View
229
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
1
Fundamentals of Void Swelling in Metal Alloys
L. K. Mansur
Workshop on Characterization of Advanced Materials under Extreme Environments for Next Generation Energy Systems
Brookhaven National LaboratorySeptember 25, 2009
2
Radiation-induced Swelling
• Introduction• Background on radiation effects• Importance of swelling• Fundamentals• Theory, experiments and characterization to
understand swelling—many successes, many years to get there– Critical radius & critical no. of gas atoms– Dose dependence of swelling– Irradiation variable shifts– Approaches for swelling resistant alloys
• Conclusions and Recommendations
3
Origins of Radiation Effects in Materials
• Displacement of atoms (nuclear stopping)–Dominant damage process for metals–Significant for ceramics, semiconductors, polymers–Dose unit--displacement per atom, dpa–One dpa is the dose at which on average every atom in the material
has been energetically displaced once
• Ionization and excitation (electronic stopping)–Generally can be neglected for metals–Important for polymers, ceramics, semiconductors–Dose unit--Gray, Gy, the dose for absorption of 1 J/Kg
• Transmutation reactions–Transmutation products, especially He and H from proton- and
neutron-induced reactions, exacerbate damage–Customary unit of measure is appm transmutant per dpa, e.g., appm
He/dpa, appm H/dpa
4
High Energy Accelerator Radiation Damage Comparison to Fission or Fusion Neutrons
• Highest particle energies– GeV vs. less than ~ 20 MeV for fission or fusion
• Instantaneous damage rates– 10-2 (time average ~ 10-6 dpa/s) vs. 10-6 dpa/s for
fission or fusion– He and H transmutation rates for
• GeV protons 500 appm H/dpa 100 appm He/dpa
• Fusion 10 “• Fission 0.2 “
– Wide range of other transmutations
5
Time and Energy Scales forRadiation Effects by Displacement Damage
TimeCascade Creation
10-13 s
Unstable Matrix10-11 s
Interstitial Diffusion10-6 s
Vacancy Diffusion100 s
MicrostructuralEvolution
106 s
EnergyNeutron or Proton
105 - 109 eV
Primary Knock-on Atom104 - 105 eV
Displaced Secondary102 - 103 eV
Unstable Matrix100 eV
Thermal DiffusionkT
6
Length Scales and Reaction Hierarchy for Property Changes in Structural Materials
Evolution of Microstructure(…to hundreds μm)
Displacement of Atoms(…nm)
Diffusion and Aggregation of Defects(…to hundreds nm)
Embrittlement, Swelling, Irradiation Creep(…mm to human scale…)
What is it? Why is it important?
7
Displacement Damage Occurs in Cascades
• Particle (e.g., beam proton or spallation neutron) transfers its energy to the primary knock-on atom (pka)
• High energy particles, e.g., GeV protons or fusion neutrons may produce atomic recoils at much higher energies than fission neutrons
• Large-scale atomic simulations demonstrate that subcascade formation leads to similar defect production
• Molecular Dynamics Simulations of peak damage state in iron cascades at 100 K, R. E. Stoller, ORNL
• Many experimental confirmations in basic and fusion R&D.
10 nm
50 keV~ avg. fusion
10 keV~ avg. fission
200 keV pka energy
8
Theory, Modeling and Simulation Methods to Understand Radiation Effects
Collision leading to pka10-18 s
Cascade Creation10-13 s
Unstable Matrix10-11 s
Interstitial Diffusion10-6 s
Vacancy Diffusion100 s
MicrostructuralEvolution
106 s
Binary collision approximation(intuitive if you have played pool)
Molecular dynamics
Kinetic Monte Carlo
Cascade Diffusion Theory
Reaction Rate Theory
9
Historical Perspective on Swelling
• First observations published in 1967 by Cawthorne and Fulton
• Reaction in the community “!!#$@*&...”• Swelling responsible for restructuring of the US
and international fast reactor materials programs• Intensive research and development devoted to
fuel cladding and duct alloys in the period through early 1980’s; some applied work into early 1990’s
• Continuing level of more basic work• Theory, modeling and critical experiments have
led to understanding of mechanisms and design of swelling resistant alloys
10
Dimensional Instability
• Swelling is one of a class of phenomena collected under the term “dimensional instability”
• Other examples of dimensional instability– radiation creep (all materials)– radiation growth (anisotropic materials)– swelling by gas bubbles, cracks, … (nuclear fuels)– growth of and changes in type of pores and cracks (graphite)– shrinkage due to mass loss (polymers)
• Primary concern--swelling may cause substantial changes in dimensions of engineering components
11
Background
• Nucleation of a new phase--empty space--in the form of a distribution of nanoscale cavities
• Volume increase during displacive irradiation that typically occurs between 0.3 and 0.6 Tm
• Pure metals may swell at low doses, < 1 dpa; Complex alloys require ~ 10-100 dpa and higher
• Excess interstitials absorbed at dislocations and at other microstructural sinks; excess vacancies absorbed at cavities
12
Importance of Swelling
• Overall dimensional increase of components• Sensitivity to gradients in dose, dose rate and
temperature can lead to strong distortions• Fabricated sizes and shapes not preserved• May affect particle transport and thermal hydraulics,
especially for small and tight cores of fast reactors• Cavity distributions possible easy paths for fracture• Could limit lifetime in advanced nuclear systems and
high power accelerator components
13
Classic Defect Structure in Fe-Cr-Ni Alloy Irradiated to Moderate Dose
J. O. Stiegler, 1974
Transmissionelectronmicroscopyafter irradiation:dislocations,phase changes,cavities
