*HQHUDO RI WKH 6WDWH RI 1HZ

Attorneys for Plaintiff State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra and California State Water Resources Control Board[Additional Plaintiffs and Counsel listed on Signature Page]

Attorneys for Plaintiff State of New York

Case 3:20-cv-03005-RS Document 30 Filed 05/18/20 Page 1 of 56

All. for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell

Amoco Prod. Co. v. Village of Gambell

Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Bauer v. DeVos

Betchart v. Department of Fish & Game

Bresgal v. Brock)

Cal. Dep’t of Parks & Recreation v. Bazaar Del Mundo Inc.

Cal. ex rel. Lockyer v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric.

Califano v. Yamasaki

California v. Azar

Chalk v. U.S. Dist. Court Cent. Dist. Cal.

Chem. Waste Mgmt., Inc. v. Hunt

Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC

City of Arcadia v. U.S. EPA

City of Milwaukee v. Illinois

Encino Motorcars, LLC. v. Navarro

EPA v. California ex. rel. State Water Resources Control Bd

FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Fox TV

Genuine Parts Co. v. EPA

Hodel v. Virginia Surface Min. & Reclamation Ass’n., Inc.

Int’l Paper Co. v. OuelletteOuellette

Kansas v. United States

Mercy Catholic Med. Ctr v. Thompson

Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.State Farm

Mullins v. City of New York

Nat’l Ass’n. for the Advancement of Colored People v. Trump

Nat’l Cotton Council of Am. v. EPA

Nat’l. Mining Ass’n. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs

Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv.

NRDC v. Costle

Office of Communic’n of the United Church of Christ v. FCC

Oklahoma ex rel. Phillips v. Guy F. Atkinson Co

Organized Village of Kake v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

Rapanos v. United Statespassim

Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security

S.A. v. Trump

Shanty Town Assocs. Ltd. P’ship v. EPA

Sierra Club v. City of Colo. Springs

Sierra Club v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs

Texas v. EPA

The Wilderness Society v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Trump v. Int’l Refugee Assistance Project

U.S. v. Ashland Oil & Transp. Co.Ashland Oil

United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.

Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch

Washington v. Trump

Wickard v. Filburn

Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc.

passim

A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972

Resource and Programmatic Assessment for the Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States”

Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v. United States

SAB Review of the Draft EPA Report Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence, Letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy

Connectivity of Streams and Wetland to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence available at

passim

Technical Support Document for the Clean Water Rule: Definition of Waters of the United States

available at

The Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States ”

et seq.

United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.

et seq.

Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v.

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., State Farm

Organized Village of Kake v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

see also FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., Fox

See Encino

Motorcars, LLC. v. Navarro

Arkansas v.

Oklahoma,

see Int’l Paper Co. v.

Ouellette, Ouellette

NRDC v. Costle,

See U.S. v. Ashland Oil & Transp. Co., Ashland Oil

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook

County v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs SWANCC Rapanos v. United

States, . SWANCC

SWANCC SWANCC

Rapanos

Rapanos Rapanos Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S.

Supreme Court’s Decision in Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v. United States

Rapanos

The Clean Water Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States ”

Id. Rapanos

See id.

Connectivity of Streams and Wetland to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence available at

SWANCC Rapanos

SWANCC Rapanos Id.

Rapanos

id. compare

Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch

Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc.

All. for the Wild Rockies v.

Cottrell

See Texas v. EPA,

Bauer v. DeVos,

Encino Motorcars, LLC.

Fox TV

Id. see

See Technical Support Document for the Clean Water Rule: Definition of

Waters of the United States

10 See also

See SAB Review of the Draft EPA Report Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence, Letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy

State Farm

Genuine

Parts Co. v. EPA

objective

. See,

Nat’l Cotton

Council of Am. v. EPA, see also Mercy Catholic Med. Ctr v.

Thompson,

Office of Communic’n of the United Church of Christ v. FCC,

see e.g id.

Resource and Programmatic Assessment for the Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States”

see id

see id.

See California v. Azar

Encino Motorcars, LLC.

See S.A. v. Trump

See Nat’l Ass’n. for the

available at

Advancement of Colored People v. Trump

Rapanos Rapanos

Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC

The Wilderness Society v.

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Chevron

Id Chevron

Id. Chevron

Rapanos

IdRapanos

See id.

Rapanos

Chevron

Rapanos

See id.

See, e.g. Rapanos

Rapanos

Id. Rapanos

Rapanos

See Rapanos

A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972

EPA v.

California ex. rel. State Water Resources Control Bd

Ouellette

. see also City of Arcadia v. U.S. EPA

See City of Milwaukee v. Illinois

See Rapanos,

planning

See Shanty Town Assocs. Ltd. P’ship v. EPA

Rapanos

Rapanos,

Rapanos

SWANCC

See id SWANCC

See, e.g., Chem. Waste

Mgmt., Inc. v. Hunt

Wickard v. Filburn,

Rapanos Oklahoma ex rel.

Phillips v. Guy F. Atkinson Co Hodel v.

Virginia Surface Min. & Reclamation Ass’n., Inc.

Ashland

interstate waters

City of Milwaukee

not merely another law ‘touching interstate waters

City of

Milwaukee

See Ouellette Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Ouellette

Arkansas

federal

Amoco Prod. Co. v. Village of Gambell

see Cal. ex rel. Lockyer v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric.

Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv.,

Sierra Club v. City

of Colo. Springs

threat

Mullins v. City of New York

Kansas v. United States

Id.Id. ¶IdId. ¶Id. ¶Id.Id. ¶Id.

Id.Id.Id.

