View
215
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
809
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of
l'ederal Reserve System on Friday, May 6, 1949. The Board met
theBoard Room
PRESENT:
at 10:35 a.m.
Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.
McCabe, ChairmanEcclesSzymczakDraperClayton
Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Carpenter, SecretarySherman, Assistant SecretaryMorrill, Special AdviserThurston, Assistant to the BoardRiefler, Assistant to the ChairmanVest, Geneial CounselNelson, Director of the Division of
Personnel AdministrationLeonard, Director of the Division of
Bank OperationsYoung, Associate Director, Division
of Research and Statistics
the
in
There were presented telegrams to the Federal Reserve Banks
Or Bost'n, New York, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, and
4.4'I'encisco stating that the Board approves the establishment with-
otit chn..---44te by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on May 3, by
the. pederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis on May 4, by the Federal Re-
serve v,'°13.11ks of New York, Philadelphia, and Atlanta on May ), 1949,
the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and Chicago today, of the
°f discount and purchase in their existing schedules.
Approved unanimously.
Mr. Nelson then presented a draft of letter to the Board of
of the Retirement System of the Federal Reserve Banks
rEttet
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49 -2-
aPProving amendments to the Rules and Regulations of the Retire-
tent System to make effective the changes in benefits outlined in
the Board's letter of April 29, 1949, to Mr. Leedy, Chairman of the
Ilosrd of Trustees, and adopted by the Trustees at its meeting on
May 4) 1949, as stated in a letter from Mr. Leedy on that date.
The draft read as follows:
"With your letter of May 4, 1949, you submit copiesof proposed amendments to the Rules and Regulations of the
Retirement System of the Federal Reserve Banks which wereapproved by the Board of Trustees on that date and request
approval of the Board of Governors of these amendments inorder to effect the following changes in the benefits ofthe Retirement System applicable to the Bank Plan:
1. Final Average Salary: The normal pension bene-
fits to be calculated on the average salary for
the five consecutive years of creditable service
when salary was highest, instead of the present
ten year average.2. Service Pension Benefits: The normal service pen-
sion benefits to be fixed as one per centum of
final average salary for each year of creditable
service on a straight life basis; the additional
Prior service pension in lieu of annuity to befixed as one per centum of the best 20 yearaverage salary on a straight life basis, disre-
garding any salary in excess of fifteen thousand
dollars per annum; present members to be giventhe right to take the pension benefit payable in
respect to creditable service rendered prior tothe date of change upon a cash refund basis, upon
Specific request therefor; the pension for service
accrued subsequent to the change to be on a straight
life basis without such conversion privilege.3. Minimum Pension Benefit: The minimum pension bene-
fit to be fixed at ra year for each of the last20 years of service, on a straight life basis, in-stead of the present minimum of $24 a year on acash refund basis.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49 -3-
4. Limitation on Normal Pension: The present limi-tation of $6,000 on the maximum normal pensionpayable to be removed and a new provision sub-stituted limiting the regular retirement allow-ance payable to 75% of final average salary.
5. Active Service Death Benefit: The limitation onthe maximum lump sum death benefit payable on deathIn active service to be increased from $15,000 to$25,000.
"In addition certain amendments have been proposed toclarify the Rules or to eliminate material no longer necessary.
"The Board of Governors approves the amendments to theRules and Regulations as submitted,"
Upon motion by Mr. Draper, the foregoingletter was approved unanimously, together withthe following letter to the Presidents of allFederal Reserve Banks:
"For your information, there is enclosed a copy of aletter from the Board of Governors to the Chairman of theBoard of Trustees of the Retirement System of the Federal Re-
Banks relative to certain amendments to the Rules andAegulations of the Retirement System.
Your Bank is hereby authorized to make a lump sum pay-Illent of the amount necessary to liquidate its accrued?=iability resulting from the changes in the benefits of the:etirement System by reason of the amendments to the Rules
Regulations adopted by the Board of Trustees on May 4,
4terv.e Banks authorizing supplemental
Ste
13e.rein accordance with the discussion
194e,' and
reading as follows:
111 to provide increased allowances
Mr. Nelson also presented a draft of letter to all Federal
contributionsto the Retirement
to members already retired, pre-
at the meeting on April 29,
by th"Pursuant to the recommendation of the Committee appointedReti e Conference of Chairmen to study the benefits of thealltjement System of the Federal Reserve Banks, the Board
°rizes the Federal Reserve Banks to make supplemental
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
812
5/6/49 -4-
contributions to the Retirement System of the FederalReserve Banks to provide an increased retirement allow-ance on a straight life basis for members who werereceiving retirement allowances on May 6, 1949, providedthat no such allowance, inclusive of any supplementalbenefits previously provided, shall be increased to anamount above that which would have been payable as a re-tirement allowance if the person concerned had retiredunder the rules as amended effective May 6, 1949, andProvided further that no allowance shall be increased bymore than $40o per annum on a straight life basis andthat, except for persons retired for disability, noincrease shall be made in the allowance of any personwho separated before age 60. The foregoing authorizationis given with the understanding that it will be appliedUniformly to all such retired members by all FederalReserve Banks.
