institutions and Instruments 9 (5), 279324.
Bartram, S.M., 2004. Linear and nonlinear exchange rate exposures of German nonfinancial corporations. Journal
of International Money and Finance 23 (4), 673699.
Bartram, S.M., G.W. Brown, F.R. Fehle, 2004. International Evidence of Financial Derivatives Usage, Working
Paper, Lancaster University, University of North Carolina, University of South Carolina.
Bodnar, G.M., Dumas, B., Marston, R.C., 2002. Pass-through and exposure. Journal of Finance 57 (1), 199231.
Bodnar, G.M., Hayt, G.S., Marston, R.C., 1998. Wharton survey of financial risk management by US non-financial
firms. Financial Management 27 (4), 7092.
Campa, J.M., Goldberg, L.S., 1999. Investment, pass-through, and exchange rates. International Economic Review
40 (2), 287314.Chowdhry, B., Howe, J.T.B., 1999. Corporate risk management for multinational corporations: financial and
operational hedging policies. European Finance Review 2, 229246.
Dickins, P., 1988. Daring to hedge the unhedgeable. Corporate Finance 35 (8), 1113.
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
19/20
412 S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413
Dominguez, K.M.E., Tesar, L.L., 2001. Trade and exposure. American Economic Review 91 (2), 367
370.
Doukas, J.A., Hall, P.H., Lang, L.H.P., 2003. Exchange rate exposure at the firm and industry level. Financial
Markets, Institutions and Instruments 12 (5), 291347.Dufey, G., Giddy, I.H., 1978. International financial planning. California Management Review 21 (1), 6981.
Dufey, G., Giddy, I.H., 1997. Management of corporate foreign exchange risk. In: Choi, F.D.S. (Ed.), International
Accounting and Finance Handbook, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York (Chapter 31).
Dufey, G., 1972. Corporate finance and exchange rate variations. Financial Management 1 (2), 5157.
Eiteman, D.K., Stonehill, A.L., Moffett, M.H., 2004. Multinational business finance, 10th ed. Pearson Addison-
Wesley, Reading, MA.
Flood Jr., E., Lessard, D.R., 1986. On the measurement of operating exposure to exchange rates: a conceptual
approach. Financial Management 15 (1), 2536.
Giddy, I.H., Dufey, G., 1995. Uses and abuses of currency options. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 8 (3),
4957.
Griffin, J., Stulz, R.M., 2001. International competition and exchange rate shocks: a cross-country industry analysis
of stock returns. Review of Financial Studies 14 (1), 215241.He, J., Ng, L.K., 1998. The foreign exchange exposure of japanese multinational corporations. Journal of Finance
53 (2), 733753.
Hodder, J.E., 1982. Exposure to foreign exchange-rate movements. Journal of International Economics 13 (11),
375386.
Johnson, C.B., 1996. The effect of exchange rate changes on geographic segment earnings of U.S.-based multi-
nationals. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 7 (1), 2449.
Jorion, P., 1990. The exchange-rate exposure of U.S. multinationals. Journal of Business 63 (3), 331345.
Kanas, A., 1996a. Exchange rate economic exposure when market share matters and hedging using currency
options. Management International Review 36 (1), 6784.
Kanas, A., 1996b. Exchange rate economic exposure, business exposure and hedging using currency options.
Journal of Multinational Financial Management 6 (2/3), 119.
Knetter, M.M., 1994. Is export price adjustment asymmetric? Evaluating the market share and marketing bottle-
necks hypothesis. Journal of International Money and Finance 13 (1), 5570.
Lessard, D.R., Lightstone, J.B., 1986. Volatile exchange rates can put operations at risk. Harvard Business Review
64 (4), 107114.
Lessard, D.R., 1991. Global competition and corporate finance in the 1990s. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance
3 (4), 5972.
Levi, M.D., 1994. Exchange rates and the valuation of firms. In: Amihud, Y., Levich, R.M. (Eds.), Exchange Rates
and Corporate Performance. Irwin, New York, pp. 3748.
Levi, M.D., 1996. International Finance, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Logue, D.E., 1995. When theory fails: globalization as a response to the (hostile) market for foreign exchange.
Bank of America Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 8 (3), 3948.
Luehrman, T.A., 1990. The exchange rate exposure of a global competitor. Journal of International BusinessStudies 21 (2), 225242.
Marston, R.C., 2001. The effects of industry structure on economic exposure. Journal of International Money and
Finance 20 (2), 149164.
Moffett, M.H., Karlsen, J.K., 1994. Managing foreign exchange rate economic exposure. Journal of International
Financial Management and Accounting 5 (2), 157175.
OBrien, T.J., 1994. Corporate measurement of economic exposure to foreign exchange risk. Financial Markets,
Institutions and Instruments 3 (4), 160.
Oxelheim, L., Wihlborg, C.G., 1991. Corporate strategies in a turbulent world economy. Management International
Review 31 (4), 293315.
Oxelheim, L., Wihlborg, C.G., 1997. Managing in the turbulent world economy. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chich-
ester.
Pringle, J.J., 1991. Managing foreign exchange exposure. Continental Bank of America Journal of Applied Cor-porate Finance 3 (4), 7382.
8/6/2019 A primer on the exposure of non-financial
20/20
S.M. Bartram et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 15 (2005) 394413 413
Pringle, J.J., 1995. A look at indirect foreign currency exposure. Bank of America Journal of Applied Corporate
Finance 8 (3), 7581.
Shapiro, A.C., 1975. Exchange rate changes, inflation, and the value of the multinational corporation. Journal of
Finance 30 (2), 485502.Shapiro, A.C., 1999. Multinational Financial Management, 6th ed. Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Smithson, C.W., 2000. Managing Financial Risk, 4th ed. Irwin, Chicago.
Srinivasulu, S.L., 1981. Strategic response to foreign exchange rate risks. Columbia Journal of World Business 16
(1), 1323.
Stulz, R.M., 2003. Derivatives and Risk Management. Southwestern Publishing Co., Cincinnati.
Ware, R., Winter, R., 1988. Forward markets, currency options and the hedging of foreign exchange risk. Journal
of International Economics 25 (3/4), 291302.
Williamson, R.G., 2001. Exchange rate exposure, competitiveness and firm valuation: evidence from the world
automotive industry. Journal of Financial Economics 59 (3), 441475.
Recommended