Sierra Club v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Rural

Utilities Service

*HQHUDO RI WKH 6WDWH RI 1HZ

Documents

Chapter 13'hsrvlw ri &rxqwhu 3duw 5xshh )xqgv zlwk wkh 6wdwh %dqn lq 5hvshfw ri )ruhljq 1rq 3urmhfw &rpprglw\ /rdqv )lqh rq 'hod\ lq 'hsrvlw ri &rxqwhusduw 5xshh )xqgv zlwk wkh 6wdwh

6WDWH RI WKH 'LYLVLRQ...Apr 21, 2020 · JHDU IURP ODEV

6WDWH 6KDUHKROGLQJ DQG WKH 9DOXH RI &KLQHVH )LUPVfacultyresearch.london.edu/docs/Tian.pdf · 6WDWH 6KDUHKROGLQJ DQG WKH 9DOXH RI &KLQHVH )LUPV George Lihui Tian Revised November 18,

RI &XUUHQW &KDOOHQJHV DQG WKH 6XSSRUW IRU 6WDWH … · 2klr +hdowk &duh $ 6wxg\ ri &xuuhqw &kdoohqjhv dqg wkh 6xssruw iru 6wdwh 5hirup )heuxdu\

3URFHHGLQJV RI WKH 6WDWH RI WKH $UW &RQIHUHQFH …med-fom-ghrp-spph.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2012/05/...iii Executive Summary Fundamental elements for the provision, organization, and

6WDWH RI +DZDLL

EirGrid UGC Functional Specification - 110 kV 220 kV 400 kV...8QFRQWUROOHG ZKHQ SULQWHG 3DJH RI &'6 )6 5 HQHUDO +DQGOLQJ RI 0DQXIDFWXULQJ 3URFHVV 'HYLDWLRQV 3UHTXDOLILFDWLRQ ,QVSHFWLRQV

MOOT PROBLEM (2) - jmi.ac.injmi.ac.in/upload/EventDetail/moot_court_competition_2017_problem.pdf7kh 8qlwhg 6wdwh ri 2] >+huhlqdiwhu 862@ lv rqh ri wkh ohdglqj ghyhorslqj frxqwulhv

6WDWH RI /RXLVLDQD

VW - Clemson University · &rpprq'dwd6hw$ hqhudo,qirupdwlrq &rpprq'dwd6hw$ hqhudo,qirupdwlrq &rpprq'dwd6hw$ hqhudo,qirupdwlrq &rpprq'dwd6hw$ hqhudo,qirupdwlrq &rpprq'dwd6hw$ *hqhudo,qirupdwlrq

v Iq´±Dq 0XKkw Nh: J±h ®:WG Dv)H²j EUDq.LZIt EUjLG · $11(;85( 6wdwh &rxqflo ri (gxfdwlrq 5hvhdufk dqg 7udlqlqj &khqqdl ² 6wdwh /hyho 7udlqlqj iru 'lvwulfw 5hvrxufh *urxs 6xemhfw

2018 ANNUAL REPORT - BACON & HINKLEY HOME...6wdwh ri &rqqhfwlfxw $qqxdo 5hsruw ri /rqj 7hup &duh )dflolw\ &63 5hy 1dph ri )dflolw\ dv olfhqvhg /lfhqvh 1r 5hsruw iru

SG SF 2227, Conference Comparison May 3 v2 · 6wdwh ryhuqphqw dqg 9hwhudqv 0lolwdu\ $iidluv )lqdqfh 6) dv sdvvhg 6hqdwh dqg +rxvh )orruv hqhudo )xqg 6xppdu\ 'luhfw dqg 2shq $ssursuldwlrqv

UHPDUNV +(//$ *HQHUDO QRWHV 9HUWLFDO · PDF file,qvwdoodwlrq dqg rshudwlqj lqvwuxfwlrqv 6xemhfw wr whfkqlfdo prglilfdwlrqv ± 'dwh ri ,vvxh -xo\ 6dihw\ lqvwuxfwlrqv $ffhvvlelolw\ ri

0A1242 DMARC RFP - Ohio · 2018. 7. 17. · 6wdwh ri 2klr 'hsduwphqw ri $gplqlvwudwlyh 6huylfhv (qwhusulvh (pdlo '0$5& &orxg 6huylfhv ± 5)3 $ 2klr 'hsduwphqw ri $gplqlvwudwlyh 6huylfhv

HumanResources DepartmentOf 2016 10 26XQFWLRQDO DQG 2UJDQL]DWLRQDO $QDO\VLV RI WKH $ODEDPD 'HSDUWPHQW RI +XPDQ 5HVRXUFHV 6RXUFHV RI ,QIRUPDWLRQ 5HSUHVHQWDWLYHV RI WKH 6WDWH 'HSDUWPHQW

Certificate Master 6.3 - Washington State Board of Education · 0loo &uhhn :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh %rdug ri (gxfdwlrq

DNC COMPLAINT - … · 3odlqwlii wkh 'hprfudwlf 1dwlrqdo &rpplwwhh ³'1&´ eulqjv wklv &rpsodlqw djdlqvw 7kh 5xvvldq )hghudwlrq ³5xvvld´ wkh *hqhudo 6wdii ri wkh $uphg )rufhv ri

6WDWH RI +DZDLL 'HSDUWPHQW RI +DZDLLDQ +RPH /DQGVfiles.hawaii.gov/auditor/Reports/2018_Audit/DHHL2018.pdf · 'hsduwphqw ri +dzdlldq +rph /dqgv 5hsruw rq wkh )lqdqfldo 6wdwhphqwv :h

%ULHI ,QGXVWULDO 3URILOH RI 6HUDLNHOD .KDUDVDZDQ …dcmsme.gov.in/dips/2016-17/Sarikela-Kharsawan.pdf · 2016-08-09 · %ulhi ,qgxvwuldo 3uriloh ri 6dudlnhod .kduvdzdq 'lvwulfw *hqhudo