"In addition to the above, allowances of retired mem-bers who were receiving allowances on May 6, 1949, and whowtere retired at the request of the employing Bank betweenhe ages of 50 and 6o, may be supplemented in accordancewith the foregoing formula in cases which, in the judgment(n the employing Bank, are especially meritorious."
Upon motion by Mr. Draper, the letter wasapproved unanimously with the understandingthat the Board would make supplemental contri-butions to the Retirement System to provideIncreased allowances for retired members of theBoard's staff who were members of the "BankPlan", in accordance with the terms of the letter.
In connection with the foregoing, Mr. Nelson said that Mr.
Leecr's letter of May 4, 1949 stated that the Board of Trustees of
the Retirement System considered the recommendation in the Board's
11".;tel' April 29 that the Rules and Regulations be amended to pro-
a minimum allowance of 25 per cent of final average salaryto
e44 Member of the "Bank Plan" of the Retirement System who had
°Ilirgeted ten or more years of service, and that the Trustees
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
'
5/6/149
suggested that inasmuch as the proposal had not been considered by
the Special Committee of the Chairmen's Conference which studied the
Other changes in the benefits, it be referred to that Committee
t°1' atudY and comment.
The foregoing suggestion was approvedunanimously.
Secretary's note: Pursuant to the aboveaction, the following letter was sent toMr. Brainard, Chairman of the Special Com-mittee of the Chairmen's Conference to studythe Retirement System, under date of May 10,1949:
"The Board approved, at a meeting last Friday, changes:12_1 the Rules and Regulations of the Retirement System of'ne Federal Reserve Banks along the lines recommended inthe report of the Special Committee of the Chairmen's Con-ference which you submitted on behalf of the Conference.Inder date of April 14, 1949, which changes were adoptedbY the Board of Trustees of the Retirement System at a'fleeting on May 4, 1949.
In connection with the adoption of the amended Rules,lt,he Board of Trustees gave consideration to a recommendation2" the Board of Governors that an additional minimum pro-"'sion be incorporated in the Rules and Regulations whereby1fl15It,,x 'Bankber of the Retirement System retiring under the 'Bank_Ian' after attaining age 65 with at least ten years ofluireditable service with the Reserve System would receive a,.°1111e1 retirement allowance not less than 25 per cent of his
average salary.this "After discussion, the Board of Trustees felt that since
s, suggestion had not received the consideration of the
4.eacial Committee of the Chairmen's Conference which had con-and acted upon the other proposed changes in the
C-irement System, the Committee should be afforded an oppor-tnitY to consider this recommendation before any action byrt Board of Trustees. The Board of Governors, therefore,
Zests that your Committee give consideration to this pro-axd that it submit a statement as promptly as possible
tivcee:;11111g ithe suggested additional minimum, or any alterna-may wish to suggest."
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49 -6-
Mr. Draper reported that at the meeting of the Executive
ectilmittee of the Board of Trustees of the Retirement System on May
4' 1949, the Trustees indicated they would be glad to have two
rePresentatives of the Board attend meetings of the investment
coralnittee. It was understood that Mr. Draper would make a recom-
ntelidation as to who should be appointed to represent the Board as
e'880ciates on the investment committee.
A memorandum from Mr. Leonard prepared under date of May 5,
1949/ was then presented in which he recommended that the Board
11/terPose no objection to acceptance by the Federal Reserve Bank
"Sett Francisco of the low bid for the construction of a building
tor „'le Portland Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
"Po..„"land, Oregon. Mr. Leonard stated that the Portland Branch
-`.01"13 recommended the letting of contracts as proposed, thatthis
'les concurred in by the directors of the Federal Reserve Bank
or -'1"ancisco, and that he felt it would be desirable to authorize
the coAtracts .
