View
212
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
®
© 2010 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc.© 2010 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc.
June 2010June 2010 Hydrology Domain Working Group Hydrology Domain Working Group
74th OGC Technical Committee
Toulouse, France
Ulrich Looser, David Lemon, Ilya Zaslavsky
September 22, 2010
Sponsored and hosted by
OGC®
© 2010 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 2
AgendaAgenda
1. Introduction, first results from the Toulouse workshop, IEs and WaterML2.0 (08:00 – 10:10)– 08:00-08:10: Welcome and Introduction (Ulrich Looser)
– 08:10-08:20: General Update on Surface Water IE (Peter Fitch)
– 08:20-08:50: Presentation, demo and discussion SWIE Use Case 1 Cross border data exchange (Sylvain Grellet, Michael Natschke, Simon Jirka)
– 08:50-09:10: Presentation of updated work plan SWIE Use Case 2 Forecasting (Peter Gijsbers)
– 09:10-09:25: Presentation, demo and discussion SWIE Use Case 3 Global Runoff (Michael Natschke)
– 09:25-09:40: Presentation on current status Groundwater IE (Nate Booth)
– 09:40-09:55: WaterML2.0 presentation and status (Peter Taylor, via remote link)
– 09:55-10:10 Discussion
OGC®
© 2010 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 3
Agenda Agenda (continued)(continued)
2. Presentations (10:10-10:45)– 10:10-10:30 Jeremy Tandy (UK Met Office) MetOcean DWG
presentation of cross-domain Use Case– 10:30-10:45 Irina Dornblut (GRDC) Concept of Hydro
Features
3. Discussion and motions (10:45-10:55)
OGC®
© 2010 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 4
Document Motion templateDocument Motion template
• Sample Document Motion:
• The <DWG or SWGname> recommends that the OGC Technical Committee approve release of <OGC Document Number> “<OGC Document Name>” as an OGC <White Paper/Discussion Paper/ Engineering Report>– Pending and final edits and review by OGC staff– <Any Discussion Points that the TC needs to be aware of>– Motion: <Name of person making the motion>– Second: <name of the person seconding the motion>– If there is a hand vote, the results of the vote. Otherwise, the phrase
<There was no objection to unanimous consent> should be used
OGC®
© 2010 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 5
Motion template to Request an electronic voteMotion template to Request an electronic vote
• The <DWG or SWGname> recommends that the OGC Technical Committee approve an electronic vote to approve release of <OGC Document Number> “<OGC Document Name>” as an OGC <Best Practice/Adopted Standard>– Pending and final edits and review by OGC staff– <Any Discussion Points that the TC needs to be aware of>– Motion: <Name of person making the motion>– Second: <name of the person seconding the motion>– If there is a hand vote, the results of the vote. Otherwise, the phrase
<There was no objection to unanimous consent> should be used
OGC®
Actions
Recommended