14
Swelling of 20% CW Stainless Steel in EBR-II
Garner and Gelles, 1990
15
Large Reductions in Swelling Can be Attained by Alloying Additions
L. K. Mansur and E. H. Lee
16
Cluster Approach to Swelling
Discrete Master Equation
Fokker-Planck Approximation
17
Radial Growth Rate
Cavity Growth
Dislocation Loop Growth
18
Bias-driven Swelling Requires Accumulation of Critical No. of Gas Atoms, ng*
Critical radius andcritical number ofgas atoms, keys to
understanding swelling,a result of combined
theory and criticalexperiments
19
Critical Radius Concept Discovered and Developed via Theoretical Modeling
• V. F. Sears, 1971• K. C. Russell, 1978• M. R. Hayns, et al, 1978• L. K. Mansur and W. A. Coghlan, 1983• H. Trinkaus, 1983• R. E. Stoller and G. R. Odette, 1985• L. K. Mansur, et al., 1986--exact solutions for
van der Waals and higher pressure EOS gas
20
Concepts for Control of Swelling Derived from Critical Radius
• Critical quantities vary with composition– Move toward compositions that produce larger critical
quantities, i.e., higher doses before swelling
• For a given critical size or critical number of gas atoms, dilute gas over a large number of cavities– Slow gas accumulation rate in each cavity and delay
the attainment of critical number of gas atoms and therefore delay bias driven swelling
21
Controlled Variable Experiment to Investigate Critical Radii in Low and High Ni Alloys
-Sequenced gas injection and heavy-ion irradiation-Gas injection established cavity distribution spanning critical number of gas atoms-Results confirmedcritical number of gasatoms for bias-driven growth larger for high Ni alloy
E. H. Lee, L. K. Mansur, Phil. Mag. A 52 (1985) 493
22
Calculated Map of Swelling with Cavity and Helium Concentrations
Cavities have accumulatedcritical number of gas atoms
Cavities have notaccumulated
critical numberof gas atoms
23
Early Nanostructured MaterialFor Swelling Resistance
AusteniticStainless
Steel
Precipitate-matrix interfacesallow nucleation of so manycavities that critical number
of gas atoms cannot beaccumulated in any one
Number of cavities is lowso that critical numberof gas atoms is quickly
accumulated in each
E. H. Lee, L. K. Mansur,Phil Mag. A 61 (1990) 733
24
Dose Dependence of Swelling Depends on Balance of Sink Strengths
Observed over wide dose range
Low to medium dose or low Nc
High dose or high Nc
Simplest case: dislocations and
cavities only
25
Relative Swelling as a Function of Dislocation-Cavity Sink Strength Ratio
Broad range of experiments in many alloys gives results consistent with low
swelling for Q >>1 and Q <<1 and high
swelling for Q ~ 1
27
Requiring Invariance in Key Quantities Leads to Irradiation Variable Shifts
Highly Useful Relationships Obtainable Analytically• Temperature shift to reach same total point defect
absorption at sinks for different dose rates• Temperature shift to reach same swelling (same net
vacancy absorption at cavities) for different dose rates
• Dose shift to reach same total point defect absorption at sinks for different dose rates
• Dose shift to reach same swelling for different dose rates
• Temperature shift to reach same total point defect absorption at sinks for different doses
28
Concentrations and Cumulative Losses of Defects for Limiting Conditions
29
More General Relations for Irradiation Variable Shifts
Temperature shift with dose rate for invariantswelling with arbitrary differences in sinkstrength and primary mode of defect loss
30
Simplest Relations for Irradiation Variable Shifts
Temperature shift with dose rate for invariantnet absorption at voids, i.e., invariant swelling
For recombination dominated conditions
31
Comparison of Temperature Shift Theory with Experiments in Nickel
32
Alloy Design for Swelling Resistance Guided by Theory and Mechanistic Experiments
• High concentration nanostructures impart swelling (and embrittlement) resistance– Devise compositions so that desired nanostructures emerge at
moderate doses– Fine initial nanostructures may be irrelevant– Sabilize structures for high doses or long times at lower doses
• Increase the required critical number of gas atoms, ng*– Tailor composition for low bias– Maximize overall concentration of point defect sinks
• Lower rate of approach to critical number of gas atoms, ng*– Dilute gas over as many bubbles as possible– Reduce residual gas content– Lower He transmutation gas (composition, isotopic tailoring)
• Avoid precipitate point defect collector effect– Eliminate coarsely distributed large precipitates
33
Comprehensive Publications on Theory and Modeling• L. K. Mansur, "Void Swelling in Metals and Alloys under Irradiation: An
Assessment of the Theory," Nucl. Technol. 40 (1978) 5-34 • L. K. Mansur, "Mechanisms and Kinetics of Radiation Effects in Metals
and Alloys," A chapter in the book, Kinetics of Non-Homogeneous Processes, edited by G. R. Freeman, Wiley-Interscience, New York 1987, pp. 377-463.
• L. K. Mansur, "Theory and Experimental Background on Dimensional Changes in Irradiated Alloys," International Summer School on the Fundamentals of Radiation Damage, Urbana, Illinois, August 1993, J. Nucl. Mater. 216 (1994) 97-123.
Compilation of Experimental Results on Stainless Steels• F. A. Garner, “Irradiation Performance of Cladding and Structural Steels
in Liquid Metal Reactors,” Chapter 6, Volume 10A, Nuclear Materials, Part 1, B. R. T. Frost, ed., Materials Science and Technology: A Comprehensive Treatment, R. W. Cahn, P. Haasen, and E. J. Kramer, eds., VCH publishers, Germany, 1994.
Cavity Swelling
34
Recommended