Following a discussion, upon motion by Mr.Clayton, the following telegram to Mr. Mangels,First Vice President of the Federal ReserveBank of San Francisco, was approved unanimously.
to liaurtel May 3, Board will interpose no objectionRonnt!!ding contract for Portland Branch building to01,- Hammond Co. in the amount of $1,828,407 on basisEtuj"°1'1 basic bid adjusted for alternates accepted, and
Which ur,Iorizes expenditures for Portland building contracts"aye been or will be executed by your Bank and not
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
815
5/6/49 -7-
"assigned to general contractor, with aggregate amount
not to exceed $2,257,379, including allowance forredesign for earthquake resistance, all as outlined in
Your telegram. Also, as requested in your telegram,
Board authorizes allowance of $100,000 for contingencies.
Understand that such allowance will permit making minor
Changes and expenditures without prior submission to
Board but that any material items will be submitted for
Board's consideration."
Mr. Leonard then referred to the discussion at the meeting
011 /%bruary 20, 1949, concerning the proposed construction of an
ftadition to the Detroit branch building of the Federal Reserve
taalkOf Chicago and to the further discussion at the meeting on
letarch 8, 1949, of the Board's policy concerning major Federal
Reserve construction projects as set forth in the Bank's letter
orl'ebruary 27, 1948, (S-1015), which stated that the Board did
144 favor such construction unless the need was of an emergency,
48 4istinguished from an urgent, character.
In this connection, Mr. Leonard also referred to a memorandum
41464144Y 3, 1949 from Messrs. Young, Wood, and Klaman of the Divi-
411311 Of Research and Statistics concerning the proposed construction
1)r°/*ata of the Federal Reserve Banks and stating that in view of the
chaja43_ea that had taken place in the construction and construction
14Sterial8 industries, as well as the general economy, it would be
4Nalate to permit the Federal Reserve Banks to proceed with planstor'04struction. A memorandum from Mr. Leonard dated May 5, 1949,Net._
-44qaelided that the policy stated in the Board's letter 5-1015 dated
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49 -8-
lebruary 27, 1948, be modified and that the Reserve Banks be advised
that the Board would now consider programs for alterations and im-
Provements believed to be necessary to provide satisfactory working
.conditions in. Federal Reserve buildings. Mr. Leonard stated that
141'. Vardaman concurred in this recommendation.
With respect to the proposed construction at the Detroit
btallch building, Mr. Leonard said that this project had not been con-
urgent but that it was believed to be highly desirable, and
Ile 'would recommend that the Chicago Bank should be authorized to pro-
firm bids for the construction at Detroit on the basis of the
Pl‘°Posed plans and specifications previously submitted. In this
CO'm:014XML, he presented a memorandum dated May 4, 1949 relating to
the petroit program which stated that Mt. VardemAn concurred in this
l'eccumendation.
There followed a discussion of the reasons which led to the
e4cl'tion of the policy in S-10151 of the changes in the economic
411414+4w-vall since that letter was issued, and of the needs for major
c'LlitIllation at some of the Federal Reserve Banks and branches. It
the consensus of the members present that at the appropriate time
41011,-'44- the next session of the Congress, the Board should propose
telklal of the existing limitation in the law on the cost of Federal
lieserv
e Eank branch buildings mnd, if Congress were not willing to
1144a 0change a request should be made for an increase in the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
81[7
5/6/49 -9-
authorization granted by the Congress on July 30, 1947,
for the construction of branch buildings. During the discussion
Carpenter read a draft of proposed letter to all Federal Reserve
444/ as follows:
"In its letter of February 27, 1948 (S-1015; F.R.L.S.
#30)3), the Board expressed the belief that extensive
alterations or improvements to or construction of new
Federal Reserve Bank buildings should not be undertakenin times of pronounced inflationary conditions or when thereare substantial shortages of labor and construction materials.
Accordingly, the Board stated that it would not favor such
construction unless the need therefor was of an emergency,as distinguished from an urgent, character. Under that policy
various projects for modernizing both head office and branch
buildings and construction programs for branches have beenheld in abeyance.
"In view of changed conditions, the Board believes that
the policy set forth in letter S-1015 may now be appropriately
modified, and, accordingly, letter S-1015 is cancelled. Withmodification of that policy, which had been adopted as a tem-
P°rarY measure because of the post-war conditions, the Boardwill now consider programs for alterations and improvementsbelieved to be necessary to provide satisfactory working
conditions in Federal Reserve buildings."It will not be possible, however, to undertake all con-
struction programs at the branches until further amendment
i8 made to paragraph 9 of Section 10 of the Federal Reserve
Act) which contains the over-all limitation of $10,000,000 on
costs of 'building proper'."In this connection, the latest information the Board
has on some branch building programs was submitted in response
to its letter of August 8, 1947. Space requirements and
:stimates of cost may have changed considerably since then.
will be appreciated, therefore, if you will inform the
405.rd of any changes in branch building programs since infor-
!ation thereon was last submitted and of any changes in the
Zsttmated cost of 'building proper, exclusive of the cost ofrhe vaults, permanent equipment, furnishings, and fixtures'
,4r°ril figures heretofore submitted. This request, of course,
i;ces not apply to those branches for which programs have
,nn aPProved since August 1947 or which the Board now has"Lmer consideration.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49 -10-
"The last two paragraphs of letter S-10151 which areOf continuing applicability, are included in this letteras the following paragraphs.
