View
219
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
1/30
Buildings are almost always designed and built as isolated,individual entities. Te adverse eects on neighboringbuildings and the community at large are rarely consideredoutside o the legally mandated setback requirements.
Buildings as Individual Entities
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
2/30
Buildings Interact
Te shadow cast by the iconic Empire State on its neighboring buildings. Wind tunnel o okyo build
Blocked window view in Hong Kong high
LIGHT
VIEWS
WIND
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
3/30
Pedestrian skybridges connecting buildings at 24th Street,NYC
I.M. Peis Hancock ower is skewed to have a minimalimpact on Bostons historic Copley Square
Optimally Designed Building Interaction
Kevin Roches proposed elevated buildingallowing or open public plaza below
Apartment building with solar panels(Bern, Switzerland)
ACCESS PLAZASOLAR SIZE
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
4/30
Retrot Buildings orPositive Interactions
Altering buildings to interact as a retrot conditioninvolves prohibitve initial costs when considered inisolation
$$
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
5/30
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
6/30
Original Condition Cut Out Courtyard Tower Add
Retrot - FAR Example:
Do I want a courtyard to improve environmental conditions?
Yes No
Can I aord a courtyard?
Yes No
Build as Individual Partnership Opportunities Available?
Yes No
Invoking new FAR exception, will the valueo the FAR created by cutting out the court-
yard sell at a high enough price to cover thecost o cutting out the courtyard?
No Yes
Build with money rom sale o FAR
}
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
7/30
Tower Addition Consider Eects
on Neighbor
Optimize Tower Addition to
Mitigate Adverse Eects
on Neighbor
How Will the Addition Impact Neighbors?
FAR CAVEAT:
Bought to be developed, the extra FAR will inevitably aectits neighbors. Tereore, another condition or using the extraFAR is that the developer must coordinate with the communityto mitigate any adverse eects on neighboring buildings.
FAR Marketplace
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
8/30
New Addition - Neighbor Interaction Example:
Designed by developer
Neighbor chooses
Designed by developer
Neighbor chooses
Neighbor chooses
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
9/30
Tis Interaction can be Dened by a Linear Workfow
Optimize Tower Addition to
Mitigate Adverse Eectson Neighbor
Original Condition Cut Out Courtyard Tower Addition
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
10/30
MAXIMIZE:
MINIMIZE:
MEHOD:
LightAir
New core with atrium (Jenna)
LightAirSquare ootageSouthern exposure
Construction costsAdverse eects on neighbor
Solar collectorGreen wall
Neighbor approval
Neighbors blocked lightingNeighbors bad views
RotateFormal changesOutput rom towers solar collectorView o towers green wallCommunity program
Each Stage has Dierent Goals and Methods
Optimize Tower Addition to
Mitigate Adverse Eectson Neighbor
Original Condition Cut Out Courtyard Tower Addition
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
11/30
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
12/30
Typical Floor Plan- Ofce Floor
Women Men
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
13/30
Parametric Changes- Void Strategy
Women Men Women
Men
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
14/30
Element Strategy- Jm3544 Element
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
15/30
- Void Area : 2767 square feet
Output parameter
- Core Area : 2981 square feet
- Length of Void : 70 feet
Input parameter
- Void Area : 3275square feet
Output parameter
- Core Area : 2981 square feet
- Length of Void : 82 feet
Input parameter
- Void Area : 4833 square feet
Output parameter
- Core Area : 2981 square feet
- Length of Void : 120 feet
Input parameter
Input Parameter
Parametric Changes- Void Strategy
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
16/30
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
default
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
17/30
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
defaul
f.a.r. f.a.r.
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
18/30
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
default
f.a.r.f.a.r.
extension
extens
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
19/30
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
default
f.a.r.f.a.r.
extension
extens
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
20/30
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
default
f.a.r.f.a.r.
extension
extens
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
21/30
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
default
f.a.r.f.a.r.
extension
neutralizing strategy
P i l Si Addi i
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
22/30
Potential Site or Addition
Ad E t N i hb
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
23/30
Adverse Eects on NeighborCaused by Addition
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
24/30
}Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
25/30
}
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
26/30
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
}
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
27/30
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
}
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
28/30
Mitigation o developing extra FAR
Design solution
Veto Massing Redesign
Utility / monetary compensation
Payo Veto
$$ Energy
Program Access
Does the redesign solve adverse eects?
Yes No
Aesthetics
}
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
29/30
8/2/2019 4/4/12 330 Hudson Workflow
30/30
Recommended