View
222
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
1/48
1
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After this lecture, you should be able to:Define & explain the scope of charge of profits taxDefine the chargeable person to profit taxExplain the meaning of badges of trade and applythem to determine whether trade exists.Understand the rate of profit taxUnderstand the concessionary rate for qualifying debtinstruments
Unit 1 - Profits Tax ( )Scope of Charge
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
2/48
2
Basic Charge of profits tax Section14(1) the charging section
3 conditions:1) on every person carrying on trade, profession or
business in Hong Kong ; - Carrying on businessin Hong Kong?
2) In respect of his assessable profits from such
trade, profession or business; - assessable profits?3) Profits arising in or derived from Hong Kong
sourced in Hong Kong? ( locality/source of profits)
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
3/48
3
Exclusion from profits tax:
profits arising from sale of capital
assets (no capital gain tax): s.14(1)Therefore, no capital gain tax.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
4/48
4
Source PrincipleTwo tests in s14:
a person is carrying on business in HK- a practicalmatter of fact:
e.g. 1) the company is managed and controlledin HK, and
2) the profits must have a HK sourceIf satisfying both tests, the profit is chargeable in HK under this section
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
5/48
5
THE "SOURCE" CONCEPT
In general, there are two main sources of income or profits:
1) rendering services or performing activities (e.g.commission); and
2) holding of property (e.g. interest).
The former is often described as active income incontrast with the passive income in the later.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
6/48
6
Active income
in general, includes: trading profits profit from purchase and sale of listed securities profit from purchase and sale of unlisted
securities
manufacturing profits commission or service fees
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
7/48
7
Passive income
in general, includes: interest rental income from immovable property rental income from movable property
royalty or licence fees from intangibleassets.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
8/48
8
Tests are relevant in determining the
source of certain income1) test2) test3) test
4) testFor active income, the proper approach in ascertainingits source is usually the test .For passive income such as dividends, interest or rent,
the operations test may not be appropriate as thetaxpayer does not need to perform any activities other than making and holding the investment. In suchcircumstances, the __________________________ test may be used in determining the source of suchincome.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
9/48
9
Chargeable Person
A person (taxpayer) as defined in s 2,includes:
1) a corporation2) partnership3) trustee4) a body of persons
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
10/48
10
Residence Status
The residence status of the person alone bearsno relevancy to whether the person is subject
to Hong Kong profits tax. It is the source of the profits that requires considerations.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
11/48
11
Definition of business
Has a wide meaningSection 2(1): includes
farming, poultry and pig rearing,letting or sub-letting of premises by a corporation,
andsub-letting of premises by any other person
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
12/48
12
Definition of profession
Usually involves the exercise of intellectual skill or manual skill controlled by intellectual knowledge,
practically, refers to such professions as lawyers,doctors, accountants, freelancers, etc.In practice, most professions also fall within themeaning of business.
Distinction from employment ( - see unit 3 in courseof Taxation I: control test, integration test, economicreality test, totality of facts)
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
13/48
13
Definition of trade
Section 2 : includesevery trade and manufacture, andevery adventure ( ) and concern in thenature of trade
Isolated transaction e.g. sale of property can be anadventure in the nature of trade
It is a question of fact - look at all the circumstancesof the casePractically, the words "trade" and "business" areinterchangeable
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
14/48
14
Badges of trade 6 badges
6 factors to consider whether a trade exist(please read pp.212 - 215 for details and case law):
1) subject matter of transaction2) length of period of ownership3) frequency of similar transactions4) supplementary work 5) circumstances responsible for the realisation;6) motive
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
15/48
15
1. Subject MatterThings are purchased usually for four purposes:
a) consumption (e.g. food); b) investment (e.g. shares, real estate);c) personal enjoyment (e.g. painting); or
d) trading (e.g. goods for resale). Things which can neither be consumed, nor yieldsincomes or personal enjoyment to the owner arelikely to have been acquired for trading purpose.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
16/48
16
Subject matter of transaction 1.1 Nature of asset & 1.2 Quantity of asset - whether
the asset can yield income or personal enjoyment, e.g.CIR v Fraser (1942): an isolated transaction of a largequantity of whisky by a wood cutter which was too large
for his own consumption Rutlege v CIR (1920): an isolated purchase and resale of a large quantity (1 million) of toilet rolls, this could not
be acquired for personal enjoyment or production of
income. Martin v Lowry (1926): a purchase of 44 million yards of linen by an agricultural merchant, followed by the settingup of an organisation to advertise and sell the linen
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
17/48
17
2. Length of ownership
the shorter the period, the more likely it is a tradeException: If an asset had been acquired for long-
term investment & was sold within a short time dueto some unforeseen circumstances, the owner will not
be regarded as trading ( CIR v Beautiland Co. Ltd (1992) 3 HKTC 322)Depending on the nature of business, a sale after along period of holding will still amount to trading
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
18/48
18
CIR v Sincere Insurance & Investment Co Ltd (1973) HKTC 602
immovable properties held for > 20 years
were held to be current assets becauseinvestment assets of an insurance company arecurrent assets which must be readily realisableto meet possible claims.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
19/48
19
3. Frequency / number of similar
transactionsrepeated transactions of the same kindsuggests that a trade may be carried on
In Edward v Bairstow (1955), the taxpayers purchased and sold five lots of cotton spinning plants - held to be trading
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
20/48
20
Frequency continuesIn Leach v Pogson (1962 ), T formed & sold 30driving schools. He accepted these transactionswere trading transactions except the 1st drivingschool. Held: the subsequent sale can throwlight on the 1st sale & all 30 schools wereformed & sold in the course of trading.