"There is no objection, of course, to the employmentOf architects to prepare preliminary plans for contemplatedhead office and branch building construction or alterations.The Board should be informed, however, concerning thedetails of any agreements made with the architects for suchPlans, which agreements should include a provision that theFederal Reserve Bank is not obligated to retain the archi-tect for any work beyond the preparation of preliminaryPlans, but that if he is retained the payment for such workwill be taken into account in the final fee. No commitmentShould be entered into for the preparation of detailed plansand specifications until the preliminary plans have beenreviewed by the Board. In submitting preliminary plans andestimates of cost for the construction of a Federal ReserveBranch bank building or a major alteration or additionthereto, it will be appreciated if the information includesthe data called for in letter S-1003 dated December 5, 1947(P.R.L.S. #3053).
"The above does not relate to normal maintenance, that!-13, to such repairs and alterations as are chargeable toRePairs and alterations' on Form F. R. 96, or to minorPlacements chargeable to the appropriate allowance for
"Predation. However, alterations and improvements, in-c uding replacements, of a major character and new con-
should„ not be undertaken without prior considera-tion by the Board.”
Upon motion by Mr. Szymczak, the foregoingletter was approved unanimously, together withthe following letter to Mr. Young, President ofthe Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago:
j "Reference is made to your letters of January 22 and
,.!nuarY 29, 1949, and to the Board's reply of February 23,4narding the Detroit Branch building program.
'It is noted that the architects estimated at the timethatthe cost of the program, including contractors' and
!Fehitects' fees, would be approximately $3,895,000, and that:.?eY recommended that an additional allowance be made of7erri140,000 for contingencies and $50,000 for necessaryu Aat„ ca,Les, dust partitions, and special conditions of con-''etion due to having to build a substantial portion of
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
9
5/6/49 -11-
"the addition before alteration of the old building canbe started.
"The Board will now interpose no Objection to theprocuring of firm bids for the construction at Detroiton the basis of the proposed plans and outline specifi-cations as submitted to the Board, with the understand-ing that the bids will be submitted to the Board forapproval before a contract for the work is entered intoby Your Bank. Please forward, when they are completed,a copy of the final specifications as submitted to thebidders."
Mr. Clayton then presented a draft of a tentative agenda
r0' the Conference of Chairmen of the Federal Reserve Banks to be
1114 at White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, on May 28, 29, and
30, 1949.He stated that the agenda had been prepared on the
1111818 of suggestions made by the individual Chairmen and that he
41"r. Daarmont, Chairman of the Chairmen's Conference, had dis-
cUseed the arrangement of topics. In this connection, Mr. Clayton
1'4113" the question of providing entertainment at the evening meet-
Inas(n the Conference, stating that some members of the Chairmen's
e°4terence felt that such entertainment would be desirable. It
1/44 th-6 consensus that if the Chairmen's Conference desired such
Illitertairutent, the Board would not object to it, provided the
were kept within a reasonable amount. Mr. Clayton also sug-
ested that unless the members of the Chairmen's Conference felt ittleces
84rY to have a stenographic report of the proceedings, the
lIrkttiec,-- of preparing such a transcript not be followed at this
C°4terenes.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49
g'90
-12-
Mr. Clayton raised the question who from the Board's staff
should attend the Conference, stating that the presence of most of
the members of the senior staff was called for by topics on the
agenda and suggesting that those in the staff positions which were
l'ePresented at the Conference held in May 1948 be invited to attend.
Re also suggested that, in keeping with the custom that had been
r°110wed in the past, the Board authorize the payment of the ex-
/)ellses of the Conference which would not be covered by travel and
"bsistence expenses.
Mr. Clayton's suggestions were approvedunanimously with the understanding that theappropriate item in the 1949 nonpersonal bud-get of the Office of the Secretary would beincreased to cover the costs of the Conferencethat were not covered by travel and subsis-tence expenses of the individuals in attendance.
