Presentation of AOM paper: Understanding Project Based Production through Socio-technical Modularity

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

This paper develops an approach for understanding Project Based Production. This form of production is characterized by unique deliverables, high complexity, high value, high risk, profound uncertainty and many stakeholders and is increasingly important the postmodern society. Common to the practices of PBP and other production practices is the goal of balancing the dilemma between creativity and productivity. In response to industrialized production, the concept of modularity gained popularity for addressing this dilemma by exploring product, process and organization structures. However with the starting point in system theory and a strong bias towards industrial production, the predominant understanding of modularity faces difficulty in explaining practices of Project Based Production in both social – technical and dynamic – stable aspects. Illustrated by a case the paper addresses this gap, by offering a reinterpretation of the modularity concept from a socio-technical perspective in general and Actor Network Theory (ANT) in particular. By formulating modularity from an ANT perspective covering social, material and process aspects, the modularity of a socio-technical practice can be understood as an entanglement of product, process, organizational and institutional modularity. The paper concludes proposing central questions for the development of the concept of modularity for understanding, designing and managing of PBP.

Citation preview

Understanding Project Based Production through Socio-technical Modularity

AOM 2012, Boston

Christian Thuesenchth@dtu.dk

dk.linkedin.com/in/matute

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)2 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Areas of interest

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)3 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Project Based Production• An increasing amount the production in of our society is realized

through projects.

• Some examples are– construction industry (buildings, infrastructure…)– offshore projects (shipbuilding, oil & gas rigs…)– creative projects (movies, theatrical productions, festivals…)– IT projects (IT development, programming…)

• These cases on project based production (PBP) combines in various degrees technologies and practices from

industrialized production and project management

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)4 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Order Chaos

Disciplinary Interdisciplinary

Hierarchy Network

Standardized Unique

Efficiency Creativity

Linear Iterative

Bureaucratic Dynamic

Codifying Experimenting

Repetition Innovative

Class Individual

Degeneration Stress

Challenges of Project based Production

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)5 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Order Chaos

Disciplinary Interdisciplinary

Hierarchy Network

Standardized Unique

Efficiency Creativity

Linear Iterative

Bureaucratic Dynamic

Codifying Experimenting

Repetition Innovative

Class Individual

Degeneration Stress

Possible solution… modularity

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)6 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

What is modularization?• Modularity is an attribute of a complex system that advocates designing

structures based on– Minimizing interdependence between modules and – Maximizing interdependence within them

that can be mixed and matched in order to obtain new configurations without loss of the system’s functionality or performance (Baldwin and Clark 1997; Langlois 1992).

• Each module communicates and interacts with the others via standardized interfaces that allow modules’ decoupling

Source: Campagnolo & Camuffo 2009

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)7 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Two ways to describe modularity

Source: (Fixson 2003)

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)8 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Literature review of modularity

Campagnolo & Camuffo (2010) reviews 125 publications and finds:

• A complex field of studies offering different definitions, measures and applications of the modularity concept

• Three main units of analysis – product design modularity– production system modularity– organizational design modularity.

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)13 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

The shortcommings of existing theories

• Research is based on an assumption of technological determinism (Campagnolo & Camuffo 2010, p 279). hard to explain the dynamic contexts and social entanglements of modularity

• “Modularity is mostly studied in static situations…. In reality, however, no system is really static. Products change, processes evolve, organizations adapt, and innovations appear, and all of these changes are accelerating.” (Fixon 2006, p.31)

• No studies are capable of linking the three perspectives (Campagnolo & Camuffo 2010, p. 277).

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)14 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Requirements to a reinterpretation • A reinterpretation of the concept of modularity should be

able to understand a system with– physical and material artifacts– social actors

• while at the same time both – handle stability and dynamism…

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)15 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Ambition• to explore the possibilities for

understanding modularity from a socio-technical perspective in general and actor network theory in particular.

• More specifically is the intention to develop: an approach for analyzing the modularity

of Project Based Productions practices covering both social – technical and

dynamic – stable aspects.

• open up new avenues of research and practice.

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)16 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Actor Network Theory• A theory of technology, science, social actors, society, nature and power,

all analyzed with the same conceptual framework (Callon 1986, Law 1992 & Latour 2005).

• Key concepts – Network– Actors– Translations

• Principle of symmetry– Covering both human and nonhuman actors– An actor is an network and visa versa

• Not a normative theory subscribing predefined analytical categories any importance

An e

xem

plar

y ca

se

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)18 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Understanding the socio-technical modularity

Through: Actors…

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)19 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Understanding the socio-technical modularity

Through: Actors, Network…

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)20 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Understanding the socio-technical modularity

Through: Actors, Network, Translations…

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)21 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Understanding the socio-technical modularity

Through: Actors, Network, Translations and Black boxes

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)22 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Modularity in ANTModules = groups of actors (black boxes) which have stabilized over time.

Product modularity

stable collection of non human actors

Organizational modularity

stable collection of human (and non human) actors

Process modularity

translations processes with a high degree of repetition among certain actors

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)23 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Types of modularity

Source: Campagnolo & Camuffo 2009

Processmodularity

Organizational modularity

Product modularity

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)24 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Consequences

Modularity is a matter of perspective

Different types of modularity• Product, Process, Organizational• Customer, User, Market• Practices• Institutionalized

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)25 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Consequences Modularity is in the making

Enables us to understand learning and innovation processes• Reproductive/Incremental• Disruptive/Radical

• Might be combined with existing normative modularization tools like MFD and PVM

Managerial challenge

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)26 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Framework for understanding the socio-technical modularity of Project-based Production practicesDimension Questions

Market To whom is it produced / delivered? (customer/user/market)

Product What is produced / delivered?(product/service/experience)

Organizational Who is producing / delivering it? (organization/practice)

Process How is it produced / delivered? (process/practice)

Institutional How is it influenced by institutional actors?

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)27 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Directions for further studies

“For a hammer everything is a nail”

we must be reflective in our approach for studying, designing and managing modularity

This opens up a research agenda regarding • Clarification of the concept of Modularity

(theoretical and practical)• Conducting empirical analysis of the modularity

of different socio-technical systems• Development of tools and practices for

studying, designing and managing modularity.

Christian Thuesen (chth@dtu.dk)28 DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark

Questions and comments