18 February 2019 Using Data Analytics to Mitigate the

Using Data Analytics to Mitigate the Effects of Load Cycling and Low Load Operation

Elijah Caselman, P.E.Asset Management Engineer, Black & Veatch

18 February 2019

What are the challenges?

• Base-load design

• Multi-system modifications

• Reliability

• Heat Rate

• What else could go wrong?

2

Quantifiable Effect on Reliability

• Load cycling units tend to experience higher forced outage rates.

• Problems can occur in unexpected places.

• How do we mitigate the effects?

3

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

EFO

R

Peaking Baseload

EFOR vs Load Profile

*Based on NERC GADS data (2006-2010)

Quantifiable Effect on Heat Rate

• Less efficient operation at lower loads

• How do we maximize equipment performance and reduce fuel costs?

4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

% F

ull L

oad

Heat

Rat

e

% Load

Heat Rate vs Load

Data Analytics

• Using data to provide insight into equipment performance and reliability• Improve operations and maintenance planning

• Advanced pattern recognition (APR) - Early detection of emerging issues

• Wide plant coverage across:• Boiler• Turbine• BOP

• Issue tracking and storage

5

Modifications – Sliding Pressure Operation

• Sliding pressure operation can provide the following benefits:• Reduce boiler feed pump power• Reduce throttling losses across the HP turbine governor valves• Improve steam temperatures

• Potential concerns:• Metallurgical limits – drum temperature will change with pressure• Slower control response

6

Modifications – Sliding Pressure Operation

• Data analytics used to quantify the impacts of sliding pressure operation• Net heat rate improvement driven by increased HPT efficiency and higher steam

temperatures

7

Up to 15.5% increase in HPT efficiency observed during sliding

pressure operation

10-20+ degF increase in hot reheat temp

Minor increase in spray flows

Modifications – Air Quality Control Equipment• Impacts of cycling:

• Higher emissions and ammonia usage during low load operation: CO, NOx• Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) not designed for lower gas temperatures. • Gas temperatures limit load flexibility

8

SCR Inlet NOx increases >33% when operating at ~180 MW

net vs 200 MW net

Modifications – Air Quality Control Equipment• Steps taken to mitigate cycling impacts:

• Boiler tuning to improve emissions at lower loads• Revised settings to allow combustion optimizer to remain enabled at lower loads

9

Reduced ammonia flow by ~250 lb/hr or ~50%

Reduced SCR Inlet NOx by ~33% at 180 MW net

<190 MW net <190 MW net>190 MW net

Higher SCR Inlet NOx and ammonia flow at 180mwn

prior to tuning

Modifications – Boiler Feed Pump

• The boiler feed pump operates further away from the best efficiency point at lower loads which reduces pump life.

• Pump vibrations increase at lower loads

• Boiler feed pump recirculation line is more susceptible to flow-accelerated corrosion during low load operation due to lower temperatures and high pipe velocities

10

Modifications – Boiler Feed Pump• Data analytics used to determine the

effect of operational changes on BFP

11

Low Load -rated pressurerecirc CLOSED

Low Load -rated pressure

recirc OPEN

Low Load -sliding pressure

recirc OPEN

Reduced vibrations

• Pump operates closer to BEP with sliding pressure and recirc valve open

• Low vibrations when operating near BEP

FWH Drip Pump• HP FWH drip pump out of service for many years due to repeated failures.

• Pump not needed at full load• HR and cost impacts of operating with the pump out of service at low load were ~100 Btu/kWh and $100,000/yr

• FWH level fluctuations due to control room operators manually controlling drain valves at low loads.

12

Condenser Performance• Advanced pattern recognition (APR) used to identify increase in condenser backpressure at low load.

• No significant change at full load

• Backpressure increased >1 inHg at low load. HR and cost impacts were >300 Btu/kWh and $50,000/month.

13

Summary

• Market forces are driving a change in operation

• Not an easy task

• Equipment considerations

• Reliability and heat rate concerns

• Entering the unknown

• Additional steps are necessary to ensure reliable operation

14

18 February 2019