During the foregoing discussion, Mr. Eccles withdrew from
the 111 eti4g, and at this point Messrs. Morrill and Nelson left the
Before this meeting, copies of a letter dated April 20, 1949,trota mr
• Peyton, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,
had464 sett to each member of the Board, outlining a proposed cen-
tl'41 king seminar for university and college teachers of money
114 banki--ng along the lines discussed at the meeting on November 9,
1948
teretic_Would be approximately $3,600, and that he would assume the
1'4% Peyton's letter stated that the total cost of such con-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
821.
5/6/49 -13-
expenditure was satisfactory unless the Board advised to the con-
trary.
Although there was some question whether the project could
be carried out without giving the impression that the Federal Re-
serve was trying to "sell" those in attendance on a point of view,
it was the consensus that there would be no objection to its being
Ulidertaken as an experiment on the basis suggested by Mr. Peyton
14110 was fully aware of the problems involved.
Following the discussion, upon motion by
Mr. Clayton, a telegram to Mr. Peyton was ap-
proved unanimously in the following form:
"Board interposes no objection to your proceeding
as an experiment with plans for trip for teachers of
monetary economics as outlined your letter April 20, 1949
to Chairman McCabe. Board also approves addition to your
current budget for bank and public relations amount of
$3600 to cover anticipated expenses of trip."
Chairman McCabe referred to the discussion at the joint meet-
it&ct the Board with the Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks on
May 1J, 1949, concerning proposed legislation on industrial loans,
41c1 to the feeling among the Presidents and the members of the Board
that legislation to liberalize the existing authority would have
littleoPportunity for consideration at the present session of Con-
Re suggested that, under the circumstances, no attempt be made
this time to have legislation introduced in the present session,
that 101--ans be made to present a proposal to the Congress at an appro-
Pllat e time in the future, that in his statement on proposed or pond-le
Eislation at the forthcoming Conference of Chairmen of the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49 -14-
Federal Reserve Banks he inform the Chairmen of the views of the
13ard and ask for /Ivy comments that the Chairmen might have.
Chairman McCabe's suggestion wasapproved unanimously.
Mr. Morrill and Mr. Millard, Director of Division of Examina-
t10118) entered the meeting at this time.
Mr. Szymczak stated that a draft of letter to the Bank of
Arlerica National Trust and Savings Association, San Francisco, Cali-
forni-a with respect to its applications for permission to establish
three branches in Germany had been prepared by the staff in the light
" the discussions at the conferences with Russell G. Smith, Execu-
tive Vice President of the Bank of America, on Wednesday and Thurs-
43r' APril 13 and 14, 1949. The draft, he said, after discussing the
8 view concerning the capital position of the Bank, proposed to
aPktIre the applications
tel&the't the Board would
for the branches in Germany and also indica-
be glad to consider a request for the forma-
Or a separate corporation under the provisions of Section 25a ofthe p--a
eral Reserve Act for the purpose of handling the foreign opera-tic),
-48 of Bank of America.
During a discussion of the draft, Mr. Szymczak suggested thatb
e taking action with respect to the proposed letter, the Secre_tEtry
utain the views of the members of the Board who were not pre-
0
411It at this meeting and that the matter be considered at another
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
82.?
5/6/49
meeting of the Board.
-15-
Mr. Szymczak's suggestion was approvedunanimously.
Mr. Clayton then withdrew from the meeting.
Mr. Morrill stated that he received a telephone call from
Mr. Townsend during the meeting who stated that Mr. Evans had in-
dicated that he contemplated recessing the hearings in the Clayton
ActProceeding about May 21, after which Messrs. Evans and Town-
would return to Washington with a view to discussing the case
with the members of the Board prior to resumption of the hearings in
Swarancisco about July 1, 1949.
At this point Messrs. Riefler, Vest, Leonard, Millard and
101) e.-"tsvithdrew and the action stated with respect to each of the
rukttershereinafter referred to was taken by the Board:
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Peo%teral Reserve System on May 5, 1949, were approved uanimously.
Memorandum dated May 61 1949, from Mr. Bethea, Director oftheti
"-sion of Administrative Services, recommending that the tem-
DclretzlY aPPointment of Mrs. Ruth Buck, a page in that Division, be
"u for an additional period of one month from May 12, 1949,
4° Ilange in her present basic salary at the rate of $2,284.00Der atnalm.
vith
Approved unanimously.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49 -16-
Memorandum dated May 4, 1949, from Mr. Bethea, Director
Of the Division of Administrative Services, recommending an in-
crease in the basic salary of William R. McDonald, a clerk in that
tivision, from $2,423.04 to $2,498.28 per annum, effective May 15,
1949.
