View
214
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
12014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14
“That’s Entertainment!Well, At Least The Lawyers Will Enjoy It”
January 22, 2014Beverly Hills, California
Sponsored By Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart P.C.
Moderator: Tiffany W. Easton, Esq.
Panelist(s): Keith A. Watts, Esq.
#IHCC12
090701_2 2
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Overview – Lights! Action! Litigate!
Unpaid interns
Individual expression
Bullying in the workplace
Trade secrets
090701_3 3
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Overview
Unpaid interns
Bullying in the workplace
Trade secrets
Individual expression
Clashes between the rights of employees and the employer’s business interests.
090701_4 4
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Interns and Volunteers
“Attention To Detail” is “Key”
State and federal labor laws define “employee” very broadly.
“Employees” are subject to federal and state minimum wage and overtime laws.
090701_5 5
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Interns and Volunteers
090701_6 6
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Interns and Volunteers
The DOL has made clear that most volunteers and interns will be viewed as employees: – “Under the [FLSA], employees
may not volunteer services to for-profit private sector employers.”
– “Internships in the ‘for-profit’ private sector will most often be viewed as employment . . . .”
090701_7 7
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Interns and Volunteers
Lawsuits brought by unpaid workers such as volunteers and interns are on the rise.
In August a putative class action was brought against MLB by event “volunteers” who worked at All-Star Games and related events, such as FanFest. Potential class could include at least 2,000 people.
Law is short on guidance with respect to volunteers.
090701_8 8
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Interns and Volunteers
USDOL has made clear that sports leagues and teams are subjects of interest.
USDOL has contacted MLB and investigated the wage practices of two MLB clubs.
USDOL will be meeting with all MLB clubs at the Winter Meetings on various topics of concern – including unpaid interns, exemptions, and daily-rate paid employees.
090701_9 9
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Interns and Volunteers
Numerous class action lawsuits have been filed in the sports and entertainment industries alleging that unpaid interns are subject to minimum wage and overtime laws.
– E.g., Pittsburgh Power (arena football), Fox Searchlight (interns from “Black Swan” film), MSG, Hearst Corp., Sony, Warner, etc.
State of case law is in flux and several decisions are on appeal.
Expect more cases to filed until standard is clarified.
090701_10 10
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Volunteers
DOL has taken the position that employees may not volunteer services to for-profit private sector employers,
However, there are situations in which they may do so for private, not-for-profit employers if:
– the individual neither contemplates nor receives compensation (but may collect paid expenses, reasonable benefits, or a nominal fee);
– the services have a civic, charitable, or humanitarian purpose;
– the services are provided without pressure or coercion; and
– the services rendered are not the same type of services rendered by the individual in his/her capacity as an employee of the same entity.
090701_11 11
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Volunteers
DOL has taken the position that employees may not volunteer services to for-profit private sector employers,
However, there are situations in which they may do so for private, not-for-profit employers if:
– the individual neither contemplates nor receives compensation (but may collect paid expenses, reasonable benefits, or a nominal fee);
– the services have a civic, charitable, or humanitarian purpose;
– the services are provided without pressure or coercion; and
– the services rendered are not the same type of services rendered by the individual in his/her capacity as an employee of the same entity.
090701_12 12
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Volunteers
Some leagues, e.g., the NFL, have used a not-for-profit “host committee” to organize their volunteers.
It is, however, unlikely that a not-for-profit entity would escape liability for wage and hour violations stemming from the use of volunteers because the services the volunteers provide is not civic, charitable, or humanitarian in nature.
090701_13 13
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Volunteers
Examples of what the USDOL considers to be “civic, charitable, or humanitarian” in nature:– Men's or women's organizations sending members or
students into hospitals or nursing homes to provide certain personal services for the sick or elderly;
– Parents assisting in a school library or cafeteria as a public duty to maintain effective services for their children;
– Individuals volunteering to perform such tasks as driving vehicles or folding bandages for the Red Cross; and
– Working with disabled children or disadvantaged youth.
090701_14 14
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Internships
Private sector employers must pay their interns unless they meet a very rigid six-factor test under the federal law.
Some states, such as California, look at additional Interns and Volunteers factors.
Main focus of analysis is whether the internship is primarily for intern’s benefit.
090701_15 15
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Internships
Private sector employers must pay their interns unless they meet a very rigid six-factor test under the federal law.
Some states, such as California, look at additional factors.
Main focus of analysis is whether the internship is primarily for intern’s benefit.