even one single transaction can amount totrading (e.g. CIR v Fraser - see above)
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
21/48
21
4. Supplementary work done
Work done or alteration to make the assetmore saleable,
Organisation set up to sell, etc?In Cape Brandy Syndicate v CIR (1921), asyndicate acquired a quantity of South African
brandy, shipped it to UK, blended it withFrench brandy, recasked ( ) & sold it innumerous lots --> a trade.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
22/48
22
Supplementary work done continues
In CIR v Livingston & Ors (1926), Ts purchased &converted a cargo vessel into a steam drifter & thensold it at a profit --> tradingSee Martin v Lowry , a wholesale machinery merchant
purchased a large quantity of Government surplusaircraft linen and disposed of the linen in a number of lots. It was held that a trade was carried on withregard to the methods adopted for the resale of the
linen, the number of operations entered into and thetime occupied by the resale.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
23/48
23
5. Circumstances responsible for
disposal The original intention is not resalereasons other than profit-making, e.g.emergency or other factorsIn D10/88 , T bought a unit in an uncompleted
building. After discovering that another property would be developed in front, thus blocking the sea-view of his unit, he sold theunit. The profit was held not taxable.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
24/48
24
6. Motive profit-seeking motive?
it is perhaps the most important factor The intention at the time of acquisition (theoriginal intention) is very importantIn Clark v Follett (1973), T bought a farm withimmediate intention for sale --> trading
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
25/48
25
Motive continues
In Taylor v Good, T purchased a piece of landintending to build a house for use as his
residence. His wife refused to live in it & thehouse was sold --> not trading.T in Central Enterprises Ltd v CIR could not
provide satisfactory evidence that the originalintention was to hold the property for long-term investment --> trading.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
26/48
26
Motive continues
Not test is conclusive, all the circumstanceshave to be examined.
Motive is perhaps the most important factor
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
27/48
27
Capital or Current assets
The 6 badges of trade can be used to analysewhether an asset is a fixed or current asset.
There is no capital gain tax in Hong Kong. If one can prove that the "profits" resulted from a
business activity is in fact a capital gain (e.g.
profit on sale of investments), the "profits" sogenerated are not subject to profits tax.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
28/48
28
Proof of profit-seeking motive
Original intention - at the time of acquisition( Lionel Simmons Properties Ltd v CIR (1980) 53TC 461).
A mere hope or wish which is not realistic andrealisable is not sufficient ( All Best Wishes v CIR (1992))the stated intention of the TP is not conclusive, in
particular self-serving statementsintention must be supported by objective evidence
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
29/48
29
Evidence to prove motive
board of directors minutes classification of assets in
accountstax returns
prospectus
other documents
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
30/48
30
Evidence to prove motive continues
adequacy of finance (see California Copper Syndicate Ltd v Harris (1904) TC - T did not havesufficient capital to develop the copper mines at the
time of purchase an adventure in the nature of trade)sufficiency of income, i.e. whether the assets
produce high income yield or personal satisfactioncorrespondence, internal memo & other documentswhich disclose Ts intention manner of acquisition (e.g. inheritance)
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
31/48
31
Evidence to prove motive continues
whether depreciation allowance has beenclaimed on the assets
whether there were advertisements for resaleor rentalwhether the offer for purchase was solicited or unsolicitedtrading interests in the same field
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
32/48
32
Other factorsa) Advertising, recruitment of salesmen, employment of agents etc,would be valid activities for securing sales.
b) The circumstances showing engagement in the same field andshowing expertise or specialised knowledge of the commodity may
be good indicators of trading.
c) The method of financing the transaction has to be considered. For example, the purchase money may have been borrowed such thatthe asset bought must be sold quickly in order to repay the loan, or that the price would be paid for out of the sale proceeds.
d) The method of acquiring the property is also relevant. If the propertyis acquired by way of gift or inheritance, it can hardly be the casethat the subsequent sale of the property is regarded as trading.
