View
218
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
2-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
2-2
1• The Nature of Law
• The Resolution of Private Disputes• Business and The Constitution
• Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance,
and Critical Thinking
Foundations of American Law
PA
R
T
2-3
The Resolution of Private Disputes
PA ET RHC 2
“In case of dissension, never dare to judge till you have heard the other side.”
Euripides
2-4
Learning Objectives
• Identify sources and types of law• Identify the law that takes precedence
when two types of laws conflict • Differentiate criminal law from civil law• Differentiate schools of jurisprudence • Describe the role of precedent (stare
decisis)• Explain major techniques of statutory
interpretation
2-5
• The United States has a federal court system and each state has a court system
• A Court is established by a government to hear and decide matters before it and redress past or prevent future wrongs
• Jurisdiction (the power to hear and speak) may be original (trial) or appellate (reviews trial court)
The U.S. Judicial System
2-6
• General jurisdiction courts (i.e., trial courts) hear most types of cases– Levels generally classified according to dollar
amount of damages or location– Examples: county courts, district courts
• Limited jurisdiction courts hear specialized types of cases; appeals from decisions often require new trial in general jurisdiction court– Examples: traffic court, tax court, family court
General vs. Limited Jurisdiction
2-7
• Subject-matter jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to hear a particular type of dispute
• Courts of criminal jurisdiction hear trials of crimes and misdemeanors– Offenses against the public at large
• Courts of civil jurisdiction hear and decide issues concerning private rights and duties (e.g., contracts, torts), and non-criminal public matters (e.g., zoning, probate)
Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
2-8
• Besides subject-matter jurisdiction, court must have either in personam or in rem jurisdiction
• In personam jurisdiction requires that defendant be resident of, located within, or acted within physical boundaries of the court’s authority
• In rem jurisdiction applies when property that is the subject of the dispute is located within physical boundaries of the court’s authority
In Personam or In Rem Jurisdiction
2-9
• Federal courts must have jurisdiction based on diversity or federal question
• Diversity jurisdiction exists when the dispute is between citizens of different states and amount in controversy exceeds $75,000
• Federal question jurisdiction exists when the dispute arises under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States
Federal Court Jurisdiction
2-10
Civil Procedure
• A set of rules establishing how a lawsuit proceeds from beginning to end
• In an adversarial system, the plaintiff bears the burden of proof to prove his/her case by a preponderance of the evidence
• Once plaintiff has made a prima facie case (i.e., proved the basic case), the burden of proof may shift to defendant
2-11
• Plaintiff’s complaint or petition plus the defendant’s answer or response are known as the pleadings
• Defendant may enter a counterclaim against plaintiff or cross-complaint against 3rd party
• Other parties may enter the case• Motion practice begins
Civil Pre-Trial Procedure
2-12
• Discovery: Obtaining evidence from other party through interrogatories, requests for admissions, requests for documents, and depositions– Discovery process can be a battleground– See Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Ruiz
• Pretrial Conference: Where judge will hear and rule on many evidentiary issues, discovery disputes, and other concerns
Civil Pre-Trial Procedure
2-13
• Jury Selection – Voir Dire or
Jury Questioning
• Opening Statement from each party
Civil Trial Procedure
2-14
• Plaintiff’s case through direct examination of witnesses (defendant performs cross-examination) and defendant’s case through direct examination (and plaintiff’s cross-examination)
• Closing argument or summation from each party
• Jury verdict
Civil Trial Procedure
2-15
• Trial motions include: motions in limine (motion to limit evidence), voluntary non-suit or dismissal (drop the case), motion for compulsory non-suit or summary judgment
• After summation or closing argument, a party may move for a mistrial (injustice or overwhelming prejudice) or directed verdict (weight of evidence leads to only one conclusion)
Civil Trial Procedure
2-16
• Trier of Fact sees material evidence (physical objects, documents), hears testimony of witnesses (who provide factual evidence), and decides outcome of the case based on facts; trier of fact may be judge or jury
• Matters of law are issues not of fact, but of law; matters of law decided only by a judge– E.g., whether a statute means X or Y, or
one law or another applies to the facts
Civil Trial Procedure
2-17
• After jury verdict, a party may make a motion for new trial, judgment non obstanto verdicto (notwithstanding the verdict) or remittitur (defendant requests judge to reduce amount of damages the jury recommended)
• After a judgment has been entered:– Losing party may appeal decision to higher court– Winning party must have the judgment executed
(carried out) to obtain money, property, or action ordered by the court
Civil Post-Trial Procedure
2-18
Alternate Dispute Resolution
• Arbitration: dispute settled by one or more arbitrators selected by the parties to a dispute; relatively formal; Uniform or Federal Arbitration acts typically used
• Mediation: parties choose neutral party to aid resolution of dispute
• Reference to Third Party: dispute resolution by rent-a-judge, minitrial, summary jury trial, or association tribunal
2-19
Thought Question
• If you were served with a lawsuit, what would you do about it?
Recommended