090701_16 16
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
The Criteria for Internshipsto be Unpaid under Federal Law
1. The internship is similar to training that would be given in an educational environment
2. The experience is for the benefit of the intern
3. The intern does not displace regular employees and works under close supervision of existing staff
090701_17 17
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
The Criteria for Internships to be Unpaid under Federal Law (cont’d)
4. Employer derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern, and on occasion its operations may be actually be impeded
5. No promise of a job at the conclusion of the internship; and
6. Mutual understanding that the intern is not entitled to wages for the time spent in the internship.
Fact Sheet #71, USDOL
090701_18 18
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Federal Exemption May Apply
Interns/volunteers are exempt from federal minimum wage and overtime laws if employees of an “amusement or recreational establishment” and if:
– The establishment doesn’t operate for more than 7 months in any calendar year; OR
– In the preceding calendar year, the monthly average of total receipts for the lowest six months is not more than 33⅓ percent of the receipts for the greatest six months.
090701_19 19
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Considerations in Relying on Amusement/Recreational Exemption
“Major league baseball teams may properly be considered ‘recreational establishments, or establishments designed for ‘amusement.’” And, “establishments” include “sports events.” Adams v. Detroit Tigers
Case law calls into question proper method of accounting – cash or accrual method?
Consider the practical implications of disclosing confidential revenue figures.
Also consider implications of what is defined as revenue for HRR.
090701_20 20
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Additional Criteria under California Law
Students working as interns or trainees to fulfill licensing requirements, or to qualify for a skilled vocation or profession, are not employees if the training is academically oriented and designed primarily for the benefit of the student. The DLSE requires that the training be an essential part of an established course at an accredited school, or of an institution approved by a public agency to provide training for licensure.
The program may not be for the benefit of any one employer, a regular employee may not be displaced by the trainee, and the training must be supervised by the school or a disinterested agency. The DLSE considers a student receiving on-the-job training with a specific employer to be an “employee" covered by state wage-and-hour laws. An employer may not avoid wage and hour laws by calling an employee a 'trainee.'
An employee may be paid a subminimum wage as a 'learner' during the first 160 hours of employment in occupations in which the learner has no previous or similar or related experience.
090701_21 21
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Don’t Forget! Joint Employer Issues . . . .
“Employer” includes “any person” other than a labor organization “acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee.” 29 U.S.C. § 203(d).
Thus, more than one employer (e.g., both the league and the club) can be responsible for minimum wage and overtime violations.
090701_22 22
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Potential Liability – Interns
Liquidated damages (double damages)
Attorneys’ fees
Defense costs
Statute of limitations is 3 years under federal law.
Example: – One intern works 30 hours/week at $7.25/hour (minimum
wage) for a year = $11,310
– Ten interns working 30 hours/week at $7.25/hour for a year = $113,100
– Ten interns working 30 hours/week at $7.25/hour for 6 years = $678,600
– Liquidated (double) damages = $678,600
– Total = $1,357,200 plus costs and fees
090701_23 23
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Potential Liability – Volunteers
Example: The NFL has 15,000 volunteers, each of whom must work 2 shifts of 4 hours each. – 15,000 volunteers at $7.25/hour for 8 hours =
$870,000
– Liquidated (double) damages = $870,000
– Total = $1,740,000 plus costs and fees
090701_24 24
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Possible Solutions
Pay interns and volunteers a minimum wage, limit number of hours worked, and record hours; or
For interns, create a formal internship program with scheduled start and end dates. – Maintain records of hours worked.– Emphasize and put into practice the training and
supervisory characteristics of the internship program. – Internship should not be used as a substitute for regular,
paid employees or as a trial period for individuals seeking employment at the end of the internship.
– Provide a written offer letter to the student intern, stating that (a) the internship is unpaid; and (b) that a job is not guaranteed upon completion of the training or completion of the person’s schooling. And act accordingly.
– When publicizing the internship, state that applicants who will receive college credit are preferred.