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. McLarin, President of the Federal Reserve
BellIC of Atlanta, reading as follows:
"In accordance with your wire, copy of Board's let-ter of May 4, 1949, enclosing proposed bill relating tocapital requirements for admission to membership and theestablishment of branches by State member banks is being
sent direct to the officer in charge at your Birminghqm,
Jacksonville, Nashville, and New Orleans Branches."
Approved lin5nimous1y.
Letter to the Honorable H. E. Cook, Director, Federal Deposit
Illetlralace Corporation, reading as follows:
"In view of the circumstances described in your letter
of April 22, 1949, the Board of Governors assents to your
Proposal to audit the certified statements filed in connec-tion with determining the deposit insurance assessment baseby State member banks in New York, New Jersey and Delaware'with deposits of over $10,000,000, also to audit the state-
rtlents filed by smaller banks in a limited number of casesIlhere the checking of statements and reports indicates thatsuch action is desirable. The Federal Reserve Banks of New
4°rk and Philadelphia have been advised of this action.
"The Board is pleased to learn that, as was reportedvith respect to other States in which audits have been made,
110 discrepancies were found through your audits of statementsbubmitted by State member banks in Ohio, Pennsylvania and
b nnessee which were considered of sufficient importance to be!ought to its attention. If any significant discrepancies'I's disclosed by the audits presently being undertaken, it
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49 -17-
"will be appreciated if you will advise the Reserve Bankconcerned and the Board.
"It is noted that, in your opinion, after the pro-
posed audits in New York, New Jersey and Delaware, a
sufficiently representative group will have been con-
tacted to develop the information desired with respectto your original project. It is assumed that it may be
Practicable, thereafter, to develop a procedure, to be
followed as a part of the regular examination of banks,
which will provide the information or verification con-
sidered necessary with respect to statements submitted
for assessment purposes. The Board feels that it is
Important that this matter be clarified at an early date."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Gidney, President of the Federal Reserve Bank
"Cleveland, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of April 29, 1949,
regarding the retirement of Mr. Charles Koenig, chief
engineer, and the desire of your board of directors to
retain his services for one year following his retire-
Ment."In cases of this kind it has been the general
Policy to make some adjustment in the salary of an em-
Ployee retained in service after retirement, due to the
fact that he would be receiving an allowance from the
Retirement System. It appears, however, that yourBank
Proposes to continue to pay Mr. Koenig the same salary
that he is now receiving."Due to the special circumstances outlined in your
letter, the Board is willing in this case to depart from
the usual policy, and approves the payment of salary to
kr. Charles Koenig, chief engineer, at the rate of $5,250
Per annum for the period July 1, 1949 through June 30,1950."
Approved unanimously.
Seere tarY of the Treasury, reading as follows:
Letter to the Honorable E. F. Bartelt, Fiscal Assistant
825
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49 -18-
"Enclosed is a copy of a letter dated April 26, 1949,from Vice President Peterson of the Federal Reserve Bankof St. Louis with reference to inquiries received fromState member banks asking whether wholly-owned affiliates ofsuch banks would be allowed to purchase non-eligible govern-ment bonds in the market for their own investment accountand whether a bank would be permitted to purchase at thistime non-eligible governments for a trading account as per-
mitted by Treasury Department Circular No. 787 dated May 17,1946, where such bank had not availed itself of the privi-lege at the time offered. Also enclosed is a copy of a
telegram dated May 4, 1949, from Mr. Peterson stating thatseveral inquiries had been received from banks asking
whether a bank which had availed itself of the right to
Purchase restricted issues and had since sold the bonds,
Presumably in the open market, could reestablish a bond
trading account in the restricted issues covered by that
circular."In response to a telephone inquiry made by Mr. Goodman
Of the Board's Division of Examinations, Commissioner of the
Public Debt Kilby advised that the authorization in Depart-
ment Circular No. 787 permitting commercial banks to hold,for the purpose of facilitating transactions for the account
Of customers, a limited amount of non-eligible governmentsIS a continuing authority. It was indicated that the fact
that a bank had not availed itself of the privilege of pur-
chasing restricted issues or that a bank had disposed of
such bonds originally acquired under the authority of De-
Partment Circular No. 787 should not be regarded as a bar-rier to the establishment of such a bond trading account.
Enclosed is a copy of our telegram of this date to the Fed-
eral Reserve Bank of St. Louis advising of the position of
Your Department."Mr. Kilby said that the inquiry concerning the purchase
Of non-eligible government bonds by —holly-owned affiliatesOf commercial banks presents a different question and sug-
gested that the Treasury Department be asked for a formal
ruling on the matter. Accordingly, it will be appreciated
if You will advise as to the views of your Department with
reference to this matter in order that we may inform the
Pederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis."
