1 Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und Messtechnik Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe /...

Preview:

Citation preview

1Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

COST 286

Workshop 'Impact of Communications

Technology to EMC'

PLC - Measurement of Mains Characteristics

Sven Battermann, Heyno Garbe

Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikUniversität Hannover

E-mail: battermann@ieee.org

2Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Overview

• Introduction – Description of the problem• Interference scenario• Derivation of limits (CISPR 16-4-4)• Idea and description of new measurement techniques• Results of STSM Barcelona/Hannover• Conclusions – new interesting work that has to be done

3Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Broadband communication networks• with Primary task => Data transmission

– LAN– DSL / ADSL / VDSL– ...

• with Secondary task => Data transmission– PLC– ISM-Applications – e.g. configuration of power drives– ...

Totally different electrical characteristics of the used cables / lines!

4Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Mains used for telecommunication network

Modem

Modem

220 V Netz

Fed with DM-Mode Conversion to CM

Conversion to CM

RJ-45 orUSB to PC

RJ-45 orUSB to PC

5Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Problems and known effectsObservations:• For EMC: Radiation• data rate decreases with distance from feed point• Different data rates in different rooms• influence of load condition (used devices)• Operation of “special” devices also decreases data rate

Questions: What are the reasons for this phenomenal experiences? What is the particular disturbance scenario? Quantification of mains influence possible?

6Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Common mode current development

PLCModem

PLCModem

Radiation

power-line

symmetricalfeeding(DM-current)

aymmetricalstructure(CM-current)bad symmetry

changing impedanceresonances...

Fed withdifferential mode

Partially convertedto common mode

7Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

What is the problem with CM-currents?• Two differential mode signals (DM also symmetric

current) with 180° phase shift compensate! => low radiation

• The common mode signal (CM also asymmetric current) will be radiated – without compensation!

• Problem: The fed DM-signal converts to a CM-Signal, if there are any asymmetries!

8Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Interference scenario

broadbandtelecommunication

service

Short-wave Service(e.g. broadcast)

What is the interference scenario?

Coupling Line guided interferenceField guided interference Transferfunction?

9Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Interference scenario - victim• What is the impact of a common mode current on a

connected device (receiver)?

Ed Hare: Radio frequency interference

Power Supply – mains network

10Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

CM-current in the input circuit

The common mode current flows through the input circuit of the receiver -> voltage drop at the input resistor -> interference

11Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Problem• The limits used today have partially been defined in

1930.• At that time narrowband interferers (transmitter) and

stochastic broadband interferers (e. g. electric motors) have been known.

• Different situation today:– Many telecommunication-services use a broadband

spectrum up to the short-wave band.– Different services are always on, therefore they are

no stochastic interferers anymore.

12Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Influence on the limits?• The limits (1930) are derived from the old interference

scenario.• The interference scenario changed significantly.

Questions:• Is it possible to model the situation today (with

broadband telecommunication services) with the old interference scenario?

• It is reasoned to use the old limits, based on a different scenario for the interference scenario today?

• Is it possible to safeguard the radio services?

13Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Derivation of Limits• It has to be expected that the use of the full limits of

CISPR 22 cannot safeguard the protection of radio services anymore!

What has to be done:• For a valid protection of radio services a detailed

analysis of the interference scenario is necessary.• CISPR 16-4-4 gives hints for the derivation of limits

based on 10 influencing factors even under consideration of broadband services

=> Rational derivation of limits.

14Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Influencing factors of CISPR 16-4-4Quantification of probability• Derivation of limits – just a value with a specified

probability of a reception without disturbance.

R actual signal-to-interference ratio, Rp Protection ratio

1. Simultaneous use of interference source and victim2. Use of the same frequency3. Use in a distance, that will allow disturbances4. Full use of limits over large frequency ranges

2 2 2 2 2 2Limit w m p z a c β u α w m u z a cU R t t

R R P;P R R

15Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Interference scenario CISPR 16-4-4

Where is the back path for the common mode current?

16Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Worst case: Receiver with indoor antenna!

0 5 10 15 20 25 30-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70Measurement with dipole antenna (Comb.-Gen. CM)

f / MHz

U /

dBµV

without mains / without chokewith mains / without choke

0 5 10 15 20 25 30-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70Measurement with rod antenna (Comb.-Gen. CM)

f / MHz

U /

dBµV

without mains / without chokewith mains / without choke

Dipole outdoor antenna Indoor rod antenna

17Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Model of the transmission (channel model)

Description with 2- and 4 port devices

Generator with

Feeding

(source)

Mains with

sockets

(channel)

Radio with

powersupply

(victim)

18Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Measurements to be performed…• What is a reasonable measurement setup?

• It is a „simple“ measurement problem – we just want to know the attenuation of the mains network between source and victim

-> Mains Decoupling Factor-> Mains Attenuation Factor

Two port network analyser -> that’s it! – Really?

19Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Expansion of the model

Generator withfeeding(source)

Mains network with the used socket

Radio with power supply(victim)

All 3 components have to be described in detail!

? ??

20Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Expansion of the model

Netz

21Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Differential mode feeding

49 W

RX-Chassis

22 nF

L

PE

N

Receiver/Radio-Dummy

Rod-antenna

Coupling-network

MainsGenerator

22 nF

Common-mode chokeCurrent-Balun

SymmetryVoltage-Balun

Feeding-Network

Isym,in

Iasym,out

sym,insym/asym 10

asym,out

20 logI

dI

22Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Common mode feeding

49 W

RX-Chassis

22 nF

GeneratorCounter-poise

L

PE

N

Receiver

Rod-antenna

Feeding-network

Coupling-network

Mains

49 W22 nF

Iasym,outIasym,in

asym,inasym/asym 10

asym,out

20 logI

dI

23Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Reasons for these measurements• Why currents – what about well known CDNs with

disturbance voltage measurement?– Is the voltage the reason for the disturbance?– What is the influence of the difference between CDN

impedance against real mains impedance?

• Why don‘t you use a typical balun for telecommunication lines? – Do we have 120 Ohm? – Have you ever checked the characteristics of your

balun with other loads than 120 Ohm?

24Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Receiver chassis: Flow of current

rod-antenna

ICM

Receiver

ICM,Antenna

ICM,Chassis

Receiver

Rod antennaCoupling

network to mains

25Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Feeding with comb-generator

Generator

Counterpoisecurrent-probe

Generator

CM-chokebalun

mains

Common mode feeding Differential mode feeding

26Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Attenuation CM in / CM out

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100DCM/CM - mit Netzverbindung

f / MHz

Das

ym /

dBWald (norm. Wohnung)Stadt (Altbau)Kantstraße (leeres Haus)

27Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Attenuation DM in / CM out

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100DDM/CM - mit Netzverbindung

f / MHz

Dsy

m /

dBWald (norm. Wohnung)Stadt (Altbau)Kantstraße (leeres Haus)

28Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Mains Decoupling Factor• Measured voltage at the radio dummy for both feedings• Normalized to the measurement voltage on the AMN

0,symsym/asym 10

1

20 logU

MDFU

0,asymasym/asym 10

1

20 logU

MDFU

29Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Difference – Mains decoupling factor• The constant impedance of the V-network is an ideal

load for the balun. • The measurements of the fed asym. to sym. (ICM‑VNetw) /

(IN‑VNetw) current and the measured disturbance voltage at the V-network will show a minor frequency dependence.

• When the source will be connected with the mains the asym. (ICM-Mains) and sym. (IN-Mains) currents will change significantly due to the frequency dependent impedance of mains network and the resulting influence on the balun.

30Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Measurement with AMN

0 5 10 15 20 25 3070

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

f / MHz

Measurement with Signalgenerator (sym. feeding)

UV-Netw / dBµVIN-VNetw / dBµAIN-Mains / dBµA

0 5 10 15 20 25 3040

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

f / MHz

Measurement with Signalgenerator (asym. feeding)

UV-Netw / dBµVICM-VNetw / dBµAICM-Mains / dBµA

Differential mode feeding Common mode feeding

31Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

STSM - Measurement Setup

32Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Common mode currents on cabling

0 5 10 15 20 25 3015

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65PC LAN Side - PLC off

f / MHz

I / d

BµA

KeyboardMainsMouseLANMonitor

0 5 10 15 20 25 3015

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65PC LAN Side - PLC on

f / MHz

I / d

BµA

KeyboardMainsMouseLANMonitor

33Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Impedance measurement with VNA

34Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Conclusions• Why doing near field measurements?

– try to measure the most important quantity for the disturbance -> Current

• Measurement Setup was presented during CISPR meeting in South Africa – (-> accepted! - Draft)

• What has to be done:– noise floor measurements with radio dummy– more attenuation measurements of mains networks

35Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Long term – Mains – Country side/City

0 5 10 15 20 25 30-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40Rauschmessung K

f / MHz

I / d

BµA

0 5 10 15 20 25 30-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40Rauschmessung M

f / MHz

I / d

BµA

Country side City

36Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Long term – Mains – Country side/City

0 5 10 15 20 25 30-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10Rauschmessung K

f / MHz

I / d

BµA

0 5 10 15 20 25 30-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15Rauschmessung M

f / MHz

I / d

BµA

Median

37Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Long term – Mains – Country side/City

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16Standardabweichung der Rauschmessung K

f / MHz

I / d

BµA

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

2

4

6

8

10

12

14Standardabweichung der Rauschmessung M

f / MHz

I / d

BµA

Standard deviation

38Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Long term – Mains – Country side

39Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Long term – Mains – City

40Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Measurement with outdoor antenna

Country side City

41Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

• A lot of work has to be done!

• But a real interesting one!

42Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Used frequency ranges - ISDN

VDSL => will even use 20-30 MHz!

43Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Used frequency ranges - PLC

Measured antenna feed-point voltage

44Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Source

45Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Connection – the line

46Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

victim

47Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Measurements

• First idea was the measurement of LCL and TCL

• Derived from good results with telecommunication cables

48Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Longitudinal Conversion Loss

Feed the voltage EL and Measure VT.

Measurement ?

)log(20T

L

VE

LCL

49Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Measurement adapter

50Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Longitudinal Conversion Loss

Industry area Old house installation

51Institut für Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik und MesstechnikProf. Dr.-Ing. Heyno Garbe / Dipl.-Ing. Sven Battermann

Is LCL sufficient?• A lot of LCL measurements have been performed all

over the world.

• It is the correct quantity to describe the interference scenario?

• Let us try to model the interference scenario...

Recommended