090701_25 25
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Expression
How to address economic and political activism on and off the job
090701_26 26
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Economic Speech
NLRA Section 7 protects an employee’s right to discuss wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment
State laws protect similar conduct, i.e., California wage discussions
090701_27 27
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Economic Speech
But there are limits . . . – Sit down strikes
– Disclosing confidential business information
– False allegations where the allegations are malicious or made with a reckless disregard for the truth
– Disparagement of an employer’s business unrelated to employee interests and/or working conditions
– Violence, profanity and vulgarity
090701_28 28
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Political Speech
State laws may protect certain political speech outside the workplace
State laws that apply to any off-duty lawful conduct
090701_29 29
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Non-Solicitation Policies
What should employers do?– Adopt a non-solicitation policy
– Ban solicitations / distributions by non-employees on company property
– Ban all solicitations / distributions during work hours and in working areas
– Ban all organizational solicitations / distributions on company property at all times
090701_30 30
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Non-Solicitation Policies
What should employers allow?– Charitable solicitations
– Invitations for personal events
– Personal email communications
BUT– Cannot allow some commercial
solicitations but not others
– Cannot selectively enforce policies
– Cannot allow solicitations from one union and not another
090701_31 31
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Non-Verbal Expression
What to do with the employees who feel the need to “dress up” for work
090701_32 32
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Religious Discrimination
Cloutier v. Costco, 390 F.3d 126 (1st Cir. 2004)
– Plaintiff was a member of the Church of Body Modification
– Costco adopted a grooming policy that prohibited facial piercings
– Employee refused to remove facial piercings (although no customers complained about the piercing)
– she was fired
090701_33 33
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Religious Discrimination
Costco – held: it was an undue hardship to accommodate her religious beliefs given that she regularly interacted with customers, and Costco determined her piercings detracted from the company’s image
090701_34 34
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Religious Discrimination
EEOC v. Red Robin, 2005 WL 2090677 (W.D. Wash 2005)
– Plaintiff was a member of Kemeticism, an ancient Egyptian religion
– Red Robin’s grooming policy required employees to cover any tattoos
– Employee refused to cover his tattoos and (although no customer complained about his tattoo)
– he was fired
090701_35 35
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Religious Discrimination
Red Robin – held: that it was not an undue hardship to allow him to show his very small tattoo even though he regularly interacted with customers, and RR determined that his tattoo detracted from its family-friendly image
090701_36 36
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Religious Discrimination
Brown v. F.L. Roberts & Co., 896 N.E.2d 1279 (Mass. 2008)– Plaintiff was a practicing Rastafarian
– F.L. Roberts (Jiffy Lube) initiated new grooming policy which required employees with customer contact to be clean-shaven and hair should be clean, combed, and neatly trimmed or arranged
090701_37 37
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Religious Discrimination
Brown v. F.L. Roberts & Co., 896 N.E.2d 1279 (Mass. 2008)– Employee refused to shave or cut
his hair, so employee was transferred to work only in lower bay, with no customer contact
090701_38 38
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Religious Discrimination
Brown – held: exemption from a grooming policy could never amount to an undue hardship
once employee made clear he could not comply with the policy for religious reasons, the employer was obligated to engage in an interactive process to find a reasonable accommodation
090701_39 39
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Religious Discrimination
What employers should do– Adopt written criteria for the hiring process
– Train recruiters about what questions can and cannot be asked in the hiring process Don’t ask about an
applicant’s religious beliefs, affiliations, participation, commitments and/or past, current, or future practices
090701_40 40
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Religious Discrimination
What employers should do – May ask potential employees if they are
available to work on weekends / overtime but cannot ask whether employees observe specific religious holidays.
– Cannot automatically deny positions to applicants who cannot work the hours because of their religious—accommodation
090701_41 41
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
CA -- Wearing Religious Clothing or Hairstyle is Protected Activity
AB 1964 clarifies that wearing religious clothing or a religious grooming practice as a belief or observance is protected by the Fair Employment and Housing Act.
090701_42 42
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Model Grooming Policy
Adopt a Grooming Policy– Provide expectations for
professional appearance
– Provide business attire examples Dress shirts, ties, business
heels, etc.
– Prohibit torn, dirty or frayed clothing
– Ban clothing that reveals too much cleavage, stomach or back
– Ban beach wear and tattoos and piercings
090701_43 43
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Electronic Expression
Bring Back the Typewriter
090701_44 44
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
What Is Bullying?
Bully = A blustering, quarrelsome, overbearing person who habitually badgers and intimidates smaller or weaker people
Bullying = – Attack or intimidation with the intention to cause fear,
distress, or harm that is either physical (hitting, punching), verbal (name calling, teasing), or psychological/relational (rumors, social exclusion);
– A real or perceived imbalance of power between the bully and the victim; and
– Repeated attacks or intimidation between the same children over time.
Cyber-Bullying = bullying that occurs through e-mail, a chat room, instant messaging, a website, text messaging, or videos or pictures posted on websites or sent through cell phones.
