State of the City 2012

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

State of the City 2012 Mayor Alvin New & Interim City Manager Michael Dane

TOPICS

• ½ Cent sales tax funded projects• Budget• Streets• Water

½ Cent sales Tax Projects

Producers Park

• Project Began Summer 2010• Completed Fall 2011• Cost: $1,665,000

Meadowcreek Park (renovation)

• Project began Spring 2010• Completed Fall 2011• Cost: $256,000

Love Municipal Pool (renovation)

• Project Began Spring 2011• Completed Spring 2012• Cost: $3,262,000

Rio Vista Park (renovation)

• Project Began Spring 2012• To be completed Fall 2012• Cost: $813,900

River Improvements

• Project Began Fall 2011• Project to be completed Spring 2013• Cost: $9,300,000

Red Arroyo Trail

• Project to begin Summer 2014• Project to be complete Summer 2015• Project Cost: $4,000,000• Funding Sources: • Federal ($3,200,000) • City Half-Cent Sales Taxes and Storm Water Funding ($650,000) • Donations ($150,000)

½ Cent Sales Tax Projects

• Current or Future projects– Airport Terminal Rehab– Fort Concho– 29th Street Sports Complex– Fairgrounds (cattle barn)– Hickory Water Supply– City Auditorium

City Hall

• Construction started August 2010• Employees Moved in June 2012• Open House event early October

2012-2013 Budget

Budget Goals

• Modest employee raises• Street maintenance/Sealcoat• Property Tax Rate reduction

Budget Goals vs. Resources

• Budget Gap of approximately $751,000

• Proposed to close the gap through cuts and targeted fees

Closing the Budget Gap

• Total proposed cuts & reorgs $379,000

• Number of positions cut: 8 full time 1 part time

Closing the Budget Gap

• Fees vs Taxes• Proposing fee increases totaling

$342,000

10 year property tax history

Increased Street Maintenance

• Staff is proposing to triple the street sealcoat budget

• Proposed $1,800,000 in sealcoat

Streets

City Streets

–Total lane miles of streets: 1150 miles

–Major Roadways: 283 lane miles

–Residential Streets: 867 lane miles

Street Useful Life

– Different street types have different useful lives and different routine maintenance needs

– When considering what type of street to construct it is important to consider 1) Initial Capital Cost 2) Overall Useful Life and 3) Long Term Maintenance Needs

Street Life Cycle

–Asphalt vs. concrete–2/3 of the cost of a roadway is what is below the surface; the asphalt surface merely protects the investment below it

–The useful life potential of a street is fully dependent on it being properly maintained

– Impact of reduced maintenance

Street TypesAsphalt Streets

• Useful life of 25 years of properly maintained– Proper maintenance to achieve 25 year useful life

• Sealcoat – every 8 years (maximum)• Mill and Overlay – at 15 years if roadway shows

signs of major distress (* Residential streets are low volume and typically only require sealcoating every 8 years)

• Complete Reconstruction – Approximately every 25-30 years

• Major maintenance costs over 75 year period (1 mile of 40’ wide street) - $8,000,000.00

Street Types

Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) Streets(Grape Creek Road and 50th Street)

• Useful life approximately 75-100 years– Initial cost 5-15% greater– Maintenance – no major routine maintenance

required– Major maintenance costs over 75 year period

(1 mile of 40’ wide street)• Asphalt - $8,000,000.00• RCC - $1,500,000.00

(for mill and overlay only if required)

Street Reconstruction

– The City currently has 55 streets listed for reconstruction in its Capital Improvements Plan at a cost of approximately $155M

– Street Construction Methods• Roller Compacted Concrete Reconstruction (RCC)

– Removal of 6 to 8 inches of material and replacement with roller compacted concrete

– Cost per square yard: $175, Useful life: 75-100 years• “Full Depth” Reconstruction (Asphalt)

– Complete removal and replacement of roadway from surface to depth of approximately 22 inches

– Cost per square yard: $150, Useful life: 25 years

Capital Borrowing Capacity

• Current capital budget $ 1,756,529

• LESS $250,000 annually for fire truck replacement

• Could use $1,506,529 capital budget for debt service

– Assuming 20 years at 4% we could borrow approximately $20,475,000 principal

– Budget impact?

San Angelo’s Water Supply

Historical Lake Levels

Ivie Reservoir

123,400

75,820

Twin Buttes Reservoir

Lake Nasworthy

Change in Volume: 1,980 Acre-FeetChange in Elevation: 21 Inches

O H Ivie Reservoir

Projected Water Supply w/o Hickory

Month

Pro

ject

ed S

up

ply

, A

cre-

Fee

t

Twin Buttes South Pool Pumping

Pipelines to Equalization Channel

Flow Through Equalization Channel

Water Flowing Into North Pool

Hickory Project Update

Well Field Collector Pipelines

• Installation of 50,700 feet of pipe to nine wells

• General Contractor: Price Construction

• Pipeline Sub-Contractor: Darnell & Dickson

• Contract Amount: $3.8 million

• Project Substantially Complete: May 2012

Well Field Layout

Transmission Pipeline

• 62 miles of 30” pipe from well field to San Angelo

• Contractor: Oscar Renda

• Sub-Contractor: S J Louis

• Contract Amount: $39 million

• Contract Completion: July 2013

30” Pipeline Installation

Transmission Pipeline Status

WELL FIELD

PUMP STATION

STARTINGPOINT

7 MILESAS OF 8/1/12

4.5 MILESAS OF 8/1/12

30” PIPELINE

TOTAL: 62 MILESCOMPLETED: 11.5 MILES

Well Field-Booster Pump Station

• Equip 9 Existing Wells

• Construct 6 mgd Pump Station

• Construct Two 500,000 gallon Tanks

• Install Microwave Telemetry System

Booster Station-Well Field Contract

• Contractor: Archer Western

• Contract Amount: $12.85 million

• Notice to Proceed: June 18, 2012

• Substantial Completion: June 2013

Treatment Plant

• Treatment Method Selected: June 2012

• 20% Design Status: August 2012

• Advertise for Bids: April 2013

• Notice to Proceed: June 2013

• Substantial Completion: August 2014

9 mgd usage2014 - 2018

Cost Estimate to Expand to 9mgd Capacity

• Well Field: $10,720,000– Five (5) New Wells Drilled, Cased and Equipped– Expanded Well Field Access Roads

• Booster Pump Station: $260,000– Two (2) Additional Pumps and Electrical

• Contingencies: $2,920,000

• Engineering & Construction Mgmt.: $2,160,000

• Total: $16,060,000

Future of Water:

• Hickory Water Supply• Tri-City Water • Reuse of Water • Other options

Keys for the Future:

• Inter-organizational cooperation

• Water supply development• Awareness of

intergovernmental fiscal issues

Mayor Alvin New – alvin.new@sanangelotexas.us Interim City Manager Michael Dane – michael.dane@sanangelotexas.us325-657-4241

Mayor Alvin New – alvin.new@sanangelotexas.us Interim City Manager Michael Dane – michael.dane@sanangelotexas.us325-657-4241

Recommended