View
1.235
Download
9
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
các Slide môn Law thuộc chương trình tiên tiến K49, NEU. Nhóm 13 gồm có các thành viên: Phạm Duy Thanh, Đặng Phương Tâm, Nguyễn Tiến Thịnh, Nguyễn Văn Sơn. Giảng viên : Trần Văn Nam.
Citation preview
Nguyen Tien Thinh
Pham Duy Thanh
Nguyen Van Son
Dang Phuong Tam
CASE 8 – 209GROUP 13
Acceptances
Pearsall and Alexander
friends for over 20 years
• A half-pint of vodka• Orange juice• Two cups• Lottery tickets
“Package”
They wonBought more
Lottery tickets
Yes
I has no moneyA half of price?
Are you in on it ?
Pearsall Alexander
16/12/1982
The first package bought by Pearsall
Then, Alexander snatched and
scratched boths tickets
Pearsall snatched the tickets, scratched one and
left another one for Alexander
16/12/1982
The second “package” bought by Alexander
Alexander
Refused to split
Won $20.000
Does Pearsall have a right to
half the winnings ?
Yes
- Intent - Definiteness - Communication
AnalyseOffer + Acceptance = Agreement
- Intent- Exactiveness- Communication
meeting of mind
valid validShare fortunes of ticket
Precedent
Plantiff: Richard ZientaraDefendant: Bernice Kaszuba (506 NE2d 1 (IN. 1987)
(Sources: www.lotterypost.com )
Richard Zientara offered Kaszuba to buy tickets for him
She accepted and used moneyhe gave to buy tickets regularly
• However, when it was a $1,696,800 winner she refused to give it to him and claimed the winnings for herself
• He successfully sued her
Judgment in favor of Pearsall was appropriate on this breach of agreement
Verdict
Implication in Vietnam
Plantiff: Mr. N. T. TDefendant: Mr. T. T. L (Ba Ria, Ben Tre Province) (Sources: http://www.phapluattp.vn)
L. bought 4 tickets T. bought 3 tickets
10/2006
Mr.L Mr.T
I have to work, hold tickets for me, please
One of 3 T’s tickets won speacial prize
L scratches 7 tickets without T’s permission
Mr.TMr.L
- L received 100 millions VND, gave 50 millions for T- T did not know which ticket the prize came from and
received 50 millions - 2 months later, T realized then sued L on Ba Tri court
and claimed that L had to pay him 50 millions
No. Give back to me my money !
Decision
Is there any acceptance from T?
NO There is no agreement between T and L.
Judgment in favor of N. T .T was appropriate
Group 13Acceptances
Case 8 – Page 209
Thank for listening !
Recommended