Elisabeth White - Baker & McKenzie - Spotlight on biosimilars

  • View
    888

  • Download
    11

  • Category

    Business

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Elisabeth White delivered the presentation at 2014 Future of the PBS Summit. The 11th annual Future of the PBS Summit marks a wonderful opportunity to review future frameworks and preferred outcomes for pharmacy regulators, pharmaceutical companies and wholesalers, practitioners, educators and consumers. For more information about the event, please visit: http://www.informa.com.au/futurepbs14

Citation preview

11th Annual Future of the PBS Summit Spotlight on biosimilars

Elisabeth White, Partner, Baker & McKenzie 5 May 2014

2

Biologics & Biosimilars

Small Molecule Examples

Paracetamol

Codeine

Aspirin

3

Large Molecule Examples

Immunoglobulin G 4

Growth in the biologics market

5

–  IMS estimates that biologics will account for around 19% to 20% of the total pharmaceutical sales globally by 2017, with a projected market value of USD 221 billion

–  Growth is driven largely by Monoclonal Antibodies (MAB) and human insulin –  The US still commands majority of biologic sales with a market share of 43%,

followed by the EU (21%) and Japan (9%)

Source: IMS Health Thought Leadership

Blockbuster Biologic Products

6

AbbVie

Monoclonal Antibodies

7

Monoclonal Antibodies are protein molecules produced by the immune system specifically targeted at certain substance E.g. Humira, Herceptin, Avastin, Enbrel

Importance of Biologics

8

Source: Capital IQ, AbbVie, Amgen and Roche 2012 Annual Reports

Forecast revenues of selected blockbusters post-patent

9

“Biosimilar”– similar but not the same

– follow-on biologic / subsequent entry biologic / similar biological medicinal product

– not bioequivalent or generic – manufactured differently through different bio-system, e.g.

recombinant DNA, bacterial strain and purification – no products are exactly the same due to different amino

acid sequence, impurities and 3D structure. – huge barrier of entry for new players due to complex

manufacturing process

10

Biosimilar vs. Chemical Generic

11

Key issues

12

Prescribing practices

Regulatory pathway

Reimbursement

Australian biosimilars regime

13

Department of Health TGA

•  Comparability / clinical data on safety and efficacy

•  Abridged data set and regulatory pathway

•  Naming •  Indications and extrapolation •  PV

Pharmaceutical Benefits Division

•  Safety •  Efficacy •  Interchangeability •  Substitutibility •  Pricing

Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines Survey 2013 -  470 physicians in Europe -  54%: basic understanding of biosimilars -  22%: familiar with this category of medicine -  24%: cannot define or heard of biosimilars -  54%: thought same INN meant the products were

structurally the same -  Most prefer to prescribe brand name products

14

Australian Approved Biosimilars Biologic Biosimilar Eprex® (epoetin alfa) Janssen Cilag

Aczicrit® (epoetin lamda) Sandoz

Grandicrit® (epoetin lambda) Sandoz

Novicrit® (epoetin lambda) Novartis

Neupogen® (filgrastim) Amgen

Nivestim® (filgrastim) Hospira

Tevagrastim® (filgrastim) Aspen

Zarzio® (filgrastim) Sandoz

Genotropin® (somatropin) Pfizer

Omnitrope® (somatropin) Sandoz

SciTropin® (somatropin) SciGen Australia

15

It’s all in the name…

INN: International Non-Proprietary Name ABN: Australian Biologic Name ABN for biosimilars:

reference product ABN + identifier sim(a) and WHO code

eg infliximab simfam

16

Implications of TGA naming policy for PBS regime

– pursuant to section 85AB National Health Act, the Minister: – determines whether a listed drug is on F1 or F2 – may only determine a drug is on F1 if the drug satisfies

all the criteria for F1 – criteria for F1 set out in section 85AB(4) – biosimilar used in NH Act but undefined – the references to drug or listed drug (i.e. ABN) in section

85AB(4) become determinative

17

F1 criteria a)  there are no branded items of pharmaceutical products that:

i.  have the drug; and ii.  are bioequivalent or biosimilar; and iii.  are listed brands of the pharmaceutical items on any day in the

relevant period; b)  there are no brands of pharmaceutical items that:

i.  have another listed drug that is in the same therapeutic group as the drug; and

ii.  are bioequivalent or biosimilar; and iii.  are listed brands of the pharmaceutical items on any day in the

relevant period; c)  the drug was not on F2 on the day before the formulary determination

comes into force

18

Key issues and the way forward?

19

TGA naming policy determinative of formulary allocation?

Substitutability / interchangeability ‘a’ flagging

How do biosimilars fit within the philosophy of the formularies and

pricing policy? F3?

20

WATCH THIS SPACE!

Questions

21

Recommended