080123 1 OFDM(a) Competence Development PartI Final

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

aaa

Citation preview

OFDM(A) Competence Development – Part IPer Hjalmar Lehne, Frode Bøhagen, Telenor R&I

R&I seminar, 23 January 2008, Fornebu, Norway

Per-hjalmar.lehne@telenor.com

Frode.bohagen@telenor.com

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

2

Outline

• Part I: What is OFDM?

• Part II: Introducing multiple access: OFDMA, SC-FDMA

• Part III: Wireless standards based on OFDMA

• Part IV: Radio planning of OFDMA

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

3

OFDM Basic Concept

• Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) is a multi-carrier modulation scheme

– First break the data into small portions

– Then use a number of parallel orthogonal sub-carriers to transmit the data

• Conventional transmission uses a single carrier, which is modulated with all the data to be sent

Single Carrier Company

Multi Carrier Company

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

4

OFDM Basic Concept

• OFDM is a special case of Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM)

• For FDM

– No special relationship between the carrier frequencies

– Guard bands have to be inserted to avoid Adjacent Channel Interference (ACI)

• For OFDM

– Strict relation between carriers: fk = k·f where f = 1/TU

(TU - symbol period)

– Carriers are orthogonal to each other and can be packed tight

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

5

OFDM Transmission model

Channel, h(t)

Modulator and transmitter

Wireless channel

Receiver and demodulator

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

6

Orthogonality – the essential property

• Example: Receiver branch k

– Ideal channel: No noise and no multipath

Tu = 1/f gives subcarrier orthogonality over one Tu

=> possible to separate subcarriers in receiver

qk,0

qk,adte

T

adteea

T

1 k1N

0q

T

0

tT

1kq2j

U

qT

0

ftk2j1N

0q

ftq2jq

U

c U

U

U c

Received signal, r(t)

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

7

OFDM – Signal properties

Time domain

Frequency domain

Power Spectrum for OFDM symbol

frequency

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

8

OFDM – Signal properties

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

9

Multipath channel

],[ 00

],[ 11

Diffracted and Scattered Paths

Reflected Path

LOS Path

],[ kk

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

10

Multipath channel (cyclic prefix)

Time[]

Amplitude []

Example multipath profile

0 1 The prefix is made cyclic to avoid inter-carrier-interference

(ICI) (maintain orthogonality)

Multipath introduces inter-symbol-interference (ISI)

TU

Prefix is added to avoid ISITUTCP

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

11

Multipath channel (cyclic prefix)

• Tcp should cover the maximum length of the time dispersion

• Increasing Tcp implies increased overhead in power and bandwidth (Tcp/ TS)

• For large transmission distances there is a trade-off between power loss and time dispersion

CP Useful symbol CP Useful symbolCP Useful symbol

TUTcp

TS

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

12

Multipath channel (frequency diversity)

=

• The OFDM symbol can be exposed to a frequency selective channel

• The attenuation for each subcarrier can be viewed as “flat”

– Due to the cyclic prefix there is no need for a complex equalizer

• Possible transmission techniques

– Forward error correction (FEC) over the frequency band

– Adaptive coding and modulation per carrier

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

13

Multipath channel (frequency diversity)

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

14

Frequency/subcarrier

Pilot carriers /reference signals

Data carriers

Multipath channel (pilot symbols)

• The channel parameters can be estimated based on known symbols (pilot symbols)

• The pilot symbols should have sufficient density to provide estimates with good quality (tradeoff with efficiency)

• Different estimation methods exist

– Averaging combined with interpolation

– Minimum-mean square error (MMSE)

Pilot symbol

Time

Frequency

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

15

The Peak to Average Power Problem

• A OFDM signal consists of a number of independently modulated symbols

• The sum of independently modulated subcarriers can have large amplitude variations

• Results in a large peak-to-average-power ratio (PAPR)

1N

0k

tfk2jk

c

ea)t(x

PA

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

16

The Peak to Average Power Problem

• Example with 8 carriers and BPSK modulation

– x(t) plotted

• It can be shown that the PAPR becomes equal to Nc

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

17

The Peak to Average Power Problem

• High efficiency power amplifiers are desirable

– For the handset, long battery life

– For the base station, reduced operating costs

• A large PAPR is negative for the power amplifier efficiency

• Non-linearity results in inter-modulation

– Degrades BER performance

– Out-of-band radiation

PA

PIN

POUT

IBO

AM/AM characteristic

OBO

Average Peak

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

18

The Peak to Average Power Problem

• Different tools to deal with large PAPR

– Signal distortion techniquesClipping and windowing introduces distortion and out-of-band radiation, tradeoff with respect to reduced backoff

– Coding techniquesFEC codes excludes OFDM symbols with a large PAPR (decreasing the PAPR decreases code space). Tone reservation, and pre-coding are other examples of coding techniques.

– Scrambling techniquesDifferent scrambling sequences are applied, and the one resulting in the smallest PAPR is chosen

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

19

OFDM Synchronization

• Timing recovery

– No problem if offset is within

• Frequency synchronization

– A carrier synchronization error will introduce phase rotation, amplitude reduction and ICI

– Frequency offsets of up to 2 % of f is negligible

– Even offsets of 5 – 10 % can be tolerated in many situations

max

CP Useful symbol

Integration period, TU

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

20

Choosing the OFDM parameters

• Symbol time (TU) and subcarrier spacing (f) are inverse

– TU = 1/f

• Consequences of increasing the subcarrier spacing

– Increase cyclic prefix overhead

• Consequences of decreasing the subcarrier spacing

– Increase sensitivity to frequency inaccuracy

– Increasing number of subcarriers increases Tx and Rx complexity

Increasing subcarrier spacing

Decreasing subcarrier spacing

Increase sensitivity to frequency accuracy

TU

Increase CP overhead

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

21

Summary

• Advantages

– Splitting the channel into narrowband channels enables significant simplification of equalizer design

– Effective implementation possible by applying FFT

– Flexible bandwidths enabled through scalable number of sub-channels

– Possible to exploit both time and frequency domain variations (time domain adaptation/coding + freq. domain adaptation/coding)

• Challenges

– Large peak to average power ratio

23 Jan 2008

OFDM Competence Development

22

Summary

Channel, h(t)

PACP

Frequency/subcarrier

Pilot carriers /reference signals

Data carriers