090701_45 45
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
What Drives Bullying
Driven by perpetrators' need to control the targeted individual(s);
Initiated by bullies who choose targets, timing, place and methods; and
May escalate to involve others who side with the bully, either voluntarily or through coercion.
090701_46 46
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Prevalence of Cyber Bullying
According to a study by the Cyber bullying Research Center, approximately 20% of young people reported experiencing cyber bullying in their lifetimes.
Another study by Cox Communications and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children indicates that about 1 in 10 teens have cyber bullied someone online or by text message and 16% have seen or heard of a friend who bullied others.
090701_47 47
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
How Serious is Bullying?
Recent instances have led to suicide.
“Bullies” have faced serious criminal charges, including invasion of privacy.
090701_48 48
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
What can you do?
Be vigilant.
Be aware:– Visit http://www.stopbullying.gov/
– Visit http://thebullyproject.com/indexflash.html
Speak up.
090701_49 49
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Why Worry About Intellectual Property?
Lifeblood of your business
You paid for it
Advance planning can prevent disputes
You can get blamed for employee abuses
090701_50 50
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Protectable Assets
Confidential information
Physical property
Relationships–With employees
–With customers
–With suppliers
090701_51 51
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Examples of Trade Secrets
Client/customer lists (relating to non-public information; e.g., pricing information, buying habits, etc.)
Business or commercial plans, including marketing strategies and infrastructure organization
Technical information and devices
“Know-How” and “Negative Know-How”
090701_52 52
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Some Examples of What Is NOT A Trade Secret
Information derived from reverse engineering
Business forms and procedures
Patented inventions
Sales telemarketing scripts and pitch materials
Course and training materials, and instruction materials
090701_53 53
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
How do you “maintain secrecy?”
Training
Employment handbooks/manuals
Stamp confidential documents
Password/firewall protection
Lock and key
Monitoring electronic/telephonic usage
Prohibition of recording devices
Non-disclosure agreements for employees, visitors, recruits, business partners
090701_54 54
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
CA Has Strong Public Policy In Favor Of Allowing Employee Mobility
Business and Professional Code § 16600 Invalidates restrictions on lawful business
Business and Professional Code § 17200 prohibits business practices that are– unfair
– fraudulent
– illegal
090701_55 55
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
What is the Status of the Law?
Edwards v. Arthur Anderson LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008)
No non-competes (and we really mean it)
Not even “narrow restraints”
Trade secret exception viable?
Limited statutory exceptions still apply
090701_56 56
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Uncertain Grounds for Customer and Employee Solicitation Agreements?
Retirement Group v. Galante (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 1226, 1237 – Agreements restricting employments are void but
tortious conduct is actionable
Dowell v. Biosense Webster, Inc. (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 564, 577:– Questions continued viability of trade secret
exception
Richmond Technologies, Inc. v. Aumtech Business Solutions, No. 11–CV–02460–LHK, 2011 WL 2607158 (N.D.Cal. July 1, 2011)– Interpreting existence of trade secret exception
090701_57 57
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Drafting Enforceable Agreements
Identify your core concern and protectable interest
Don’t get greedy
Narrowly tailor the covenant
Consider choice of law issues
090701_58 58
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
What Security Measures Can You Take To Protect Your IP?
Restrict access to and physical segregation of information
Use of confidentiality agreements with employees/visitors/business partners
Stamp confidential documents
Use computer passwords and firewalls
Monitor employee telecommunication devices
Examine employment history when hiring
090701_59 59
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Other Sources of Protection
Duty of loyalty
Duty of disclosure
Duty not to usurp corporate opportunities
Fiduciary duties
Everything except wages belongs to the employer
090701_60 60
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Other Sources of Protection
090701_61 61
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Summary & Key Takeaways
Review Your Policies and Practices Regarding Interns & Volunteers
Review Your Policies Regarding Freedom of Expression In The Workplace – And All Its Permutations
Implement a Bullying Policy – And Take Bullying Seriously
Review Your Trade Secret Policies And Practices – Protect “The Crown Jewels!”
090701_62 62
#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference
Insert Sponsor Logo here
Open Forum - Questions
632014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14
THANK YOU!!
“That’s Entertainment!Well, At Least The Lawyers Will Enjoy It”
Sponsored by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart P.C.
Moderator: Tiffany W. Easton, Esq.Panelist(s): Keith A. Watts, Esq.
#IHCC12
000000_64
11th Annual In-House Counsel ConferenceJanuary 29, 2014 (Los Angeles, CA)
#IHCC1464
www.acc.com/chapters/socal/
Recommended