Approved unanimously, together with a
telegram to Mr. Peterson, Vice President of
the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, read-
ing as follows:
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
827
5/6/49 -19-
"Reurlet April 26 and telegram May 4 Commissionerof Public Debt Kilby advised us informally that authoriza-
tion in Department Circular No. 787 permitting commercial
banks to hold, for the purpose of facilitating transactions
for the account of customers, a limited amount of non-
eligible governments is continuing authority. The fact
that bpnk had not availed itself of privilege of purchasing
restricted issues or that bank had disposed of such bonds
originally acquired under this authority should not be re-
garded as barrier to establishment of such a bond trading
account. Kilby felt that inquiry concerning purchase of
non-eligible government bonds by wholly-owned affiliates of
commercial banks presents different question and suggested
Treasury Department be asked for formal ruling. Accordingly,
ruling is being requested and you will be advised upon
receipt."
let
Letter to Mr. Thomas Graham, The Bankers Bond Company, Inc.,
Floor Kentucky Home Life Building, Louisville 2, Kentucky, read-
as follows:
"This refers to your letter of April 26, 1949 to Chair-
man McCabe, inquiring as to the attitude of the Board with
regard to allowing banks to underwrite housing bonds as
Provided in section 502(a) of the Housing Act of 1949 which
haS recently passed the Senate."You are, of course, aware of the fact that under
existing law national banks are permitted to deal in andUnderwrite general obligations of any State or politicalsubdivision thereof, obligations issued under the authority
of the Federal Farm Loan Act, obligations issued by the
Federal Home Loan Banks or the Home Owners' Loan Corporation,
itsured obligations of the Federal Housing Administration
if guaranteed as to principal and interest, and obligations?f national mortgage associations. In these circumstances,
Ihe Board did not interpose an objection to the provision21 the Housing bill permitting national banks to underwritehe bonds provided for therein, particularly since such
nligations appear to be adequately secured and their maturi-'lee are limited to not more than 18 months."
Approved unanimously.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
82.M
5/6/49 -20-
Letter to Mr. Emil Schram, President of the New York Stock
Exeu--0-uce, reading as follows:
"From time to time in the last few years the NewYork Stock Exchange has surveyed its members to determinethe number of margin accounts and has cooperated withUS in making this information available to the Board.
"Following the count of margin accounts that youkindly supplied to us as of June 30, 1948, vs would be
Interested in knowing the number of margin accounts atthe end of June 1949. If you feel, as we do, that thisfigure would be of interest and value also to the Exchange,we should appreciate your sending us the result of yoursurvey."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Honorable W. M. Wheeler, House of Representa-
tives, reading as follows:
"The attached letter, dated April 15, from Mr. W. M.48e, Woodbine, Georgia, was received with your memorandumOf April 28. Mr. Bass suggests that Regulation W should be
changed so that 'trade-in' allowances for old articlescould be used as all or part of the down payment for instal-
143171t purchases of new or different furniture, appliances,
cooking stoves, etc.'As Mr. Bass mentions, the provisions are different for
automobiles, in which case trade-in allowances may be used
" all or part of the required down payment for anotherautomobile.
"The difference in the manner in which 'trade-ins' are. 1Lu1dled in the case of automobiles arises from the fact that
.nm is a well established used-car market, with recognized
Published standards of used-car prices, and it has long'Jaen customary for the trade-in to be accepted as part ofthe Purchase price of automobiles., "In the case of furniture, appliances, etc., prices of;sed models are not nearly as well standardized as they arer.or used cars. Newspaper advertisements often reflect this:?ndition with such phrases as '(so many) dollars for your'31.11.)cl (article) regardless of condition'. Also, as Mr. Bassanx8rVes, the down payment requirements for automobiles are
'higher, 33-1/3 per cent, while for all other articlesdown
cent Payment required by the regulation is only 10 per
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49
}38.zat
-21-
"Regulation W exerts its influence on the rate ofexpansion of instalment credit through the establishmentOf minimum down payments and maximum maturities. In viewof the conditions described above the down payment restric-tions would be much less effective if trade-in allowancescould be used as all or a part of the required down paymentfor furniture, appliances, etc. Mr. Bass' arguments areappealing and have received careful consideration. However,In view of all the circumstances it does not appear feasibleto amend the regulation in this respect at this time."
Approved manimously.