e) Destination of proceeds of sale - The way the sale proceeds are putto use may indicate the purpose for sale and thus the intention of the
person carrying on such a business. For example, whether the salemoney is retained for use in a similar activity or for another form of investment.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
33/48
33
Totality of Facts
None of these characteristics by itself will beconclusive of trading and none of them is
necessarily over-riding in itself.All facts must be considered as a whole beforewe can decide whether an activity amounts to a
trade and, hence, whether the activity issubject to tax.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
34/48
34
Corporations v Individuals
It is easier to prove that a corporation istrading than an individual
The object clause a corporationsmemorandum of association usually includesthe conduct of a trade or business
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
35/48
35
Illegal trading
profits therefrom are taxableIn Mann v Nash (1932), profits from theoperation from illegal automatic machineswere taxableIn Partridge v Mallandaine (1886), profits of
illegal horse-racing bookmakers were held to be trading receipts.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
36/48
36
Betting and gambling
Gambling which is merely entertainment is nottrading even though it is habitual
In Graham v Green (1925), a regular horse-racing gambler was held not to be carrying ona business
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
37/48
37
Speculation
Speculation may not amount to trading.In D57/94, T claimed that the losses incurred by himon Hong Seng Index Futures & Forex dealings wastrading loss.BOR refused to allow the losses on the grounds thatthe pattern of his dealings was not habitual or systematic.T was in a position no different from other privateinvestors who seeks quick fortune in those markets.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
38/48
38
However In Burdge v Pyne (1968), winnings of the proprietor of a club gained in card games withmembers of the club were held to be assessableas the taxpayer had some knowledge or expertise in the games.
Authorities in Australia & New Zealandconfirm that horse gambling wins of jockeys &trainers amount to receipts from a business or
profession
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
39/48
39
In D55/87 , a gambling win of an amateur jockey was held not to be receipts from a trade, business or professionProfessional jockeys & horse trainers are likelyto be subject to profits tax on horse gamblingwins
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
40/48
40
Mutual trading
A man cannot make profit out of himself. Thus profits from trading by a body of persons with
its members is not taxable under common law.
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
41/48
41
Trading in / trading with HK
HK-sourced profits from trading in HongKong taxable (i.e. with permanent
establishment in Hong Kong)Profits from trading with Hong Kong non-taxable (i.e. with no permanent establishment
( ) in Hong Kong; e.g. goods merely purchased from or sold to Hong Kong by a UK company)
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
42/48
42
Definition of permanent establishment:
(Inland Revenue Rule IRR5) See Chapter 23, p.677.A branch, management or other place of
business andAn agent who:
has and habitually exercises a general authority or
has stock of merchandise from which the agentregularly fills orders
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
43/48
43
CIR v. Bartica Investment Ltd . (1966)Business was held to be carried on in HK based onthe following facts:
- Board meetings of the nominee directors took place in HK
- All accounting and other records were kept inHK and maintained by accountants in HK
- Legal authorized signatories of bank accountswere also in HK - money was used to secure an offshore loan for an
associated company in Australia
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
44/48
44
Commencement & Cessation of
businessWhether a business has commenced or ceased, bothare a question of fact to be determined by looking at
the facts of individual cases
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
45/48
45
Profits tax rate:
Standard rate (for persons other than corporations)15% - 1998/99 to 2002/03; 15.5% - 2003/04;
16% - 2004/05 to 2007/08; 15% - 2008/09 to2009/10.Corporation rate16% - 1998/99 to 2002/03; 17.5% - 2003/04 to2007/08; 16.5% - 2008/09 to 2009/10.the rates will be given in test & exam
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
46/48
46
Concessionary tax rates
Section 14A half of tax rate for interest, profit on sale/redemption/presentment derivedfrom certain qualifying debt instruments issuedSection 14B w.e.f. 1998/99, by election, half of tax rate for
assessable profits derived from the business of reinsuring offshore risks as a professionalreinsurer;assessable profits to be determined by a formula
under 23A(2)
7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
47/48
47
Concessionary rate for qualifying
debt instrumentsdebts issued by MTRC, Airport Authority andKCRC(details can be obtained from IRD website)
http://www.hongkongairport.com/eng/index.html7/30/2019 2011 Unit 1 Scope of charges - s.ppt
48/48
"Debt instrument"
means an instrument specified in Part I of Schedule 6of the IROwhich:
is lodged with and cleared through the Hong Kong
Monetary Authority; is issued by a person who has a suitable credit rating; has an original maturity of five years or more; has a minimum denomination of HK$50,000 (with effect
from 1 April 1999) or its equivalent in a foreign currency; is issued to the public in Hong Kong; and if it is a scriptless instrument, it is one that would qualify
if it were in a physical form.
Recommended