1 Climate change, renewable energy, the EU and the world wide context Lutz Ribbe (Euronatur), Member...

1

Climate change, renewable energy, the EU and the world

wide context

Lutz Ribbe (Euronatur),Member of the Economic and Social Committee

Round Table EU-Brasil July 2009

3

The 10 biggest CO2-producer (2005)(in million tons – from energy sources: gas, oil, coal)

438 502 532 611880 982

1406

2532

5327

6526

France

Italy

Canad

a* UK

Germ

any

India

*

Japan

Russi

a

China

USA

responsible for 2/3 of the global CO2-Emission coming from energy use

*= 2002 source: iwr

use of energy = 80% of GHG sources

4

The 10 biggest CO2-producer (2005)(in million tons – from energy sources: gas, oil, coal)

438 502 532 611880 982

1406

2532

5327

6526Red = G8-member states (so called `developed countries`)

G8 (13% of global population) responsible for appr. 45% of the global CO2 Emission

USA: more than 22%

*= 2002, source: iwr

5

CO2- Emission (tons/ per capita + year)

1,0

3,0

4,4

7,58,0

10,2 10,4

16,718,0

19,7

0,0

1,0

2,0

3,0

4,0

5,0

6,0

7,0

8,0

9,0

10,0

11,0

12,0

13,0

14,0

15,0

16,0

17,0

18,0

19,0

20,0

21,0

India

China

World

Polan

d

EU (25)

Germ

any

Russi

a

Canad

a

Austra

l.USA

More than 2 to = unsustainable!!!

6

another source: land use (and change)

20% of GHG emission worldwide

7

8

unsustainable too!!!

10

land use change …

- Indonesia: still 80 Mio ha of rainforest, every year they cut 2 Mio ha ( 600 Mio t of CO2)(=UK)

- Amazonas: 50% or more of the rainforest might be destroyed by 2030 ( 96 bln t of CO2)

11

… good for our climate?

- Deforestation/ overuse is happening in many other countries too very unsustainable way of using land who makes profit? positive regional development? environmental damage (forest protects against flood)

EESC opinion adopted in June 2009

13

Consequences

• dramatic economic consequences, for the global but also local economy (f.e. private farmers) (see Stern report, costs: up to 20% of our GDP)

• People will be directly effected:– many different health problems (see WHO)

– hurricanes: more often and stronger– floods (more heavy rainfall, deforestation)

15

a kind of „summary“

1. the developed countries are mainly responsible for the GHG emissions, directly or indirectly

2. but: poor people are suffering most!3. we are at the beginning of new

competition in land use between food, feed and energy/ biofuel production (and biodiversity) (different critical opinions prepared and adopted by the EESC = role of civil society)

16

Decisions of the EU-summit

• CO2 reduction (EU-summit, march 2007):

• -30% until 2020, if other industrialized countries contribute in the same way

• “guaranteed”: -20% until 2020• -60 to -80% until 2050 (basis: 1990)

• ambitious goals! Commission: a new

„industrial revolution“

17

CO2- emission (tons/ per capita) 200510,2

8,0

0,0

1,0

2,0

3,0

4,0

5,0

6,0

7,0

8,0

9,0

10,0

11,0

Germanytoday

EU today

18

2020: EU goal - 30%, Germany - 40%10,2

6,1

8,0

5,6

0,0

1,0

2,0

3,0

4,0

5,0

6,0

7,0

8,0

9,0

10,0

11,0

Germanytoday

Germany 2020 EU today EU 2020

19

2050: goal - 60%10,2

6,1

4,1

8,0

5,6

3,2

0,0

1,0

2,0

3,0

4,0

5,0

6,0

7,0

8,0

9,0

10,0

11,0

Germanytoday

Germany 2020 Germany 2050 EU today EU 2020 EU 2050

20

2050: goal - 80%10,2

6,1

2,1

8,0

5,6

1,6

0,0

1,0

2,0

3,0

4,0

5,0

6,0

7,0

8,0

9,0

10,0

11,0

Germanytoday

Germany 2020 Germany 2050 EU today EU 2020 EU 2050

21

Energy package

• 20% of all energy coming from renewable sources (by 2020)