Telegram to Mr. Slade, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
Of San Francisco, reading as follows:
"Reurtel regarding plan of Kelley Blue Book to Subscribers that prewar car prices in current guide book shouldbe reduced 10 per cent for all purposes. Although as statedin its wire of January 25 to Watkins at Los Angeles the Boarddoes not in general approve of flat percentage changes toadjust estimated values to current market, under special cir-cUmstanoes in this case the Board does not object to the pro-
for the change in values. However, notification toelley subscribers should be explicit as to effective datend as to the model years covered; also, it should clearlyIndicate that on and after the effective date the reduced
Pl'icee apply for purposes of Regulation W."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Roger W. Jones, Assistant Director, Legislative
e, Bureau of the Budget, reading as follows:
uest.,"This refers to your letter dated April 25, 1949, re-re-
the,-,all. . ',Ilq 1451 'To amend section s5 06 of the Servicemen 'expression of the Board's views with respect toi
12diustment Act of 1944, as amended, to provide a prooedure017er 'which veterans who are in default in meeting payments11..
i
?)a or farm mortgages guaranteed under such Act may bethose111
411 retaining possession of such homes or farms in., t4nitscases in which the default is not due to their own
.,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/149 -22-
"The bill would provide that whenever there is a de-fault on a home or farm mortgage insured by the Veterans'Administration, the Administrator of Veterans' AffairsShall cause an immediate investigation to be made for thePurpose of determining whether the veteran wishes to retainPossession of the farm or home and also the cause of thedefault. If, as a result of such investigation, the Ad-
ministrator determined that the veteran desired to retainthe home or farm, that the default was due to no fault ofthe veteran, and that there is a reasonable likelihoodthat the veteran if extended reasonable forbearance wouldbe able to satisfy the mortgage, the Administrator wouldbe directed to take over the mortgage, if the mortgageeIs willing, or to pay to the mortgagee on behalf of theveteran payments on the mortgage for up to three years.If the Administrator took over the mortgage he could granta three year moratorium to the veteran.
"The Board is of course in sympathy with the objectiveOf preventing unnecessary foreclosures and assisting de-serving veterans to retain their homes and farms. This goalalso accords with the general purpose of helping to pro-.”Ct the general economy against the dislocations associa--ced with widespread foreclosures.
"It would appear that under the present sections 506
2c1 509 of the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, asu.'?ended, the Veterans' Administration may be able to accom-
ttish results similar to those provided for in the proposed1.4.1, but we recognize that there may be advantages in mak-
4 this authority somewhat clearer and more specific., "There may be a question however, whether it is de-
able 1slrpro to make mondatory a provision as detailed as theauiPosed bill. For example, it is conceivable that the re-e,2"ement of an immediate investigation In each case may4:ail substantial expense and in many cases may as a
bir matter be unnecessary. In the circumstances itbe well to consider the advisability of changing the
b, to authorize rather than direct the specific action4 Laie stat Admie_ _ n strator, and perhaps to substitute a general
men., nt of objectives for some of the detailed require-k.s of the bill."
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated April 29, 1949, from Mr. Clayton with
tn- a routine request from the House Committee on Post
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/6/49 -23-
Office and Civil Service for a report on H. R. 4169, a bill to re-
l'ise the Classification Act of 1923, reading as follows:
"After conferring with the Legal Division, it is myrecommendation that no report be made unless a specialrequest is later received. The abovementioned bill is acomprehensive revision of the Classification Act of 1923governing rates of basic compensation for employees ofthe Government generally. In lieu of the present schedulesthe bill establishes two new basic compensation schedules-- General Schedules and Crafts, Protective and Custodial;it is understood that in the transition from present schedulesto the new schedules some employees will realize moderate
salary increases; the bill provides for in-grade increasesWithin certain limitations; longevity increases are pro-vided for employees below the higher grades; and the newclassification schedules embrace positions, the salariesOf which go up to $15,000. At the present time it isUnderstood that the top salary classification is $10,330.Al though the existing Classification Act and the acts in-
the pay of Federal employees are not applicable tohe Board, the Board as a matter of policy has followed
such acts in a general way."The bill contains a number of exemptions, one of which
18 that it shall not apply to 'employees none or only part::!!' whose compensation is paid from appropriated funds of thenited States.' This provision clearly exempts the Board,.dllice its finds are expressly declared not to be appropriated
it "The request for a report appears to be routine, sinceBo is not signed. Therefore, unless other members of the„?.rd have a different view, the request for a report on'us bill will be filed pending further developments.
If at a later date it should appear desirable to make;0112Po7t, because of the receipt of a follow-up request orettother reasons, it would probably be advisable merely toolak_s that the Board has no objection to the bill and not toem any comment as to whether it is applicable to Board
P-LoYees."
Approved unanimously.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Recommended