2001-2002 Preliminary Survey Results

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

2001-2002 Preliminary Survey Results. Presented to the SAE Sections Board: Wednesday, March 6, 2002. Survey Mail List. 27,101 members of 37 sections. ALBERTA BALTIMORE BRITISH COLUMBIA CAROLINA CENTRAL ILLINOIS CENTRAL ONTARIO CHICAGO CUMBERLAND VALLEY DAYTON - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

2001-2002 Preliminary Survey Results

Presented to the SAE Sections Board:

Wednesday, March 6, 2002

Survey Mail List• 27,101 members of 37 sections

MISSISSIPPI VALLEY NEW ENGLANDNORTHWEST OREGONOTTAWAROCKFORD-BELOITSALT LAKESOUTH TEXASSOUTHERN CALIFORNIASOUTHERN NEW ENGLANDSOUTHWESTERN ONTARIOST. LOUISTEXAS GULF COASTVIRGINIAWASHINGTON DCWESTERN MICHIGANWESTERN NEW YORK WICHITA

ALBERTABALTIMOREBRITISH COLUMBIACAROLINACENTRAL ILLINOISCENTRAL ONTARIO CHICAGOCUMBERLAND VALLEY DAYTON EASTERN CAROLINAINDIANAKANSAS CITYLEHIGH VALLEYMANITOBA MEXICOMID-CONTINENTMID-MICHIGANMID-SOUTHMILWAUKEE

Survey Mail List

• Average Age: 50.3

• Average Membership Years: 11.9

• 3% attended a PDD program (2000-2001)

• 3% Section Officers (2000-2001)

• 13% attended a major meeting or exhibit (2000-2001)

• 12% involved with standards (2000-2001)

• 14% purchased SAE product (fiscal 2001)

Respondents

• About 2700 surveys returned

• Roughly equivalent to a 10% response rate– Past surveys at 15-20%– Not anonymous– Second survey

• Initial findings based on ~500 of the 2700 responses … findings may change

Initial Findings: Top-Tier Measure

Section Activities: Importance/Satisfaction

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Tech

Mtg

Tour

s

Networ

k

Social

ize

Cont E

d

Newsle

tter

Web

site

Colleg

iate

Mea

lsAW

IM

Non-T

ech

Value

Satisfaction

Comparison to 9-00 results2000 vs 2001 results

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Tech

Mtg

Tour

s

Networ

k

Social

ize

Cont E

d

Newsle

tter

Web

site

Colleg

iate

Mea

lsAW

IM

Non-T

ech

Value

Satisfaction

Section Choice PreferencesSection Affiliation Preference

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Choice Multiple Drop

Company Support of Membership

• 51% of members say their company pays for dues

• 82% of those members say they would pay for their own memberships if necessary

• Thus… about 9% of SAE membership is dependent on direct corporate support

• This does not account for members who have not joined because of this factor

Travel to Section MeetingsMaximum distance members will

travel to section meetings

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

5 miles 10 miles 25 miles 50 miles 100 miles 250+ miles

Day Preferences for Section Meetings

Meeting Day Preferences

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday

Comparison of Day Preferences

Day Preference Comparison

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Sun

Meeting Day

Mon Pref

Tues Pref

Wed Pref

Thurs Pref

Meeting Topic PreferencesGroundVehicle 3.9Engineering_design 3.8Engine_technology 3.7Motorsports 3.5Alternative_fuels 3.4Off-Highway 3.3Fuel_cells 3.3Business_engineering 3.2Testing 3.2IV-Telematics 3.2Aerospace 3.242volt 3.1Manufacturing-Lean 3.1Project_management 3.1

SpaceExpl/Tech 3.0 Quality 3.0Diesel_technology 3.0Environment 2.9Noise_emissions 2.9Fluid_dynamics 2.9Mobility-new_economy 2.8Student_presentations 2.8Brakes 2.7Software_training 2.7Raw_Materials 2.5ISO_compliance 2.4Airbags 2.2

Recommended