• Energy efficiency: +20% until 2020 1,5% each year: buildings, cars, products

• Transport policy (more railway)• 10% from renewables, not just biofuels (by

2020 + )

22Benediktbeuren, 30. April 2009 22

Bioethanol und Biodiesel

Brasil USA EU15

Biofuel-share2004 21,6 % 1,6 % 0,8 %

benötigte Fläche in % der Getreide-, Ölsaaten- & Zuckerfläche 2004

8 5 4

Biofuel goal 10 % 10 % 10 %

benötigte Fläche in % der Getreide-, Ölsaaten- & Zuckerfläche 2004

3 30 52

23

37 m2 solar

10.000 km

2.062 m2 maize

24

Climate change - just a technical problem?

• Reaching these ambitious goals is not a mere technical issue.

• It takes more than saving energy and technological solutions like solar/ renewables

• It is all about political power and markets; the idea is to „make money“

• Interest groups !

25

Centralized/ De-centralized structures

• the age of fossil energy was/is the age of centralized, relatively inefficient energy production structures

large power plants with low efficiency rates (35 to 45%, residual heating)

very few global operating oil companiesnot many large energy suppliers, with

excellent access to decision makerin Germany: 4, in France: just 1

26

50% of the energy of coal gets lost

27

electricity to warm up water:

90% of the energy of coal gets lost

28

unsustainable too!!!

29

Centralised/De-centralised structures

• The age of regenerating energies becomes the age of de-centralized and efficient energy structures: Sun on the roof (Electricity and Heating)Combined Power and Heating Systems (with more than

90% energy efficiency, instead of 45% in the case of large power (coal/nuclear) plants)

De-centralized energy circuits using biomass

Consumer starts to be a producer ( + )

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

Who will profit?

• new energy producers (consumers becomes producer), new market players

• new workplaces in the regions: energy saving techniques, short-distance supply networks, solar energy and local workforce, biomass/ -gas, including decentralized vegetable oil technologies

• but the old „large“ energy suppliers wish to maintain centralized structures; they live from them

38

Project „Desertec“

40

Access to cheap energy

• A crucial question for fighting against poverty !!!

41

EU-India round table

• discussion on renewable energy and climate change

• practical example form daily life: how to cook?– today: cow dung, wood, kerosene

health problems for women, environmental damage

– tomorrow: electricity from big power plants?– or: cooker fired with vegetable oil from local

production?

42

Plant Oil Stove - Protos

Facts and figures:

Power range: 1.6–3.8 kW

Usage: 2 - 6 liters oil per week for a family

of 4-5

→ 100 - 300 liters per year

Fuel: All plant oils, also used oils

(development with coconut-oil)

Efficiency: 35 – 48 %

Emissions: Ten times lower than with high quality kerosene

CO2-balance: Neutral

43

Documentation of integrated project

44

needed: vegetable oil

Strategy of de-centralization?– a sustainable vegetable oil production by

private farmer– as a new source for a new environmental

friendly, regional energy networks– in which a farmer can become a real player

in the economic chain

or

45

vegetable oil/ biofuel

Strategy of centralized structure?– should the farmer just produce a cheap row

material? – or do we want to see not farmers, but an

“effective” industrial production by big companies

– just for export as a “bio”-fuel, to feed the cars all over the world?

46

dezentralized oil-mill

Ölmühle Kramerbräuhof in Pfaffenhofen

Ölmühle Wöhrl in Galgenhofen / FFB

47

Petrol station on a farm

48

pure vegetable oil for tractors

49

50

Pure vegetable oil for heating or cooling systems

100 kW el

120 kW th

51

the role of civil society

• we have to start and to follow the discussion on the „new“ energy policy

• organize itself to counteract the lobby and self-interest of big multinational companies

without civil society the new energy age will not be possible

52

… let´s explore new avenues!